Eddystone vs i beacon
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•221 views
There is a need to understand the basic features extended by both iBeacon and Eddystone. Let’s assess the differences between the two beacon protocols to see what they offer.
Report
Share
Eddystone vs i beacon
- 2. Introduction • Google entered the beacon space when it launched Eddystone in July 2015, two years after Apple introduced iBeacon technology. In the presence of the two giants, Apple and Google, this relatively new technology saw a lot of traction. there is a need to understand the basic features extended by both iBeacon and Eddystone. • Let’s assess the differences between the two beacon protocols to see what they offer.
- 3. iBeacon vs Eddystone (Technology ) • Apple’s iBeacon iBeacon technology is a beacon protocol that has been built into Apple’s iOS 7 and later versions of mobile operating system that allows iPhones and iPads to constantly scan for Bluetooth devices nearby. Beacons use Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) which is a part of Bluetooth 4.0 specification. • Google’s Eddystone Google’s Eddystone, formerly called UriBeacon, is a beacon protocol for open-source beacons which could be manufactured by any business at an affordable cost.
- 4. iBeacon vs Eddystone (Compatibility ) • Apple’s iBeacon It is Android and iOS compatible, but native only for iOS • Google’s Eddystone It is Android and iOS compatible. In fact, it is cross-platform and thus is compatible with any platform that supports BLE beacons.
- 5. iBeacon vs Eddystone (Profile) • Apple’s iBeacon It is aproprietary software. Thus, the specificationis controlled by Apple. • Google’s Eddystone It is open-source. The specification is published openly on GitHub, under the open-source Apache v2.0 license, so that businesses and developers can access and contribute to it.
- 6. iBeacon vs Eddystone (Use) • Apple’s iBeacon It is simple to implement. • Google’s Eddystone coding when it comes to integration, since it sends more packets of information than iBeacon.
- 7. iBeacon vs Eddystone (Usage) • Apple’s iBeacon UUIDs, one of the components in the advertising packet, are basically tied in to the developer’s server. Therefore, when it is sent to a smartphone, the device would need a specific app to do a particular task with the information received. Therefore, a mobile app is necessary to receive messages via iBeacon. • Google’s Eddystone Eddystone, on the other hand, sends out URL in place of UUID, which can simply open in a web browser vis-à-vis specific apps. For iOS devices, it is supported by Chrome with the ‘Today’ notifications enabled, whereas for Android devices, it is supported on the ‘Physical Web’ browser.
- 8. iBeacon vs Eddystone (Security and Privacy) • Apple’s iBeacon There is no specific feature such as Ephemeral Identifiers (EIDs) in iBeacon. The signal transmitted by a beacon is a public signal and can be detected by any iOS device and certain Android devices with proper specifications. • Google’s Eddystone Eddystone has a built-in feature called EIDs that constantly change and allow beacons to broadcast a signal that can only be identified by ‘authorized clients’.
- 9. iBeacon vs Eddystone (API) • Apple’s iBeacon Apple has no specific API made available for iBeacon fleet management. Application Program Interface (API) is a set of routines, protocols, and tools for building software applications. It specifies how software components should interact. • Google’s Eddystone Eddystone has an advantage here since Google has launched two APIs (Nearby API and Proximity Beacon API) that makes Eddystone beacons more powerful. These APIs also make beacon fleet management much easier.
- 10. THANK YOU info@fidelitservices.com +91 9699356148 www.fidelitservices.com