EVOLVE'14 | Maximize | Paul Legan | A Case Study in DAM
- 1. A CASE STUDY IN DIGITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT
NOVEMBER 18, 2014
PRESENTED BY
Paul Legan - 3|SHARE Corporation
- 2. 2
INTRODUCTION
Paul Legan
Managing Partner, 3|SHARE Corporation
• Background in Economics and Information Technology
• Located in San Diego, CA
- 4. 4
MANY GO TO SOCIAL MEDIA.
(AND AN EMBARRASSING AMOUNT ARE
PUPPY OR WEATHER RELATED.)
- 8. 8
AND I’M JUST ONE PERSON
IMAGINE A 20,000 EMPLOYEE COMPANY.
- 10. 10
ASSETS ARE A LOT OF THINGS.
•Often are scattered across an organization.
•Are the result of an iterative process.
•Often cost a lot to create and manage.
ASSETS ARE VALUABLE.
- 12. 12
COMMON REASONS FOR AN ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Centralize your
assets for easy
findability
Collaborate on
asset creation before
market launch
Distribute assets
to the proper
audiences
Reduce the effort
to organize assets
through putability.
Asset
Management
- 21. 21
QUESTIONS TO ASK
•What are the current limitations?
•Where are assets stored?
•Who creates the assets?
• Internal creative team vs. an external partner (or
both)
•What tools are used to create the assets?
•What’s the typical workflow?
- 23. 23
YOUR AUDIENCE IS… WHO?
• How many types of consumers of your assets are there?
•What do your audience members want to see most?
•What value do you generate for your audience members?
•Why do they want your assets?
- 25. 25
THAT’S NOT MY JOB.
•Who manages metadata?
•Who adds metadata to assets?
•What amount of automation is right for your team?
REMEMBER PUTABILITY?
- 27. 27
META-WHA..?
• How do you currently use metadata?
•What types of metadata do you see around you?
•Who can represent each group of users that will utilize the system?
•What types of information are finite and what require more freedom?
- 32. 32
BRANDPORTAL REQUIREMENTS
•ASICS needed a method to distribute assets to their retailers.
• They had outgrown their existing, custom-built DAM.
•Metadata was very important.
• As was sharing.
- 33. 33
WHAT’S INSIDE?
•Over 600 GB of assets
•Quarterly photography and editing sessions create thousands of assets
• Planned growth of over 1 TB per year
•Dozens of custom collections and distribution channels
- 34. 34
KEY FEATURES
•Automatically tag assets by folder and by product type
• Filter and sort assets so retailers can find exactly what the need
• Find related assets by metadata and logic
•Download assets into a variety of rendition formats
•Authors can create custom collections for specific users and groups
•Ability for end users to save and share carts with other users
- 35. 35
PUTABILITY
•Metadata Templates
• CSV Import by Product Type
• Creative Suite Integration
•WebDAV and FTP Sync
- 37. 37
FINDABILITY
• eCommerce-style filter
summary box
• Tag and Property filter options
•Ability for authors to customize
the set of filters per collection or
user
- 38. 38
SHARING
•Collections created by
authors and distributed
to many
• Shared carts created by
end users and sent to
individual users by email
- 39. 39
DISTRIBUTION
• Multiple asset rendition
types allow users to
download the right
format for their needs
• Related assets allow
users to download all
assets in a logical set
- 40. 40
RESULTS
•Cost savings of at least one full time employee effort to manage asset
distribution across the organization
• Hundreds of retailers share thousands of carts to their colleagues
• Retailer reduction of effort to produce artifacts based on ASICS
assets is significant
• Expansion into Asia by end of year and Europe by end of 2015
- 41. 41
KEY TAKEAWAYS
•Always consider growth and the multiple language support.
• You cannot spend too much time solving the metadata problem.
• Utilize the strengths of AEM Assets and extend where appropriate.
• The single best way to increase adoption of a new system is to reduce
the complexity (that putability thing again).