SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Electric Power 2009, Chicago, USA Pre-Conference Workshop  EP09 PC8: Resurgence of Coal to Liquid and Gas - Current Status and Future Development An Update on the Global Markets for Coal-to-Liquids Technologies Dr Andrew W. Cox Energy Intelligence & Marketing Research 192 Sandyford Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 1RN UNITED KINGDOM. Tel: 44-191-261 5274 [email_address]
Introduction As part of the Electric Power 2007 conference, a pre-conference workshop containing a panel of distinguished speakers examined the future of coal liquefaction / coal-to-liquids [CTL] technologies. After two years it is appropriate to re-examine this topic and produce a progress report on the global developments and the outlook for the future.   CTL technologies have a long and distinguished pedigree – being initially developed in Europe during the first three decades of the Twentieth Century.   A wide spectrum of liquid fuels and other chemicals can be produced from coal - but these processes became uneconomic in the post-World War II era when large volumes of cheap crude oil from the Middle East and other oil producing countries entered the marketplace. Since then commercial interest in CTL has been sporadic and marginal in nature [primarily driven by energy security concerns and hikes in the price of crude oil].
The increase in the price of crude oil between 2005 and 2008 led to a new surge of interest and commercial activity. However, the collapse in the oil price between Summer 2008 and early 2009 – falling from US$147/barrel to below US$40/barrel caused many CTL projects to be abandoned or postponed.    In spite of this setback, the outlook for CTL in several parts of the world remains positive – with major production facilities undergoing construction and commissioning in China.   The inevitable recovery in global oil demand - as well as the peak production of light sweet crude oil in the next few years - will lead to crude oil prices recovering and will also underpin the requirement for alternative fuel sources, which include CTLs.  
Developing CTL Technologies There are several reasons behind the development of CTL projects: CTL technologies can offer greater security of supply in the provision of liquid fuels and chemicals for countries which have substantial coal reserves.   These countries are best characterised as being “oil poor, coal rich”. They have developing economies and a corresponding increase in vehicle numbers and demand for liquid fuels – as well as increasing imports of crude oil and petroleum products. CTL projects and associated developments have the potential to create higher paid employment in coalfield areas – thereby assisting economic development. Higher value liquid fuels and chemicals can be produced by CTL/polygeneration projects [compared to coal-based electricity technologies].

Recommended for you

Prezentation on pak energy
Prezentation on pak energyPrezentation on pak energy
Prezentation on pak energy

The document summarizes energy consumption and production trends in Pakistan from 1996-1997 to 2006-2007. Some key points: - Energy consumption grew faster in non-OECD countries like China and South Asia (3.0% annually) than in OECD countries (1.0%) from 1996-1997 to 2005-2006. - Primary energy supplies in Pakistan increased 4.3% from 55.5 MTOE in 2004-2005 to 57.9 MTOE in 2005-2006. Natural gas accounted for 50.4% of supplies and oil 28.4%. - Electricity generation capacity was 19,440 MW in July-March 2006-2007. WAPDA generated 63,

12 months, 5 sites, 1 billion tonnes of co2 storage by 2030. the eti introduc...
12 months, 5 sites, 1 billion tonnes of co2 storage by 2030. the eti introduc...12 months, 5 sites, 1 billion tonnes of co2 storage by 2030. the eti introduc...
12 months, 5 sites, 1 billion tonnes of co2 storage by 2030. the eti introduc...

Last week, the UK’s Energy Technologies Institute (ETI) published the results of its 12-month, £2.5million CO2 Storage Appraisal Project, Progressing development of the UK’s Strategic Carbon Dioxide Storage Resource. The Project, funded by the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change and carried out by Pale Blue Dot Energy, Axis Well Technology and Costain, confirmed that there are no technical hurdles to permanently storing large volumes of CO2 in offshore geological storage off the coast of the UK, including sites large enough to comfortably service CO2 supplies from mainland Europe. Over the course of 12 months this ambitious Project identified 20 specific CO2 storage sites (from a potential 579 sites) which together represent the tip of a very large strategic national CO2 storage resource potential, estimated to be around 78GT (78,000 million tonnes). Five of these sites were then selected for further detailed analysis given their potential contribution to mobilise commercial-scale CCS projects for power and industrial use in the UK. This Webinar provided an opportunity to dig deeper into the wealth of comprehensive data and modelling that has been made publically available through the publishing of this report, and to consider its significance for helping to de-risk future CCS investment decisions. To expertly guide us through this process, the Global CCS Institute was delighted to welcome Andrew Green, Programme Manager - Carbon Capture & Storage at the ETI, and Alan James, Managing Director at Pale Blue Dot Energy (the Consortium Lead for this project) to join us for the webinar. After an overview of the Project and a more detailed look at the final outcomes, Andrew and Alan were joined by subject matter specialists: Steve Murphy – Pale Blue Dot Energy, Angus Reid – Costain, and Sharon McCollough – Axis Well Technologies, for a live Q&A session for the second half of the webinar.

Energy transition
Energy transitionEnergy transition
Energy transition

The document discusses the ongoing global transition away from fossil fuels toward renewable energy. It outlines the rise of solar, wind, and other renewable sources of energy as coal, oil, and nuclear power decline. Coal use is peaking in many countries as plants close due to regulations and competition from cheaper renewables and natural gas. Solar and wind power have experienced remarkable cost declines and are increasingly outcompeting fossil fuels in many places. The transition is being driven by falling prices, technological advances, concerns about pollution and climate change, and shrinking fossil fuel reserves that are harder and more expensive to access.

energy
Gas-to-liquid technologies could also stimulate the development of underground coal gasification in some countries – with the product gases used for [co-production] electricity generation and liquid fuel production.   “ Stranded” [isolated] and low rank/poor quality coal deposits can be utilised in the production of liquid fuels. These are deposits which may be too remote from demand centres to be used for electricity generation or too poor in quality and therefore uneconomic for the coal export trade.
CTL Technologies Despite being a solid fossil fuel, coal can be converted into a liquid fuel - a process known as liquefaction. One tonne of coal can produce between one and four barrels of liquids depending on the composition of the coal used and the CTL technology employed.   The liquid fuels produced from coal can be refined to produce transport fuels and a wide of range other products [such as plastics and solvents]. There are two main types of CTL technology: Direct  and  Indirect.
Direct Coal Liquefaction [DCL] DCL processes aim to add hydrogen to the organic structure of the coal, breaking it down only as far as is necessary to produce distillable liquids.   Many different processes have been developed, but most are closely related in terms of underlying reaction chemistry. Common features are the dissolution of a high proportion of pulverised coal in a solvent at elevated temperatures and pressures, followed by the hydrocracking of the dissolved coal with H 2  and a catalyst.   DCL technologies may involve several stages - with the syncrude being upgraded to the desired range of products using conventional refining techniques.
DCLs have been developed by a wide range of companies and research organisations over recent decades.   Papers from Lowell Miller of the US Department of Energy have listed 7 single-stage DCL technologies & 11 two-stage technologies – with an additional 6 involving mild pyrolysis and 13 co-processing and dry hydrogenation systems.

Recommended for you

llM University of Reading 2013 Carbontrading
llM University of Reading 2013 CarbontradingllM University of Reading 2013 Carbontrading
llM University of Reading 2013 Carbontrading

The document discusses carbon trading and the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) which allows developed countries to implement emissions-reducing projects in developing countries to earn carbon credits. It provides background on climate change and outlines how the CDM works and its objectives. Case studies of the CDM in Malaysia and China are presented, highlighting different project types and the economic and environmental benefits, as well as challenges, of the CDM.

law
AP-122-Hetero-Polyaromatic-Ring-Opening-Reactions-in-scCO21
AP-122-Hetero-Polyaromatic-Ring-Opening-Reactions-in-scCO21AP-122-Hetero-Polyaromatic-Ring-Opening-Reactions-in-scCO21
AP-122-Hetero-Polyaromatic-Ring-Opening-Reactions-in-scCO21

This document discusses using supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) for upgrading oil sands, coal, biomass, and transportation fuels with less energy than conventional processes. It describes how scCO2 can play several key roles in bitumen upgrading and integrated clean coal and biomass technologies. Experimental results show superior hydrogen desulfurization and denitrogenation conversions in scCO2 compared to conventional solvents, at remarkably mild conditions (100-200°C lower). Reactions produced high levels of hydrocracking products like ethylcyclohexane. The findings suggest scCO2 is a promising medium to develop highly active hydrogenating catalysts for ultra-deep desulfurization needed to meet stringent fuel regulations.

Modernising the european lignite triangle
Modernising the european lignite triangleModernising the european lignite triangle
Modernising the european lignite triangle

In a new study, Agora Energiewende and Forum Energii analyse the opportunity for a phase out from lignite and the effects this would have in the power sector in Poland, Czech Republic, and Germany by 2032. The study finds that an accelerated phase out is technically and economically feasible if coordinated among the three countries – provided, lignite is being substituted by renewable energy sources.

lignitecoalenergy
Indirect Coal Liquefaction [ICL] Indirect Coal Liquefaction [ICL] has evolved since the 1920s when the  Fischer-Tropsch [FT]  process was developed in Germany. FT involves, at a first step, the complete breakdown of the coal structure by gasification with steam. The composition of the gasification products is then adjusted to give the required mixture of H 2  and CO, and to remove sulphur-containing catalyst poisons. The resulting "synthesis gas" is reacted over a catalyst at relatively low pressures and temperatures.  A range of catalyst compounds are used in the FT processes developed by different companies – including iron, cobalt and molybdenum.   The product spectrum from the FT plant and refinery depends on the temperatures and pressures in the process, gas composition, catalysts used, etc. The products may be paraffins, olefinic hydrocarbons or alcohols (particularly methanol).  
ICL technologies have been developed by several companies. These include: Sasol Rentech  Syntroleum Mobil Shell Hybrid Direct-Indirect systems have also been developed –  such as Headwaters potential project in the Philippines.     
The Rentech Process The Syntroleum Process
FT diesels are among the best liquid transportation fuels available in the world today. They meet or exceed all current and proposed international emission standards.   FT diesel fuels have:   High Cetane Index Numbers – a measure of ignition quality and fuel efficiency of a diesel fuel (FT diesels usually have an index number >70, compared to 30-50 for traditional diesels]; Ultra-low levels of sulphur and aromatics;   Lower levels of CO, NO X  and particulate emissions compared to many diesel fuels. FT diesels can also be blended to produce biodiesels.    

Recommended for you

Air Capture & Carbon Negative Technology - Graciela Chichilnisky (October 17,...
Air Capture & Carbon Negative Technology - Graciela Chichilnisky (October 17,...Air Capture & Carbon Negative Technology - Graciela Chichilnisky (October 17,...
Air Capture & Carbon Negative Technology - Graciela Chichilnisky (October 17,...

Air Capture & Carbon Negative Technology - Economics & Engineering - Graciela Chichilnisky (October 17, 2012 @ Cambridge University)

CCS learnings from the LNG sector
CCS learnings from the LNG sectorCCS learnings from the LNG sector
CCS learnings from the LNG sector

The liquefied natural gas sector has experienced large growth in the last decade and is expected to grow more in the decades to come. WorleyParsons recently completed a study for the Global CCS Institute to identify the trends in the LNG sector and to make a range of assessments on how these trends may impact on the CCS industry. At this webinar, Graeme Cox, Principal Consultant from WorleyParsons focused on looking at industry wide and project specific aspects of LNG and relate these to industry wide and project specific aspects of CCS. The cost escalation of LNG projects was explained as well as the impact this may have on the deployment of CCS. Graeme concluded by identifying opportunities whereby LNG and CCS can be integrated.

Grangemouth CCS project, Stephen Kerr, Summit Power - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Bia...
Grangemouth CCS project, Stephen Kerr, Summit Power - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Bia...Grangemouth CCS project, Stephen Kerr, Summit Power - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Bia...
Grangemouth CCS project, Stephen Kerr, Summit Power - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Bia...

This document provides an overview and update of the Caledonia Clean Energy Project (CCEP). It summarizes that CCEP aims to build a 570MW gasification power plant in Grangemouth, Scotland that would capture 94% of CO2 emissions from coal. It would transport the captured CO2 via existing pipelines to offshore storage. The project is currently finalizing a grant agreement and work program to further develop preliminary design and feasibility over 18 months. Long term, CCEP aims to be the anchor project for a full integrated CCS system in Scotland capturing from multiple sources and storing in multiple offshore locations while enabling enhanced oil recovery.

Co-Production / Polygeneration Schemes ICL can also be the basis for complex co-production schemes [sometimes referred to as "Poly-generation"] - involving coal gasification, hydrogen production, liquid fuels production, chemicals and fertiliser production, and Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle [IGCC] electricity generation. Many papers and report on this topic stress that poly-generation systems help “maximise the value of coal”.
Future CTL Technologies? Since the CTL workshop at EP 2007 there have been several reports and papers highlighting potential CTL technological advances.   There have been several reports highlighting the use of  plasma gasification technology  in future CTL processes. Research is being carried out in several countries – including the US and Japan.  In a paper published in November 2008, researchers in Italy proposed a  new dual-bed configuration for coal gasification  that, in laboratory simulations of Coal-to-Liquids production, is 71.1% more energy efficient; increases the mass yield of synthetic fuel by 39.4%; and releases 31.9% less CO 2  than conventional gasification.  The lead researcher for the study was Dr Maria Sudiro of the University of Padova. This research is ongoing.
The proposed CO 2  and H 2  pathway (bottom) rather than the traditional CO and H 2  pathway (top) can improve efficiency and reduce CO 2  emissions by 15%. In March 2009, r esearch workers from the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits), South Africa and Rutgers University published a brief description of a new Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) reaction chemistry and process designs that they say could increase F-T process efficiency and reduce CO 2  emissions by 15% compared to the conventional process.  The new process [outlined below], which uses a carbon dioxide and hydrogen route rather than the traditional carbon monoxide and hydrogen route, could also open up a pathway for the direct use of CO 2  and H 2  derived from low-carbon processes (nuclear, wind, solar, bio).
Development Timescales? It is unlikely that these new CTL technological options will be commercialised before  2020 – but they offer considerable opportunities to significantly increase the efficiencies of CTL  conversion and as well as reducing the environmental  impacts of many CTL processes.

Recommended for you

Slides from Launch of Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2013
Slides from Launch of Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2013Slides from Launch of Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2013
Slides from Launch of Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2013

Slides used at the launch of the International Energy Agency's (IEA) new edition of the Medium-Term Gas Market Report (MTGMR), for 2013. The launch event was held at the International Economic Forum in St. Petersburg, Russia on June 20, 2013.

hydraulic fracturingieamaria van der hoeven
Gas Arabia Summit: Unconventional Gas Developments in the Gulf
Gas Arabia Summit: Unconventional Gas Developments in the GulfGas Arabia Summit: Unconventional Gas Developments in the Gulf
Gas Arabia Summit: Unconventional Gas Developments in the Gulf

Rana Samaha, Middle East R&A Director at Energy Intelligence, presented at the 10th Gas Arabia Summit, Dubai, January 13, 2015. These slides include content on: 1.) US Shale gas developments: Key success factors 2.) GCC gas imbalances; role of unconventional gas developments 3.) GCC NOC's different approaches; Saudi Aramco's mandate

unconventional gasenergy industryoil industry
CO₂ Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea: Securing a Low-Carbon...
CO₂ Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea: Securing a Low-Carbon...CO₂ Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea: Securing a Low-Carbon...
CO₂ Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea: Securing a Low-Carbon...

CO₂ Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea: Securing a Low-Carbon Future for the UK, Stuart Haszeldine, University of Edinburgh - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Biannual 8-9 September 2015

International Developments South Africa South Africa has been the world leader in CTL technologies for several decades – with the corporation Sasol having built large-scale plants using indirect coal liquefaction technology at Sasolburg in the 1950s and Secunda in the 1980s.  Sasol current consumes up to 30m tonnes/year of coal, producing up to 150,000 barrels/day of liquid fuels and chemicals.  Sasol's plant at Secunda  The company has been evaluating the construction of a further 80,000 barrels/day liquid fuels plant at  Mafutha near Lephalale, South Africa. A nalysts have said this multi-billion dollar project would have major environmental and financial hurdles to overcome before it is approved by both Sasol itself and the South African government.
South Africa II During March 2009 Sasol announced that it was scaling back capex by 40% over the next three years. The corporation is involved in joint ventures to evaluate or develop GTL and CTL projects in several countries – including India, China [with Shenhua Group], the US, India, Uzbekistan and Qatar. Sasol is also in early talks about a project to convert Indonesia’s reserves of lignite into liquid fuels.   Pat Davies, Sasol chief executive, was reported by the Financial Times as saying “I still believe these big projects are viable.” However, he said the company had not yet decided which initiatives would fall by the wayside.
China Since the last workshop in Electric Power 2007 the Chinese CTL sector has moved forward with several commercial developments. A series of coal-to-chemicals projects, based on gasification technology, have been completed in several Chinese provinces. Other CTL plants, using DCL and ICL technologies are also under construction. However, in August 2008 the central government had placed severe restrictions on many liquefaction projects under construction.  It felt that too many projects were being developed before the technologies were proven at the commercial scale.
However, the most prominent CTL project is being developed in Inner Mongolia by the integrated mining and energy  Shenhua Group Co .   This huge DCL project, which is being built in two stages, will have an estimated annual output of 5 million tonnes. The first stage includes three production lines with total investment of 24.535 billion yuan. The first line has cost 12.3 billion yuan and has a predicted oil yield of 1.08 million tonnes a year. The first trial operation of this plant was launched on 30 th  December 2008 and the quality end products, diesel, naphtha and liquefied natural gas, were produced on the second day. The trial was stopped after it ran successfully for more than 300 hours. Further extended trials will be carried out during Spring/Summer 2009. It is currently anticipated that this initial stage of the plant will be fully commissioned before the end of 2009.

Recommended for you

7th study meeting Tokyo - Holger Bietz
7th study meeting Tokyo - Holger Bietz7th study meeting Tokyo - Holger Bietz
7th study meeting Tokyo - Holger Bietz

On 16 May 2013, the Global CCS Institute hosted its seventh study meeting in Tokyo. This presentation is by Holger Bietz, the Institute's General Manager, Projects, Financial and Commercial.

The Role of Carbon Removals-Brussels
The Role of Carbon Removals-Brussels The Role of Carbon Removals-Brussels
The Role of Carbon Removals-Brussels

This document discusses the need for carbon removal technologies to combat climate change and proposes Global Thermostat's technology as a solution. It notes that carbon neutral is not enough and carbon negative approaches are required to reduce CO2 levels according to the IPCC. Global Thermostat has developed an air capture technology that can make going carbon negative possible. The document outlines Global Thermostat's pilot projects and describes how their technology could capture billions of tons of CO2 annually from power plant waste heat in the US. It proposes using funding from a Green Climate Fund and carbon market to build carbon negative power plants globally.

Carbon Finance
Carbon FinanceCarbon Finance
Carbon Finance

This document outlines a research plan for analyzing the price determinants and volatility of EU emission allowances (EUAs) and certified emission reductions (CERs). The plan includes an introduction to carbon finance, the Kyoto Protocol, and the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). It then reviews relevant literature on EU ETS price formation, econometric modeling approaches, and determinants of carbon dioxide emissions. Finally, it describes the proposed research methodology, including identifying gaps in current research, objectives, design, variables, data sources, models, hypotheses, analyses, and implications. The plan is to guide research on the financial risk and opportunities associated with the carbon market.

cdmcereua
Extract from China Daily – 22 nd  January 20 09 [Location of Ordos, Inner Mongolia]
The coal-to-liquids plant operated by Shenhua Group in Ordos, Inner Mongolia autonomous region.  [China Daily – 8 th  January 2009]
Another CTL project has been developed in Inner Mongolia by  Yitai Group . In March 2009, Yitai Group announced a successful test run with its 160,000-tonne indirect CTL facility, producing quality diesel oil and naphtha.    Based in Jungar Banner, Inner Mongolia, Yitai Group has an annual output of 100 million tonnes of coal. Its CTL project was approved by the central government in 2005 and began construction in 2006, with an investment of nearly 2.7 billion yuan (395 million U.S. dollars).    Yitai Group plans to upgrade the facility and extend its annual production capacity to 600,000 tons with ultimate capacity of five million tons.   The Yitai facility is China's first industrial-scale CTL plant using ICL technology.  The company has indicated that by improving the technology and having economies of scale in the next generation of ICL plants, it can reduce production costs to approximately US$40/barrel crude oil equivalent.
China Outlook I The outlook for CTL plant developments in China is currently unclear.   Reports in the Chinese media at the start of 2009 indicated that the country’s government was more favourably included to allow the development of CTL projects – as they will assist the country’s energy security. Both Shenhua Group,  Yitai Group and other companies with ongoing commercial developments  are currently proceeding with their project schedules. Other companies in China – including the mining group Datang and state-owned petroleum giant CNOOC – have announced that they are actively evaluating the development of new coal gasification/CTL projects [including a possible large project in Shanxi province]. However, other key partners in the Chinese CTL sector – most notably Sasol and Shell – appear to have postponed their development plans for the next few years.   

Recommended for you

111158_CCM
111158_CCM111158_CCM
111158_CCM

Statoil is establishing a full-scale carbon capture project at Mongstad, Norway to capture up to 1.2 million tonnes of CO2 annually from the combined heat and power plant. This project is a collaboration between the Norwegian government, Statoil, Shell and Sasol to test and improve carbon capture technologies at an industrial scale. The captured CO2 will help Norway establish a complete carbon capture and storage value chain to combat climate change.

Qiao and Zhou - CCS in China and the Guangdong CCS readiness study - Presenta...
Qiao and Zhou - CCS in China and the Guangdong CCS readiness study - Presenta...Qiao and Zhou - CCS in China and the Guangdong CCS readiness study - Presenta...
Qiao and Zhou - CCS in China and the Guangdong CCS readiness study - Presenta...

This document outlines a carbon capture and storage readiness study conducted in Guangdong, China. It provides background on carbon emissions and policy in China, highlighting the country's continued reliance on coal. The study aimed to determine if carbon capture and storage (CCS) is needed and applicable in Guangdong. Key tasks included analyzing emissions and storage capacity from major point sources in Guangdong. Preliminary results found power plants accounted for 66% of emissions. Two potential inland storage basins were identified but have low capacity. The Pearl River Mouth Basin offshore has potential for higher storage due to its large size and sediment thickness. The study seeks to inform Guangdong's CCS roadmap and policy.

carbonglobal ccs instituteco2
Coal to Liquid Market.pptx
Coal to Liquid Market.pptxCoal to Liquid Market.pptx
Coal to Liquid Market.pptx

The document discusses coal-to-liquid (CTL) technology, which converts coal into liquid fuels like diesel, gasoline, and jet fuel. It describes the basic CTL process of coal gasification, syngas generation, Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, and product refining. While CTL provides energy security and fuel versatility, it also faces challenges of high costs and large carbon emissions. The global CTL market is projected to experience significant growth by 2030, especially in regions with abundant coal like North America, Asia Pacific, and South Africa.

coal to liquid
China Outlook II Royal Dutch Shell said in mid-April 2009 that it had decided to postpone a coal-to-liquids (CTL) joint project with Shenhua Group in the Ningxia Hui autonomous region. But the company added that it will keep playing an active role in China's coal gasification sector. Recent Chinese publications have predicted that the country could have 30 million to 50 million tonnes of CTL production capacity by 2020.
  USA The US is currently reliant on overseas suppliers for over 65% of its crude oil supplies - and this figure is set to rise still further over the next decade making the US increasingly vulnerable to geopolitical turmoil, supply disruptions and future price hikes. While the US has a rapidly diminishing volume of crude oil reserves, it possesses significant indigenous coal resources [much of which can be economically extracted]. Proven reserves of coal exist in 26 states - and US reserves amount to 250-years supply at current rates of consumption.
US CTL Project Activity Until recently, activity in the USA centred around the development of several coal-to-liquids pilot plant projects. However, over the last two years several larger-scale coal liquefaction/polygeneration projects have been announced. Major projects  [involving feasibility studies, design stage work, or construction phase] involve several companies and project partners. These include: DKRW Advanced Fuels Rentech  Headwaters WMPI AIDEA Diversified Energy Synfuel Inc.  The projects have capacities ranging from 2,000 to 80,000 barrels/day.
US CTL Project Activity [continued] Syntroleum Corporation have formed a joint venture wit Tyson Foods. Dynamic  Fuels  will utilise Syntroleum’s Technology to convert animal fats and greases provided by Tyson into ultra-clean renewable diesel and jet fuel. The first production plant is being constructed at Geismar, Louisiana. Several  Canadian companies  [including Cash Minerals, Silverado, West Hawk Development Corp] are also evaluating or developing CTL projects – primarily in North America & China.   

Recommended for you

Coal Liquefaction
Coal LiquefactionCoal Liquefaction
Coal Liquefaction

Coal liquefaction is a process that converts coal into liquid fuels like diesel or gasoline. There are two main types of coal liquefaction: direct and indirect. Direct liquefaction involves partially refining coal directly into synthetic crude oil, while indirect liquefaction first gasifies coal into syngas and then converts the syngas into liquid fuels using processes like Fischer-Tropsch or the Bergius process. Major countries investing in coal liquefaction include China, South Africa, and Australia. It offers benefits like energy security but also faces challenges of high costs and potential environmental impacts.

Solid Fuels 6-A
Solid Fuels 6-ASolid Fuels 6-A
Solid Fuels 6-A

Coal liquefaction and carbonization are processes to convert coal into liquid and gaseous fuels. Liquefaction increases the hydrogen to carbon ratio in coal to produce synthetic crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbon fuels through either direct or indirect methods. Carbonization is the process of heating coal to drive off volatile liquid and gaseous products, leaving behind a solid residue called coke. High-temperature carbonization produces metallurgical coke for blast furnaces, while low-temperature carbonization was developed to produce town gas and smokeless fuel.

Relevant Details of Matthew Stone Project RF1, Renovare RF1, Matthew Stone
Relevant Details of Matthew Stone Project RF1, Renovare RF1, Matthew StoneRelevant Details of Matthew Stone Project RF1, Renovare RF1, Matthew Stone
Relevant Details of Matthew Stone Project RF1, Renovare RF1, Matthew Stone

To learn about biogas to liquid fuel technology expert Matthew Stone Renovare Fuels Chairman. Find latest info of matthew stone, matthew stone project rf1, renovare project rf1, renovare rf1. For more details visit on here: - https://matthewstoneprojectrf1.blogspot.com/ Search Query:- Matthew Stone Matthew Stone Project RF1 Renovare Fuels Renovare Project RF1 Renovare RF1

duncan clark project rf1matthew stone project rf1renovare project rf1
Important US CTL Project DKRW Advanced Fuel s are developing a large CTL project at  Medicine Bow , Carbon County, Wyoming. This proposed p roject is a greenfield, mine-mouth, industrial gasification facility producing methanol – which will be converted to produce 15,000 to 20,000 barrels per day of gasoline using ExxonMobil methanol-to-gasoline (MTG) technology. Arch Coal are a major shareholder in the DKRW Advanced Fuels. In March 2009 DKRW reported that the construction phase of the project is expected to begin in 2010 – with fuel production scheduled for 2010 [timescale being subject to the project obtaining all the necessary permits]. The project has been delayed by the fall in the price of crude oil and the credit crunch in 2008/09 - and also faces significant opposition from environmental groups.
Progress and Delays Several factors have either delayed the construction of the many US CTL projects – or effectively led to them being postponed for an indefinite period.  These can be summarised under the following headings: The decline in the price of crude oil and oil products during 2008/09; The credit crunch – which has caused project finance to dry up; Rising construction costs [which in some cases doubled between 2006 and 2008]; Uncertainty over environmental regulations – particularly the need for carbon capture and storage [CCS] at major projects.
Aircraft Fuel Testing Support for CTL has been provided by the US Department of Defense in developing its Clean Fuel Initiative.  A selection of coal-based and biomass-based fuels have been tested in a range of aircraft. Sampling tubing and instrumentation control cables laid out on the pavement  beside NASA’s DC-8 flying laboratory in between synthetic fuels emission and  engine performance tests at the Dryden  Aircraft Operations Facility in Palmdale,  California. During early 2009 NASA and 11 other research groups, including researchers from the US Department of Defense (DoD), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), tested two synthetic jet fuels derived from gasified coal and natural gas using the Fischer-Tropsch process (Jet CTL and GTL). These tests are part of the Alternative Aviation Fuel Experiment  [AAFEX].
Environmental Opposition Many environmental groups in the US have been extremely vocal in their opposition to new CTL plants - saying the plants are dirty and will only increase the nation’s carbon footprint and cause more global warming. Their influence at the Congressional and State levels has undermined the support for CTL from the sector’s key political allies. Protesters in Washington D.C. – 1 st  May 2009 US OUTLOOK It currently looks like CTL in the US will  not  make a significant contribution to liquid fuel production until at least the middle of the next decade – assuming that the financing is available for a new generation of plants and that environmental constraints and political opposition are overcome.  

Recommended for you

CCS Forum Report - Summary report - July 2016 with FSC
CCS Forum Report - Summary report - July 2016 with FSCCCS Forum Report - Summary report - July 2016 with FSC
CCS Forum Report - Summary report - July 2016 with FSC

1. Key priorities for CCS discussed at the forum include developing frameworks to understand the interplay between CCS technologies and markets, screening new sorbents and solvents for CO2 capture, and de-risking CO2 storage infrastructure. 2. Standards need to be established for evaluating new CO2 capture processes, and utilizing CO2 via enhanced oil recovery can help develop transportation infrastructure in the near-term. 3. Meeting long-term climate targets requires supporting CCS research and deploying the technology, as options like BECCS rely on a mature CCS industry. Funding is urgently needed to progress CCS deployment.

Coal To liquid
Coal To liquidCoal To liquid
Coal To liquid

Coal to liquid (CTL) is a process that converts coal into synthetic fuels by liquefying it. It was not economically viable when oil prices were low but interest has grown with higher oil prices. CTL is best for countries with large coal reserves but high oil import dependence, like India and China. While it enhances energy security, CTL faces challenges from high costs and environmental concerns unless carbon capture technology is used. Several CTL plants have been proposed or announced internationally but many face technical, economic, and environmental barriers.

coalliquid fuels
carbon capture storage.pdf
carbon capture storage.pdfcarbon capture storage.pdf
carbon capture storage.pdf

As that known carbon dioxide recorded high level of this last years and as agreed in IPCC, that must take serious steps to prevent it and, carbon capture storage is the best candidate thing that has can be done to this issue.

India India has shown considerable interest during the last four years in developing a CTL sector – based on the country’s large coal reserves.    The country has a growing volume of crude oil imports, partly due to an increasing vehicle population and corresponding increase in demand for transportation fuels. Considerable preparatory work has been carried out by the Indian Government to develop the necessary policy framework and other requirements that will underpin a new CTL sector in the country.   During 2008 there were several reports that South Africa's  Sasol  was working jointly with India's  Tata Group  to acquire coalfields for a new CTL venture. However, it seems likely that any joint CTL project between these two companies will be delayed until there is a strengthening of the global economy and their respective balance sheets.
Reliance Industries Limited  (RIL) (based in Mumbai) outlined plans in late-2008 to develop an integrated power project that would include coal mining, a 1,000-megawatt (MW) power plant fuelled by coal rejects, a coal-to-liquid (CTL) plant, and a fly-ash utilization unit.  RIL has signed agreements with ExxonMobil Corporation, Headwaters Inc., and the German engineering company Uhde GmbH to help implement the plan. The proposed power plant is a partnership with Torrent Power Limited (Ahmedabad, Gujarat).  RIL plans to set up the project at Angul in the Dhenkanal district of Orissa. Land acquisition has been started by the government and a 1,000-acre plot has already been identified for the CTL unit near Orissa's Gopalpur port. The CTL unit would involve a range of activities – including coal mining, the conversion of coal to oil, coal gasification, and the production of fertilizers such as ammonia from the coal-based gas.  
Australia Companies based in  Australia  has been developing several underground coal gasification projects which will provide opportunities to test this evolving technology – with small volumes of product gas being used for power generation and possibly CTL production.  In April 2009  Australia-based  Regal Resources  has completed a share placement to fund the pilot testing of a novel Underground Coal to Liquids (UCTL) process near Melbourne. Regal will seek to acquire Magma Limited, the holder of UCTL patents.  UCTL is an  in situ  process that converts brown coal/lignite to liquid hydrocarbon and gas products within the coal seam. Each component of the process has been demonstrated in the laboratory, but there has yet to be a field test.
Australia II Another key player in Australia is  Linc Energy . In October 2008, Linc Energy successfully produced the first hydrocarbon liquids from its Chinchilla demonstration facility in Queensland [shown below] which introduces underground coal gasification (UCG) synthesis gas into a Fischer-Tropsch reactor that produces high quality synthetic fuel.  Linc Energy is licensing Syntroleum's CTL technology. Linc Energy have also announced plans to develop UCG activities in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming, USA – with the goal of  producing fuels like ultra clean diesel and Jet A1. Other UCG developments in Vietnam have also been proposed.

Recommended for you

Ijetr042116
Ijetr042116Ijetr042116
Ijetr042116

IJETR, ER Publication, Research Papers, Free Journals, High Impact Journals, M.Tech Research Articles, Free Publication, UGC Journals,

ijetrer publicationresearch papers
A Biomass R-D-Pyrolysis-Gasify EU-2002
A Biomass R-D-Pyrolysis-Gasify EU-2002A Biomass R-D-Pyrolysis-Gasify EU-2002
A Biomass R-D-Pyrolysis-Gasify EU-2002

This document summarizes the proceedings from an expert meeting organized by the European Commission to review biomass pyrolysis and gasification technologies and explore policies to encourage their implementation. The following key points were discussed: 1) Gasification technology has progressed over 20 years of EC support but commercial deployment has been disappointing. Technical barriers like feeding systems and reactor design need further optimization. 2) Gas cleaning is now sufficiently reliable but demonstration is needed to prove solutions for difficult fuels and lower costs. Hot gas cleaning requires more research. 3) Non-technical barriers around modeling, data sharing, fuel flexibility, and demonstration at commercial scale also need addressing to accelerate implementation of gasification.

Steel & CCS - Jean-Pierre Birat, ESTEP
Steel & CCS - Jean-Pierre Birat, ESTEPSteel & CCS - Jean-Pierre Birat, ESTEP
Steel & CCS - Jean-Pierre Birat, ESTEP

The document discusses steel production, which produces carbon dioxide (CO2) as a byproduct that is difficult to reduce. It outlines the Ultra-Low CO2 Steelmaking (ULCOS) program in the EU that examined various CCS and non-CCS routes to significantly cut CO2 emissions from steelmaking. CCS is present in three of the four ULCOS solutions as it allows continued use of existing blast furnace processes. However, accurately assessing costs of applying CCS to steel production is challenging as the technologies require demonstration at scale with many uncertainties. The document considers some alternative policy approaches beyond

#carbon#costs#ccs
Australia III Altona Energy  are also continuing feasibility work for t he Arckaringa Project. Altona holds three exploration licences covering 2,500 sq. kms in the northern portion of the Permian Arckaringa Basin in South Australia. All three deposits lie close to the Adelaide to Darwin railroad and the Stuart Highway. Altona’s primary focus is the completion of a bankable feasibility study for an integrated 10 million barrel per year Coal to Liquid (CTL) plant with a 560 MW co-generation power facility.
Australia IV The other prospective project in Australia is the Monash Energy Project . The project envisages a large CTL plant producing up to 60,000 barrels/day of FT diesel as well as associated power generation. Brown coal will be the fuel source – with the reserves located in the Latrobe Valley, approximately 160km to the east of Melbourne, Victoria. The development of this project [like other large coal-based projects in Australia] will require CCS. The project developers have yet to announce their final plans. Project details: www.monashenergy.com.au
Other Countries Detailed feasibility studies for CTL projects have been carried out in several other countries – most notably  New Zealand  and the  Philippines . There has also been considerable interest in developing CTLs in  Indonesia . Sasol is currently carrying out a feasibility study for a series of coal-to-liquids plants in Indonesia which could have a targeted combined capacity of 1.1 million barrels per day.  The underlying reasons for developing CTL capacity in these countries remain today. They have indigenous coal resources and significant imports of crude oil and petroleum products. However, the credit crisis conditions, which have affected global trade and the development of these projects, needs to abate before any major development work commences. .
Conclusions Main Challenges and Opportunities The principal factor affecting this sector is the future  price of crude oil . Currently crude oil prices are recovering from their lows caused by falling global demand.  Prices are currently in the range of US$55-60/barrel.   Most analysts predict that prices will increase to US$65/barrel [or higher] by 2010. Long-term price forecasts are notoriously unreliable! CTL projects will require crude oil prices to remain at/above US$65-70/barrel before many currently moribund CTL projects are developed – and possibly US$85-90/barrel if CCS is included as part of the production facilities.  

Recommended for you

An Overview of Power Plant CCS and CO2-EOR Projects
 An Overview of Power Plant CCS and CO2-EOR Projects An Overview of Power Plant CCS and CO2-EOR Projects
An Overview of Power Plant CCS and CO2-EOR Projects

CO2 has been used for many decades in the industrial processes and food manufacturing, including soft drinks. Likewise, it is an essential component of other everyday items such as fire extinguishers. In very high concentrations, CO2 like any dense gas, can act as an asphyxiate material, which can be dangerous to humans with its adverse impact on respiration. Thus, CO2 is captured to minimize risks to humans’ health and the environment. A general overview of the current carbon capture and storage (CCS) and CO2 based enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) projects is presented in this paper. This work provides a summary of the current worldwide CCS and CO2-EOR projects along with their potential benefits. CCS is a process used to capture CO2 that is produced by industrial facilities. The CCS technology involves CO2 capture, transport and storage. On the other hand, EOR is a generic term for various techniques to increase recovery from oil fields. The injection of CO2 into underground rock formation of oil reservoirs in order to improve their recovery is called CO2-EOR.

DME Methanol Outlook for gas conversion Amoco 2000
DME Methanol Outlook  for gas conversion Amoco 2000DME Methanol Outlook  for gas conversion Amoco 2000
DME Methanol Outlook for gas conversion Amoco 2000

The document discusses Amoco's strategy to capitalize on the emerging gas-to-liquids (GTL) industry through focusing on oxygenate products like methanol and dimethylether (DME). It describes GTL as a strategic inflection point that will transform the energy industry similarly to the past shift from coal to oil. Amoco aims to establish a commercial position in methanol and DME production through various projects and partnerships. This will allow them to control fundamental building blocks in chemical and fuel markets and monetize stranded natural gas resources. The key is to act quickly as a first mover to build capability and options before competitors, in order to influence the strategic changes coming to the energy industry through GTL.

The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtree
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtreeThe best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtree
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtree

Brad Crabtree, "The critical role of CCS and EOR in managing US carbon emissions" in "CO2 Summit II: Technologies and Opportunities", Holly Krutka, Tri-State Generation & Transmission Association Inc. Frank Zhu, UOP/Honeywell Eds, ECI Symposium Series, (2016). http://dc.engconfintl.org/co2_summit2/3

eorkinetic emergyccs
The long-predicted  Peak Oil period  will eventually arrive – probably early in the next decade.  The current lack of investment in oil exploration and production due to the current global recession will probably lead to supply and demand for crude oil tightening significantly within the next two to three years. Demand for transport fuels, both globally and in the US, will recover as the global economy exits from the current economic recession. Increasing demand for transportation fuels [caused by future growth in global vehicle populations] will drive up crude oil prices. This will undoubtedly assist the development of alternative fuel sources – including CTLs. A key challenge affecting the development of CTL [and polygeneration plants] will be the potential  commercial risks . Will the [battered] banks and project financiers overcome their fears of crude oil price movements and other market-related risks and support CTL projects?
Project Costs and Project Funding Constraints In late April 2009 Industrialinfo.com broadcast a webcast containing some background data on the development of coal gasification plants in the US. There are about 30 coal gasification projects in the pipeline across the United States.  These projects are non-IGCC, non-power generation coal gasification projects aimed at producing hydrocarbons mainly, syngas, LNG, and CTLs [including diesel]. At this stage not one of these projects has moved into the construction phase.  The capital required to engineering, equip and construct these plants totals more than $59 billion, and in the current credit crisis, finding the funding to move these projects forward has been challenging for the industry. When the availability of credit improves these projects may be revived.  
Another key factor which has caused the cancellation or delay of many CTL projects during 2008/09 has been the escalation of the capex for many CTL plants.  The construction of an 80,000 barrels/day CTL plant in the US could cost in excess of US$5 billion. Detailed cost breakdowns of major projects are rarely published – and are frequently shrouded in commercial confidentiality. The lack of operating CTL plants has also hampered any reliable assessments of capex and operating costs. The imposition of additional environmental regulation on CTL plants – particularly future regulations involving carbon capture and storage – is also acting as a major deterrent to their construction.  Until legislation and regulation on the development of CCS in US and other countries is finalised it is impossible for the project developers and their financial backers to produce accurate estimates on plant costs.  
Further Challenges In many countries [including the US] there is a serious shortage of  engineers  and specialists who are needed to build and operate new CTL facilities. Long-term training programmes will be required. More  RD&D  is required over the next decade to improve CTL plant design, efficiency and operational characteristics. Process intensification could ensure significant improvements in plant efficiency and also the economic utilisation of smaller, stranded coal deposits.  There are also opportunities for new CTL technologies to be commercially proven by 2020 – although this will require a significant capital investment by the main companies. Improvements in  catalyst utilisation  [particularly the use of nano-catalysts] will help reduce the costs of producing CTL fuels. This is important as some catalysts are based on high cost feedstocks – such as cobalt and molybdenum.  

Recommended for you

Paul Fennell (Imperial College London) - Cost comparison of different technol...
Paul Fennell (Imperial College London) - Cost comparison of different technol...Paul Fennell (Imperial College London) - Cost comparison of different technol...
Paul Fennell (Imperial College London) - Cost comparison of different technol...

Paul Fennell (Imperial College London) - Cost comparison of different technologies for industrial CCS - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannual 21-22 April 2015

ccsindus
Policy directions to 2050
Policy directions to 2050Policy directions to 2050
Policy directions to 2050

This document discusses policy options for transitioning to a low-carbon economy by 2050. It explores sustaining economic growth while transforming energy production and consumption. The presentation builds on previous publications by identifying policy ideas without prescribing specific approaches. It discusses challenges like uncertain development pathways and high/low carbon scenarios. Milestones by 2025 include efficiency gains, commercializing carbon capture and storage, renewable deployment, and vehicle efficiency. National policy frameworks and international cooperation on technology and emissions management can help achieve long-term climate goals.

Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Carbon Capture and Sequestration Tech...
Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Carbon Capture and Sequestration Tech...Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Carbon Capture and Sequestration Tech...
Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Carbon Capture and Sequestration Tech...

This paper reviews the state of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, the potential benefits and challenges of implementing Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) technology in Nigeria as a means of mitigating the threat posed in emitting CO2. In 2010 Nigeria was ranked 44th by the International Energy Agency (IEA) for emitting about 80.51 million metric tons of CO2 annually. In this paper, the three different stages that constitute carbon capture and sequestration are discussed individually, and then the potential for their integration into a commercial scale CCS process is considered. CCS technology shows promising possibility for application in plants that emit large amounts of CO2 and also considered are some technological improvements to capture CO2 from air, as the technology can be applied for removing CO2 directly from the atmosphere and thus reducing the effect of emissions from vehicles and other moving sources. The development and deployment of CCS in Nigeria will be very significant in ensuring that we are able to meet increasing energy demand and keep the lights on whilst minimizing the environmental damage. The market for CCS in Nigeria is likely to be measured in $billions with the potential of creating over 100,000 jobs.

Improving Health & Safety CTL and associated chemical plants need to be operated to best international health, safety and environmental standards to avoid incidents causing serious loss of life – plus land, water and air pollution. Developing and maintaining these health, safety and environmental standards will be a challenge for China as well as other countries. Aftermath of Chemical Plant Explosion in China – 26 th  August 2008 20 workers were killed, plus over 50 injured
Environmental footprint of CTL technologies The production of liquid fuels from coal involves the production of 150% or more of CO 2  compared to fuels produced by traditional crude oil refineries. US research studies have indicated that if CTL production facilities are fitted with CCS their CO 2  emissions can be reduced to below that of crude oil refineries.  A study produced by the  US Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory  [NETL], which was published in early 2009, concluded that a  CTL process with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) yields a diesel fuel with 5-12% less lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to the average emissions profile of petroleum-derived diesel, based on the US national average in 2005. The report noted that further reductions in the GHG profile of the fuel can be achieved if coal is co-gasified with biomass.
Environmental footprint II A further report from  Rentech  on the GHG emissions from its proposed Natchez CTL plant  concluded that the fuels from the facility would produce 11% to 23% fewer carbon dioxide emissions than would result from fuels produced from conventional crude refining. Rentech proposes using petroleum coke as feedstock with the Rentech Fischer-Tropsch process to produce approximately 30,000 barrels per day of synthetic fuels, specialty waxes and chemicals. The facility is designed to capture approximately 80% of the carbon dioxide generated in the production process, which will be sold under a long-term agreement with Denbury Resources for enhanced oil recovery in the region.
Installing CCS During April 2009 Shenhua Group announced that it is carrying out research and development for the country's first carbon capture and storage (CCS) project at its new direct CTL plant in Inner Mongolia.  Carbon sequestration measures, including geological storage, are being considered for Shenhua's CCS project, which could be put into full operation during the next decade. It is likely that other CTL project operators in China will watch carefully watch the CCS RD&D work by Shenhua before committing themselves to adopting this technology.

Recommended for you

Comparative Economic Analysis of Using Natural Gas For Liquefied Natural Gas ...
Comparative Economic Analysis of Using Natural Gas For Liquefied Natural Gas ...Comparative Economic Analysis of Using Natural Gas For Liquefied Natural Gas ...
Comparative Economic Analysis of Using Natural Gas For Liquefied Natural Gas ...

Comparative economic analysis of the production of diesel through Gas-to-Liquid (GTL) Technology and the production of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) both using natural gas was presented. The data for costs of constructing and running GTL and LNG plants were obtained for the study. Plant procurement costs, shipping and tanker facilities costs, the expected capacities of the GTL and LNG plants and the feed gas volume needed to produce those capacities of liquid products were gathered with which the costs analyses and revenue analyses were conducted. Two assumptions made were that the diesel would be the only product of the GTL project and LNG, the only product of the LNG plant. The 33000bbl/day of liquid product from the GTL plant was taken to be all diesel while the 5mmtpa of NGL got from the LNG plant was ignored. The 33000bbl/day of diesel and 22mmtpa of LNG were then used for the analyses. Concentration was on the profit indicators used to evaluate the advantage of one over the other. Figures were used to determine the pay-out of the projects which is 9.16years for GTL and 1.97years for LNG respectively. The Net Present Value (NPV) and Profit per Dollar Invested (P/$) that make up the project economics were estimated for GTL and LNG. The NPV over 15years and at an expected rate of return of 10% was $2.11billion for GTL and $45.17billion for LNG. For GTL, the P/$ was 2.02 and for LNG, it was 6.62. From the whole analysis done it is easily seen that the LNG project is more economically viable than the GTL project since the LNG project has higher NPV, lower pay-out and higher P/$ than the GTL project.

dieselcostspayout
Coal_Gasification_Overview_1712844563.pdf
Coal_Gasification_Overview_1712844563.pdfCoal_Gasification_Overview_1712844563.pdf
Coal_Gasification_Overview_1712844563.pdf

Gasification

coal
John Gale (IEAGHG) - CCS in the Process Industries - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannu...
John Gale (IEAGHG) - CCS in the Process Industries - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannu...John Gale (IEAGHG) - CCS in the Process Industries - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannu...
John Gale (IEAGHG) - CCS in the Process Industries - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannu...

The document summarizes key findings from the 2013 CCS Roadmap report: - CCS could contribute 14% of emissions reductions between 2015-2050 compared to business as usual and is critical for low-carbon energy. - Individual CCS technologies are well understood but large-scale demonstration projects integrating them remain a challenge. - Incentive frameworks and 30 operating CCS projects by 2020 are urgently needed. - 45% of captured CO2 from CCS could come from industrial applications between 2015-2050.

Other Impacts from CTL developments Large-scale CTL plants encourage the development and expansion of coalfields [often in remote locations]. Most CTL plants will be located in close proximity to low-cost sources of coal. Surface mining  can have significant negative environmental impacts. In some regions new/upgraded transportation infrastructure may also be required to cope with increased coal extraction. And CTL plants may accelerate the  depletion of coal resources  in some regions. This is a concern in China where total coal production and demand is now anticipated to reach 3 billion tonnes per annum during the next decade.
CTL plants also consume large volumes of  water  [several barrels of water per barrel of product].  This a major environmental issue in regions with a low rainfall [such as northern China]. Water is required for a range of uses at a CTL plant: process water, boiler feed water, steam for water shift reactions, and cooling water to remove heat at various production stages [particularly in the highly exothermic FT processes].   Reports from China have indicated that Shenhua Group has installed water recycling facilities at its new CTL plant – located in the arid Inner Mongolian region. To provide enough water for the Ordos CTL project, groundwater is piped in from 100 kilometres away. The price of water may significantly increase if regular severe droughts continue in China. They could act as a deterrent to the future expansion of CTL production.
Final Thoughts CTL fuels will have to compete with other energy sources in the coming decades – not just traditional crude oil, but also biofuels, natural gas and non-traditional hydrocarbon fuels.  The future development of CTL technologies will depend on the CTL plants being able to produce fuels that are competitive in the transportation fuel and chemicals markets - and also being able to meet increasingly strict environmental operating standards.      Strong government support must be a key element in the future development of CTL projects.
Recommended Further Reading Gordon R. Couch (March 2008) Coal to liquids Report No: CCC/132 IEA Clean Coal Centre, London [http://www.iea-coal.org.uk]   Michael Toman, Aimee E. Curtright, David S. Ortiz, Joel Darmstadter, Brian Shannon (2008) Unconventional Fossil-Based Fuels: Economic and EnvironmentalTrade-Offs Rand Corporation  [www.rand.org]   Thomas J. Tarka et al  (January 2009) Affordable, Low-Carbon Diesel Fuel from Domestic Coal and Biomass Report No: DOE/NETL-2009/1349 National Energy Technology Laboratory  [www.netl.doe.gov]  

Recommended for you

Overcapacity in eu and nafta where is it? by Marcel Genet Laplace Conseil
Overcapacity in eu and nafta where is it? by Marcel Genet Laplace ConseilOvercapacity in eu and nafta where is it? by Marcel Genet Laplace Conseil
Overcapacity in eu and nafta where is it? by Marcel Genet Laplace Conseil

The document discusses the shift from integrated steel mills to minimills over the last 40 years. Minimills, which use electric arc furnaces to melt scrap steel, have lower costs and more flexibility than traditional blast furnace mills. The share of steel produced by minimills has been growing steadily in Europe and North America. Recently, access to cheap shale gas in the US has improved the competitiveness of direct reduced iron plants, which may further increase minimills' market share. Most overcapacity in the steel industry is currently found in integrated blast furnace mills, especially in Europe and North America.

european steelplattsmarcel genet

More Related Content

What's hot

Cctc 6262013
Cctc 6262013Cctc 6262013
Yanchang Petroleum CCS Project - Enhanced oil recovery using CO2 in North Wes...
Yanchang Petroleum CCS Project - Enhanced oil recovery using CO2 in North Wes...Yanchang Petroleum CCS Project - Enhanced oil recovery using CO2 in North Wes...
Yanchang Petroleum CCS Project - Enhanced oil recovery using CO2 in North Wes...
Global CCS Institute
 
Apic 2014 pattaya noor jivraj jacobs emerging feedstocks 18 05-2014 for web site
Apic 2014 pattaya noor jivraj jacobs emerging feedstocks 18 05-2014 for web siteApic 2014 pattaya noor jivraj jacobs emerging feedstocks 18 05-2014 for web site
Apic 2014 pattaya noor jivraj jacobs emerging feedstocks 18 05-2014 for web site
Noor Jivraj
 
Prezentation on pak energy
Prezentation on pak energyPrezentation on pak energy
Prezentation on pak energy
Noman Mughal
 
12 months, 5 sites, 1 billion tonnes of co2 storage by 2030. the eti introduc...
12 months, 5 sites, 1 billion tonnes of co2 storage by 2030. the eti introduc...12 months, 5 sites, 1 billion tonnes of co2 storage by 2030. the eti introduc...
12 months, 5 sites, 1 billion tonnes of co2 storage by 2030. the eti introduc...
Global CCS Institute
 
Energy transition
Energy transitionEnergy transition
Energy transition
Kongsbreen
 
llM University of Reading 2013 Carbontrading
llM University of Reading 2013 CarbontradingllM University of Reading 2013 Carbontrading
llM University of Reading 2013 Carbontrading
ReadingLLMlegaleagles
 
AP-122-Hetero-Polyaromatic-Ring-Opening-Reactions-in-scCO21
AP-122-Hetero-Polyaromatic-Ring-Opening-Reactions-in-scCO21AP-122-Hetero-Polyaromatic-Ring-Opening-Reactions-in-scCO21
AP-122-Hetero-Polyaromatic-Ring-Opening-Reactions-in-scCO21
Greg Curtis
 
Modernising the european lignite triangle
Modernising the european lignite triangleModernising the european lignite triangle
Modernising the european lignite triangle
Forum Energii
 
Air Capture & Carbon Negative Technology - Graciela Chichilnisky (October 17,...
Air Capture & Carbon Negative Technology - Graciela Chichilnisky (October 17,...Air Capture & Carbon Negative Technology - Graciela Chichilnisky (October 17,...
Air Capture & Carbon Negative Technology - Graciela Chichilnisky (October 17,...
Graciela Chichilnisky
 
CCS learnings from the LNG sector
CCS learnings from the LNG sectorCCS learnings from the LNG sector
CCS learnings from the LNG sector
Global CCS Institute
 
Grangemouth CCS project, Stephen Kerr, Summit Power - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Bia...
Grangemouth CCS project, Stephen Kerr, Summit Power - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Bia...Grangemouth CCS project, Stephen Kerr, Summit Power - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Bia...
Grangemouth CCS project, Stephen Kerr, Summit Power - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Bia...
UK Carbon Capture and Storage Research Centre
 
Slides from Launch of Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2013
Slides from Launch of Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2013Slides from Launch of Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2013
Slides from Launch of Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2013
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Gas Arabia Summit: Unconventional Gas Developments in the Gulf
Gas Arabia Summit: Unconventional Gas Developments in the GulfGas Arabia Summit: Unconventional Gas Developments in the Gulf
Gas Arabia Summit: Unconventional Gas Developments in the Gulf
Energy Intelligence
 
CO₂ Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea: Securing a Low-Carbon...
CO₂ Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea: Securing a Low-Carbon...CO₂ Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea: Securing a Low-Carbon...
CO₂ Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea: Securing a Low-Carbon...
UK Carbon Capture and Storage Research Centre
 
7th study meeting Tokyo - Holger Bietz
7th study meeting Tokyo - Holger Bietz7th study meeting Tokyo - Holger Bietz
7th study meeting Tokyo - Holger Bietz
Global CCS Institute
 
The Role of Carbon Removals-Brussels
The Role of Carbon Removals-Brussels The Role of Carbon Removals-Brussels
The Role of Carbon Removals-Brussels
Graciela Chichilnisky
 
Carbon Finance
Carbon FinanceCarbon Finance
Carbon Finance
Ajay Dhamija
 
111158_CCM
111158_CCM111158_CCM
111158_CCM
Ingvill J. Bækø
 
Qiao and Zhou - CCS in China and the Guangdong CCS readiness study - Presenta...
Qiao and Zhou - CCS in China and the Guangdong CCS readiness study - Presenta...Qiao and Zhou - CCS in China and the Guangdong CCS readiness study - Presenta...
Qiao and Zhou - CCS in China and the Guangdong CCS readiness study - Presenta...
Global CCS Institute
 

What's hot (20)

Cctc 6262013
Cctc 6262013Cctc 6262013
Cctc 6262013
 
Yanchang Petroleum CCS Project - Enhanced oil recovery using CO2 in North Wes...
Yanchang Petroleum CCS Project - Enhanced oil recovery using CO2 in North Wes...Yanchang Petroleum CCS Project - Enhanced oil recovery using CO2 in North Wes...
Yanchang Petroleum CCS Project - Enhanced oil recovery using CO2 in North Wes...
 
Apic 2014 pattaya noor jivraj jacobs emerging feedstocks 18 05-2014 for web site
Apic 2014 pattaya noor jivraj jacobs emerging feedstocks 18 05-2014 for web siteApic 2014 pattaya noor jivraj jacobs emerging feedstocks 18 05-2014 for web site
Apic 2014 pattaya noor jivraj jacobs emerging feedstocks 18 05-2014 for web site
 
Prezentation on pak energy
Prezentation on pak energyPrezentation on pak energy
Prezentation on pak energy
 
12 months, 5 sites, 1 billion tonnes of co2 storage by 2030. the eti introduc...
12 months, 5 sites, 1 billion tonnes of co2 storage by 2030. the eti introduc...12 months, 5 sites, 1 billion tonnes of co2 storage by 2030. the eti introduc...
12 months, 5 sites, 1 billion tonnes of co2 storage by 2030. the eti introduc...
 
Energy transition
Energy transitionEnergy transition
Energy transition
 
llM University of Reading 2013 Carbontrading
llM University of Reading 2013 CarbontradingllM University of Reading 2013 Carbontrading
llM University of Reading 2013 Carbontrading
 
AP-122-Hetero-Polyaromatic-Ring-Opening-Reactions-in-scCO21
AP-122-Hetero-Polyaromatic-Ring-Opening-Reactions-in-scCO21AP-122-Hetero-Polyaromatic-Ring-Opening-Reactions-in-scCO21
AP-122-Hetero-Polyaromatic-Ring-Opening-Reactions-in-scCO21
 
Modernising the european lignite triangle
Modernising the european lignite triangleModernising the european lignite triangle
Modernising the european lignite triangle
 
Air Capture & Carbon Negative Technology - Graciela Chichilnisky (October 17,...
Air Capture & Carbon Negative Technology - Graciela Chichilnisky (October 17,...Air Capture & Carbon Negative Technology - Graciela Chichilnisky (October 17,...
Air Capture & Carbon Negative Technology - Graciela Chichilnisky (October 17,...
 
CCS learnings from the LNG sector
CCS learnings from the LNG sectorCCS learnings from the LNG sector
CCS learnings from the LNG sector
 
Grangemouth CCS project, Stephen Kerr, Summit Power - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Bia...
Grangemouth CCS project, Stephen Kerr, Summit Power - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Bia...Grangemouth CCS project, Stephen Kerr, Summit Power - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Bia...
Grangemouth CCS project, Stephen Kerr, Summit Power - UKCCSRC Strathclyde Bia...
 
Slides from Launch of Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2013
Slides from Launch of Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2013Slides from Launch of Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2013
Slides from Launch of Medium-Term Gas Market Report 2013
 
Gas Arabia Summit: Unconventional Gas Developments in the Gulf
Gas Arabia Summit: Unconventional Gas Developments in the GulfGas Arabia Summit: Unconventional Gas Developments in the Gulf
Gas Arabia Summit: Unconventional Gas Developments in the Gulf
 
CO₂ Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea: Securing a Low-Carbon...
CO₂ Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea: Securing a Low-Carbon...CO₂ Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea: Securing a Low-Carbon...
CO₂ Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea: Securing a Low-Carbon...
 
7th study meeting Tokyo - Holger Bietz
7th study meeting Tokyo - Holger Bietz7th study meeting Tokyo - Holger Bietz
7th study meeting Tokyo - Holger Bietz
 
The Role of Carbon Removals-Brussels
The Role of Carbon Removals-Brussels The Role of Carbon Removals-Brussels
The Role of Carbon Removals-Brussels
 
Carbon Finance
Carbon FinanceCarbon Finance
Carbon Finance
 
111158_CCM
111158_CCM111158_CCM
111158_CCM
 
Qiao and Zhou - CCS in China and the Guangdong CCS readiness study - Presenta...
Qiao and Zhou - CCS in China and the Guangdong CCS readiness study - Presenta...Qiao and Zhou - CCS in China and the Guangdong CCS readiness study - Presenta...
Qiao and Zhou - CCS in China and the Guangdong CCS readiness study - Presenta...
 

Similar to Cox Presentation Ep 2009

Coal to Liquid Market.pptx
Coal to Liquid Market.pptxCoal to Liquid Market.pptx
Coal to Liquid Market.pptx
KaustubhBhandari6
 
Coal Liquefaction
Coal LiquefactionCoal Liquefaction
Coal Liquefaction
mohkab1
 
Solid Fuels 6-A
Solid Fuels 6-ASolid Fuels 6-A
Solid Fuels 6-A
AhsanN2
 
Relevant Details of Matthew Stone Project RF1, Renovare RF1, Matthew Stone
Relevant Details of Matthew Stone Project RF1, Renovare RF1, Matthew StoneRelevant Details of Matthew Stone Project RF1, Renovare RF1, Matthew Stone
Relevant Details of Matthew Stone Project RF1, Renovare RF1, Matthew Stone
Matthew Stone
 
CCS Forum Report - Summary report - July 2016 with FSC
CCS Forum Report - Summary report - July 2016 with FSCCCS Forum Report - Summary report - July 2016 with FSC
CCS Forum Report - Summary report - July 2016 with FSC
Alexandra Howe
 
Coal To liquid
Coal To liquidCoal To liquid
Coal To liquid
Ishan Shah
 
carbon capture storage.pdf
carbon capture storage.pdfcarbon capture storage.pdf
carbon capture storage.pdf
IbrahimKhalilOmar
 
Ijetr042116
Ijetr042116Ijetr042116
A Biomass R-D-Pyrolysis-Gasify EU-2002
A Biomass R-D-Pyrolysis-Gasify EU-2002A Biomass R-D-Pyrolysis-Gasify EU-2002
A Biomass R-D-Pyrolysis-Gasify EU-2002
H Janardan Prabhu
 
Steel & CCS - Jean-Pierre Birat, ESTEP
Steel & CCS - Jean-Pierre Birat, ESTEPSteel & CCS - Jean-Pierre Birat, ESTEP
Steel & CCS - Jean-Pierre Birat, ESTEP
Global CCS Institute
 
An Overview of Power Plant CCS and CO2-EOR Projects
 An Overview of Power Plant CCS and CO2-EOR Projects An Overview of Power Plant CCS and CO2-EOR Projects
An Overview of Power Plant CCS and CO2-EOR Projects
Husen E . Bader
 
DME Methanol Outlook for gas conversion Amoco 2000
DME Methanol Outlook  for gas conversion Amoco 2000DME Methanol Outlook  for gas conversion Amoco 2000
DME Methanol Outlook for gas conversion Amoco 2000
Steve Wittrig
 
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtree
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtreeThe best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtree
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtree
Steve Wittrig
 
Paul Fennell (Imperial College London) - Cost comparison of different technol...
Paul Fennell (Imperial College London) - Cost comparison of different technol...Paul Fennell (Imperial College London) - Cost comparison of different technol...
Paul Fennell (Imperial College London) - Cost comparison of different technol...
UK Carbon Capture and Storage Research Centre
 
Policy directions to 2050
Policy directions to 2050Policy directions to 2050
Policy directions to 2050
wbcsd
 
Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Carbon Capture and Sequestration Tech...
Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Carbon Capture and Sequestration Tech...Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Carbon Capture and Sequestration Tech...
Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Carbon Capture and Sequestration Tech...
theijes
 
Comparative Economic Analysis of Using Natural Gas For Liquefied Natural Gas ...
Comparative Economic Analysis of Using Natural Gas For Liquefied Natural Gas ...Comparative Economic Analysis of Using Natural Gas For Liquefied Natural Gas ...
Comparative Economic Analysis of Using Natural Gas For Liquefied Natural Gas ...
IJRES Journal
 
Coal_Gasification_Overview_1712844563.pdf
Coal_Gasification_Overview_1712844563.pdfCoal_Gasification_Overview_1712844563.pdf
Coal_Gasification_Overview_1712844563.pdf
Venkatsubramanian84
 
John Gale (IEAGHG) - CCS in the Process Industries - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannu...
John Gale (IEAGHG) - CCS in the Process Industries - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannu...John Gale (IEAGHG) - CCS in the Process Industries - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannu...
John Gale (IEAGHG) - CCS in the Process Industries - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannu...
UK Carbon Capture and Storage Research Centre
 
Overcapacity in eu and nafta where is it? by Marcel Genet Laplace Conseil
Overcapacity in eu and nafta where is it? by Marcel Genet Laplace ConseilOvercapacity in eu and nafta where is it? by Marcel Genet Laplace Conseil
Overcapacity in eu and nafta where is it? by Marcel Genet Laplace Conseil
Audrey Bayard
 

Similar to Cox Presentation Ep 2009 (20)

Coal to Liquid Market.pptx
Coal to Liquid Market.pptxCoal to Liquid Market.pptx
Coal to Liquid Market.pptx
 
Coal Liquefaction
Coal LiquefactionCoal Liquefaction
Coal Liquefaction
 
Solid Fuels 6-A
Solid Fuels 6-ASolid Fuels 6-A
Solid Fuels 6-A
 
Relevant Details of Matthew Stone Project RF1, Renovare RF1, Matthew Stone
Relevant Details of Matthew Stone Project RF1, Renovare RF1, Matthew StoneRelevant Details of Matthew Stone Project RF1, Renovare RF1, Matthew Stone
Relevant Details of Matthew Stone Project RF1, Renovare RF1, Matthew Stone
 
CCS Forum Report - Summary report - July 2016 with FSC
CCS Forum Report - Summary report - July 2016 with FSCCCS Forum Report - Summary report - July 2016 with FSC
CCS Forum Report - Summary report - July 2016 with FSC
 
Coal To liquid
Coal To liquidCoal To liquid
Coal To liquid
 
carbon capture storage.pdf
carbon capture storage.pdfcarbon capture storage.pdf
carbon capture storage.pdf
 
Ijetr042116
Ijetr042116Ijetr042116
Ijetr042116
 
A Biomass R-D-Pyrolysis-Gasify EU-2002
A Biomass R-D-Pyrolysis-Gasify EU-2002A Biomass R-D-Pyrolysis-Gasify EU-2002
A Biomass R-D-Pyrolysis-Gasify EU-2002
 
Steel & CCS - Jean-Pierre Birat, ESTEP
Steel & CCS - Jean-Pierre Birat, ESTEPSteel & CCS - Jean-Pierre Birat, ESTEP
Steel & CCS - Jean-Pierre Birat, ESTEP
 
An Overview of Power Plant CCS and CO2-EOR Projects
 An Overview of Power Plant CCS and CO2-EOR Projects An Overview of Power Plant CCS and CO2-EOR Projects
An Overview of Power Plant CCS and CO2-EOR Projects
 
DME Methanol Outlook for gas conversion Amoco 2000
DME Methanol Outlook  for gas conversion Amoco 2000DME Methanol Outlook  for gas conversion Amoco 2000
DME Methanol Outlook for gas conversion Amoco 2000
 
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtree
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtreeThe best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtree
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtree
 
Paul Fennell (Imperial College London) - Cost comparison of different technol...
Paul Fennell (Imperial College London) - Cost comparison of different technol...Paul Fennell (Imperial College London) - Cost comparison of different technol...
Paul Fennell (Imperial College London) - Cost comparison of different technol...
 
Policy directions to 2050
Policy directions to 2050Policy directions to 2050
Policy directions to 2050
 
Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Carbon Capture and Sequestration Tech...
Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Carbon Capture and Sequestration Tech...Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Carbon Capture and Sequestration Tech...
Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Carbon Capture and Sequestration Tech...
 
Comparative Economic Analysis of Using Natural Gas For Liquefied Natural Gas ...
Comparative Economic Analysis of Using Natural Gas For Liquefied Natural Gas ...Comparative Economic Analysis of Using Natural Gas For Liquefied Natural Gas ...
Comparative Economic Analysis of Using Natural Gas For Liquefied Natural Gas ...
 
Coal_Gasification_Overview_1712844563.pdf
Coal_Gasification_Overview_1712844563.pdfCoal_Gasification_Overview_1712844563.pdf
Coal_Gasification_Overview_1712844563.pdf
 
John Gale (IEAGHG) - CCS in the Process Industries - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannu...
John Gale (IEAGHG) - CCS in the Process Industries - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannu...John Gale (IEAGHG) - CCS in the Process Industries - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannu...
John Gale (IEAGHG) - CCS in the Process Industries - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannu...
 
Overcapacity in eu and nafta where is it? by Marcel Genet Laplace Conseil
Overcapacity in eu and nafta where is it? by Marcel Genet Laplace ConseilOvercapacity in eu and nafta where is it? by Marcel Genet Laplace Conseil
Overcapacity in eu and nafta where is it? by Marcel Genet Laplace Conseil
 

Cox Presentation Ep 2009

  • 1. Electric Power 2009, Chicago, USA Pre-Conference Workshop EP09 PC8: Resurgence of Coal to Liquid and Gas - Current Status and Future Development An Update on the Global Markets for Coal-to-Liquids Technologies Dr Andrew W. Cox Energy Intelligence & Marketing Research 192 Sandyford Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 1RN UNITED KINGDOM. Tel: 44-191-261 5274 [email_address]
  • 2. Introduction As part of the Electric Power 2007 conference, a pre-conference workshop containing a panel of distinguished speakers examined the future of coal liquefaction / coal-to-liquids [CTL] technologies. After two years it is appropriate to re-examine this topic and produce a progress report on the global developments and the outlook for the future.   CTL technologies have a long and distinguished pedigree – being initially developed in Europe during the first three decades of the Twentieth Century.   A wide spectrum of liquid fuels and other chemicals can be produced from coal - but these processes became uneconomic in the post-World War II era when large volumes of cheap crude oil from the Middle East and other oil producing countries entered the marketplace. Since then commercial interest in CTL has been sporadic and marginal in nature [primarily driven by energy security concerns and hikes in the price of crude oil].
  • 3. The increase in the price of crude oil between 2005 and 2008 led to a new surge of interest and commercial activity. However, the collapse in the oil price between Summer 2008 and early 2009 – falling from US$147/barrel to below US$40/barrel caused many CTL projects to be abandoned or postponed.   In spite of this setback, the outlook for CTL in several parts of the world remains positive – with major production facilities undergoing construction and commissioning in China.   The inevitable recovery in global oil demand - as well as the peak production of light sweet crude oil in the next few years - will lead to crude oil prices recovering and will also underpin the requirement for alternative fuel sources, which include CTLs.  
  • 4. Developing CTL Technologies There are several reasons behind the development of CTL projects: CTL technologies can offer greater security of supply in the provision of liquid fuels and chemicals for countries which have substantial coal reserves.   These countries are best characterised as being “oil poor, coal rich”. They have developing economies and a corresponding increase in vehicle numbers and demand for liquid fuels – as well as increasing imports of crude oil and petroleum products. CTL projects and associated developments have the potential to create higher paid employment in coalfield areas – thereby assisting economic development. Higher value liquid fuels and chemicals can be produced by CTL/polygeneration projects [compared to coal-based electricity technologies].
  • 5. Gas-to-liquid technologies could also stimulate the development of underground coal gasification in some countries – with the product gases used for [co-production] electricity generation and liquid fuel production.   “ Stranded” [isolated] and low rank/poor quality coal deposits can be utilised in the production of liquid fuels. These are deposits which may be too remote from demand centres to be used for electricity generation or too poor in quality and therefore uneconomic for the coal export trade.
  • 6. CTL Technologies Despite being a solid fossil fuel, coal can be converted into a liquid fuel - a process known as liquefaction. One tonne of coal can produce between one and four barrels of liquids depending on the composition of the coal used and the CTL technology employed.   The liquid fuels produced from coal can be refined to produce transport fuels and a wide of range other products [such as plastics and solvents]. There are two main types of CTL technology: Direct and Indirect.
  • 7. Direct Coal Liquefaction [DCL] DCL processes aim to add hydrogen to the organic structure of the coal, breaking it down only as far as is necessary to produce distillable liquids.   Many different processes have been developed, but most are closely related in terms of underlying reaction chemistry. Common features are the dissolution of a high proportion of pulverised coal in a solvent at elevated temperatures and pressures, followed by the hydrocracking of the dissolved coal with H 2 and a catalyst.   DCL technologies may involve several stages - with the syncrude being upgraded to the desired range of products using conventional refining techniques.
  • 8. DCLs have been developed by a wide range of companies and research organisations over recent decades.   Papers from Lowell Miller of the US Department of Energy have listed 7 single-stage DCL technologies & 11 two-stage technologies – with an additional 6 involving mild pyrolysis and 13 co-processing and dry hydrogenation systems.
  • 9. Indirect Coal Liquefaction [ICL] Indirect Coal Liquefaction [ICL] has evolved since the 1920s when the Fischer-Tropsch [FT] process was developed in Germany. FT involves, at a first step, the complete breakdown of the coal structure by gasification with steam. The composition of the gasification products is then adjusted to give the required mixture of H 2 and CO, and to remove sulphur-containing catalyst poisons. The resulting "synthesis gas" is reacted over a catalyst at relatively low pressures and temperatures. A range of catalyst compounds are used in the FT processes developed by different companies – including iron, cobalt and molybdenum.   The product spectrum from the FT plant and refinery depends on the temperatures and pressures in the process, gas composition, catalysts used, etc. The products may be paraffins, olefinic hydrocarbons or alcohols (particularly methanol).  
  • 10. ICL technologies have been developed by several companies. These include: Sasol Rentech Syntroleum Mobil Shell Hybrid Direct-Indirect systems have also been developed – such as Headwaters potential project in the Philippines.    
  • 11. The Rentech Process The Syntroleum Process
  • 12. FT diesels are among the best liquid transportation fuels available in the world today. They meet or exceed all current and proposed international emission standards.   FT diesel fuels have:   High Cetane Index Numbers – a measure of ignition quality and fuel efficiency of a diesel fuel (FT diesels usually have an index number >70, compared to 30-50 for traditional diesels]; Ultra-low levels of sulphur and aromatics;   Lower levels of CO, NO X and particulate emissions compared to many diesel fuels. FT diesels can also be blended to produce biodiesels.    
  • 13. Co-Production / Polygeneration Schemes ICL can also be the basis for complex co-production schemes [sometimes referred to as "Poly-generation"] - involving coal gasification, hydrogen production, liquid fuels production, chemicals and fertiliser production, and Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle [IGCC] electricity generation. Many papers and report on this topic stress that poly-generation systems help “maximise the value of coal”.
  • 14. Future CTL Technologies? Since the CTL workshop at EP 2007 there have been several reports and papers highlighting potential CTL technological advances.   There have been several reports highlighting the use of plasma gasification technology in future CTL processes. Research is being carried out in several countries – including the US and Japan. In a paper published in November 2008, researchers in Italy proposed a new dual-bed configuration for coal gasification that, in laboratory simulations of Coal-to-Liquids production, is 71.1% more energy efficient; increases the mass yield of synthetic fuel by 39.4%; and releases 31.9% less CO 2 than conventional gasification. The lead researcher for the study was Dr Maria Sudiro of the University of Padova. This research is ongoing.
  • 15. The proposed CO 2 and H 2 pathway (bottom) rather than the traditional CO and H 2 pathway (top) can improve efficiency and reduce CO 2 emissions by 15%. In March 2009, r esearch workers from the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits), South Africa and Rutgers University published a brief description of a new Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) reaction chemistry and process designs that they say could increase F-T process efficiency and reduce CO 2 emissions by 15% compared to the conventional process. The new process [outlined below], which uses a carbon dioxide and hydrogen route rather than the traditional carbon monoxide and hydrogen route, could also open up a pathway for the direct use of CO 2 and H 2 derived from low-carbon processes (nuclear, wind, solar, bio).
  • 16. Development Timescales? It is unlikely that these new CTL technological options will be commercialised before 2020 – but they offer considerable opportunities to significantly increase the efficiencies of CTL conversion and as well as reducing the environmental impacts of many CTL processes.
  • 17. International Developments South Africa South Africa has been the world leader in CTL technologies for several decades – with the corporation Sasol having built large-scale plants using indirect coal liquefaction technology at Sasolburg in the 1950s and Secunda in the 1980s. Sasol current consumes up to 30m tonnes/year of coal, producing up to 150,000 barrels/day of liquid fuels and chemicals. Sasol's plant at Secunda The company has been evaluating the construction of a further 80,000 barrels/day liquid fuels plant at Mafutha near Lephalale, South Africa. A nalysts have said this multi-billion dollar project would have major environmental and financial hurdles to overcome before it is approved by both Sasol itself and the South African government.
  • 18. South Africa II During March 2009 Sasol announced that it was scaling back capex by 40% over the next three years. The corporation is involved in joint ventures to evaluate or develop GTL and CTL projects in several countries – including India, China [with Shenhua Group], the US, India, Uzbekistan and Qatar. Sasol is also in early talks about a project to convert Indonesia’s reserves of lignite into liquid fuels.   Pat Davies, Sasol chief executive, was reported by the Financial Times as saying “I still believe these big projects are viable.” However, he said the company had not yet decided which initiatives would fall by the wayside.
  • 19. China Since the last workshop in Electric Power 2007 the Chinese CTL sector has moved forward with several commercial developments. A series of coal-to-chemicals projects, based on gasification technology, have been completed in several Chinese provinces. Other CTL plants, using DCL and ICL technologies are also under construction. However, in August 2008 the central government had placed severe restrictions on many liquefaction projects under construction. It felt that too many projects were being developed before the technologies were proven at the commercial scale.
  • 20. However, the most prominent CTL project is being developed in Inner Mongolia by the integrated mining and energy Shenhua Group Co .   This huge DCL project, which is being built in two stages, will have an estimated annual output of 5 million tonnes. The first stage includes three production lines with total investment of 24.535 billion yuan. The first line has cost 12.3 billion yuan and has a predicted oil yield of 1.08 million tonnes a year. The first trial operation of this plant was launched on 30 th December 2008 and the quality end products, diesel, naphtha and liquefied natural gas, were produced on the second day. The trial was stopped after it ran successfully for more than 300 hours. Further extended trials will be carried out during Spring/Summer 2009. It is currently anticipated that this initial stage of the plant will be fully commissioned before the end of 2009.
  • 21. Extract from China Daily – 22 nd January 20 09 [Location of Ordos, Inner Mongolia]
  • 22. The coal-to-liquids plant operated by Shenhua Group in Ordos, Inner Mongolia autonomous region. [China Daily – 8 th January 2009]
  • 23. Another CTL project has been developed in Inner Mongolia by Yitai Group . In March 2009, Yitai Group announced a successful test run with its 160,000-tonne indirect CTL facility, producing quality diesel oil and naphtha.   Based in Jungar Banner, Inner Mongolia, Yitai Group has an annual output of 100 million tonnes of coal. Its CTL project was approved by the central government in 2005 and began construction in 2006, with an investment of nearly 2.7 billion yuan (395 million U.S. dollars).    Yitai Group plans to upgrade the facility and extend its annual production capacity to 600,000 tons with ultimate capacity of five million tons.   The Yitai facility is China's first industrial-scale CTL plant using ICL technology. The company has indicated that by improving the technology and having economies of scale in the next generation of ICL plants, it can reduce production costs to approximately US$40/barrel crude oil equivalent.
  • 24. China Outlook I The outlook for CTL plant developments in China is currently unclear.   Reports in the Chinese media at the start of 2009 indicated that the country’s government was more favourably included to allow the development of CTL projects – as they will assist the country’s energy security. Both Shenhua Group, Yitai Group and other companies with ongoing commercial developments are currently proceeding with their project schedules. Other companies in China – including the mining group Datang and state-owned petroleum giant CNOOC – have announced that they are actively evaluating the development of new coal gasification/CTL projects [including a possible large project in Shanxi province]. However, other key partners in the Chinese CTL sector – most notably Sasol and Shell – appear to have postponed their development plans for the next few years.  
  • 25. China Outlook II Royal Dutch Shell said in mid-April 2009 that it had decided to postpone a coal-to-liquids (CTL) joint project with Shenhua Group in the Ningxia Hui autonomous region. But the company added that it will keep playing an active role in China's coal gasification sector. Recent Chinese publications have predicted that the country could have 30 million to 50 million tonnes of CTL production capacity by 2020.
  • 26.   USA The US is currently reliant on overseas suppliers for over 65% of its crude oil supplies - and this figure is set to rise still further over the next decade making the US increasingly vulnerable to geopolitical turmoil, supply disruptions and future price hikes. While the US has a rapidly diminishing volume of crude oil reserves, it possesses significant indigenous coal resources [much of which can be economically extracted]. Proven reserves of coal exist in 26 states - and US reserves amount to 250-years supply at current rates of consumption.
  • 27. US CTL Project Activity Until recently, activity in the USA centred around the development of several coal-to-liquids pilot plant projects. However, over the last two years several larger-scale coal liquefaction/polygeneration projects have been announced. Major projects [involving feasibility studies, design stage work, or construction phase] involve several companies and project partners. These include: DKRW Advanced Fuels Rentech Headwaters WMPI AIDEA Diversified Energy Synfuel Inc. The projects have capacities ranging from 2,000 to 80,000 barrels/day.
  • 28. US CTL Project Activity [continued] Syntroleum Corporation have formed a joint venture wit Tyson Foods. Dynamic Fuels will utilise Syntroleum’s Technology to convert animal fats and greases provided by Tyson into ultra-clean renewable diesel and jet fuel. The first production plant is being constructed at Geismar, Louisiana. Several Canadian companies [including Cash Minerals, Silverado, West Hawk Development Corp] are also evaluating or developing CTL projects – primarily in North America & China.  
  • 29. Important US CTL Project DKRW Advanced Fuel s are developing a large CTL project at Medicine Bow , Carbon County, Wyoming. This proposed p roject is a greenfield, mine-mouth, industrial gasification facility producing methanol – which will be converted to produce 15,000 to 20,000 barrels per day of gasoline using ExxonMobil methanol-to-gasoline (MTG) technology. Arch Coal are a major shareholder in the DKRW Advanced Fuels. In March 2009 DKRW reported that the construction phase of the project is expected to begin in 2010 – with fuel production scheduled for 2010 [timescale being subject to the project obtaining all the necessary permits]. The project has been delayed by the fall in the price of crude oil and the credit crunch in 2008/09 - and also faces significant opposition from environmental groups.
  • 30. Progress and Delays Several factors have either delayed the construction of the many US CTL projects – or effectively led to them being postponed for an indefinite period. These can be summarised under the following headings: The decline in the price of crude oil and oil products during 2008/09; The credit crunch – which has caused project finance to dry up; Rising construction costs [which in some cases doubled between 2006 and 2008]; Uncertainty over environmental regulations – particularly the need for carbon capture and storage [CCS] at major projects.
  • 31. Aircraft Fuel Testing Support for CTL has been provided by the US Department of Defense in developing its Clean Fuel Initiative. A selection of coal-based and biomass-based fuels have been tested in a range of aircraft. Sampling tubing and instrumentation control cables laid out on the pavement beside NASA’s DC-8 flying laboratory in between synthetic fuels emission and engine performance tests at the Dryden Aircraft Operations Facility in Palmdale, California. During early 2009 NASA and 11 other research groups, including researchers from the US Department of Defense (DoD), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), tested two synthetic jet fuels derived from gasified coal and natural gas using the Fischer-Tropsch process (Jet CTL and GTL). These tests are part of the Alternative Aviation Fuel Experiment [AAFEX].
  • 32. Environmental Opposition Many environmental groups in the US have been extremely vocal in their opposition to new CTL plants - saying the plants are dirty and will only increase the nation’s carbon footprint and cause more global warming. Their influence at the Congressional and State levels has undermined the support for CTL from the sector’s key political allies. Protesters in Washington D.C. – 1 st May 2009 US OUTLOOK It currently looks like CTL in the US will not make a significant contribution to liquid fuel production until at least the middle of the next decade – assuming that the financing is available for a new generation of plants and that environmental constraints and political opposition are overcome.  
  • 33. India India has shown considerable interest during the last four years in developing a CTL sector – based on the country’s large coal reserves.   The country has a growing volume of crude oil imports, partly due to an increasing vehicle population and corresponding increase in demand for transportation fuels. Considerable preparatory work has been carried out by the Indian Government to develop the necessary policy framework and other requirements that will underpin a new CTL sector in the country.   During 2008 there were several reports that South Africa's Sasol was working jointly with India's Tata Group to acquire coalfields for a new CTL venture. However, it seems likely that any joint CTL project between these two companies will be delayed until there is a strengthening of the global economy and their respective balance sheets.
  • 34. Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) (based in Mumbai) outlined plans in late-2008 to develop an integrated power project that would include coal mining, a 1,000-megawatt (MW) power plant fuelled by coal rejects, a coal-to-liquid (CTL) plant, and a fly-ash utilization unit. RIL has signed agreements with ExxonMobil Corporation, Headwaters Inc., and the German engineering company Uhde GmbH to help implement the plan. The proposed power plant is a partnership with Torrent Power Limited (Ahmedabad, Gujarat). RIL plans to set up the project at Angul in the Dhenkanal district of Orissa. Land acquisition has been started by the government and a 1,000-acre plot has already been identified for the CTL unit near Orissa's Gopalpur port. The CTL unit would involve a range of activities – including coal mining, the conversion of coal to oil, coal gasification, and the production of fertilizers such as ammonia from the coal-based gas.  
  • 35. Australia Companies based in Australia has been developing several underground coal gasification projects which will provide opportunities to test this evolving technology – with small volumes of product gas being used for power generation and possibly CTL production. In April 2009 Australia-based Regal Resources has completed a share placement to fund the pilot testing of a novel Underground Coal to Liquids (UCTL) process near Melbourne. Regal will seek to acquire Magma Limited, the holder of UCTL patents. UCTL is an in situ process that converts brown coal/lignite to liquid hydrocarbon and gas products within the coal seam. Each component of the process has been demonstrated in the laboratory, but there has yet to be a field test.
  • 36. Australia II Another key player in Australia is Linc Energy . In October 2008, Linc Energy successfully produced the first hydrocarbon liquids from its Chinchilla demonstration facility in Queensland [shown below] which introduces underground coal gasification (UCG) synthesis gas into a Fischer-Tropsch reactor that produces high quality synthetic fuel. Linc Energy is licensing Syntroleum's CTL technology. Linc Energy have also announced plans to develop UCG activities in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming, USA – with the goal of producing fuels like ultra clean diesel and Jet A1. Other UCG developments in Vietnam have also been proposed.
  • 37. Australia III Altona Energy are also continuing feasibility work for t he Arckaringa Project. Altona holds three exploration licences covering 2,500 sq. kms in the northern portion of the Permian Arckaringa Basin in South Australia. All three deposits lie close to the Adelaide to Darwin railroad and the Stuart Highway. Altona’s primary focus is the completion of a bankable feasibility study for an integrated 10 million barrel per year Coal to Liquid (CTL) plant with a 560 MW co-generation power facility.
  • 38. Australia IV The other prospective project in Australia is the Monash Energy Project . The project envisages a large CTL plant producing up to 60,000 barrels/day of FT diesel as well as associated power generation. Brown coal will be the fuel source – with the reserves located in the Latrobe Valley, approximately 160km to the east of Melbourne, Victoria. The development of this project [like other large coal-based projects in Australia] will require CCS. The project developers have yet to announce their final plans. Project details: www.monashenergy.com.au
  • 39. Other Countries Detailed feasibility studies for CTL projects have been carried out in several other countries – most notably New Zealand and the Philippines . There has also been considerable interest in developing CTLs in Indonesia . Sasol is currently carrying out a feasibility study for a series of coal-to-liquids plants in Indonesia which could have a targeted combined capacity of 1.1 million barrels per day. The underlying reasons for developing CTL capacity in these countries remain today. They have indigenous coal resources and significant imports of crude oil and petroleum products. However, the credit crisis conditions, which have affected global trade and the development of these projects, needs to abate before any major development work commences. .
  • 40. Conclusions Main Challenges and Opportunities The principal factor affecting this sector is the future price of crude oil . Currently crude oil prices are recovering from their lows caused by falling global demand. Prices are currently in the range of US$55-60/barrel.   Most analysts predict that prices will increase to US$65/barrel [or higher] by 2010. Long-term price forecasts are notoriously unreliable! CTL projects will require crude oil prices to remain at/above US$65-70/barrel before many currently moribund CTL projects are developed – and possibly US$85-90/barrel if CCS is included as part of the production facilities.  
  • 41. The long-predicted Peak Oil period will eventually arrive – probably early in the next decade. The current lack of investment in oil exploration and production due to the current global recession will probably lead to supply and demand for crude oil tightening significantly within the next two to three years. Demand for transport fuels, both globally and in the US, will recover as the global economy exits from the current economic recession. Increasing demand for transportation fuels [caused by future growth in global vehicle populations] will drive up crude oil prices. This will undoubtedly assist the development of alternative fuel sources – including CTLs. A key challenge affecting the development of CTL [and polygeneration plants] will be the potential commercial risks . Will the [battered] banks and project financiers overcome their fears of crude oil price movements and other market-related risks and support CTL projects?
  • 42. Project Costs and Project Funding Constraints In late April 2009 Industrialinfo.com broadcast a webcast containing some background data on the development of coal gasification plants in the US. There are about 30 coal gasification projects in the pipeline across the United States. These projects are non-IGCC, non-power generation coal gasification projects aimed at producing hydrocarbons mainly, syngas, LNG, and CTLs [including diesel]. At this stage not one of these projects has moved into the construction phase. The capital required to engineering, equip and construct these plants totals more than $59 billion, and in the current credit crisis, finding the funding to move these projects forward has been challenging for the industry. When the availability of credit improves these projects may be revived.  
  • 43. Another key factor which has caused the cancellation or delay of many CTL projects during 2008/09 has been the escalation of the capex for many CTL plants. The construction of an 80,000 barrels/day CTL plant in the US could cost in excess of US$5 billion. Detailed cost breakdowns of major projects are rarely published – and are frequently shrouded in commercial confidentiality. The lack of operating CTL plants has also hampered any reliable assessments of capex and operating costs. The imposition of additional environmental regulation on CTL plants – particularly future regulations involving carbon capture and storage – is also acting as a major deterrent to their construction. Until legislation and regulation on the development of CCS in US and other countries is finalised it is impossible for the project developers and their financial backers to produce accurate estimates on plant costs.  
  • 44. Further Challenges In many countries [including the US] there is a serious shortage of engineers and specialists who are needed to build and operate new CTL facilities. Long-term training programmes will be required. More RD&D is required over the next decade to improve CTL plant design, efficiency and operational characteristics. Process intensification could ensure significant improvements in plant efficiency and also the economic utilisation of smaller, stranded coal deposits. There are also opportunities for new CTL technologies to be commercially proven by 2020 – although this will require a significant capital investment by the main companies. Improvements in catalyst utilisation [particularly the use of nano-catalysts] will help reduce the costs of producing CTL fuels. This is important as some catalysts are based on high cost feedstocks – such as cobalt and molybdenum.  
  • 45. Improving Health & Safety CTL and associated chemical plants need to be operated to best international health, safety and environmental standards to avoid incidents causing serious loss of life – plus land, water and air pollution. Developing and maintaining these health, safety and environmental standards will be a challenge for China as well as other countries. Aftermath of Chemical Plant Explosion in China – 26 th August 2008 20 workers were killed, plus over 50 injured
  • 46. Environmental footprint of CTL technologies The production of liquid fuels from coal involves the production of 150% or more of CO 2 compared to fuels produced by traditional crude oil refineries. US research studies have indicated that if CTL production facilities are fitted with CCS their CO 2 emissions can be reduced to below that of crude oil refineries. A study produced by the US Department of Energy (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory [NETL], which was published in early 2009, concluded that a CTL process with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) yields a diesel fuel with 5-12% less lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to the average emissions profile of petroleum-derived diesel, based on the US national average in 2005. The report noted that further reductions in the GHG profile of the fuel can be achieved if coal is co-gasified with biomass.
  • 47. Environmental footprint II A further report from Rentech on the GHG emissions from its proposed Natchez CTL plant concluded that the fuels from the facility would produce 11% to 23% fewer carbon dioxide emissions than would result from fuels produced from conventional crude refining. Rentech proposes using petroleum coke as feedstock with the Rentech Fischer-Tropsch process to produce approximately 30,000 barrels per day of synthetic fuels, specialty waxes and chemicals. The facility is designed to capture approximately 80% of the carbon dioxide generated in the production process, which will be sold under a long-term agreement with Denbury Resources for enhanced oil recovery in the region.
  • 48. Installing CCS During April 2009 Shenhua Group announced that it is carrying out research and development for the country's first carbon capture and storage (CCS) project at its new direct CTL plant in Inner Mongolia. Carbon sequestration measures, including geological storage, are being considered for Shenhua's CCS project, which could be put into full operation during the next decade. It is likely that other CTL project operators in China will watch carefully watch the CCS RD&D work by Shenhua before committing themselves to adopting this technology.
  • 49. Other Impacts from CTL developments Large-scale CTL plants encourage the development and expansion of coalfields [often in remote locations]. Most CTL plants will be located in close proximity to low-cost sources of coal. Surface mining can have significant negative environmental impacts. In some regions new/upgraded transportation infrastructure may also be required to cope with increased coal extraction. And CTL plants may accelerate the depletion of coal resources in some regions. This is a concern in China where total coal production and demand is now anticipated to reach 3 billion tonnes per annum during the next decade.
  • 50. CTL plants also consume large volumes of water [several barrels of water per barrel of product]. This a major environmental issue in regions with a low rainfall [such as northern China]. Water is required for a range of uses at a CTL plant: process water, boiler feed water, steam for water shift reactions, and cooling water to remove heat at various production stages [particularly in the highly exothermic FT processes].   Reports from China have indicated that Shenhua Group has installed water recycling facilities at its new CTL plant – located in the arid Inner Mongolian region. To provide enough water for the Ordos CTL project, groundwater is piped in from 100 kilometres away. The price of water may significantly increase if regular severe droughts continue in China. They could act as a deterrent to the future expansion of CTL production.
  • 51. Final Thoughts CTL fuels will have to compete with other energy sources in the coming decades – not just traditional crude oil, but also biofuels, natural gas and non-traditional hydrocarbon fuels. The future development of CTL technologies will depend on the CTL plants being able to produce fuels that are competitive in the transportation fuel and chemicals markets - and also being able to meet increasingly strict environmental operating standards.   Strong government support must be a key element in the future development of CTL projects.
  • 52. Recommended Further Reading Gordon R. Couch (March 2008) Coal to liquids Report No: CCC/132 IEA Clean Coal Centre, London [http://www.iea-coal.org.uk]   Michael Toman, Aimee E. Curtright, David S. Ortiz, Joel Darmstadter, Brian Shannon (2008) Unconventional Fossil-Based Fuels: Economic and EnvironmentalTrade-Offs Rand Corporation [www.rand.org]   Thomas J. Tarka et al (January 2009) Affordable, Low-Carbon Diesel Fuel from Domestic Coal and Biomass Report No: DOE/NETL-2009/1349 National Energy Technology Laboratory [www.netl.doe.gov]