SlideShare a Scribd company logo
In-Process Review (LZ)
   Action: Define an In-process review (IPR)
   Condition: You are a recruiting leader
    with the requirement to understand the
    components of an IPR. You have access
    to USAREC Manual (UM) 3-02, Field
    Manual (FM) 6-22, and access to the
    internal production outlook Leader Zone.
   Standard: Define a daily IPR used
    effectively, while incorporating the use
    of Leader Zone as a validation tool, and
    maintaining a high focus on
    performance standards and operational
    effectiveness.
 An IPR is:
• A Quality Control Checkpoint
• Focused on performance standards
• Formal w/Informal Methods
› Outline
 Personnel
 Present Mission
 Projections
 Processing
 Prospecting
 Recruiting Operations Plan
 Future Soldier Training Program
 Supports Leadership Imperative
 Goal
    › Encouragement
    › Enable
    › Direction
 Communication
 Systematic Review
   Modification
    › Behavior
    › Performance
 Scheduled Regularly
 Centered on Recruiting Functions
 Conducted
    › Telephone
    › Face-to-Face
   Mutual Trust
   Review
    ›   MAP
    ›   Leads and Prospecting Analysis (LPA)
    ›   Processing Data
    ›   Future Soldier Roster
 Discussion Points
 Uniformity
    › Prepared
    › Develops Patterns of Thinking
    › Fosters Successful Habits
   Personnel
    › Review Strength Issues
       Are there any health or other Soldier Family issues?
       How many recruiters are in the foxhole to accomplish
        the plan?
       Has all monthly counseling been completed?
       How can we increase efficiency?
       How can we increase their effectiveness?
    › Administration Topics
       Soldier Development
       Pay, Awards, NCOER’s
   Mission Posture
    ›   What is this PL’s mission?
    ›   Where does the unit stand on the mission?
    ›   When will the unit make the mission?
    ›   Are there any obstacles or potential obstacles
        that could affect the mission?
    ›   What courses of action (COAs) have been
        developed to overcome these obstacles?
    ›   Who is shipping to the training base this week or
        this month?
    ›   Are there any issues that may prevent their
        shipping?
    ›   Are there any pending Future Soldier losses?
   Projections
    › Who is projected and when are they scheduled
        to enlist?
    ›   Is the application complete?
    ›   Has the packet been forwarded within
        prescribed time lines?
    ›   Does the applicant require special testing
        (medical or administrative)?
    ›   What might keep this applicant from enlisting or
        commissioning?
    ›   Did the station commander interview (“hot
        seat”) this person?
    ›   Which applicant is closest to enlisting?
    ›   Which applicant is next closest?
   Processing
    › Who is testing and when?
    › How many testers should there be?
    › What is the expected processing time line for
      these testers?
    › What COA has been developed to ensure
      success in this area?
   Prospecting
    › Based on yesterday’s prospecting plan,
        what was supposed to happen?
    ›   What results were expected and what was
        achieved?
    ›   Did results meet or exceed MAP goals?
    ›   What is the COA to correct any shortfalls?
    ›   What is your plan to correct any shortfalls?
   ROP
    › What needs to change?
    › How are we going to do it?
    › Do we need additional resources to execute
      the new COA?
    › What are we going to measure?
    › What will be our early warning indicators?
    › Who will be responsible for this step?
   Future Soldiers
    › Are there any Future Soldiers shipping this month and who
        are they?
    ›   When are they shipping?
    ›   Have recruiters completed their quality assurance checks?
    ›   Have required documents been placed in the ship
        packets?
    ›   Have all Future Soldiers received an initial orientation?
    ›   Do all Future Soldiers have an Army Knowledge Online
        account?
    ›   How many referrals did Future Soldiers deliver last week?
    ›   What Future Soldier training or event is planned in this PL?
Mission Posture
Processing
Prospecting
Prospecting
Prospecting
In-Process Review (LZ)
In-Process Review (LZ)
Questions?

More Related Content

In-Process Review (LZ)

  • 2. Action: Define an In-process review (IPR)
  • 3. Condition: You are a recruiting leader with the requirement to understand the components of an IPR. You have access to USAREC Manual (UM) 3-02, Field Manual (FM) 6-22, and access to the internal production outlook Leader Zone.
  • 4. Standard: Define a daily IPR used effectively, while incorporating the use of Leader Zone as a validation tool, and maintaining a high focus on performance standards and operational effectiveness.
  • 5.  An IPR is: • A Quality Control Checkpoint • Focused on performance standards • Formal w/Informal Methods
  • 6. › Outline  Personnel  Present Mission  Projections  Processing  Prospecting  Recruiting Operations Plan  Future Soldier Training Program
  • 7.  Supports Leadership Imperative  Goal › Encouragement › Enable › Direction  Communication  Systematic Review
  • 8. Modification › Behavior › Performance  Scheduled Regularly  Centered on Recruiting Functions  Conducted › Telephone › Face-to-Face  Mutual Trust
  • 9. Review › MAP › Leads and Prospecting Analysis (LPA) › Processing Data › Future Soldier Roster  Discussion Points  Uniformity › Prepared › Develops Patterns of Thinking › Fosters Successful Habits
  • 10. Personnel › Review Strength Issues  Are there any health or other Soldier Family issues?  How many recruiters are in the foxhole to accomplish the plan?  Has all monthly counseling been completed?  How can we increase efficiency?  How can we increase their effectiveness? › Administration Topics  Soldier Development  Pay, Awards, NCOER’s
  • 11. Mission Posture › What is this PL’s mission? › Where does the unit stand on the mission? › When will the unit make the mission? › Are there any obstacles or potential obstacles that could affect the mission? › What courses of action (COAs) have been developed to overcome these obstacles? › Who is shipping to the training base this week or this month? › Are there any issues that may prevent their shipping? › Are there any pending Future Soldier losses?
  • 12. Projections › Who is projected and when are they scheduled to enlist? › Is the application complete? › Has the packet been forwarded within prescribed time lines? › Does the applicant require special testing (medical or administrative)? › What might keep this applicant from enlisting or commissioning? › Did the station commander interview (“hot seat”) this person? › Which applicant is closest to enlisting? › Which applicant is next closest?
  • 13. Processing › Who is testing and when? › How many testers should there be? › What is the expected processing time line for these testers? › What COA has been developed to ensure success in this area?
  • 14. Prospecting › Based on yesterday’s prospecting plan, what was supposed to happen? › What results were expected and what was achieved? › Did results meet or exceed MAP goals? › What is the COA to correct any shortfalls? › What is your plan to correct any shortfalls?
  • 15. ROP › What needs to change? › How are we going to do it? › Do we need additional resources to execute the new COA? › What are we going to measure? › What will be our early warning indicators? › Who will be responsible for this step?
  • 16. Future Soldiers › Are there any Future Soldiers shipping this month and who are they? › When are they shipping? › Have recruiters completed their quality assurance checks? › Have required documents been placed in the ship packets? › Have all Future Soldiers received an initial orientation? › Do all Future Soldiers have an Army Knowledge Online account? › How many referrals did Future Soldiers deliver last week? › What Future Soldier training or event is planned in this PL?