Lessons Learned From Neogeography Nc Gis 2009
•
12 likes•2,171 views
The document discusses the evolution of neogeography from traditional GIS. Key differences are that neogeography is user-centric while GIS is map-centric. Neogeography tools are more accessible due to cheaper technology and open source software. Common criticisms of neogeography include lack of metadata, unreliable analysis, and "Google map fatigue". The document outlines ways to address these issues and encourage participation, interoperability, and usability of neogeography tools.
Report
Share
Lessons Learned From Neogeography Nc Gis 2009
- 1. Lessons Learned from Neogeography Applied to GIS Andrew Turner Presented at the andrew@fortiusone.com North Carolina GIS Conference http://highearthorbit.com February 20, 2009 in Raleigh, NC
- 2. Who am I?
- 3. The path to becoming a neogeographer
- 4. http://flickr.com/photos/x180/2494170626/ Who are the Neogeographers?
- 5. How did we get here? Cartographic Evolution
- 6. GeoWeb GoogleMaps & GoogleEarth Mashups Geolocated Mobile Devices
- 7. Locative Media Happiness Maps HeadMap Manifesto Mapping Hacks
- 9. Web Mapping
- 10. Planning
- 11. Navigation
- 13. Storytelling
- 14. Functionality Future GIS Server OSGeo Increasing Accessibility GIS Open Tools Money + Time Cost Geospatial Trend
- 15. What is the key difference between GIS and Neogeography?
- 20. metadata analysis cartography Common Criticisms
- 21. metadata analysis cartography Common Criticisms
- 22. How to encourage providing metadata?
- 23. Wiki Sharing of Data http://www.hurricanewiki.org/wiki/ Hurricane_Ike_GIS_Resources
- 25. Simple Forms
- 26. Explorable
- 27. Web-aligned
- 28. What about searching through metadata?
- 31. metadata analysis cartography Common Criticisms
- 32. How can we trust amateurs to do analysis?
- 33. We’ve head this before...
- 37. Safe Routing http://www.ridethecity.com
- 38. MySociety House Price http://www.mysociety.org/2007/more-travel-maps/ vs. Travel Time
- 40. metadata analysis cartography Common Criticisms
- 42. “Red Dot Fever”
- 45. EveryBlock http://everyblock.com
- 46. CloudMade
- 50. Thematic Styling
- 51. Classification
- 52. Styling
- 53. Base Data
- 54. Comparative Analysis http://maker.geocommons.com/maps/839
- 55. Inspect the Data
- 56. usability interoperability participation New Areas
- 58. Story Telling
- 59. EverySquareMile
- 60. Language Support
- 61. Easy Interfaces http://wrp.geothings.net
- 62. Interoperability Standards Interfaces Collaboration http://flickr.com/photos/alfr3do/7436142/
- 64. The power and potential of de-facto standards.
- 65. GoogleEarth
- 66. Google Layers
- 68. OGC KML 2.2 http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/kml/
- 69. <georss:point> + 45.256 -71.92 </georss:point> GeoRSS http://georss.org
- 70. USGS http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/catalogs/
- 71. Weather Mashups
- 72. Participation Collaboration Crowd-Source Volunteered Information http://www.flickr.com/photos/urbanwide/1409970010
- 73. GeoWeb2.0
- 74. What could you do with 100,000,000+ geotagged contributions? http://code.flickr.com/blog/2009/02/04/100000000-geotagged-photos-plus/
- 75. Flickr Shapefiles
- 76. What could you do to monitor democracy? http://code.flickr.com/blog/2009/02/04/100000000-geotagged-photos-plus/
- 78. How would you reach the last mile in a crisis? http://code.flickr.com/blog/2009/02/04/100000000-geotagged-photos-plus/
- 81. What could you do with 90,000+ surveyors? http://code.flickr.com/blog/2009/02/04/100000000-geotagged-photos-plus/
- 82. TomTom MapShare
- 84. Exponential Growth http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stats
- 85. Thank you Andrew Turner andrew@fortiusone.com http://highearthorbit.com http://flickr.com/photos/urbanwide/1409142545/