SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Managing your  Runtime with p2 Pascal Rapicault IBM Rational TM , p2 lead
A provisioning solution for OSGi™ systems Managing non-running instance (only on Equinox for now) Start level, framework extension Bundle pooling An extensible provisioning platform Powerful dependency resolver based on SAT4J “ Transactional” state change Extensible set of actions p2 is about installing!
Why should you care? Deploying and servicing is too often left as an afterthought, unfortunately it is your only connection with your user base. p2 offers a foundation to your provisioning problems On a device On a legacy Java server On OSGi Server side application On the cloud …
OSGi proves the power of componentization Componentization naturally spreads More components -> more management Management is hard It’s all about the Contract Defining Instantiating Executing Maintaining OSGi is good for you!
How does p2 help for OSGi provisioning? Manages the contract Dependencies Code Settings (VM args, start level, etc) Integrations Non-OSGi parts (e.g. native launcher) Extensible GUI and Headless One consistent model from installation to servicing
From install to service Concepts and Architecture Configurability Tooling
Unzipping is not installing
Initial deployment Installer p2 basic installer (~5/6M) Deployable using JavaWebStart EPP wizard  [1,2] “ Shopping cart” approach to software selection. Home brewed p2-based installer Complete application (e.g. a zip file) The application results from a provisioning operation done at build time.  [3] [1]   - EPP wizard - http://wiki.eclipse.org/EPP/Wizard [2]  -  EPP Wizard talk - http://www.eclipsecon.org/2009/sessions?id=426 [3] – Director application doc - http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_director_application
EPP Wizard The user picks its software and a custom p2 installer is built.
Initial deployment Installer p2 basic installer (~5/6M) Deployable using JavaWebStart EPP wizard  [1,2] “ Shopping cart” approach to software selection. Home brewed p2-based installer Complete application (e.g. a zip file) The application results from a provisioning operation done at build time.  [3] [1]   – EPP wizard - http://wiki.eclipse.org/EPP/Wizard [2]   –   EPP Wizard talk - http://www.eclipsecon.org/2009/sessions?id=426 [3] – Director application doc - http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_director_application
Updating, extending, … Two usage mode External mode , the p2 plug-ins are external to the application (e.g an installer) Co-hosted mode , the p2 plug-ins are in your application (e.g. the Eclipse SDK). This mode still allows the application to be externally managed. User interface The p2.ui.* bundles, offering reusable dialogs Agent running in the background checking for updates Command line using the director application
The controlled mode In comparison to the Eclipse SDK UI: Notice that the entry to  choose a site is not available. The preference page to  add repo is also removed.
Check for update on startup Details on UI customization available at: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox/p2/Adding_Self-Update_to_an_RCP_Application
Serviceability, the profile registry The profile registry reflects from a metadata standpoint What the user is currently running What the user has been running  <install>/p2/org.eclipse.equinox.p2.engine/<….profile>/ A profile can be used to recreate  the user’s installation on another machine.
From install to service Concepts and Architecture Configurability Tooling
One construct to rule them all Decouple decision making from the actual content Everything is an IU Everything is installable It is also referred to as “metadata” IU (id, ver)
Anatomy of an IU Provided Capabilities Required Capabilities Properties Artifact  reference Actions IU (id, ver)
Anatomy of an IU, requirements / capabilities Capabilities and requirements are the mechanism by which an IU express what it provides and what needs. A capability is composed of a: Namespace (string), name (string) and version A requirement is composed of a: Namespace, name and version range Namespace, name and version are open ended. The requirements and capabilities expressed by IUs can be arbitrary and don’t have to all be in the same namespace. Resources – RPMs, .exes, docs, … Virtual – if you can define a capability, I can depend on it
Separation of concerns Installable Unit Exists independently of the repository Metadata Repository Store only Installable Units.  API, no specified serialization format Artifact Repository Store only Artifacts API, no specified serialization or layout format Metadata Artifacts
Artifacts Bytes/content to be installed Any form JARs (e.g., bundles, features, …)‏ Binary executables RPM, MSI, … Multiple form JAR, pack200 Binary diff Defined, maintained, loaded  and used separately from the metadata
p2 Architecture Metadata Artifacts Runtimes Profiles OS Eclipse Engine Eclipse Classic Eclipse for C++ Other Planner Repositories Touchpoints
Terminology p2 / Agent   The provisioning infrastructure on client machines  Installable Unit (IU)   Metadata  that describes things that can be installed/configured Artifact   The actual content being installed/configured(e.g., bundle JARs) Repository A store of metadata or artifacts Profile   The target of install/management operations Planner The decision-making entity in the provisioning system Engine The mechanism for executing provisioning requests Touchpoint   The part of the engine responsible for integrating the provisioning  system to a particular runtime or management system
p2 in Action Transports Http/Https File system Volume Planner Profiles Runtimes Provisioning operation requested Metadata fetched and constraints analyzed IU install, uninstall, update operations Artifact availability and mirroring Mirroring Data transfer IUs configured into runtimes Profile updated Repositories p2 Update Site Engine OSGi Native/OS
Touchpoint / actions The decoupling between p2  and the actual runtime being modified.  An action is a piece of code in charge of changing the system (e.g installing a bundle, setting a start level, etc.). An action can be context free or context bound. See  ProvisioningAction Example of context free:  chmod ,  unzip Example of context bound:  installBundle ,  setStartLevel ,… A touchpoint provides the context in which an action is executed For example the eclipse touchpoint provides its actions values such as the eclipse install folder, the bundle pool and is also used to cache some common data structure (e.g. the state of the fwk being modified) The extension point for touchpoint and actions is defined in the engine.
From install to service Concepts and Architecture Configurability Tooling
Configurability p2 architecture allows for some of the key components to not all be in the same process. Three known possible configurations, exemplified for OSGi Milli Micro Nano
Internal management - milli Transports Http/Https File system Volume Planner Repositories p2 Update Site Engine OSGi Native/OS
External management - nano Managed   application Agent Planner OSGi fwk The agent writes out file to control the application. The “provisioning” presence in the managed application is small. Engine OSGi Native/OS Repositories p2 Update Site Transports Http/Https File system Volume
External management - micro Planner OSGi fwk The decision making on what to install is done on the agent and communicated to the managed application (no remoting provided in the open  source). The agent could also carry a copy of the profile registry. Demo - http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2009/05/05/remote-provisioning-with-p2 / Managed   application Agent Engine OSGi Native/OS Repositories p2 Update Site Transports Http/Https File system Volume Repositories p2 Update Site
From install to service Concepts and Architecture Configurability Tooling
Build, when the metadata comes to be Metadata matters The p2.publisher is responsible for metadata / artifact generation Produces p2 metadata from bundles, Eclipse features and products Can be used in any build system  PDE Build is the richest (from source to repo) Maven / tycho integration Not all metadata can be inferred Actions to be executed on a given phase Some tweaking is necessary Author metadata advice
Repository management Everybody creates repos, they need to be managed Problems You want to promote one build over another one Composite repositories You build more than you want to make available Slicing You want to replicate builds from one repository to another Mirroring applications Repository validation Repository validation that everything is installable For every IU, each artifact is available IU comparison tools, to ensure that the metadata is not changed Artifact comparison tool to ensure that one artifact has not changed  [1] Repository diff’ing tool [1] - Talk on versioning and provisioning - http://www.eclipsecon.org/2009/sessions?id=585
From install to service Concepts and Architecture Configurability Tooling
What is p2? A provisioning solution for OSGi™ systems An extensible provisioning platform A complete offering from Build time to Runtime A community and an ecosystem
p2 in wild Installer for products (EPP Wizard, WindRiver, Motorola, IBM Rational, etc.) Server managed deployment solution and distros (Genuitec, EclipseSource, Cloudsmith) Remote management of device (EclipseSource)  Buckminster (Cloudsmith) Cloud provisioning (EclipseSource) Repository management (Sonatype)
References p2 landing page http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2 All p2 articles  http://wiki.eclipse.org/Category:Equinox_p2 Getting the code  http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_Getting_Started_for_Developers Contacting us Equinox newsgroup Mailing list: p2-dev@eclipse.org
Appendix
Profile A profile is the complete description  in terms of IU of what is installed A profile contains Properties defining the “environment” such as os, ws, arch,  install location, bundle pool location The list of IUs Properties associated with IUs Class:   Org.eclipse.equinox.internal.provisional.p2.engine.IProfile
Planning a profile change Because of inter IU dependencies,  modification against a profile should be planned ProfileChangeRequest Capture the changes you want to make to the profile (e.g. Install, Uninstall). The request is processed by the Planner An update is a removal and an addition Planner The entity responsible for the evaluation of the change request, computing the transitive closure and checking the dependencies If a solution exists it will find it ProvisioningPlan The planner returns a provisioning plan. The planning succeed pass or fail. Upon failure explanations are provided. Upon success the plan returns a set of operands to go from the initial state of the profile to the desired state.
Engine The mechanism by which the profile is actually changed The engine ensures consistency of the modification by performing a “transaction”.  Runs over a set of operands (usually resulting from a planning operation) and executes a given set of phases on them. No profile consistency validation is done Engine.perform(Operand[] ops, PhaseSet phases, IProgressMonitor pm) For each phase, the engine interprets from the touchpoint data of the IU, the action specific to the phase. The engine looks up the action to execute. Currently 8 phases are defined, and the typical set of phases (and their order) is defined in  DefaultPhaseSet . The design allows for new phases could be added. The engine emit events on the  IProvisoningEventBus  to describe what is happening. Events on the bus are post events and can not be vetoed.
Installable Unit Fragments An installable unit fragment is an entity that attaches to an installable unit. Much like OSGi fragments, IU fragments are used to complement an existing installable unit and appear as one with the IU they attached to. They are typically used to deliver action to an installable unit (e.g. start level) because IUs should stay as context agnostic as possible IU fragments can be attached to several IU at the same time. See for example the  tooling.osgi.bundle.default   IU that applies to all bundles. Note that IU fragments are not how OSGi fragments are delivered. OSGi fragments are delivered as regular IU with requirements on their host.
Installable Unit Patches An installable unit patch has the ability to “modify” the requirements of any other installable unit. Deal with three concerns: The IUs to which the patch apply The lifecycle of patch The changes applied Note: In 3.5 the feature patch editor only exposes some of those capabilities .

More Related Content

Managing Your Runtime With P2

  • 1. Managing your Runtime with p2 Pascal Rapicault IBM Rational TM , p2 lead
  • 2. A provisioning solution for OSGi™ systems Managing non-running instance (only on Equinox for now) Start level, framework extension Bundle pooling An extensible provisioning platform Powerful dependency resolver based on SAT4J “ Transactional” state change Extensible set of actions p2 is about installing!
  • 3. Why should you care? Deploying and servicing is too often left as an afterthought, unfortunately it is your only connection with your user base. p2 offers a foundation to your provisioning problems On a device On a legacy Java server On OSGi Server side application On the cloud …
  • 4. OSGi proves the power of componentization Componentization naturally spreads More components -> more management Management is hard It’s all about the Contract Defining Instantiating Executing Maintaining OSGi is good for you!
  • 5. How does p2 help for OSGi provisioning? Manages the contract Dependencies Code Settings (VM args, start level, etc) Integrations Non-OSGi parts (e.g. native launcher) Extensible GUI and Headless One consistent model from installation to servicing
  • 6. From install to service Concepts and Architecture Configurability Tooling
  • 7. Unzipping is not installing
  • 8. Initial deployment Installer p2 basic installer (~5/6M) Deployable using JavaWebStart EPP wizard [1,2] “ Shopping cart” approach to software selection. Home brewed p2-based installer Complete application (e.g. a zip file) The application results from a provisioning operation done at build time. [3] [1] - EPP wizard - http://wiki.eclipse.org/EPP/Wizard [2] - EPP Wizard talk - http://www.eclipsecon.org/2009/sessions?id=426 [3] – Director application doc - http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_director_application
  • 9. EPP Wizard The user picks its software and a custom p2 installer is built.
  • 10. Initial deployment Installer p2 basic installer (~5/6M) Deployable using JavaWebStart EPP wizard [1,2] “ Shopping cart” approach to software selection. Home brewed p2-based installer Complete application (e.g. a zip file) The application results from a provisioning operation done at build time. [3] [1] – EPP wizard - http://wiki.eclipse.org/EPP/Wizard [2] – EPP Wizard talk - http://www.eclipsecon.org/2009/sessions?id=426 [3] – Director application doc - http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_director_application
  • 11. Updating, extending, … Two usage mode External mode , the p2 plug-ins are external to the application (e.g an installer) Co-hosted mode , the p2 plug-ins are in your application (e.g. the Eclipse SDK). This mode still allows the application to be externally managed. User interface The p2.ui.* bundles, offering reusable dialogs Agent running in the background checking for updates Command line using the director application
  • 12. The controlled mode In comparison to the Eclipse SDK UI: Notice that the entry to choose a site is not available. The preference page to add repo is also removed.
  • 13. Check for update on startup Details on UI customization available at: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox/p2/Adding_Self-Update_to_an_RCP_Application
  • 14. Serviceability, the profile registry The profile registry reflects from a metadata standpoint What the user is currently running What the user has been running <install>/p2/org.eclipse.equinox.p2.engine/<….profile>/ A profile can be used to recreate the user’s installation on another machine.
  • 15. From install to service Concepts and Architecture Configurability Tooling
  • 16. One construct to rule them all Decouple decision making from the actual content Everything is an IU Everything is installable It is also referred to as “metadata” IU (id, ver)
  • 17. Anatomy of an IU Provided Capabilities Required Capabilities Properties Artifact reference Actions IU (id, ver)
  • 18. Anatomy of an IU, requirements / capabilities Capabilities and requirements are the mechanism by which an IU express what it provides and what needs. A capability is composed of a: Namespace (string), name (string) and version A requirement is composed of a: Namespace, name and version range Namespace, name and version are open ended. The requirements and capabilities expressed by IUs can be arbitrary and don’t have to all be in the same namespace. Resources – RPMs, .exes, docs, … Virtual – if you can define a capability, I can depend on it
  • 19. Separation of concerns Installable Unit Exists independently of the repository Metadata Repository Store only Installable Units. API, no specified serialization format Artifact Repository Store only Artifacts API, no specified serialization or layout format Metadata Artifacts
  • 20. Artifacts Bytes/content to be installed Any form JARs (e.g., bundles, features, …)‏ Binary executables RPM, MSI, … Multiple form JAR, pack200 Binary diff Defined, maintained, loaded and used separately from the metadata
  • 21. p2 Architecture Metadata Artifacts Runtimes Profiles OS Eclipse Engine Eclipse Classic Eclipse for C++ Other Planner Repositories Touchpoints
  • 22. Terminology p2 / Agent The provisioning infrastructure on client machines Installable Unit (IU) Metadata that describes things that can be installed/configured Artifact The actual content being installed/configured(e.g., bundle JARs) Repository A store of metadata or artifacts Profile The target of install/management operations Planner The decision-making entity in the provisioning system Engine The mechanism for executing provisioning requests Touchpoint The part of the engine responsible for integrating the provisioning system to a particular runtime or management system
  • 23. p2 in Action Transports Http/Https File system Volume Planner Profiles Runtimes Provisioning operation requested Metadata fetched and constraints analyzed IU install, uninstall, update operations Artifact availability and mirroring Mirroring Data transfer IUs configured into runtimes Profile updated Repositories p2 Update Site Engine OSGi Native/OS
  • 24. Touchpoint / actions The decoupling between p2 and the actual runtime being modified. An action is a piece of code in charge of changing the system (e.g installing a bundle, setting a start level, etc.). An action can be context free or context bound. See ProvisioningAction Example of context free: chmod , unzip Example of context bound: installBundle , setStartLevel ,… A touchpoint provides the context in which an action is executed For example the eclipse touchpoint provides its actions values such as the eclipse install folder, the bundle pool and is also used to cache some common data structure (e.g. the state of the fwk being modified) The extension point for touchpoint and actions is defined in the engine.
  • 25. From install to service Concepts and Architecture Configurability Tooling
  • 26. Configurability p2 architecture allows for some of the key components to not all be in the same process. Three known possible configurations, exemplified for OSGi Milli Micro Nano
  • 27. Internal management - milli Transports Http/Https File system Volume Planner Repositories p2 Update Site Engine OSGi Native/OS
  • 28. External management - nano Managed application Agent Planner OSGi fwk The agent writes out file to control the application. The “provisioning” presence in the managed application is small. Engine OSGi Native/OS Repositories p2 Update Site Transports Http/Https File system Volume
  • 29. External management - micro Planner OSGi fwk The decision making on what to install is done on the agent and communicated to the managed application (no remoting provided in the open source). The agent could also carry a copy of the profile registry. Demo - http://eclipsesource.com/blogs/2009/05/05/remote-provisioning-with-p2 / Managed application Agent Engine OSGi Native/OS Repositories p2 Update Site Transports Http/Https File system Volume Repositories p2 Update Site
  • 30. From install to service Concepts and Architecture Configurability Tooling
  • 31. Build, when the metadata comes to be Metadata matters The p2.publisher is responsible for metadata / artifact generation Produces p2 metadata from bundles, Eclipse features and products Can be used in any build system PDE Build is the richest (from source to repo) Maven / tycho integration Not all metadata can be inferred Actions to be executed on a given phase Some tweaking is necessary Author metadata advice
  • 32. Repository management Everybody creates repos, they need to be managed Problems You want to promote one build over another one Composite repositories You build more than you want to make available Slicing You want to replicate builds from one repository to another Mirroring applications Repository validation Repository validation that everything is installable For every IU, each artifact is available IU comparison tools, to ensure that the metadata is not changed Artifact comparison tool to ensure that one artifact has not changed [1] Repository diff’ing tool [1] - Talk on versioning and provisioning - http://www.eclipsecon.org/2009/sessions?id=585
  • 33. From install to service Concepts and Architecture Configurability Tooling
  • 34. What is p2? A provisioning solution for OSGi™ systems An extensible provisioning platform A complete offering from Build time to Runtime A community and an ecosystem
  • 35. p2 in wild Installer for products (EPP Wizard, WindRiver, Motorola, IBM Rational, etc.) Server managed deployment solution and distros (Genuitec, EclipseSource, Cloudsmith) Remote management of device (EclipseSource) Buckminster (Cloudsmith) Cloud provisioning (EclipseSource) Repository management (Sonatype)
  • 36. References p2 landing page http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2 All p2 articles http://wiki.eclipse.org/Category:Equinox_p2 Getting the code http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox_p2_Getting_Started_for_Developers Contacting us Equinox newsgroup Mailing list: p2-dev@eclipse.org
  • 38. Profile A profile is the complete description in terms of IU of what is installed A profile contains Properties defining the “environment” such as os, ws, arch, install location, bundle pool location The list of IUs Properties associated with IUs Class: Org.eclipse.equinox.internal.provisional.p2.engine.IProfile
  • 39. Planning a profile change Because of inter IU dependencies, modification against a profile should be planned ProfileChangeRequest Capture the changes you want to make to the profile (e.g. Install, Uninstall). The request is processed by the Planner An update is a removal and an addition Planner The entity responsible for the evaluation of the change request, computing the transitive closure and checking the dependencies If a solution exists it will find it ProvisioningPlan The planner returns a provisioning plan. The planning succeed pass or fail. Upon failure explanations are provided. Upon success the plan returns a set of operands to go from the initial state of the profile to the desired state.
  • 40. Engine The mechanism by which the profile is actually changed The engine ensures consistency of the modification by performing a “transaction”. Runs over a set of operands (usually resulting from a planning operation) and executes a given set of phases on them. No profile consistency validation is done Engine.perform(Operand[] ops, PhaseSet phases, IProgressMonitor pm) For each phase, the engine interprets from the touchpoint data of the IU, the action specific to the phase. The engine looks up the action to execute. Currently 8 phases are defined, and the typical set of phases (and their order) is defined in DefaultPhaseSet . The design allows for new phases could be added. The engine emit events on the IProvisoningEventBus to describe what is happening. Events on the bus are post events and can not be vetoed.
  • 41. Installable Unit Fragments An installable unit fragment is an entity that attaches to an installable unit. Much like OSGi fragments, IU fragments are used to complement an existing installable unit and appear as one with the IU they attached to. They are typically used to deliver action to an installable unit (e.g. start level) because IUs should stay as context agnostic as possible IU fragments can be attached to several IU at the same time. See for example the tooling.osgi.bundle.default IU that applies to all bundles. Note that IU fragments are not how OSGi fragments are delivered. OSGi fragments are delivered as regular IU with requirements on their host.
  • 42. Installable Unit Patches An installable unit patch has the ability to “modify” the requirements of any other installable unit. Deal with three concerns: The IUs to which the patch apply The lifecycle of patch The changes applied Note: In 3.5 the feature patch editor only exposes some of those capabilities .

Editor's Notes

  1. JEFF
  2. JEFF
  3. Refer to the continuum
  4. This is made possible because of immutability IU and artifacts
  5. `