Ford presentation
- 2. Overview
• Company Overview
– Ford’s brief history
– Mission and Vision statement
– Current Objectives &
Strategies
• New Mission and Vision
• External Assessment
– Industry Analysis
– Opportunities & Threats
– EFE Matrix
• Internal Assessment
– Strengths & Weaknesses
– Financial ratios
– IFE Matrix
• Strategy Formulation
– SWOT Matrix
– BCG
– Space Matrix
– IE Matrix
– Grand Strategy Matrix
– QSPM Matrix
• Strategic Plan for the Future
– Objectives
– Strategies
• Implementation
– EPS/EBIT
– Other issues
• Evaluation
• Ford 2008 Update
- 3. About the Company
• Manufactures and distributes automobiles on
six continents, strong presence in all 50 states.
• Employs approximately 224,000 people and
operates 90 plants worldwide.
• Brands include Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Volvo,
Mazda and Ford Motor Credit Company
(financial service).
- 4. Ford’s Brief History
1903 – Ford Motor Company founded in Michigan
1908 – Model T introduced
1913 – first moving automobile assembly line in the
world
1956 – Ford’s stocks go on sale (10.2 million shares
sold the first day)
1987 – beginning of the acquisitions of other
brands
1988 – Ford Motor Company reached the peek
- 7. Mission & Vision Statement
"To become the world's leading consumer
company for automotive products and
services.“
- Ford doesn’t have vision statement
- 8. Objectives
• To contribute to stabilizing the climate by
considering reducing long-term emission
• To promote the development of an
infrastructure that will expand the use of bio-
fuels and help reduce our dependence on oil
• To cut the usage of global energy by 27% and
the usage of water by 25%
- 9. Strategies
• Utilizing their advance technology
• Building of smaller vehicle
• Cost reduction
• Market expansion through joint venture and
strategic alliance
- 10. New Mission & Vision Statement
- Both mission and vision are one statement
“Our vision is to become the world's leading consumer manufacturing
company for automotive products and services. To achieve this, we
the company and all our employees are dedicated to provide all our
customers and the community with safe innovative products and
services of world class standards. Through our engineering
excellence, high quality and the use of our constantly upgrading
technology we limit the harm that we cause to the environment
while delivering superior value to our customers. Our close knit
working environment allows our employees, community and
business partner to share in our success, while achieving a
substantial return on our shareholders investment. “
- 17. CPM
Ford GM
DiamlerChrysler
AG Toyota
Critical Success factors
Weigh
ts
Rati
ng
Weighted
Score
Rati
ng
Weighted
Score
Rati
ng
Weighted
Score
Rati
ng
Weighted
Score
0.0 to
1.0
1 to
4
1 to
4
1 to
4
1 to
4
Global Expansion 0.14 2 0.28 3 0.42 2 0.28 3 0.42
Financial Position 0.10 2 0.2 4 0.4 3 0.3 3 0.3
Growth 0.16 1 0.16 3 0.48 1 0.16 4 0.64
US Market Share 0.20 3 0.6 4 0.8 2 0.4 2 0.4
Customer Loyalty 0.15 4 0.6 3 0.45 4 0.6 3 0.45
Hybrid/Fuel Efficient Vehicles 0.18 3 0.54 3 0.54 2 0.36 2 0.36
Management Experience 0.07 3 0.21 4 0.28 3 0.21 3 0.21
Totals 1 2.59 3.37 2.31 2.78
- 18. Opportunities & Threats
Opportunities
• Consumers demand hybrid
and fuel efficient vehicles
• Increase in consumer
spending trends
• Consumers demand more
innovative vehicles
• Global expansion
• Industry experiences slow
and steady growth
Threats
• Weak USD
• Increase in steel and resin
pricing
• Increasing gasoline prices
• Stricter CO2 emission
standards
• Increasing mortgage rates
- 24. Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
• Strong and globally positioned
brand names
• Large employee base with
highly educated engineers and
good R&D department
• One of the largest automotive
manufacturer (along with a
long history)
• 1285% increase in net cash
• Huge increase in total equity
Weaknesses
• A lot of time spent to actually
put the product on the market
• Recording continuous losses
(net income) from 2006
• Low quality of new products
(recalls – causing losing
customers)
• Lack of management of the
company
• EPS very bad – in negative
numbers (unattractive for the
investors)
- 25. IFE Matrix
Key Internal Factors Weights Rating
Weighted
Score
0.0 to
1.0
1, 2, 3 or
4
Internal Strengths 3 or 4
Strong and globally positioned brand names 0.13 4 0.52
Large employee base with highly educated engineers and good R&D
department 0.09 3 0.27
One of the largest automotive manufacturer (along with a long
history) 0.06 3 0.18
1285% increase in net cash 0.09 3 0.27
Huge increase in total equity 0.11 4 0.44
Internal Weaknesses 1 or 2
A lot of time spent to actually put the product on the market 0.1 2 0.2
Recording continuous losses (net income) from 2006 0.12 1 0.12
Low quality of new products (recalls - causing losing customers) 0.12 1 0.12
Bad management of the company 0.08 2 0.16
EPS very bad - in negative numbers (unattractive for the investors) 0.1 1 0.1
Totals 1 2.38
- 27. SWOT Matrix
Strengths – S
1.Marcas posicionadas a nivel mundial
Fuertes
2.Gran base de empleados con los ingenieros
de alto nivel de educación y un buen
departamento de I + D
3.Uno de los mayores fabricantes del
automóvil (junto con una larga historia)
4.Aumento de 1.285% en el efectivo neto
5.Enorme incremento en el patrimonio neto
Weaknesses – W
1. gran cantidad de tiempo dedicado a poner en
realidad el producto en el mercado
2.Grabación de continuas pérdidas (ingresos
netos) a partir de 2006
3.La baja calidad de los nuevos productos
(recuerda - que causa la pérdida de clientes)
4.La falta de gestión de la empresa
5.EPS muy malas - en números negativos (poco
atractivos para los inversores)
Opportunities – O
1.Los consumidores piden vehículos híbridos
eficientes y bajo consumo de combustibles
2.Aumento de las tendencias de consumo
3.Los consumidores piden vehículos más
innovadores
4.La expansión global
5.Crecimiento de las experiencias de la industria
lento y constante
SO
1.El desarrollo de nuevos vehículos en los
combustibles alternativos (S1, S2, S4, O1,
O3. O5)
2.Ofrecer nuevos productos innovadores -
Aumento del mercado - motos (S1, S2, S3,
O2, O3, O5)
3.Concéntrarse en hacer los mejores
vehiculos de combustible eficiente
WO
1.Realizar producción mas economica y de
bajos impuesto
Threats – T
1.Débil USD
2.Aumento de los precios del acero y resina
3.El aumento de los precios de la gasolina
4.Estrictas normas de emisión de CO2
5.El aumento de las tasas hipotecarias
ST
1.Construir productos ecológicos con
materiales alternativos (S2, S3, S4, T2, T3,
T4)
2.Producir más autos para el mercado
exterior (S1, S2, S4, T1, T4)
WT
1.Combinar con los competidores (W1, W2,
W5, T2, T3, T5)
2.Fabricación únicas partes de automóviles
(W1, W2, T1, T2)
- 29. BCG Matrix
Revenues % Revenues Profit % Profit
% Market
Share
% Growth
Rate
NA 69365 45% -4161 - 61% -0.1
SA 7585 5% 1172 - 30% +33
Europe 36330 24% 744 - 81% -3
PAG 33067 21% -1872 - - +10
Asia 8032 5% 206 - 38% +3
Total 154379 100% -3911 - - -
- 30. BCG Matrix
Relative market share position in the industry
High 1.0 Medium .50 Low 0.0
High+30Medium0Low-3
Industrysalesgrowthrate
SA
APA
NA
- 32. Grand Strategy Matrix
Rapid Market Growth
Quadrant II Quadrant I
Strong
Competitive
Position
Slow Market Growth
Weak
Competitive
Position
Quadrant III Quadrant IV
- 33. Matrix Evaluation
Alternative Strategies BCG IE SPACE GRAND COUNT
Forward Integration x 1
Backward Integration x 1
Horizontal Integration x 1
Market Penetration x x x 3
Market Development x x 2
Product Development x x x 3
Concentric Diversification x x 2
Conglomerate Diversification x x 2
Horizontal Diversification x x 2
Joint Venture x 1
Retrenchment x x 2
Divestiture x x 2
Liquidation x 1
- 34. Possible Strategies
• Developing new vehicles on alternative fuels
(S1, S2, S4, O1, O3, O5) – SO1
• Offer new innovative products – increase
market share (S1, S2, S3, O2, O3, O5) – SO2
• Concentrate on making the best fuel efficient
cars (S1, S2, S3, S4, O1, O4, O5) – SO3
- 37. Objectives for the 2008 - 2010
• Reduce manufacturing expenses by 15-20% 2008
• Introduce new small fuel efficient vehicles 2009
• Enter Latin American and Asian market with
hybrid vehicles 2010
• Develop affordable electric car for US market
2009-2010
• Increase market share 2009-2010
• Build up strong financials (increase net income
and EPS by 15%) 2009-2010
- 38. Recommendation
• Manufacturing of new small fuel-efficient
vehicle $ 7,000,000,000
• Entering the Latin American and Asian market
with hybrids $ 20,000,000,000
• Implementation of electric car in the US
market $ 13,000,000,000
Total Cost = $ 40,000,000,000
- 40. EPS/EBIT
• Amount needed: $40,000,000,000
• Stock price: $7.42
• Interest rate: 7.5%
• Tax rate: 0% (firm is having a loss)
• # of shares outstanding: 2,195,000,000
• # shares needed: 500,404,312
- 41. EPS/EBIT
Common stock financing Debt financing
Recession Normal Boom Recession Normal Boom
EBIT 10 20 40 10 20 40
Interest 0 0 0 1.5 1.5 1.5
EBIT 10 20 40 8.5 18.5 38.5
Taxes 0 0 0 0 0 0
EAT 10 20 40 8.5 18.5 38.5
#shares 2.695 2.695 2.695 2.695 2.695 2.695
EPS 3.71 7.42 14.84 3.15 6.86 14.28
*data in $ billion
- 42. Other Issues
• Laws and regulations in foreign countries
• Regain lost trust in the Ford’s brand
- 46. Sources
• Ford Motor Company Annual Report 2007
• General Motors Annual Report 2007
• http://www.ford.com/about-ford/investor-
relations
• Datamonitor
– Global Automobile Industry manufacturer 2006
• Pictures taken from Web