EXPOSURE AND AVOIDANCE MECHANISM OF BLACK HOLE AND JAMMING ATTACK IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORK

International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJCSEIT), Vol.7, No.1, February 2017
DOI : 10.5121/ijcseit.2017.7102 13
EXPOSURE AND AVOIDANCE MECHANISM OF
BLACK HOLE AND JAMMING ATTACK IN MOBILE
AD HOC NETWORK
Harsh Pratap Singh1
and Rashmi Singh2
1
Department of Computer Engineering, Sri Satya Sai University of Technology and
Medical Sciences, Sehore (M.P.) India
2
Radharaman Institute of Technology and Science, Bhopal (M.P.) India
ABSTRACT
Mobile ad hoc network (MANETs) is an infrastructure-less/self-configurable system in which every node
carries on as host or router and every node can participate in the transmission of packets. Because of its
dynamic behaviour such system is more susceptible against various sorts of security threats, for example,
Black hole, Wormhole , Jamming , Sybil, Byzantine attack and so on which may block the transmission of
the system. Black hole attack and Jamming attack is one of them which promote itself has shortest or new
fresh route to the destination while jamming attack which make activity over the system. This paper
introduces the thorough literature study for the Black hole attack and jamming attack of both the attack by
various researchers.
KEYWORDS
Black Hole attack, Infrastructure-less, Jamming, MANET, Wormhole.
1. INTRODUCTION
Rise of moveable wireless communication gadgets and rising in cell innovation has made portable
mobile ad hoc network (MANET) across the board in civil and military applications. The
importance for mobile ad hoc network stem from its capacity to deliver moment organizing
determination in a range wherever the cell framework is either immoderate or difficult to convey.
MANETs will be sent while not the need for any mounted framework like base stations. Nodes in
MANET amass among themselves to decide the system progressively. They go about as a source
also as switch. As an asset they produce the bundle and as a switch they forward the parcel.
Parcels are transmitted from source to goal in multi-bounces. MANETs has gigantic applications
everyone in military and civil (therapeutic, mobile processing, Disaster recuperation) [1]. Uses of
MANET rely on upon the viability of steering convention. Nodes in MANET are powerful by
electro-synthetic batteries whose ability is limited. Services or substitutions of these batteries
won't not be conceivable. The improvement of little, less expensive and all the more capable
gadgets construct MANET a quickest creating system. A specially appointed system is self-
versatile and self-sorting out. Portable impromptu system gadgets ought to be skilled to decide the
presence of different gadgets and perform vital set up to give correspondence and sharing of
administration and information. Specially appointed systems administration allows the gadgets to
oversee connections to the system and also effectively joining and disposing of gadgets to and
from the system. On account of hub versatility, the system setup may change oftentimes and
capriciously all through time. The system is not-incorporated, where message conveyance and
system association must be performed by the nodes themselves. Steering of message is an issue in
a decentralize climate where the design fluctuates. While the most brief way from a source hub to
a goal hub relying upon a gave cost capacity in an altered system is regularly the ideal course, this
idea is mind boggling to investigate in MANET [2][3]. The applications set for MANETs are

14
adaptable, different, extending from expansive scale, exceedingly dynamic in nature, too little,
settled systems that are controlled by force sources. Alongside, legacy applications that move
from customary foundation environment into the specifically agreed connection, scores of new
offices can and will be delivered for the new climate. MANET is more powerless when
contrasted with wired system in view of portable nodes, assaults from bargained nodes inside the
system, limited physical security, dynamic design, adaptability and inadequacy of incorporated
administration. Because of these susceptibilities, MANET is more defenseless against serious
threats.
Figure 1: Architecture of Mobile Ad hoc Network
1.1 Security Goals
Security incorporates a gathering of speculations that are adequately financed. In MANET, all
systems administration exercises, i.e. Directing and parcel sending are executed by nodes
themselves in a self-arranging way. For these causes, ensuring a portable ad–hoc network is
exceptionally testing. The targets to gauge if portable specially appointed system is secured or not
are as per the following [12]:
i) Availability: Availability suggests the assets are open to validated gatherings at reasonable
times. Accessibility applies both to administrations and to information. It guarantees the
survivability of system administration notwithstanding Dos assault.
ii) Confidentiality: Confidentiality agrees that PC related assets are gotten in a minute by
validated gatherings i.e. just the individuals who to have entry to something ought to will truly
get that entrance. To oversee privacy of some private data, we require holding them mystery
from all substances that don't have benefit to get to them. Classification is a few of the time
known as protection or mystery.
iii) Integrity: Integrity suggests that assets can be modified just by verified gatherings or just in
validated way. Adjustment includes composing, evolving status, erasing and making.
Trustworthiness guarantees that a message being transmitted is never harmed.
iv) Authentication: Authentication empowers a hub to guarantee the associate hub character it is
cooperating with. Confirmation is fundamentally certification that nodes in correspondence are
approved and not impersonators. Genuineness is affirmed in light of the fact that exclusive the
honest to goodness sender can create a message that will unscramble appropriately with the
mutual key.
v) Non denial: Non disavowal affirms that beneficiary and sender of a message can't deny that
they have ever sent or acquired such a message. This is valuable when we require perceiving if
a hub with some un-required capacity is traded off or not.

15
2. ROUTING PROTOCOLS
There are copiousness and dissimilar routing protocols in MANET and categories of
investigations have been completed in topical decades [4, 5]. In this fragment, introduces the
famous and popular routing protocols in MANET. Before a mobile node wants to communicate
with a target node, it should broadcast its present status to the neighbours due to the current
routing information is unfamiliar. According to how the information is acquired, the routing
protocols can be classified into reactive, proactive and hybrid routing.
Figure 2: Classification or Routing Protocol
2.1. Proactive (table-driven)Routing Protocol
The proactive routing is additionally called table-driven routing protocol. In this routing protocol,
mobile nodes occasionally communicate them by directing data to the neighbours. Every node
needs to keep up their directing table which not in present records the adjoining nodes and
reachable nodes additionally the quantity of bounces. At the end of the day, the greater parts of
the node need to assess their neighbourhoods the length of the system topology has changed.
Beside these lines, the advantage is that the overhead ascents as the system size expands, a critical
correspondence overhead inside a bigger system topology. Be that as it may, the favourable
position is that system status can be instantly reflected if the noxious aggressor joins. The key
well known sorts of the proactive sort are goal sequenced separation vector (DSDV) [6] directing
convention and upgraded join state steering (OLSR) [7] convention.
2.2. Reactive (on-demand) Routing Protocol
The reactive routing is furnished with another appellation named on-demand routing protocol.
Dissimilar to the proactive routing, the reactive routing is fundamentally instigates when nodes
yearning to transmit data packets. The quality is that the squandered data transfer capacity
initiated from the consistently communicate can be lessened. By and by, this may likewise be the
deadly twisted when there are any vindictive nodes in the system environment. The shortcoming
is that uninvolved directing strategy prompts some bundle misfortune. Here we quickly portray
two pervasive on-demand routing conventions which are Ad hoc on-demand vector (AODV) [8]
and dynamic source routing (DSR) [9] convention. AODV is built taking into account DSDV
routing. In AODV, every node just records the following bounce data in its directing table yet
keeps up it for supporting a routing path from source to destination nodes. On the off chance that
the goal node can't be come to from the source node, the course disclosure procedure will be
executed instantly. In the course disclosure stage, the source node communicates the course ask
for (RREQ) bundle first. At that point every single moderate node get the RREQ packet, however
parts of them send the route reply (RREP) packet to the source node if the goal node data is
happened in their routing table. Then again, the course support procedure is begun when the

16
system topology has changed or the association has fizzled. The source node is educated by a
course blunder (RRER) bundle first. At that point it uses the present directing data to choose
another routing way or restart the course disclosure process for upgrading the data in routing
table. The configuration thought of DSR depends on source directing. The source directing
implies that every information packet contains the routing way from source to goal in their
headers. Unlike the AODV which just records the following bounce data in the routing table, the
versatile nodes in DSR keep up their course reserve from source to goal node. In terms of the
above exchange, the routing way can be dictated by source node in light of the verity that the
routing data is recorded in the course store at every node. Nonetheless, the execution of DSR
declines with the versatility of system expands a lower packet conveyance proportion inside the
higher system portability.
2.3. Hybrid Routing Protocol
This protocol combines the essential features of proactive routing and reactive routing to
surmount the deficiencies of them. Nearly all hybrid routing protocols are premeditated as a
hierarchical or layered network framework. In the commencement, proactive routing is employed
to completely gather the unfamiliar routing information, subsequently using the reactive routing
to uphold the routing information when network topology changes. The proverbial hybrid routing
protocols are ZRP (Zone Routing Protocol) [10] and TORA (Temporally-Ordered Routing
Algorithm) [11].
Figure 3: Zone Routing Protocol
3. Black Hole Attack & Jamming Attack
3.1 Outline of Black Hole Attack
In a blackhole attack [13], a malicious node sends counterfeit routing information, ascertaining
that it has a best route and originates further good nodes to route data packets through the
malevolent one. For example, in AODV, the misbehaving nodes can send a counterfeit Route
Reply (incorporating a counterfeit destination sequence number that is made-up to be equal or
higher than the one contained in the Route Request) to the source node, claiming that it has an
excellent new route to the destination node. This rooted the source node to opt for the route that
passes through the attacker. For that reason, all traffic will be routed through the attacker, and so,
the attacker can break/abandon the traffic. There are two verities of Black hole attack.
3.1.1 Single Black Hole Attack
In this variety of attack only one malevolent node poach into the route and attack the MANET
(see Fig. 4) by dropping the data packets to its malicious node. The malevolent nodes have the
routing capability and the attacker take the merits of the lean routing protocols of MANET. The

17
most vulnerable routing protocol is AODV, which works on the principle that the node having
maximum sequence number may be consider as the fresh node that guarantees the loop free route.
For the multiple routes, the node which exhibits higher sequence number and having the least
hope count is considered as the fresh node with optimized route to the destination.
Figure 4: Structure of Single Black Hole Attack
3.1.2 Co-operative Black Hole Attack
While the malevolent node operates in a group and attack the wireless network that attack is well
known as co-operative Black Hole. In Fig. 5 the node 2 and node 3 act as black holes. The Attack
becomes complex when the multiple malicious node work in hands in gloves with each other and
disrupt the complete routing of the data. In the cooperative black hole attack the packet
forwarding capacity of the system shatter vigorously.
One address is needed, centre all address text. For two addresses, employ two cantered tabs and
so on. For three authors, you may have to extemporize.
Figure 5: Structure of Cooperative Black hole Attack
3.2 Outline of Jamming Attack
Jamming Attack: - It is a variety of DOS attack. There are several dissimilar attack strategies that
a jammer can accomplish in order to interfere with other wireless communications. Some
probable strategies are exposed below [14]:
• Persistent Jammer: A persistent jammer unremittingly emits a radio signal that signifies
random bits; the signal generator does not follow any MAC protocol.
• Deceptive Jammer: Dissimilar from the uninterrupted jammers, deceptive jammers do not
convey random bits instead they spread semi-valid packets. This means that the packet header is
lawful but the payload is useless.
• Random Jammer: Alternates among sleeping and jamming the channel. In the principal mode,
the jammer blocks for a random period of time (it can act either like a persistent jammer or a
deceptive jammer), and in the subsequent mode (the sleeping mode) the jammer turns its
transmitters off for alternative random period of time. The energy efficiency is determined as the
ratio of the length of the jamming period over the length of the sleeping period.
• Reactive Jammer: It tries not to discarded resources by only jamming after it senses that
somebody is transmitting. Its target is not the sender but the receiver, trying to input as much
noise as probable in the packet to transform as many bits as conceivable given that only a
A
CB
S
2 3
1
D

18
minimum amount of power is required to amend enough bits so that when a checksum is
performed over that packet at the receiver it will be classified as not lawful and thus discarded.
Figure 6: Jamming Attack
4. Literature Survey
This section describes literature about the former work done in the area of black hole attack and
jamming attack discovery and anticipation in mobile ad hoc network:
4.1 Black hole Attack Literature
Author/ Research Literature Work
Vimal Kumar and Rakesh
Kumar [15]
Presented a more proficient explanation for identifying a black hole
attack with less communication rate in the MANET, which is
predominantly susceptible compared to infrastructure-based
networks because of its mobility and shared broadcast nature. As an
adversary can effectively deploy blackhole attack in the network. It
can be seen that projected work is much protected than the existing
solutions. They also compared its performance to standard AODV
routing protocol. The experimental consequences showed that the
projected approach is better than standard AODV.
Gojiya et al. [16] Intended a resolution to the black hole attack in one of the utmost
prominent routing algorithm, ad-hoc on demand distance vector
(AODV) routing, for the MANETs. The anticipated scheme employs
the Watchdog mechanism to detect malevolent node with usage of
local information of intermediary node and propagates the
information of black hole node to all other node in network the
simulation consequences showed the proficiency of anticipated
scheme in presences of black hole node.
Alem and Xuan [17] Proposed a significant solution Intrusion Detection using Anomaly
Detection (IDAD). It employs host- based Intrusion Detection
System (IDS) method to scrutinize the activities of a host. An
anomaly activity is perceived on the basis of inventory data which is
composed and is given to the IDAD system. They compared every
action of a host with the audit data on the fly and isolate a host
(node) if any of its activity resembles an activity in the inventory
data. However, there are several drawback of this method. It
necessitates superfluous memory, decelerates down the system and is
impractical to implement in specific unsympathetic scenario.

19
Seryvuth Tan et. Al.[18] Anticipated a novel method for detecting and preventing these
attacks and securing a route to the destination in a resourceful
manner. The simulation outcomes showed. In this paper SRDAODV
method significantly increases the packet delivery ratio for three
types of environments with node mobility when black hole attacks
are going on the network. They will progress the security mechanism
for data transmissions. This paper, start nodes or source node and
destination node after a route has been reputable.
Apurva Jain et al.[19] This paper customized AODV, which is TAODV (Trust based
AODV), is a network. TAODV has numerous noteworthy features as
Nodes perform trusted routing behavior mainly according to the trust
relationship s among them. A node that executes black hole behavior
will be detected and challenges by the whole network TAODV
mollify the effect of Black Hole attack but average end-to-end delay
increases in TAODV. In Indoor background Pareto traffic condition,
gives the best result as far as average throughput is consider. On the
other hand, Exponential traffic condition gives the preeminent
outcome for average end-to-end delay and CBR traffic condition
traffic condition the best outcome for packet delivery ratio. In
Outdoor environment, Pareto traffic condition gives the preeminent
consequence for average throughput and packet delivery ratio and
Exponential traffic circumstance gives the best outcome for average
end-to-end delay.
Rakhi Sharma and Dr D.V
Gupta [20],
This wor, blackhole attack and its diverse exposure techniques are
presented with literature assessment of unusual research papers that
covers black hole exposure and anticipation mechanism. A blackhole
node behaves maliciously in network and suggested wrong data
routing information or may descent the messages receives from other
nodes. Therefore it is complicated to uncover black hole attack and
avoid network from them. These techniques are used in the evasion
of network from blackhole attack
4.2 Jamming Attack Literature
Author/ Research Literature Work
Soneram Verma and Prof.
Maya Yadav [21]
The projected protocols should be proficient in parameters of Packet
Delivery ratio (PDR), End-to-End Delay (E2E), normalized routing
load (NRL), Outstanding Energy and Throughput. Based on the
motivations to fabricate novel security measures to be incorporated in
popular routing protocols AODV, the endeavor of this work has been
implement trusted ad hoc on-demand routing (TAODV) protocols for
data transmission in MANET and discover jamming node in MANET
setup using TAODV protocol. Also evade the network from jamming
attack and advance the packet delivery fraction, throughput and end-
to-end delay, normalized routing load, Residual Energy even with the
existence of jamming attacks. The consequences of both AODV and
TAODV estimate to analyze that of those two types of protocols gives
higher performance.
Pawani Popli and Paru Raj
[22]
Anticipated method used for mitigating and thwarting jamming attacks
is enforced at the medium access control (MAC) layer that has an
assimilation of a number of coordination techniques. These are an

20
assimilation of Point Controller Functions (PCF) that are used to
coordinate whole network activities at the MAC layer and RTS/CTS
(Clear-To-Send) mechanisms which is a handshaking method that
dominate the collisions on the wireless network. In this OPNET
modeler is used to simulate the complete network performance and
technique.
Ashwini Magardey and Dr.
Tripti Arjariya [23]
Projected Intrusion Detection System (IDS) security scheme which is
recognized the attacker by their routing entry offered on further nodes
routing record. The attacker has dumped the complete performance of
network. The Multipath routing protocol AOMDV is provided the
multiple path if the attacker is occurs in established path. The
contagion from attack and performance metrics like throughput,
routing load is evaluated and observe the secure anticipated security
method is immobilized the routing misconducts of jamming attacker
and makes available secure AOMDV routing performance as like to
normal AOMDV performance.
Huang et al. [24]
Presented a message security method in MANETs that employs a trust
based multipath AOMDV routing combined with lax encryption,
yielding our so-called T-AOMDV scheme. Replication outcomes
using ns2 exhibit that our scheme is much more secured than
traditional multipath routing algorithms and a freshly proposed
message security scheme for MANETs. The performance measures
used are route assortment time and trust compromise. This prerequisite
poses a security confront when malevolent nodes are present in the
network. Indeed, the subsistence of such nodes may not simply disrupt
the normal network operations, but cause sober message security issue
concerns.
Aashish Mangla and Vandana
[25]
Recommended a method working for mitigating and thwarting
jamming attacks is implemented at the MAC layer that surrounds a
combination of different coordination mechanisms. These are an
amalgamation of Point Controller Functions (PCF) which were
utilized to coordinate whole network activities at the MAC layer and
RTS/CTS (Clear- To-Send) schemes which is a handshaking
technique that moderates the collisions on the wireless network. The
complete network performance and mechanism is modeled by
employing OPNET simulator.
Zhu et al. [26] In this work, they tackled the jamming attack difficulty in a systematic
way. Exclusively, they designed a protocol that was accomplished by
self-healing wireless networks under jamming attacks. The protocol
identified and debarred an insider jammer and later restores normal
data communications among benevolent nodes despite the presence of
jamming by an originally unknown compromised node. The proposed
system integrate key organization, jammer identification and jammer
segregation in one system. Eventually, they evaluated the protocol
with USRP devices and GNU Radio in the context of jammer
localization. The experiments demonstrated that the proposed protocol
must distinguish and segregate the insider jammer with high accuracy.
Kim et al. [27] Projected a methodology to localize a wireless node by using jamming
attack as the benefit of the network. The projected localization method
was divided into two phases. In primary phase, they ascertain the
location of the jammer using power adaptation techniques. In the
second phase, they employ these properties to extrapolate the locations

21
of jammed nodes. Together this, the author design a localization
protocol using this method, and demonstrated the feasibility of the
anticipated mechanism by conducting indoor experiments based on
IEEE 802.15.4 wireless nodes. The projected schemes consequence
indicated that for some circumstances the proposed mechanism might
be used to position mobile nodes under jamming attack.
5. CONCLUSION
Security is a basic issue in the field of PC network. They are more helpless against attack and we
have enhanced the quality and issues in Mobile Ad-hoc organize and routing protocol. In this
paper, we introduce the depiction about steering convention and writing work for the introduction
of black hole and jamming attack. All mechanism is great from their viewpoint yet not best from
all focuses. Components clarified in this paper can offer data about security capacities and an
aggregate visual check, which may be proper in a few applications. Be that as it may, there is
likewise prerequisite to display a particular situation to picture the effect of with and without
Jamming attack and black hole attack for the enhancing the routing protocol.
6. REFERENCE
[1] Abderrahmane Baadache and Ali Belmehdi 2014.Struggling against simple and cooperative black
hole attacks in multi-hop wireless ad hoc networks. Computer Networks, 73:173,184.
[2] Nital Mistry, Devesh C. Jinwala and Mukesh Zaveri, 2010. Improving AODV Protocol against
Blackhole Attacks. International Multi conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists vol. 2,
[3] Payal N. Raj and Prashant B. Swadas 2010. DPRAODV: A dynamic learning system against black
hole attack in AODV based MANET. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 2, Issue
3 , pp: 54-59.
[4] Royer EM, Toh C-K 1999. A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless
Networks. IEEE Personal Communications 6(2):46–55. DOI: 10.1109/98.760423
[5] Sanzgiri K, Dahill B 2002.A Secure Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks. Paper presented at the
10th International Conference on Network Protocols, Paris, France, 12-15
[6] Perkins CE, Bhagwat P 1994. Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing
(DSDV) for Mobile Computers. Paper presented at the ACM SIGCOMM’94 Conference, London,
United Kingdom.
[7] Acquet P, Muhlethaler P, Clausen T, Laouiti A, Qayyum A, Viennot L 2001. Optimized Link State
Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks. Paper presented at the IEEE International Multi Topic
Conference, Lahore, Pakistan, 28-30.
[8] Perkins CE, Royer EM 1999. Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing. Paper presented at the
Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, New Orleans, Louisiana.
[9] Johnson DB, Maltz DA 1996. Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. In: Imielinski
T, Korth H (eds) Mobile Computing, vol 353. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 153–181.
[10] Haas ZJ, Pearlman MR, Samar P 2002. The zone routing protocol (ZRP) for ad hoc networks. IETF
Internet Draft.
[11] Park V, Corson S 1998. Temporally-Ordered Routing Algorithm (TORA) Version 1 Functional
Specification. Internet Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force MANET Working Group.
[12] Kalyani Singh 1, Mamta Martolia 2016. A Review on Jamming attack in MANET. International
Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR) Volume 5, Issue 8.
[13] Krishan Kumar,Taranjit Singh Aulakh 2016. Black Hole Attack in MANETs Preventions and
Advancements: A Review, International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887)
International Conference on Advances in Emerging Technology (ICAET 2016).
[14] Baljinder Singh, Dinesh Kumar 2015. “Jamming attack in MANET: A Selected Review” ,
International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering 5(4), pp.
1264-1267.

22
[15] Vimal Kumar, Rakesh Kumar 2015. An Adaptive Approach for Detection of Blackhole Attack in
Mobile Ad hoc Network, International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Communication
&Convergence, Procedia Computer Science 48 ( 2015 ) 472 – 479.
[16] Jayshree Gojiya, Amit Nayak, Bimal Patel 2016. An Enhanced Approach of Detection and Prevention
of Black Hole Attack on AODV over MANET. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975
– 8887) Volume 142 – No.13.
[17] Yibeltal Fantahun Alem and Zhao Cheng Xuan, 2010. Preventing Black Hole Attack in Mobile Ad-
Hoc Networks Using Anomaly Detection, International Conference on Future Computer and
Communication, pp. 672-676.
[18] Seryvuth Tan and Keecheon Kim 2013. Secure Route Discovery for Preventing Black Hole Attacks
on AODV-based MANETs”978-0-7695-5088-6/13 © 2013 IEEE.
[19] Apurva Jain and Anshul Shrotriya 2015. Investigating the Effects of Black Hole Attack in MANET
under Shadowing Model with Different Traffic conditions” IEEE International Conference on
Computer, Communication and Control.
[20] Rakhi Sharma and Dr D.V Gupta 2016. Blackhole Detection and Prevention Strategies in DTN”,
International Journal Of Engineering And Computer Science ISSN: 2319-7242 Volume 5 Issues 8,
Page No. 17386-17391.
[21] Soneram verma1, Prof. Maya Yadav 2016 “Detection and Prevention for Jamming Attack in MANET
using TAODV Protocol”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET),
Volume: 03 Issue: 05.
[22] Pawani Popli1, Paru Raj 2016. Mitigation of Jamming Attack in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”,
International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, Vol. 4,
Issue 6.
[23] Ashwini Magardey, Dr. Tripti Arjariya 2013. Secure Detection and Prevention Scheme for Jamming
Attack in MANET, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064.
[24] Jing-Wei Huang, Isaac Woungang, Han-Chieh Chao, Mohammad S. Obaidat 2011. Multi-Path Trust-
Based Secure AOMDV Routing in Ad Hoc Networks, Publication in the IEEE Globecom.
[25] Ashish Mangla ,Vandana 2015. Prevention of Jamming Attack in MANET, International Journal of
Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR), Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2015.
[26] Longquan Li, Sencun Zhu, Don Torrieriy, Sushil Jajodia 2014.Self-Healing Wireless Networks under
Insider Jamming Attacks", IEEE-2014.
[27] Yu Seung Kim, Frank Mokaya, Eric Chen, and Patrick Tague 2012. All Your Jammers Belong To Us
- Localization of Wireless Sensors Under Jamming Attack, IEEE-2012.
AUTHORS BIOGRAPHY
Harsh Pratap Singh is Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Engineering in Sri
Satya Sai University of Technology and Medical Sciences, Sehore. He has teaching
experience of 9 years. He is currently pursuing PhD in CSE at Sri Satya Sai University of
Technology and Medical Sciences, Sehore. He has actively participated in many national
and international seminar and conferences. He has published research papers in reputed
journals. He is in editorial board Journal of Harmonized Research in Engineering and also
a reviewer board member in different journals.
Rashmi Singh is Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Engineering in
Radharaman Institute of Technology and Science, Bhopal. She has completed Master of
Technology in Computer Science and Engineering. She has presented paper in different
journals. She is also a reviewer board member of various journals.

EXPOSURE AND AVOIDANCE MECHANISM OF BLACK HOLE AND JAMMING ATTACK IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORK

Related slideshows

More Related Content

EXPOSURE AND AVOIDANCE MECHANISM OF BLACK HOLE AND JAMMING ATTACK IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORK