SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Hamill Bassue
Owen Hendershot
Goran Nagradic
Overview
• Company Overview
– Ford’s brief history
– Mission and Vision statement
– Current Objectives &
Strategies
• New Mission and Vision
• External Assessment
– Industry Analysis
– Opportunities & Threats
– EFE Matrix
• Internal Assessment
– Strengths & Weaknesses
– Financial ratios
– IFE Matrix
• Strategy Formulation
– SWOT Matrix
– BCG
– Space Matrix
– IE Matrix
– Grand Strategy Matrix
– QSPM Matrix
• Strategic Plan for the Future
– Objectives
– Strategies
• Implementation
– EPS/EBIT
– Other issues
• Evaluation
• Ford 2008 Update
About the Company
• Manufactures and distributes automobiles on
six continents, strong presence in all 50 states.
• Employs approximately 224,000 people and
operates 90 plants worldwide.
• Brands include Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Volvo,
Mazda and Ford Motor Credit Company
(financial service).
Ford’s Brief History
1903 – Ford Motor Company founded in Michigan
1908 – Model T introduced
1913 – first moving automobile assembly line in the
world
1956 – Ford’s stocks go on sale (10.2 million shares
sold the first day)
1987 – beginning of the acquisitions of other
brands
1988 – Ford Motor Company reached the peek
Ford presentation
Management
Mission & Vision Statement
"To become the world's leading consumer
company for automotive products and
services.“
- Ford doesn’t have vision statement
Objectives
• To contribute to stabilizing the climate by
considering reducing long-term emission
• To promote the development of an
infrastructure that will expand the use of bio-
fuels and help reduce our dependence on oil
• To cut the usage of global energy by 27% and
the usage of water by 25%
Strategies
• Utilizing their advance technology
• Building of smaller vehicle
• Cost reduction
• Market expansion through joint venture and
strategic alliance
New Mission & Vision Statement
- Both mission and vision are one statement
“Our vision is to become the world's leading consumer manufacturing
company for automotive products and services. To achieve this, we
the company and all our employees are dedicated to provide all our
customers and the community with safe innovative products and
services of world class standards. Through our engineering
excellence, high quality and the use of our constantly upgrading
technology we limit the harm that we cause to the environment
while delivering superior value to our customers. Our close knit
working environment allows our employees, community and
business partner to share in our success, while achieving a
substantial return on our shareholders investment. “
External Assessment
Industry Analysis
Global Automobile Industry Value Global Automobile Industry Volume
Industry Segmentation
Industry Segmentation
Industry Market Share
Industry Forecast
CPM
Ford GM
DiamlerChrysler
AG Toyota
Critical Success factors
Weigh
ts
Rati
ng
Weighted
Score
Rati
ng
Weighted
Score
Rati
ng
Weighted
Score
Rati
ng
Weighted
Score
0.0 to
1.0
1 to
4
1 to
4
1 to
4
1 to
4
Global Expansion 0.14 2 0.28 3 0.42 2 0.28 3 0.42
Financial Position 0.10 2 0.2 4 0.4 3 0.3 3 0.3
Growth 0.16 1 0.16 3 0.48 1 0.16 4 0.64
US Market Share 0.20 3 0.6 4 0.8 2 0.4 2 0.4
Customer Loyalty 0.15 4 0.6 3 0.45 4 0.6 3 0.45
Hybrid/Fuel Efficient Vehicles 0.18 3 0.54 3 0.54 2 0.36 2 0.36
Management Experience 0.07 3 0.21 4 0.28 3 0.21 3 0.21
Totals 1 2.59 3.37 2.31 2.78
Opportunities & Threats
Opportunities
• Consumers demand hybrid
and fuel efficient vehicles
• Increase in consumer
spending trends
• Consumers demand more
innovative vehicles
• Global expansion
• Industry experiences slow
and steady growth
Threats
• Weak USD
• Increase in steel and resin
pricing
• Increasing gasoline prices
• Stricter CO2 emission
standards
• Increasing mortgage rates
EFE Matrix
Internal Assessment
Stock performance
Financial Highlights
• Income Statement
• Balance Sheet
• Cash Flow Statement
Ratios
Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
• Strong and globally positioned
brand names
• Large employee base with
highly educated engineers and
good R&D department
• One of the largest automotive
manufacturer (along with a
long history)
• 1285% increase in net cash
• Huge increase in total equity
Weaknesses
• A lot of time spent to actually
put the product on the market
• Recording continuous losses
(net income) from 2006
• Low quality of new products
(recalls – causing losing
customers)
• Lack of management of the
company
• EPS very bad – in negative
numbers (unattractive for the
investors)
IFE Matrix
Key Internal Factors Weights Rating
Weighted
Score
0.0 to
1.0
1, 2, 3 or
4
Internal Strengths   3 or 4  
Strong and globally positioned brand names 0.13 4 0.52
Large employee base with highly educated engineers and good R&D 
department 0.09 3 0.27
One of the largest automotive manufacturer (along with a long 
history) 0.06 3 0.18
1285% increase in net cash 0.09 3 0.27
Huge increase in total equity 0.11 4 0.44
Internal Weaknesses   1 or 2  
A lot of time spent to actually put the product on the market 0.1 2 0.2
Recording continuous losses (net income) from 2006 0.12 1 0.12
Low quality of new products (recalls - causing losing customers) 0.12 1 0.12
Bad management of the company 0.08 2 0.16
EPS very bad - in negative numbers (unattractive for the investors) 0.1 1 0.1
Totals 1 2.38
Strategic Formulation
SWOT Matrix
Strengths – S
1.Marcas posicionadas a nivel mundial
Fuertes
2.Gran base de empleados con los ingenieros
de alto nivel de educación y un buen
departamento de I + D
3.Uno de los mayores fabricantes del
automóvil (junto con una larga historia)
4.Aumento de 1.285% en el efectivo neto
5.Enorme incremento en el patrimonio neto
Weaknesses – W
1. gran cantidad de tiempo dedicado a poner en
realidad el producto en el mercado
2.Grabación de continuas pérdidas (ingresos
netos) a partir de 2006
3.La baja calidad de los nuevos productos
(recuerda - que causa la pérdida de clientes)
4.La falta de gestión de la empresa
5.EPS muy malas - en números negativos (poco
atractivos para los inversores)
Opportunities – O
1.Los consumidores piden vehículos híbridos
eficientes y bajo consumo de combustibles
2.Aumento de las tendencias de consumo
3.Los consumidores piden vehículos más
innovadores
4.La expansión global
5.Crecimiento de las experiencias de la industria
lento y constante
SO
1.El desarrollo de nuevos vehículos en los
combustibles alternativos (S1, S2, S4, O1,
O3. O5)
2.Ofrecer nuevos productos innovadores -
Aumento del mercado - motos (S1, S2, S3,
O2, O3, O5)
3.Concéntrarse en hacer los mejores
vehiculos de combustible eficiente
WO
1.Realizar producción mas economica y de
bajos impuesto
Threats – T
1.Débil USD
2.Aumento de los precios del acero y resina
3.El aumento de los precios de la gasolina
4.Estrictas normas de emisión de CO2
5.El aumento de las tasas hipotecarias
ST
1.Construir productos ecológicos con
materiales alternativos (S2, S3, S4, T2, T3,
T4)
2.Producir más autos para el mercado
exterior (S1, S2, S4, T1, T4)
WT
1.Combinar con los competidores (W1, W2,
W5, T2, T3, T5)
2.Fabricación únicas partes de automóviles
(W1, W2, T1, T2)
SPACE Matrix
FS
+6
+1
+5
+4
+3
+2
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6
IS
Conservative Aggressive
Defensive Competitive
28
BCG Matrix
Revenues % Revenues Profit % Profit
% Market
Share
% Growth
Rate
NA 69365 45% -4161 - 61% -0.1
SA 7585 5% 1172 - 30% +33
Europe 36330 24% 744 - 81% -3
PAG 33067 21% -1872 - - +10
Asia 8032 5% 206 - 38% +3
Total 154379 100% -3911 - - -
BCG Matrix
Relative market share position in the industry
High 1.0 Medium .50 Low 0.0
High+30Medium0Low-3
Industrysalesgrowthrate
SA
APA
NA
IE Matrix
Hold and Maintain
31
Grand Strategy Matrix
Rapid Market Growth
Quadrant II Quadrant I
Strong
Competitive
Position
Slow Market Growth
Weak
Competitive
Position
Quadrant III Quadrant IV
Matrix Evaluation
Alternative Strategies BCG IE SPACE GRAND COUNT
Forward Integration x 1
Backward Integration x 1
Horizontal Integration x 1
Market Penetration x x x 3
Market Development x x 2
Product Development x x x 3
Concentric Diversification x x 2
Conglomerate Diversification x x 2
Horizontal Diversification x x 2
Joint Venture x 1
Retrenchment x x 2
Divestiture x x 2
Liquidation x 1
Possible Strategies
• Developing new vehicles on alternative fuels
(S1, S2, S4, O1, O3, O5) – SO1
• Offer new innovative products – increase
market share (S1, S2, S3, O2, O3, O5) – SO2
• Concentrate on making the best fuel efficient
cars (S1, S2, S3, S4, O1, O4, O5) – SO3
QSPM
Strategic Plan for the Future
Objectives for the 2008 - 2010
• Reduce manufacturing expenses by 15-20% 2008
• Introduce new small fuel efficient vehicles 2009
• Enter Latin American and Asian market with
hybrid vehicles 2010
• Develop affordable electric car for US market
2009-2010
• Increase market share 2009-2010
• Build up strong financials (increase net income
and EPS by 15%) 2009-2010
Recommendation
• Manufacturing of new small fuel-efficient
vehicle $ 7,000,000,000
• Entering the Latin American and Asian market
with hybrids $ 20,000,000,000
• Implementation of electric car in the US
market $ 13,000,000,000
Total Cost = $ 40,000,000,000
Implementation
EPS/EBIT
• Amount needed: $40,000,000,000
• Stock price: $7.42
• Interest rate: 7.5%
• Tax rate: 0% (firm is having a loss)
• # of shares outstanding: 2,195,000,000
• # shares needed: 500,404,312
EPS/EBIT
Common stock financing Debt financing
Recession Normal Boom Recession Normal Boom
EBIT 10 20 40 10 20 40
Interest 0 0 0 1.5 1.5 1.5
EBIT 10 20 40 8.5 18.5 38.5
Taxes 0 0 0 0 0 0
EAT 10 20 40 8.5 18.5 38.5
#shares 2.695 2.695 2.695 2.695 2.695 2.695
EPS 3.71 7.42 14.84 3.15 6.86 14.28
*data in $ billion
Other Issues
• Laws and regulations in foreign countries
• Regain lost trust in the Ford’s brand
Evaluation
Ford 2008 Update
Industry Update
Sources
• Ford Motor Company Annual Report 2007
• General Motors Annual Report 2007
• http://www.ford.com/about-ford/investor-
relations
• Datamonitor
– Global Automobile Industry manufacturer 2006
• Pictures taken from Web
Questions???

More Related Content

Ford presentation

  • 2. Overview • Company Overview – Ford’s brief history – Mission and Vision statement – Current Objectives & Strategies • New Mission and Vision • External Assessment – Industry Analysis – Opportunities & Threats – EFE Matrix • Internal Assessment – Strengths & Weaknesses – Financial ratios – IFE Matrix • Strategy Formulation – SWOT Matrix – BCG – Space Matrix – IE Matrix – Grand Strategy Matrix – QSPM Matrix • Strategic Plan for the Future – Objectives – Strategies • Implementation – EPS/EBIT – Other issues • Evaluation • Ford 2008 Update
  • 3. About the Company • Manufactures and distributes automobiles on six continents, strong presence in all 50 states. • Employs approximately 224,000 people and operates 90 plants worldwide. • Brands include Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Volvo, Mazda and Ford Motor Credit Company (financial service).
  • 4. Ford’s Brief History 1903 – Ford Motor Company founded in Michigan 1908 – Model T introduced 1913 – first moving automobile assembly line in the world 1956 – Ford’s stocks go on sale (10.2 million shares sold the first day) 1987 – beginning of the acquisitions of other brands 1988 – Ford Motor Company reached the peek
  • 7. Mission & Vision Statement "To become the world's leading consumer company for automotive products and services.“ - Ford doesn’t have vision statement
  • 8. Objectives • To contribute to stabilizing the climate by considering reducing long-term emission • To promote the development of an infrastructure that will expand the use of bio- fuels and help reduce our dependence on oil • To cut the usage of global energy by 27% and the usage of water by 25%
  • 9. Strategies • Utilizing their advance technology • Building of smaller vehicle • Cost reduction • Market expansion through joint venture and strategic alliance
  • 10. New Mission & Vision Statement - Both mission and vision are one statement “Our vision is to become the world's leading consumer manufacturing company for automotive products and services. To achieve this, we the company and all our employees are dedicated to provide all our customers and the community with safe innovative products and services of world class standards. Through our engineering excellence, high quality and the use of our constantly upgrading technology we limit the harm that we cause to the environment while delivering superior value to our customers. Our close knit working environment allows our employees, community and business partner to share in our success, while achieving a substantial return on our shareholders investment. “
  • 12. Industry Analysis Global Automobile Industry Value Global Automobile Industry Volume
  • 17. CPM Ford GM DiamlerChrysler AG Toyota Critical Success factors Weigh ts Rati ng Weighted Score Rati ng Weighted Score Rati ng Weighted Score Rati ng Weighted Score 0.0 to 1.0 1 to 4 1 to 4 1 to 4 1 to 4 Global Expansion 0.14 2 0.28 3 0.42 2 0.28 3 0.42 Financial Position 0.10 2 0.2 4 0.4 3 0.3 3 0.3 Growth 0.16 1 0.16 3 0.48 1 0.16 4 0.64 US Market Share 0.20 3 0.6 4 0.8 2 0.4 2 0.4 Customer Loyalty 0.15 4 0.6 3 0.45 4 0.6 3 0.45 Hybrid/Fuel Efficient Vehicles 0.18 3 0.54 3 0.54 2 0.36 2 0.36 Management Experience 0.07 3 0.21 4 0.28 3 0.21 3 0.21 Totals 1 2.59 3.37 2.31 2.78
  • 18. Opportunities & Threats Opportunities • Consumers demand hybrid and fuel efficient vehicles • Increase in consumer spending trends • Consumers demand more innovative vehicles • Global expansion • Industry experiences slow and steady growth Threats • Weak USD • Increase in steel and resin pricing • Increasing gasoline prices • Stricter CO2 emission standards • Increasing mortgage rates
  • 22. Financial Highlights • Income Statement • Balance Sheet • Cash Flow Statement
  • 24. Strengths & Weaknesses Strengths • Strong and globally positioned brand names • Large employee base with highly educated engineers and good R&D department • One of the largest automotive manufacturer (along with a long history) • 1285% increase in net cash • Huge increase in total equity Weaknesses • A lot of time spent to actually put the product on the market • Recording continuous losses (net income) from 2006 • Low quality of new products (recalls – causing losing customers) • Lack of management of the company • EPS very bad – in negative numbers (unattractive for the investors)
  • 25. IFE Matrix Key Internal Factors Weights Rating Weighted Score 0.0 to 1.0 1, 2, 3 or 4 Internal Strengths   3 or 4   Strong and globally positioned brand names 0.13 4 0.52 Large employee base with highly educated engineers and good R&D  department 0.09 3 0.27 One of the largest automotive manufacturer (along with a long  history) 0.06 3 0.18 1285% increase in net cash 0.09 3 0.27 Huge increase in total equity 0.11 4 0.44 Internal Weaknesses   1 or 2   A lot of time spent to actually put the product on the market 0.1 2 0.2 Recording continuous losses (net income) from 2006 0.12 1 0.12 Low quality of new products (recalls - causing losing customers) 0.12 1 0.12 Bad management of the company 0.08 2 0.16 EPS very bad - in negative numbers (unattractive for the investors) 0.1 1 0.1 Totals 1 2.38
  • 27. SWOT Matrix Strengths – S 1.Marcas posicionadas a nivel mundial Fuertes 2.Gran base de empleados con los ingenieros de alto nivel de educación y un buen departamento de I + D 3.Uno de los mayores fabricantes del automóvil (junto con una larga historia) 4.Aumento de 1.285% en el efectivo neto 5.Enorme incremento en el patrimonio neto Weaknesses – W 1. gran cantidad de tiempo dedicado a poner en realidad el producto en el mercado 2.Grabación de continuas pérdidas (ingresos netos) a partir de 2006 3.La baja calidad de los nuevos productos (recuerda - que causa la pérdida de clientes) 4.La falta de gestión de la empresa 5.EPS muy malas - en números negativos (poco atractivos para los inversores) Opportunities – O 1.Los consumidores piden vehículos híbridos eficientes y bajo consumo de combustibles 2.Aumento de las tendencias de consumo 3.Los consumidores piden vehículos más innovadores 4.La expansión global 5.Crecimiento de las experiencias de la industria lento y constante SO 1.El desarrollo de nuevos vehículos en los combustibles alternativos (S1, S2, S4, O1, O3. O5) 2.Ofrecer nuevos productos innovadores - Aumento del mercado - motos (S1, S2, S3, O2, O3, O5) 3.Concéntrarse en hacer los mejores vehiculos de combustible eficiente WO 1.Realizar producción mas economica y de bajos impuesto Threats – T 1.Débil USD 2.Aumento de los precios del acero y resina 3.El aumento de los precios de la gasolina 4.Estrictas normas de emisión de CO2 5.El aumento de las tasas hipotecarias ST 1.Construir productos ecológicos con materiales alternativos (S2, S3, S4, T2, T3, T4) 2.Producir más autos para el mercado exterior (S1, S2, S4, T1, T4) WT 1.Combinar con los competidores (W1, W2, W5, T2, T3, T5) 2.Fabricación únicas partes de automóviles (W1, W2, T1, T2)
  • 28. SPACE Matrix FS +6 +1 +5 +4 +3 +2 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 IS Conservative Aggressive Defensive Competitive 28
  • 29. BCG Matrix Revenues % Revenues Profit % Profit % Market Share % Growth Rate NA 69365 45% -4161 - 61% -0.1 SA 7585 5% 1172 - 30% +33 Europe 36330 24% 744 - 81% -3 PAG 33067 21% -1872 - - +10 Asia 8032 5% 206 - 38% +3 Total 154379 100% -3911 - - -
  • 30. BCG Matrix Relative market share position in the industry High 1.0 Medium .50 Low 0.0 High+30Medium0Low-3 Industrysalesgrowthrate SA APA NA
  • 31. IE Matrix Hold and Maintain 31
  • 32. Grand Strategy Matrix Rapid Market Growth Quadrant II Quadrant I Strong Competitive Position Slow Market Growth Weak Competitive Position Quadrant III Quadrant IV
  • 33. Matrix Evaluation Alternative Strategies BCG IE SPACE GRAND COUNT Forward Integration x 1 Backward Integration x 1 Horizontal Integration x 1 Market Penetration x x x 3 Market Development x x 2 Product Development x x x 3 Concentric Diversification x x 2 Conglomerate Diversification x x 2 Horizontal Diversification x x 2 Joint Venture x 1 Retrenchment x x 2 Divestiture x x 2 Liquidation x 1
  • 34. Possible Strategies • Developing new vehicles on alternative fuels (S1, S2, S4, O1, O3, O5) – SO1 • Offer new innovative products – increase market share (S1, S2, S3, O2, O3, O5) – SO2 • Concentrate on making the best fuel efficient cars (S1, S2, S3, S4, O1, O4, O5) – SO3
  • 35. QSPM
  • 36. Strategic Plan for the Future
  • 37. Objectives for the 2008 - 2010 • Reduce manufacturing expenses by 15-20% 2008 • Introduce new small fuel efficient vehicles 2009 • Enter Latin American and Asian market with hybrid vehicles 2010 • Develop affordable electric car for US market 2009-2010 • Increase market share 2009-2010 • Build up strong financials (increase net income and EPS by 15%) 2009-2010
  • 38. Recommendation • Manufacturing of new small fuel-efficient vehicle $ 7,000,000,000 • Entering the Latin American and Asian market with hybrids $ 20,000,000,000 • Implementation of electric car in the US market $ 13,000,000,000 Total Cost = $ 40,000,000,000
  • 40. EPS/EBIT • Amount needed: $40,000,000,000 • Stock price: $7.42 • Interest rate: 7.5% • Tax rate: 0% (firm is having a loss) • # of shares outstanding: 2,195,000,000 • # shares needed: 500,404,312
  • 41. EPS/EBIT Common stock financing Debt financing Recession Normal Boom Recession Normal Boom EBIT 10 20 40 10 20 40 Interest 0 0 0 1.5 1.5 1.5 EBIT 10 20 40 8.5 18.5 38.5 Taxes 0 0 0 0 0 0 EAT 10 20 40 8.5 18.5 38.5 #shares 2.695 2.695 2.695 2.695 2.695 2.695 EPS 3.71 7.42 14.84 3.15 6.86 14.28 *data in $ billion
  • 42. Other Issues • Laws and regulations in foreign countries • Regain lost trust in the Ford’s brand
  • 46. Sources • Ford Motor Company Annual Report 2007 • General Motors Annual Report 2007 • http://www.ford.com/about-ford/investor- relations • Datamonitor – Global Automobile Industry manufacturer 2006 • Pictures taken from Web