This document discusses cyber resilience and provides guidance on developing a cyber resilience strategy. It defines cyber resilience as an organization's ability to continue operations despite adverse cyber events. The document recommends that organizations implement the five pillars of cyber resilience: prepare/identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover. For each pillar, it provides examples of specific activities organizations can undertake such as conducting risk assessments, implementing security controls, establishing incident response plans, and developing disaster recovery processes. The overall message is that cyber resilience requires a strategic, comprehensive approach across people, processes, and technologies to withstand various cyber threats.
This document discusses the principles of zero trust architecture, which aims to eliminate trust from IT systems by verifying all users and devices before granting limited, least-privilege access. It outlines the core elements of zero trust, including verifying the user, verifying their device, and limiting access and privileges. The document also notes that implementing zero trust will require monitoring the environment closely, architecting microperimeters, mapping acceptable data routes, and identifying sensitive data. Organizations may face challenges from technical debt, legacy systems, and other issues requiring new technologies or wrappers.
The document discusses how to effectively manage a cyber security operations center (SOC). It addresses questions about how to assess the effectiveness and maturity of a SOC, ensure sufficient threat detection capabilities through proper sensors and data collection, and utilize threat intelligence and data enrichment. The document also provides steps to implement threat management, incident response processes, and leverage machine learning and user entity behavior analytics to detect anomalous user behavior and insider threats.
Dell Technologies provides cybersecurity solutions to help clients assess their security posture, define a cybersecurity strategy, implement security measures, and respond to and recover from attacks. The document discusses the growing threat landscape and common types of cyberattacks. It then outlines Dell's security methodology and portfolio of assessment, managed service, and product solutions to help clients define a strategy, implement controls, and respond to incidents. The solutions are meant to deliver outcomes like defined strategies, advanced protection, risk management and operational resilience.
** CyberSecurity Certification Training: https://www.edureka.co/cybersecurity-certification-training ** This Edureka tutorial on "Cybersecurity Frameworks" will help you understand why and how the organizations are using the cybersecurity framework to Identify, Protect and Recover from cyber attacks. Cybersecurity Training Playlist: https://bit.ly/2NqcTQV
The document discusses a CISO workshop agenda to modernize a security strategy and program. It includes: - An overview of who should attend, such as the CISO, CIO, security directors, and business leaders. - The agenda covers key context and fundamentals, business alignment, and security disciplines. - Exercises are included to assess maturity, discuss recommendations, and assign next steps. - Modules will provide guidance on initiatives like secure identities and access, security operations, and data security.
SOC and SIEM systems can help organizations detect and respond to security incidents and threats in a timely manner. A SOC acts as a security operations center to monitor, analyze, and respond to cybersecurity incidents. SIEM provides real-time analysis of security alerts and events to help identify potential threats. Implementing SOC and SIEM solutions can improve an organization's security posture through early threat detection, compliance with regulations, and reduced breach impact.
Talking about Next-Gen Security Operation Center for IDNIC+APJII as representative from IDSECCONF. People-Centric SOC requires lot of investment on human in terms of quantity and quality, unfortunately, (good) IT security people are getting rare these days. Organisation need to put their investments more on technology, as in Industry 4.0, machines are getting more advanced to support Human on doing continuous and repetitive task. Moving from “traditional” to next-gen SOC require proper plan, thats what this talk was about.
The document discusses Internet of Things (IoT) and cybersecurity challenges in manufacturing. It provides an overview of the evolving threat landscape, including common hacking techniques like spearphishing and malware. The presentation emphasizes the importance of cyber hygiene practices for manufacturers such as updating software, using strong unique passwords, training employees on security basics, and not browsing as an administrator. It promotes attending an upcoming cybersecurity forum to learn more on topics that will help protect manufacturing organizations from emerging threats.
The document discusses the use of use cases to define the goals and metrics for a security operations center (SOC) program. It suggests developing use cases around monitoring specific threat vectors like the perimeter, infrastructure, and privileged accounts. Use cases should also align the SOC's capabilities with the threats the organization cares most about, such as script kiddies, insider threats, or nation-state actors. Properly defining use cases allows an organization to justify SOC expenditures and determine if it is achieving success.
Jonathan Pollet and Mark Heard of Red Tiger Security at S4x15 OTDay. The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) has been out for a year now, and some owner/operators have begun to use it to help create an ICS cyber security program. The Red Tiger Security team discusses what the CSF is and there experience in using it with real world clients.
We are rapidly approaching the next era of security where we need to be focused on the ability to recover from irrecoverable attacks. This can also be defined as resiliency. The traditional view of resiliency attempts to quickly restore assets that support services that we care about. This new approach/paradigm looks at resilience in ways that promote design patterns (distributed, immutable, ephemeral) where we do not care about a given asset at all while still keeping the overall service functioning. This new approach allows us to avoid having to deal with security at all.
In this presentation Daniel Michaud-Soucy, Principal Threat Analyst at Dragos, will demonstrate three separate models in order to identify gaps in ICS security posture. First, threat modeling serves as an inward look as an ICS network defender in order to properly understand the environment, the threat actors, the impacts, the risks and the crown jewels pertaining to an industrial process. Second, the ICS cyber kill chain serves as an outward look at the steps an adversary needs to take in order to achieve their objectives. Third, the bowtie model allows a graphical representation of the threats to the environment as well as the protection, detection, and response controls that help secure it. In the end, the asset owner creates a holistic picture of the security controls in their network, pertaining to the threat actors they care about and allows identification of gaps in their strategy. Visit www.dragos.com to learn more about the Dragos industrial cybersecurity platform for increased visibility of assets, threats and guided responses.
Presentation I gave to a client on showing the importance of implementing a vulnerability management program life cycle.
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework acts as a bridge between the management and Cybersecurity ecosystem.
The document discusses building a security operations center (SOC). It defines a SOC as a centralized unit that deals with security issues on an organizational and technical level. It monitors, assesses, and defends enterprise information systems. The document discusses whether to build an internal SOC or outsource it. It also covers SOC technologies, personnel requirements, and the five generations of SOCs. It provides resources for learning more about designing and maturing a SOC.
As company information security functions continue to grow each year with increasing attacks and regulations, how are you handling the pressure? Are you constantly battling to run the business projects and reacting to customer requests? Have you blocked off a few hours each week on your calendar to close your email, turn off your phone and try to build, assess and maintain an effective vision for your security team? This presentation will discuss a cascading approach to creating such a roadmap that is easily understood by executives and has helped gain quick buy in for multiple enterprise wide security projects.
Information technology experts can now take advantage of How To Handle Cybersecurity Risk PowerPoint Presentation Slides. This information security PPT theme infuses top-quality design with data obtained by industry experts. Explain the present situation of the target firm’s information security management employing this PowerPoint layout. The data visualizations featured here simplify the elucidation of complex data such as the analysis of the current IT department. Showcase the cybersecurity framework roadmap and risks of the internet using our PPT presentation. Elaborate on the cybersecurity risk management action plan using the tabular format via this PowerPoint slideshow. Demonstrate the cybersecurity contingency plan with appreciable ease. Our information security management system PPT templates deck assists you in assigning risk handling responsibilities to the staff. Explain the duties of the management in successful information security governance. This PowerPoint presentation also addresses the cost of cybersecurity management and staff training. Hit the download icon and start personalization. Our How To Handle Cybersecurity Risk PowerPoint Presentation Slides are explicit and effective. They combine clarity and concise expression. https://bit.ly/3o0xDkR
What have we learned from 2017's biggest breaches and how will we deal with 2018's emerging threats? Attempting to look both backward and forward over the cyber landscape, Peter Wood will review lessons learned and apply them to the evolving threatscape.
The document discusses approaches to information security, risk management, and cyber resilience. It recommends taking a three-pronged approach to information security that includes awareness, technical controls, and periodic reviews. It also suggests adopting a framework for cyber risk management that is appropriate for the organization's needs and risk appetite. Finally, it outlines six key points to achieving cyber resilience: organizational readiness, situational awareness, detection, cyber defense, mitigation and containment, and recovery.
Each strategy discussed here will focus on a specific aspect of project management that can be vulnerable to cyber threats. From establishing strong access controls and user authentication mechanisms to ensuring regular data backups and robust incident response plans, these strategies will provide project managers with practical steps to enhance their project’s cybersecurity posture. Take the first step today by requesting a demo of the Yoroproject, enabling you to proactively protect your business against cyber threats.
The document discusses strategic approaches for information security in 2018, focusing on continuous adaptive risk and trust assessment (CARTA). It recommends adopting a CARTA strategic approach to securely enable access to digital business initiatives in an increasingly complex threat environment. The document outlines key challenges in adapting existing security approaches to new digital business realities and recommends embracing principles of trust and resilience, developing an adaptive security architecture, and implementing a formal risk and security management program.