Irrigants and bond_strengths

ARTICLE IN PRESS
Basic Research—Technology

The Effect of Different Irrigating Solutions on Bond Strength
of Two Root Canal–filling Systems
Ahmed Abdel Rahman Hashem, BDS, MSc, PhD,* Angie G. Ghoneim, BDS, MSc, PhD,†
Reem A. Lutfy, BDS, MSc, PhD,† and Manar Y. Fouda, BDS, MSc, PhD†

Abstract
The bond strength of ActiV GP root canal filling system
and gutta-percha/AH plus sealer when used after final
rinse with different irrigation protocols was evaluated in
S uccessful endodontic therapy depends on thorough chemomechanical preparation
of the root canal system as well as three-dimensional obturation that provides
complete sealing of the spaces previously occupied by the canal contents (1). Mechan-
this study. Forty roots were randomly divided into four ical instrumentation usually results in an amorphous irregular smear layer covering the
groups (n = 10) according to the final irrigation regimen: canal dentinal surfaces and plugging the dentinal tubules (2). The alternating use of
group 1, 5 mL 17% EDTA; group 2, 5 mL 17% EDTA fol- EDTA and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) has long been proved efficient in removing
lowed by 5 mL 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX); group endodontic smear layer (3). On the other hand, they lack sustained antimicrobial
3, 5 mL MTAD; and group 4, 5 mL MTAD followed by 5 mL capacity (4).
2% CHX. Each group was further subdivided into two Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) has been suggested as an alternative irrigating
subgroups (n = 5): in subgroup a, the root canals were solution that could replace NaOCl. CHX is bactericidal because of its ability to precipitate
filled using warm gutta-percha and AH plus sealer, and and coagulate bacterial intracellular constituents (5). Furthermore, its antibacterial
in subgroup b, the root canals were filled using the ActiV action would persist in root canal for 12 weeks after its use as an endodontic irrigant
GP obturation system. Two-millimeter thick horizontal (6, 7).
sections from the coronal and midthirds of each root Recently, another endodontic irrigant containing 3% doxycycline hyclate, 4.25%
were sliced for the push-out bond strength measurement. citric acid, and 0.5% polysorbate 80 detergent has been introduced as MTAD. This ir-
EDTA/CHX/ActiV GP (2.46 Æ 1.02 MPa) yielded signifi- rigant is recommended as a final rinse after initial irrigation with 1.3% NaOCl (8).
cantly the highest mean bond strength value. The signif- MTAD has been shown to be a clinically effective, biocompatible (9), endodontic irri-
icantly lowest bond strength was recorded for EDTA/ActiV gant with potential sustained antibacterial activity (10). Both MTAD and EDTA were able
GP (1.12 Æ 0.72 MPa). It was concluded that the bond under mechanical agitation to completely eliminate the endodontic smear layer and
strength of ActiV GP was improved by using 2% CHX in smear plugs and to create layers of demineralized collagen matrices in the root canal
the final irrigation after 17% EDTA, whereas CHX did dentin walls (11).
not enhance the effect of MTAD on the bond strength Among the required physical properties of filling materials, adhesion was found to
of the material. The bond strength of gutta-percha/AH be a very desirable property in root canal cements. Ideal endodontic cement must seal
plus was adversely affected by MTAD and MTAD/CHX. the root canal space and should adhere to both the gutta-percha core and canal wall
(J Endod 2009;-:1–4) (12). Epoxy resin-based sealer cements such as AH Plus sealer (Dentsply, Detrey,
GmbH, Germany) have been widely used because of their acceptable physical proper-
Key Words ties, reduced solubility, apical sealability, microretention to root dentin, and adequate
ActiV GP, AH plus, bond strength, chlorhexidine, EDTA, biological performance (13, 14).
MTAD Recently, manufacturers have introduced adhesive dentistry to the field of
endodontics with a specific focus on obtaining a ‘‘monobloc’’ in which the core mate-
rial, sealing agent, and the root canal dentin form a single cohesive unit (15). ActiV GP
(Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA) is a new glass-ionomer root canal–filling system that has
From the *Endodontic Department, Ain Shams University,
Cairo, Egypt and †Endodontic Department, Cairo University,
been marketed as to create a single-cone monoblock obturation. The system comprises
Cairo, Egypt. glass ionomer impregnated and coated gutta-percha cones that are bondable to a sealing
Address requests for reprints to Dr Ahmed Abdel Rahman agent composed of barium aluminosilicate glass powder and polyacrylic acid (16). This
Hashem, Endodontic Department, Ain Shams University, Abba- was claimed to offer adhesive bonding of core material to intraradicular dentin via the
sia, Cairo, Egypt. E-mail address: endohashem@gmail.com. glass-ionomer sealer (17). Few studies have investigated the degree of bonding and
0099-2399/$0 - see front matter
Copyright ª 2009 American Association of Endodontists. adaptation of this material to root canal dentin (15, 18–20), but to date no study
doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.003 has determined the effect of different irrigants on the sealer-dentin bond strength
when using the ActiV GP obturation system. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess
and compare the bond strength of the ActiV GP root canal obturating system and gutta-
percha/AH plus sealer when used after various irrigation regimens.

Materials and Methods
Forty recently extracted human single-rooted teeth were collected and used in this
study. The teeth were thoroughly cleaned by removing the hard deposits using curettes
and the soft deposits by soaking in NaOCl 5.25% for 30 minutes. The teeth were then

JOE — Volume -, Number -, - 2009 Different Irrigating Solutions 1

ARTICLE IN PRESS
the epoxy resin, three horizontal sections of 2-mm thickness each were
cut from coronal and middle thirds of each root by using a water-cooled
precision saw (Ernst-Leitz, Wetzlar, Germany). This resulted in 15 hori-
zontal sections per subgroup with a total number of 120 horizontal
sections for the four experimental groups. Each section was coded
and measured for the apical and coronal diameters of the obturated
area using an Olympus Camedia C-5060 digital camera (Tokyo, Japan)
attached to a Zeiss stereomicroscope. Each root section was then sub-
jected to a compressive load via a universal testing machine (LIoyd LRX-
plus; LIyod Instruments Ltd, Fareham, UK) at a crosshead speed of
1 mm/min using a 0.8-mm diameter stainless steel cylindrical plunger.
The plunger tip was positioned so that it only contacted the filling mate-
rial (Fig. 1). The push-out force was applied in an apicocoronal direc-
tion until bond failure occurred, which was manifested by extrusion of
the obturation material and a sudden drop along the load deflection.
The force was recorded by using Nexygen data analysis software (LIyod
Instruments Ltd). The maximum failure load was recorded in newtons
and was used to calculate the push-out bond strength in megapascals
(MPa) according to the following formula (21):

Figure 1. The 0.8-mm plunger adjusted to the root canal filling during the Push-out bond strength ðMPaÞ
push-out bond test. Maximum load ðNÞ
¼
Adhesion area of root canal filling ðmm2 Þ
stored in distilled water. Before canal instrumentation, decoronation of
the teeth was performed by using a high-speed carbide bur and water The adhesion (bonding) surface area of each section was calculated
spray to obtain approximately 16-mm long root segments. Canal patency as:
and working length were established by inserting K file #15 (Mani, Inc, (pr1 + pr2) Â L. L was calculated as O (r1 - r2)2 + h2, where p is
Tochigi, Japan) to the root canal terminus and subtracting 1 mm from the constant 3.14, r1 is the smaller radius, r2 is the larger, and h is the
this measurement. This step was performed under 8Â using surgical thickness of the section in mm.
microscope (Opmi-Pico; Karl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The root canals Data were presented as mean and standard deviation values. A
were instrumented using K3 0.06 taper nickel-titanium rotary instru- regression model with two-way analysis of variance was used in testing
ments (SybronEndo Europe, Amersfoort, The Netherlands). Each canal significance for the effect of material and irrigant and their interactions
was enlarged to size #40 at the working length. Irrigation with 3 mL of on mean push-out bond strength. A Tukey post hoc test was used for
2.6% sodium hypochlorite was performed between each file size. pair-wise comparison between the means when an analysis of variance
The roots were then randomly divided into four groups (n = 10) test was significant. The significance level was set at p # 0.05. Statistical
according to the final irrigation regimen: group 1, 5 mL 17% EDTA analysis was performed with SPSS 15.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago,
´
(Odahcam, Dentsply, Latin America, Petropolis, RJ, Brazil); group 2, IL).
5 mL 17% EDTA followed by 5 mL 2% CHX (Consepsis, Ultradent, South
Jordan, UT); group 3, 5 mL MTAD (Biopure, Dentsplay Tulsa Dental,
Tulsa, OK); and group 4, 5 mL MTAD followed by 5 ml 2% CHX. The
Results
canals were dried using paper points #40/0.04 (Vericom CO, The mean values of bond strengths recorded for different
Gyeonggi-Do, Korea). Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups are presented in Figure 2. Subroup 2b (EDTA/CHX/ ActiV
subgroups (n = 5) according to the obturation system used. GP) yielded significantly the highest mean push-out bond strength
In subgroup a, the root canals were filled using warm gutta-percha (2.46 Æ 1.02 MPa). On the other hand, the significantly lowest mean
and AH plus root canal sealer (Dentsply, Detrey, GmbH, Germany). After push-out bond (1.12 Æ 0.72 MPa) was recorded for subgroup 1b
mixing the sealer, a gutta-percha master cone #40/0.06 (META Biomed (EDTA/ActiV GP). The remaining subgroups revealed intermediate
Co, Ltd, Chwongwon-gun, Korea) was lightly coated with sealer and in- mean values of bond strength. No significant difference was found
serted to the working length. A System B plugger size fine medium (Syb- between subgroups 3b (MTAD/ActiV GP) and 4b (MTAD/CHX/ActiV
ronEndo Europe) was used to condense the master cone to within 5 mm GP): 2.29 Æ 1.12 MPa and 2.25 Æ 0.67 MPa, respectively. This was
from the working length. The coronal and middle thirds of the canals significantly followed by subgroups 1a (EDTA/AH plus) and 2a
were then filled using Obtura II thermoplasticized technique at (EDTA/CHX/AH plus), 2.10 Æ 0.51 MPa and 2.04 Æ 0.44 MPa, respec-
185 C (Spartan/Obtura, Fenton, MO). In subgroup b, the root canals tively, with no statistically significant difference between them. Mean-
were filled using ActiV GP. The glass-ionomer sealer was mixed accord- while, a significant difference was found between subgroup 3a
ing to manufacturer’s instructions. A single ActiV GP #40/0.06 cone was (MTAD/AH plus), 1.76 Æ 1.67 MPa, and subgroup 4a (MTAD/CHX/
coated with the sealer and slowly inserted into the canal to the working AH plus), 1.26 Æ 1.02 MPa.
length. The surplus of the cone was removed by using hot system B
plugger and a layer of ActiV GP sealer was placed on the top of the Discussion
cone as recommended by the manufacturer. Dentin surface treatment with different irrigation regimens may
The roots were coded and placed in 100% humidity for 48 hours cause alteration in the chemical and structural composition of
to ensure complete setting of the sealers. Each root was then embedded human dentin, thereby changing its permeability and solubility char-
in epoxy resin in a custom-made split-ring copper mold. After setting of acteristics (22, 23) and hence affecting the adhesion of materials to

2 Hashem et al. JOE — Volume -, Number -, - 2009

ARTICLE IN PRESS

Figure 2. A histogram representing the mean values of bond strength (MPa) and standard deviation of different subgroups.

dentin surfaces (24). Optimum adhesion requires intimate contact doxycycline and citric acid among its constituents and resulting in the
between the adhesive material and the substrate to facilitate molec- removal of the smear layer and demineralization of the underlying
ular attraction and allow either chemical adhesion or penetration dentin. According to Tay et al (11), MTAD produced a 10- to 12-mm
for micromechanical surface interlocking. Therefore, adhesion thick zone of demineralized dentin compared with only a 4- to 6-mm
processes are mainly influenced by the relative surface energy thick zone produced by EDTA. Furthermore, Tween 80 detergent,
(wetting ability) of the solid surface (24, 25), which, in turn, is a constituent of MTAD, permitted increased dentin surface energy
affected by the internal dentin wetness resulting from dentin perme- and wettability, hence increasing intertubular dentin permeability as
ability provided by water in the dentinal tubules (26). This wetness is well as the exposure of collagen matrix and intertubular fluid, which
a consequence of dentin permeability provided by water in the could have negatively affected the adhesion of the hydrophobic AH
dentinal tubules (26). plus sealer. On the other hand, final irrigation with MTAD per se in
In the present study, the bond strength of the tested obturation subgroup 3b (MTAD/ActiV GP) provided a good dentinal surface treat-
systems was found to be differently affected by the various irrigation ment for the adhesion of the glass-ionomer–based sealer. In addition,
regimens applied. When 17% EDTA was used as a final irrigant, the re- the chemical bonding capacity of the ActiV GP (a diffusion-based adhe-
corded push-out bond strength values of GP/AH plus agree with those sion) would have developed by ion exchange between the glass-ion-
reported by Sly et al (27). Final irrigation with EDTA resulted in higher omer and the tooth surface. The polyalkenoic acid chains penetrate
bond strength values for GP/AH plus than for ActiV GP, which was the surface of dentin and displace phosphate ions, releasing them
consistent with another study (15). This could be attributed to the alter- into the cement. Each phosphate ion takes with it a calcium ion to main-
ation of the dentin surface energy as a result of pretreatment with EDTA. tain electrolytic balance (30).
Attal et al (28) and Dogen Buzoglut al (29) reported that EDTA signif- The values of push-out bond strength recorded with gutta-percha/
icantly decreased the wetting ability of dentinal wall (ie, decreased AH plus when using either EDTA or MTAD as a final irrigant agree with
surface energy). Therefore, a suitable dentin substrate could be those reported by De-Dues et al (31). The authors suggested that EDTA
provided for the adhesion of materials with hydrophobic nature as and MTAD provided sufficient dentin tubular area as well as depth of
the resinous AH plus. Furthermore, the effective removal of the smear demineralization, thus offering the major retention (for resin sealer)
layer by EDTA allowed for the extension of the resin into the open through micromechanical interlocking with open dentinal tubules.
dentinal tubules, creating efficient microretention as previously re- Flushing the root canal with CHX after EDTA or MTAD affected the
ported (13, 14). On the contrary, such decreased wetting ability of bond strength of obturating materials differently. CHX irrigation after
dentin surface treated with 17% EDTA prohibited the adhesion of mate- 17%EDTA had significantly doubled bond strength of ActiV GP (2.46
rials hydrophilic in nature as ActiV GP. Æ 1.02) in subgroup 2b. This could be attributed to the presence of
The use of MTAD as a final irrigant with gutta-percha/AH plus re- surface surfactant in CHX composition, which increases the dentin
sulted in a significant decrease in its bond strength (1.76 Æ 1.67) surface energy and, hence, its wettability, a property that is required
compared with EDTA/AH plus. MTAD is acidic (pH = 2.15), containing for the adhesion of ActiV GP. Moreover, CHX enhanced the cationic

JOE — Volume -, Number -, - 2009 Different Irrigating Solutions 3

ARTICLE IN PRESS
charging of the dentin surface, thus increasing the reaction of polycar- 12. Grossman LI. Physical properties of root canal cements. J Endod 1976;2:166–75.
boxylic group of the glass ionomer (32, 33). On the other hand, a final 13. Zemner O, Spielberg C, Lamberghini F, et al. Sealing properties of a new epoxy resin-
based root-canal sealer. Int Endod J 1997;30:332–4.
rinse with CHX after MTAD was of no significant effect on the bond 14. Tagger M, Tagger E, Tjan AH, et al. Measurement of adhesion of endodontic sealers
strength of ActiV GP. MTAD already contains Tween 80 that enhances to dentin. J Endod 2002;28:351–4.
dentin surface energy and surface wettability, which would, in turn, 15. Fisher MA, Berzins DW, Bahcall JK. An in vitro comparison of bond strength of
have increased dentin permeability as well as penetration and diffusion various obturation materials to root canal dentin using a push-out test design. J En-
into the dentinal tissues. Despite the fact that the final irrigation with CHX dod 2007;33:856–8.
16. Donadio M, Jiang J, Safavi KE, et al. Cytotoxicity evaluation of Activ GP and Resilon
after 17% EDTA was of no significant effect on the bond strength of GP/ cones in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:
AH plus (2.04 Æ 0.44), its use after MTAD resulted in a significant 76–9.
decrease in the bond strength of GP/AH plus when compared with the 17. Koch K, Brave D. Integral gutta-percha core/cone obturation technique. US Patent
use of MTAD per se. This is in agreement with another study (3) and 7,021,936 B2 2006.
18. Monticelli F, Sadek FT, Schuster GS, et al. Efficacy of two contemporary single-cone
may be attributed to the combined action of CHX and Tween 80 filling techniques in preventing bacterial leakage. J Endod 2007;33:310–3.
increasing the dentin permeability and prohibiting the penetration of 19. Montcelli F, Sword J, Martin RL, et al. Sealing properties of two contemporary single-
hydrophobic AH plus sealer into exposed demineralized collagen matrix, cone obturation systems. Int Endod J 2007;40:374–85.
hence interfering with adhesion of the resinous material (34, 35). 20. Fransen JN, He J, Glickman GN, et al. Comparative assessment of ActiV GP/glass ion-
Within the limitations of this study, it could be concluded that 1) omer sealer, Resilon/Epiphany, and gutta percha/AH plus obturation: a bacterial
leakage study. J Endod 2008;34:725–7.
bonding strength of ActiV GP can be improved by final irrigation with 21. Nagas E, Cehreli ZC, Durmaz V, et al. Regional push-out bond strength and coronal
17% EDTA followed by 2% CHX, 2) CHX does not enhance the effect microleakage of Resilon after different light-curing methods. J Endod 2007;33:
of MTAD on ActiV GP bond strength, and 3) the bond strength of GP/ 1464–8.
AH plus was adversely affected by MTAD and MTAD/CHX. 22. Van Meerbeek B, Lambrecht P, Inokoshi S, et al. Factors affecting adhesion to
mineralized tissues. Oper Dent 1992;5:111–24.
23. Dogan H, Oalt S. Effects of chelating agents and sodium hypochlorite on mineral
content of root dentin. J Endod 2001;27:578–80.
References 24. Erickson RL. Surface interactions of dentin adhesive materials. Oper Dent 1992;5:
1. Shipper G, Ørstavik D, Teixeria FB, et al. An evaluation of microbial leakage in roots 81–94.
filled with a thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based root canal filling material 25. Eick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH, et al. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit
(Resilon). J Endod 2004;30:342–7. Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:306–35.
2. McComb D, Smith DC. A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root 26. Pashley DH, Pashley EL, Carvalho RM, et al. The effect of dentin permeability on
canals after endodontic procedures. J Endod 1975;1:238–42. restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46:211–45.
3. Hulsmann M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment;
¨ 27. Sly MM, Moore KB, Platt JA, et al. Push-out bond of a new endodontic obturation
mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J 2003;36:810–30. system (Resilon/Epiphany). J Endod 2007;33:160–2.
4. Torabinejad M, Cho Y, Khademi AA, et al. The effect of various concentrations of 28. Attal JP, Asmussen E, Degrange M. Effects of surface treatment on the free surface
sodium hypochlorite on the ability of MTAD to remove the smear layer. J Endod energy of dentin. Dent Mater 1994;10:259–64.
2003;29:233–9. 29. Dogan Buzoglu H, Calt S, Gumusderelioglu M. Evaluation of the surface free energy
¨ ¨
5. Wang CS, Arnold RR, Trope M, et al. Clinical efficiency of 2% chlorhexidine gel in on root canal dentin walls treated with chelating agents and NaOCl. Int Endod
reducing intracanal bacteria. J Endod 2007;33:1283–9. J 2007;40:18–24.
6. White RR, Hays GL, Janer LR. Residual antimicrobial activity after canal irrigation 30. Ngo H, Mount GJ, Peters MC. A study of glass-ionomer cement and its interface with
with chlorhexidine. J Endod 1997;23:229–31. enamel and dentin using a low-temperature, high- resolution scanning electron
7. Rosenthal S, Spangberg L, Safavi KE. Chlorhexidine substantivity in root canal dentin. microscope technique. Quintessence Int 1997;28:63–9.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:488–92. 31. De-Deus G, Namen F, Galan J Jr, et al. Soft chelating irrigation protocol optimizes
8. Torabinejad M, Khademi AA, Babagoli J, et al. A new solution for the removal of the bonding quality of Resilon/Epiphany root fillings. J Endod 2008;34:703–5.
smear layer. J Endod 2003;29:170–5. 32. Fardal O, Turnbull RS. A review of the literature on use of chlorhexidine in dentistry.
9. Zhang W, Torabinejad M, Li Y. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of MTAD using the MTT J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:863–9.
tetrazoluim method. J Endod 2003;29:654–7. 33. Perdigao J, Denehy GE, Swift EJ Jr. Effects of chlorhexidine on dentin surfaces and
10. Torabinejad M, Shabahang S, Aprecio RM, et al. The antimicrobial effect of MTAD: shear bond strengths. Am J Dent 1994;7:81–4.
an in vitro investigation. J Endod 2003;29:400–3. 34. Wachlarowicz AJ, Joyce AP, Roberts S, et al. Effect of endodontic irrigants on the
11. Tay FR, Hosoya Y, Loushine RJ, et al. Ultrastructure of intraradicular dentin after shear bond strength of epiphany sealer to dentin. J Endod 2007;33:152–5.
irrigation with BioPure MTAD. II. The consequence of obturation with an epoxy 35. Li L, Liu MJ, Li SJ. Morphology effect on water sorption behavior in a thermoplastic
resin-based sealer. J Endod 2006;32:473–7. modified epoxy resin system. Polymer 2004;45:2837–42.

4 Hashem et al. JOE — Volume -, Number -, - 2009

Irrigants and bond_strengths

More Related Content

Irrigants and bond_strengths