What do you think?
Rate this book
King: A Life
Goodreads Choice Award
Nominee for Best History & Biography (2023)The first full biography in decades, King mixes revelatory and exhaustive new research with brisk and accessible storytelling to forge the definitive life for our times.
Vividly written and exhaustively researched, Jonathan Eig’s A Life is the first major biography in decades of the civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr.―and the first to include recently declassified FBI files. In this revelatory new portrait of the preacher and activist who shook the world, the bestselling biographer gives us an intimate view of the courageous and often emotionally troubled human being who demanded peaceful protest for his movement but was rarely at peace with himself. He casts fresh light on the King family’s origins as well as MLK’s complex relationships with his wife, father, and fellow activists. King reveals a minister wrestling with his own human frailties and dark moods, a citizen hunted by his own government, and a man determined to fight for justice even if it proved to be a fight to the death. As he follows MLK from the classroom to the pulpit to the streets of Birmingham, Selma, and Memphis, Eig dramatically re-creates the journey of a man who recast American race relations and became our only modern-day founding father―as well as the nation’s most mourned martyr.
In this landmark biography, Eig gives us an MLK for our a deep thinker, a brilliant strategist, and a committed radical who led one of history’s greatest movements, and whose demands for racial and economic justice remain as urgent today as they were in his lifetime.
Includes 8 pages of black-and-white photographs
Vividly written and exhaustively researched, Jonathan Eig’s A Life is the first major biography in decades of the civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr.―and the first to include recently declassified FBI files. In this revelatory new portrait of the preacher and activist who shook the world, the bestselling biographer gives us an intimate view of the courageous and often emotionally troubled human being who demanded peaceful protest for his movement but was rarely at peace with himself. He casts fresh light on the King family’s origins as well as MLK’s complex relationships with his wife, father, and fellow activists. King reveals a minister wrestling with his own human frailties and dark moods, a citizen hunted by his own government, and a man determined to fight for justice even if it proved to be a fight to the death. As he follows MLK from the classroom to the pulpit to the streets of Birmingham, Selma, and Memphis, Eig dramatically re-creates the journey of a man who recast American race relations and became our only modern-day founding father―as well as the nation’s most mourned martyr.
In this landmark biography, Eig gives us an MLK for our a deep thinker, a brilliant strategist, and a committed radical who led one of history’s greatest movements, and whose demands for racial and economic justice remain as urgent today as they were in his lifetime.
Includes 8 pages of black-and-white photographs
688 pages, Hardcover
First published May 16, 2023
About the author
Jonathan Eig
19 books503 followersJonathan Eig is the author of six books, four of them New York Times best sellers, as well as four books for children. He is a former reporter for The Wall Street Journal. His works have been translated into more than a dozen languages.
His most recent book is "King: A Life." His previous book, Ali: A Life," was the winner of the PEN Award and hailed as an "epic" by Joyce Carol Oates in her New York Times review.
His other books are: "Luckiest Man: The Life and Death of Lou Gehrig;" "Opening Day: The Story of Jackie Robinson's First Season;" "Get Capone;" and "The Birth of the Pill."
Jonathan served as consulting producer on the Ken Burns PBS documentary on Muhammad Ali.
His most recent book is "King: A Life." His previous book, Ali: A Life," was the winner of the PEN Award and hailed as an "epic" by Joyce Carol Oates in her New York Times review.
His other books are: "Luckiest Man: The Life and Death of Lou Gehrig;" "Opening Day: The Story of Jackie Robinson's First Season;" "Get Capone;" and "The Birth of the Pill."
Jonathan served as consulting producer on the Ken Burns PBS documentary on Muhammad Ali.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,185 reviews
May 6, 2024
May 6, 2024: Awarded Pulitzer Prize in Biography. A long overdue honor for the author.
In a nutshell wow. Let me get to wow. A few years ago I read Jonathan Eig’s Opening Day as my annual Jackie Robinson read. I read about Jackie Robinson every year and know his story well, but this book read like a story, a compelling story at that. I crossed checked with other nonfiction readers who I respect and they all noted that the books of Eig’s that they have read have all been top of the line. Even though at that point I had only read the one book, I could tell. As a primarily nonfiction reader I am always on the lookout as to what my preferred authors are writing or pursuing next. For the last few years, Eig’s news centered around his 2018 exploration of Muhammad Ali, which earned him National Book Award consideration. For his next book, however, Eig desired to tackle a topic greater than Ali. That subject, no small task, was Dr Martin Luther King, Jr. The history buffs among us would be waiting impatiently for that book, sure to be Eig’s signature work, to be published.
As a person who grew up reading biographies, I want the book to tell the person’s life story from a myriad of angles. Dr Martin Luther King, Jr has been a part of America’s ethos for over sixty years. Anyone fifteen years or more years older than me would have recollections about the man, either positive or negative, great or small. This biography, the first full length volume about King in thirty five years, was not written for people old enough to remember a living and breathing man. It was written for those born in the seventies and later, my generation and those that come after it, so we would know who this man was from beyond the I Have a Dream speech. Most school age children know the speech rather than the man. This birthday has become a federal holiday, a lead up to African American heritage month. Schools might teach the speech and explain to children to follow their dreams. Or they might have a brief lesson on Dr King. Libraries used to have programs about King on his birthday but now those are closed as well, so school children do not have as much of a chance to learn about who he was or what his movement was about. His birthday becoming yet another three day weekend on the academic calendar. Jonathan Eig set about to rectify this. Generations would learn who Dr King was beyond the I Have a Dream Speech. Since knowing about this book, I had been salivating at my chance to read it, and it lived up to its hype.
It is not necessary to regurgitate King’s life. That is the purpose of a biography, and Eig is among the elite when it comes to that. After a chance meeting with one of King’s childhood friends, he was encouraged to interview those who remembered him well, friends and family and acquaintances, before it was too late. He also is the first biographer to utilize works on the internet, his father’s unpublished memoir, and King’s extensive FBI files. From these primary source documents, Eig was able to piece together the life of Dr King from a uniquely new perspective. The background about segregation and Jim Crow and the key events in the civil rights movement all receive their due, but this book is about the whole person behind the movement and how he got to that point. Not all aspects of King’s life were positive or pretty. Even though I have read extensively on Jackie Robinson and the civil rights movement including one of Coretta Scott King’s memoirs, at times this book was still hard to take in, and I had to read it in small doses rather than as one long story, despite Eig’s extraordinary writing. His purpose has been to introduce the whole person and if that meant including the not so savory parts of both King’s life and the civil rights movement, then that’s what it would take to piece together this life for those too young to remember.
As a teacher I want to teach about Dr King to my students. Granted I am a substitute and I never know what class I am going to end up with on the days closest to King’s birthday. Somehow the discussion ends up back with I Have a Dream. Little did I know prior to reading that while this speech is considered a cornerstone moment in American history, it is hardly who King was. Although his father was a prominent minister in Atlanta, the schools King attended were segregated, and despite having dedicated teachers, not as advanced as the white schools. King skipped two grades during school and entered Morehouse College at age fifteen. This made him younger and put him at an academic disadvantage to his classmates, leading King to the lifelong tendency to plagiarize. From Morehouse, King attended Crozer Theological Seminary, his first time in the north, and finally to Boston University where he would eventually receive his doctorate in religion. It was in Boston that he wrote a letter of encouragement to Jackie Robinson, noting how his integrating a major sport would open up new opportunities to the race. It was also in Boston that King met his future wife Coretta and realized that he was called to preach in the south. Somehow before the civil rights movement took off, King had a calling that he would be the one to lead it. Still in his twenties, this was a tremendous burden to be placed on anyone, and, yet, King and Coretta answered this call to lead.
I am not sure where I would start teaching about King after reading this. Many blacks in the south were thrilled with the gains of the early parts of the civil rights movement. Yet a younger generation lead in part by Malcolm X and then Stokeley Carmichael were not satisfied with King’s adherence to passive resistance and non-violence. They called for black power and a more militant means to achieving societal gains. The more extremist sectors of the civil rights movement called King’s speech a sellout to whites and the federal government. On the other hand, the FBI, an old boys network resistant to change, believed King to be too extremist and wiretapped his phones for years. With access to most of these FBI tapes, we now know that King might not have been a perfect husband or person. He kept mistresses, gambled, drank, and shot pool. He slept four hours a night and was rarely home as he canvassed the country giving speeches and fundraising. When at home, he practiced his sermons and speeches so they would have the desired affect upon delivery, in King’s signature deep booming voice, that at times sounded like singing and prayer. This placed a heavy burden on Coretta as the mother of his four children even though she desired to travel and give speeches of her own. Was King the perfect person and minister that society made him out to be? Probably not but, not to condone his behavior, he would not have been the first prominent person in society to keep a mistress. Was he as left wing as the FBI made him out to be? Again, probably not; initially he just wanted to be treated like a full person under the constitution, an inalienable right that had been granted to white Americans two hundred years prior. Using passive resistance, sermons, peaceful marches, sit-ins, and boycotts does not paint the picture of an extremist person. Rather the release of these FBI tapes paints the bureau as ruthless, extremist, not to be trusted, all in the name of denouncing the person in the movement who was probably the least extreme. By utilizing the FBI tapes, Eig does give readers a more complex person, while stating his unfavorable opinion of the FBI.
Jonathan Eig gives his due to Coretta Scott King’s involvement in the movement as well as many key figures including King’s closest friends Ralph Abernathy and Andrew Young. They both play a prominent role in the duration of the book. After reading this biography that was well worth its wait I have come away learning a more complete picture of a man who even I knew most by his speech, birthday, and date of assassination. With the recent death and all but retirement of some of the nation’s prominent historians, the torch has been passed to a younger generation of history writers who write history like the story that it is in a way that makes it accessible to younger generations. Jonathan Eig should have his name at the forefront of discussion when it comes to who is America’s top historian today. His work on King should be considered his opus, one I am privileged to have read, and one that vaults him to the top when discussing a who’s who of America’s history writers
5 stars
Book of the year
In a nutshell wow. Let me get to wow. A few years ago I read Jonathan Eig’s Opening Day as my annual Jackie Robinson read. I read about Jackie Robinson every year and know his story well, but this book read like a story, a compelling story at that. I crossed checked with other nonfiction readers who I respect and they all noted that the books of Eig’s that they have read have all been top of the line. Even though at that point I had only read the one book, I could tell. As a primarily nonfiction reader I am always on the lookout as to what my preferred authors are writing or pursuing next. For the last few years, Eig’s news centered around his 2018 exploration of Muhammad Ali, which earned him National Book Award consideration. For his next book, however, Eig desired to tackle a topic greater than Ali. That subject, no small task, was Dr Martin Luther King, Jr. The history buffs among us would be waiting impatiently for that book, sure to be Eig’s signature work, to be published.
As a person who grew up reading biographies, I want the book to tell the person’s life story from a myriad of angles. Dr Martin Luther King, Jr has been a part of America’s ethos for over sixty years. Anyone fifteen years or more years older than me would have recollections about the man, either positive or negative, great or small. This biography, the first full length volume about King in thirty five years, was not written for people old enough to remember a living and breathing man. It was written for those born in the seventies and later, my generation and those that come after it, so we would know who this man was from beyond the I Have a Dream speech. Most school age children know the speech rather than the man. This birthday has become a federal holiday, a lead up to African American heritage month. Schools might teach the speech and explain to children to follow their dreams. Or they might have a brief lesson on Dr King. Libraries used to have programs about King on his birthday but now those are closed as well, so school children do not have as much of a chance to learn about who he was or what his movement was about. His birthday becoming yet another three day weekend on the academic calendar. Jonathan Eig set about to rectify this. Generations would learn who Dr King was beyond the I Have a Dream Speech. Since knowing about this book, I had been salivating at my chance to read it, and it lived up to its hype.
It is not necessary to regurgitate King’s life. That is the purpose of a biography, and Eig is among the elite when it comes to that. After a chance meeting with one of King’s childhood friends, he was encouraged to interview those who remembered him well, friends and family and acquaintances, before it was too late. He also is the first biographer to utilize works on the internet, his father’s unpublished memoir, and King’s extensive FBI files. From these primary source documents, Eig was able to piece together the life of Dr King from a uniquely new perspective. The background about segregation and Jim Crow and the key events in the civil rights movement all receive their due, but this book is about the whole person behind the movement and how he got to that point. Not all aspects of King’s life were positive or pretty. Even though I have read extensively on Jackie Robinson and the civil rights movement including one of Coretta Scott King’s memoirs, at times this book was still hard to take in, and I had to read it in small doses rather than as one long story, despite Eig’s extraordinary writing. His purpose has been to introduce the whole person and if that meant including the not so savory parts of both King’s life and the civil rights movement, then that’s what it would take to piece together this life for those too young to remember.
As a teacher I want to teach about Dr King to my students. Granted I am a substitute and I never know what class I am going to end up with on the days closest to King’s birthday. Somehow the discussion ends up back with I Have a Dream. Little did I know prior to reading that while this speech is considered a cornerstone moment in American history, it is hardly who King was. Although his father was a prominent minister in Atlanta, the schools King attended were segregated, and despite having dedicated teachers, not as advanced as the white schools. King skipped two grades during school and entered Morehouse College at age fifteen. This made him younger and put him at an academic disadvantage to his classmates, leading King to the lifelong tendency to plagiarize. From Morehouse, King attended Crozer Theological Seminary, his first time in the north, and finally to Boston University where he would eventually receive his doctorate in religion. It was in Boston that he wrote a letter of encouragement to Jackie Robinson, noting how his integrating a major sport would open up new opportunities to the race. It was also in Boston that King met his future wife Coretta and realized that he was called to preach in the south. Somehow before the civil rights movement took off, King had a calling that he would be the one to lead it. Still in his twenties, this was a tremendous burden to be placed on anyone, and, yet, King and Coretta answered this call to lead.
I am not sure where I would start teaching about King after reading this. Many blacks in the south were thrilled with the gains of the early parts of the civil rights movement. Yet a younger generation lead in part by Malcolm X and then Stokeley Carmichael were not satisfied with King’s adherence to passive resistance and non-violence. They called for black power and a more militant means to achieving societal gains. The more extremist sectors of the civil rights movement called King’s speech a sellout to whites and the federal government. On the other hand, the FBI, an old boys network resistant to change, believed King to be too extremist and wiretapped his phones for years. With access to most of these FBI tapes, we now know that King might not have been a perfect husband or person. He kept mistresses, gambled, drank, and shot pool. He slept four hours a night and was rarely home as he canvassed the country giving speeches and fundraising. When at home, he practiced his sermons and speeches so they would have the desired affect upon delivery, in King’s signature deep booming voice, that at times sounded like singing and prayer. This placed a heavy burden on Coretta as the mother of his four children even though she desired to travel and give speeches of her own. Was King the perfect person and minister that society made him out to be? Probably not but, not to condone his behavior, he would not have been the first prominent person in society to keep a mistress. Was he as left wing as the FBI made him out to be? Again, probably not; initially he just wanted to be treated like a full person under the constitution, an inalienable right that had been granted to white Americans two hundred years prior. Using passive resistance, sermons, peaceful marches, sit-ins, and boycotts does not paint the picture of an extremist person. Rather the release of these FBI tapes paints the bureau as ruthless, extremist, not to be trusted, all in the name of denouncing the person in the movement who was probably the least extreme. By utilizing the FBI tapes, Eig does give readers a more complex person, while stating his unfavorable opinion of the FBI.
Jonathan Eig gives his due to Coretta Scott King’s involvement in the movement as well as many key figures including King’s closest friends Ralph Abernathy and Andrew Young. They both play a prominent role in the duration of the book. After reading this biography that was well worth its wait I have come away learning a more complete picture of a man who even I knew most by his speech, birthday, and date of assassination. With the recent death and all but retirement of some of the nation’s prominent historians, the torch has been passed to a younger generation of history writers who write history like the story that it is in a way that makes it accessible to younger generations. Jonathan Eig should have his name at the forefront of discussion when it comes to who is America’s top historian today. His work on King should be considered his opus, one I am privileged to have read, and one that vaults him to the top when discussing a who’s who of America’s history writers
5 stars
Book of the year
January 19, 2023
Jonathan Eig has earned himself a lifelong reader. This bio of MLK is unputdownable. Seriously, it is ridiculously good. Extensively sourced and beautifully written, Eig's work presents a flawed, good man doing the best he could to fight for the oppressed while loving his friends and enemies. Sadly, Dr. King's story and the resistance he faced to equality is still a relevant subject. Gladly, Jonathan Eig has penned a volume that compellingly tells that story.
ARC provided.
Great book.
ARC provided.
Great book.
February 10, 2023
Over the years, I have read several books on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., his life & the movement. Of all those books, this is by far the best book on Dr. King. Jonathan Eig's biography of Dr. King covered many facets of his life which we had never really seen before. From start to finish, I could not put this one down.
Thank to Netgalley, the publisher & Jonathan Eig for the opportunity to read this ARC.
Thank to Netgalley, the publisher & Jonathan Eig for the opportunity to read this ARC.
May 29, 2023
Audiobook ……read by Dion Graham
…..20 hours and 45 minutes
We’ve heard “I Have A Dream” speech so many times we don’t even hear it anymore”.
Many people took MLK’s
nonviolent approach as passivity….. but….. forget that - Martin Luther King Jr. was actually very aggressive with nonviolent protests.
“MLK (called Little Mike at home) was deliberately misunderstood in his lifetime… And he remains so today”.
This is the first biography to make use of thousands of recently released FBI documents, (King was under stressful, surveillance), thousands of other researched papers, letters, business records, White House phone recordings, oral histories, un-aired television footage. Many family and friends that contributed to this book.
Those closest people to King saw his flaws all along. His power grew from his ability to grapple with contradictions.
But when pressure against King built up, he didn’t back down—-despite the obvious risks. Yet — MLK did have health problems, and one wonders if the stress that he lived under was partly the cause.
King reminded his followers of the moral beauty of their fight.
It was not only for fairness, it was for the future.
It was for redemption. It was for America to be a better loving country for all people.
It was for God.
Every single time that King could’ve stepped down… (and nobody would have blamed him), he kept going.
It was his faith in God that kept him going.
I got a lot of value and joy from the 20 hours I spent with this book.
Phenomenal Biography…..
…..covering a full life: family
upbringing (his parents, controlling Father, and two siblings), his education, dating a white woman in college, his marriage to Coretta Scott, and their four children, church dedication and leadership, the fight over the bus seat which was much bigger that the immediate injustice, jail, King’s sensitivities, depression, loneliness, beliefs that didn’t waver, his relationship with John F Kennedy, and Lyndon Johnson, the March on Washington Street…..etc. etc. This book is massively comprehensive….
The Dream….the hope….
“We the Negro people are no longer afraid” ….. “we have woke up” ——
Protesters came out of the woodwork——singing and walking.
“People had the power to change the world”.
King practiced educating White people of the Negro revolution.
He was arrested 29 times fighting for justice….and ‘hated’ the isolation.
The Baptist Minister and social rights activist was our greatest leader in the civil rights movement in the 1950’s and 60’s.
His contribution to civil rights, freedom, an equality for African-Americans was beyond ‘business-as-usual’.
He also delivered some of the 20th century’s most exemplary celebrated speeches.
King won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 —
Jonathan Eig should win the Pulitzer Prize for this book in 2023.
Given that there had not been a biography on Martin Luther King for almost 40 years… This book is an outstanding accomplishment— relevant to the years we’re living right now.
“Love is the only force that can capture hate”.
…..20 hours and 45 minutes
We’ve heard “I Have A Dream” speech so many times we don’t even hear it anymore”.
Many people took MLK’s
nonviolent approach as passivity….. but….. forget that - Martin Luther King Jr. was actually very aggressive with nonviolent protests.
“MLK (called Little Mike at home) was deliberately misunderstood in his lifetime… And he remains so today”.
This is the first biography to make use of thousands of recently released FBI documents, (King was under stressful, surveillance), thousands of other researched papers, letters, business records, White House phone recordings, oral histories, un-aired television footage. Many family and friends that contributed to this book.
Those closest people to King saw his flaws all along. His power grew from his ability to grapple with contradictions.
But when pressure against King built up, he didn’t back down—-despite the obvious risks. Yet — MLK did have health problems, and one wonders if the stress that he lived under was partly the cause.
King reminded his followers of the moral beauty of their fight.
It was not only for fairness, it was for the future.
It was for redemption. It was for America to be a better loving country for all people.
It was for God.
Every single time that King could’ve stepped down… (and nobody would have blamed him), he kept going.
It was his faith in God that kept him going.
I got a lot of value and joy from the 20 hours I spent with this book.
Phenomenal Biography…..
…..covering a full life: family
upbringing (his parents, controlling Father, and two siblings), his education, dating a white woman in college, his marriage to Coretta Scott, and their four children, church dedication and leadership, the fight over the bus seat which was much bigger that the immediate injustice, jail, King’s sensitivities, depression, loneliness, beliefs that didn’t waver, his relationship with John F Kennedy, and Lyndon Johnson, the March on Washington Street…..etc. etc. This book is massively comprehensive….
The Dream….the hope….
“We the Negro people are no longer afraid” ….. “we have woke up” ——
Protesters came out of the woodwork——singing and walking.
“People had the power to change the world”.
King practiced educating White people of the Negro revolution.
He was arrested 29 times fighting for justice….and ‘hated’ the isolation.
The Baptist Minister and social rights activist was our greatest leader in the civil rights movement in the 1950’s and 60’s.
His contribution to civil rights, freedom, an equality for African-Americans was beyond ‘business-as-usual’.
He also delivered some of the 20th century’s most exemplary celebrated speeches.
King won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 —
Jonathan Eig should win the Pulitzer Prize for this book in 2023.
Given that there had not been a biography on Martin Luther King for almost 40 years… This book is an outstanding accomplishment— relevant to the years we’re living right now.
“Love is the only force that can capture hate”.
July 2, 2024
A monumental biography. Meticulously researched with compassion, and a love for the most iconic Civil Rights Leader of all time, Mr. Eig deservedly won his Pulitzer Prize for writing "King".
This is no ordinary biography. Eig writes of Dr. King's life and death as if it were a kaleidoscope of images and moments that sear themselves into the reader's mind. Since MLK has become so iconic in the American lexicon, I read about a human being whose life mirrored those classic heroes that rise and fall.
I did not know Dr. King almost died from a stabbing made by a mentally disturbed woman named Izola Wade Curry in Harlem. I learned that Dr. King had an ambivalent relationship with President Kennedy when it came to Civil Rights. I learned that Dr. King had a far better working relationship with President Johnson who later signed the Civil Rights Act and the Fair Housing Act into law. Their collaboration fell apart when Dr. King became vocal about his antiwar stance on Vietnam.
King's relationship with his equally iconic wife Coretta was a reserved one. She stood quietly on the sidelines, pushing her own agendas of Civil Rights as she supported her husband. She took the high road when her husband's several infidelities came into light. After King was assassinated, Mrs. King became a staunch supporter of "women's rights, gay rights, religious freedom, AIDS awareness, nuclear disarmament" (Eig 556). She would pass away in 2006.
Dr. King's relationship with his father, Daddy King was also fraught with tension, and I did not know that his mother Alberta would later be murdered shortly after his assassination by James Earl Ray.
Eig also chronicles with a deft hand of King's triumphs: With the help of Bayard Rustin, Dr. King was able to organize the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. This becomes the time and place where history was made when King orated the legendary "I Have a Dream" speech in 1963. Eig writes about the impact of this speech, "King reminded listeners that his people have suffered, that their trust had been violated...fought and died in the struggle for freedom" (Eig 337).
Also he recounts when King wrote "Letter from Birmingham Jail", of how this would become "part of American History that captured the spirit of the Civil Rights movement and the fierce brilliance of its leader" (Eig 296).
King would go on to spar, and in equal measure have friendships and professional relationships with historical icons Bayard Rustin, Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, President Nixon (whom he was on friendlier terms with, rather than President Kennedy); Senator Robert F. Kennedy. He would
witness the birth of Brown vs Board of Education, the Selma March of 1965, the murder of Emmett Till, and the genesis of the Vietnam War just to list a few of the world events that would dominate during King's life. He would also unfortunately become the target of J. Edgar Hoover’s racist ire, and he’d pursue on bringing King down at every turn.
Eig manages to capture King's inner life in heartbreaking fashion, "the movement had forced the nation to address some of its inequities, and merely exposed others. The same liberals who helped fight Jim Crow in the South failed to address issues of job discrimination, housing segregation, police assaults on black communities in the North. These conditions would not change" (Eig 533). Though King was able to project a calm, stoic demeanor- he often felt that white allies would not fully acknowledge systemic and racist ideologies that had been put in place.
I truly felt that Dr. King was portrayed as a full fledged human: with hopes, fears, anxieties, lust and sexual desire- all things that J. Edgar Hoover hated about him as he conducted surveillance on him. I think I walked away with a lot more information about Dr. King than I knew before in a roundabout way, and Mr. Eig has written this splendid and sprawling biography that is equally intimate.
As a kid growing up, I only knew vague information about Dr. King's legacy.
But as an adult and educator, I agree with Eig's opinion that "our simplified celebration of King comes at a cost, sapping the strength of his philosophical and intellectual contributions" (557).
I did not know much, and after reading Eig's book, I know a little more.
This is no ordinary biography. Eig writes of Dr. King's life and death as if it were a kaleidoscope of images and moments that sear themselves into the reader's mind. Since MLK has become so iconic in the American lexicon, I read about a human being whose life mirrored those classic heroes that rise and fall.
I did not know Dr. King almost died from a stabbing made by a mentally disturbed woman named Izola Wade Curry in Harlem. I learned that Dr. King had an ambivalent relationship with President Kennedy when it came to Civil Rights. I learned that Dr. King had a far better working relationship with President Johnson who later signed the Civil Rights Act and the Fair Housing Act into law. Their collaboration fell apart when Dr. King became vocal about his antiwar stance on Vietnam.
King's relationship with his equally iconic wife Coretta was a reserved one. She stood quietly on the sidelines, pushing her own agendas of Civil Rights as she supported her husband. She took the high road when her husband's several infidelities came into light. After King was assassinated, Mrs. King became a staunch supporter of "women's rights, gay rights, religious freedom, AIDS awareness, nuclear disarmament" (Eig 556). She would pass away in 2006.
Dr. King's relationship with his father, Daddy King was also fraught with tension, and I did not know that his mother Alberta would later be murdered shortly after his assassination by James Earl Ray.
Eig also chronicles with a deft hand of King's triumphs: With the help of Bayard Rustin, Dr. King was able to organize the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. This becomes the time and place where history was made when King orated the legendary "I Have a Dream" speech in 1963. Eig writes about the impact of this speech, "King reminded listeners that his people have suffered, that their trust had been violated...fought and died in the struggle for freedom" (Eig 337).
Also he recounts when King wrote "Letter from Birmingham Jail", of how this would become "part of American History that captured the spirit of the Civil Rights movement and the fierce brilliance of its leader" (Eig 296).
King would go on to spar, and in equal measure have friendships and professional relationships with historical icons Bayard Rustin, Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, President Nixon (whom he was on friendlier terms with, rather than President Kennedy); Senator Robert F. Kennedy. He would
witness the birth of Brown vs Board of Education, the Selma March of 1965, the murder of Emmett Till, and the genesis of the Vietnam War just to list a few of the world events that would dominate during King's life. He would also unfortunately become the target of J. Edgar Hoover’s racist ire, and he’d pursue on bringing King down at every turn.
Eig manages to capture King's inner life in heartbreaking fashion, "the movement had forced the nation to address some of its inequities, and merely exposed others. The same liberals who helped fight Jim Crow in the South failed to address issues of job discrimination, housing segregation, police assaults on black communities in the North. These conditions would not change" (Eig 533). Though King was able to project a calm, stoic demeanor- he often felt that white allies would not fully acknowledge systemic and racist ideologies that had been put in place.
I truly felt that Dr. King was portrayed as a full fledged human: with hopes, fears, anxieties, lust and sexual desire- all things that J. Edgar Hoover hated about him as he conducted surveillance on him. I think I walked away with a lot more information about Dr. King than I knew before in a roundabout way, and Mr. Eig has written this splendid and sprawling biography that is equally intimate.
As a kid growing up, I only knew vague information about Dr. King's legacy.
But as an adult and educator, I agree with Eig's opinion that "our simplified celebration of King comes at a cost, sapping the strength of his philosophical and intellectual contributions" (557).
I did not know much, and after reading Eig's book, I know a little more.
November 25, 2023
"[Martin Luther] King mixed poetry, prayer, and patriotism. For another speaker, the result might have been ponderous, but King used these religious and poetic forces to inspire all of America to seize this moment of opportunity; to bring peace, love, and equality to those who had so long been denied; and to fulfill, at last, the promise of the American dream . . . the crowd roared and sang out in praise." -- regarding an early rendition of the famed 'I Have a Dream' speech in June 1963, on page 322
Bringing the same sort of thoroughness and detail to the literary table that earlier fueled Opening Day: The Story of Jackie Robinson's First Season and Ali (both are excellent, by the way), it is perhaps no great surprise - but still certainly welcome - that author Eig now focuses on the civil rights icon Martin Luther King as the subject of his latest biographic endeavor with the aptly-titled King. It's another exemplary work, clocking in at nearly 600 pages, and paying respect to the man's regrettably brief thirty-nine years. Beginning with an unforgettable opening scene - with MLK's fraternal grandmother dispensing some heaven-sent whup-ass on the ignorant man who foolishly attacked her juvenile son (MLK's father) while he was performing a good deed for a neighbor - readers follow King from cradle to assassination as he expands his good works beyond the pulpit in the deep American South, bringing a bold sense of legitimacy and honor with his non-violent approach to achieving justice, change, and fairness for oppressed citizens. Admittedly, he was only human and not a saint (this was even pointed out by his strong and dutiful wife Coretta in the text), so the plagiarism during his college years and the multiple affairs during his marriage are discussed, but largely the narrative sticks to his tireless work throughout the 50's and 60's. It would appear he truly felt a calling to try to right the wrongs affecting hundreds of thousands of folks, and it was telling and extremely sad that towards the end of his life a melancholic and troubled MLK correctly and unfortunately intuited (especially in the aftermath of the murders of John F. Kennedy and Malcolm X) that he soon would also meet a violent and intentionally tragic end. I additionally learned of a number of previously unknown (to me) facts, such as his birth name was really 'Michael,' he attended seminary only an hour's drive from my hometown (!), and he survived being stabbed by a deranged woman during a publicity appearance in 1958, with immediate recovery instructions being not to sneeze or it could possibly cause his demise (!!!). This was an absorbing and invigorating book.
Bringing the same sort of thoroughness and detail to the literary table that earlier fueled Opening Day: The Story of Jackie Robinson's First Season and Ali (both are excellent, by the way), it is perhaps no great surprise - but still certainly welcome - that author Eig now focuses on the civil rights icon Martin Luther King as the subject of his latest biographic endeavor with the aptly-titled King. It's another exemplary work, clocking in at nearly 600 pages, and paying respect to the man's regrettably brief thirty-nine years. Beginning with an unforgettable opening scene - with MLK's fraternal grandmother dispensing some heaven-sent whup-ass on the ignorant man who foolishly attacked her juvenile son (MLK's father) while he was performing a good deed for a neighbor - readers follow King from cradle to assassination as he expands his good works beyond the pulpit in the deep American South, bringing a bold sense of legitimacy and honor with his non-violent approach to achieving justice, change, and fairness for oppressed citizens. Admittedly, he was only human and not a saint (this was even pointed out by his strong and dutiful wife Coretta in the text), so the plagiarism during his college years and the multiple affairs during his marriage are discussed, but largely the narrative sticks to his tireless work throughout the 50's and 60's. It would appear he truly felt a calling to try to right the wrongs affecting hundreds of thousands of folks, and it was telling and extremely sad that towards the end of his life a melancholic and troubled MLK correctly and unfortunately intuited (especially in the aftermath of the murders of John F. Kennedy and Malcolm X) that he soon would also meet a violent and intentionally tragic end. I additionally learned of a number of previously unknown (to me) facts, such as his birth name was really 'Michael,' he attended seminary only an hour's drive from my hometown (!), and he survived being stabbed by a deranged woman during a publicity appearance in 1958, with immediate recovery instructions being not to sneeze or it could possibly cause his demise (!!!). This was an absorbing and invigorating book.
September 19, 2023
Revised and cross-published on The Avocado
Jonathan Eig's King: A Life is the latest biography of civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. Eig, previously a biographer of Muhammad Ali and Jackie Robinson, notes that "King's life and lessons are often smoothed and polished beyond recognition," creating a saintly image that people of all political persuasions - radical organizers, milquetoast liberals, even mendacious conservatives - have tried claiming as their own. None of this actually grapples with King's beliefs, which balanced progressive theology, traditional Black Baptist oratory, social democratic reformist ideas and unwavering Christian faith. Nor does it account for King's deep unpopularity in his lifetime, with conservatives smearing him as a communist, liberals fretting that his tactics incited violence and Black radicals who felt he had "one foot in the cotton field and another in the White House." Eig seeks to reintroduce us to King the Man, a flawed individual riven by inner conflict and self-doubt, but also an extraordinary leader, organizer and spokesman for his cause.
Eig's book spends a lot of time sketching King's personal relationships, starting with his father Martin Luther King Sr. A popular Atlanta priest with strong memories of growing up in the post-Reconstruction South, Daddy King's domineering personality cast a long shadow and provided a forbidding example to his son. Though King considered becoming a teacher, studying at Morehouse College, he eventually chose the priesthood, attending graduate school in Boston and marrying Coretta Scott over his father's objections. In 1954, King was assigned to the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery Alabama, where he soon gained a reputation as an uncommonly powerful orator. Those who knew King by reputation were disarmed first by his relatively short stature, then by his informal, jocular style which won him many admirers. Not long after arriving in Montgomery, though, King found himself in the limelight, when the NAACP's Rosa Parks initiated a bus boycott that helped kick off the modern Civil Rights Movement.
King's leadership of the Boycott gained him a national reputation, though as Eig stresses he was only one of many organizers, from Parks to NAACP leader E.D. Nixon, who carried it to its conclusions. King wrestled with the burdens and pleasures of his newfound notoriety. On the one hand, he was feted in the press and lionized by Black leaders for his courage and oratory; but he and his family were targeted with arrest, harassment, death threats and several assassination attempts (one in Harlem, where he was stabbed in the chest by a deranged woman). King developed close friendships with fellow minister Ralph Albernathy, who helped him cofound the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and Stanley Levison, a white progressive whose ties to the Communist Party earned King no end of grief. But he also clashed, not only with radicals like Malcolm X but allies like Birmingham organizer Fred Shuttleworth, who feuded with King over tactics and resented his outsized media coverage. And his relationship with Coretta often grew strained; Coretta, who had aspired to be a singer, wasn't fond of her husband's insistence that she serve as a stay-at-home wife, and eventually began finding ways to involve herself in the Movement's actions.
Eig provides lively sketches of the highpoints of the Civil Rights Movement, from the confrontations in Montgomery and Birmingham to the March on Washington, amusingly depicted in novelistic style through the perspective of onlookers (including King's police guard, who fidgets with the microphone during King's speech). He shows that King's worldview wasn't easily classified; an admirer of progressive theologians like Reinhold Niebuhr and Harry Emerson Fosdick, he also incorporated Gandhi's tactics of nonviolence and Black community organizing to his work, creating an admixture of ideas that defied easy classification. While he described himself as "more socialistic than capitalistic" to Coretta, he balked at the materialism of Marxist thought and saw it more useful as a critique than a basis for action. Perhaps this accounts for his ability to win allies across the political spectrum, from mainstream politicians like Nelson Rockefeller and Lyndon Johnson to radicals like Stokely Carmichael/Kwame Ture, who butted heads with King over his "Black Power" slogan but viewed him with admiration as an "amazing, incredible, inspiring" leader who provided a generation of activists "their first real act of self-affirmation."
While Taylor Branch's three-volume biography depicts King's relationships with politicians and the media in fine grain detail, Eig makes heavy use of recently available documents, from oral histories to FBI files and White House tapes, to reconstruct King's life. We're reminded again of Hoover's campaign against the man he dubbed America's "top alley cat," his connivance with Kennedy and Johnson in harassing and wiretapping King and the infamous "suicide letter" which, Eig shows, contributed to King's periodic bouts of depression. Eig deals fairly with discussions of King's near-compulsive infidelity, particularly his long-term relationship with SCLC's Education Director Dorothy Cotton; though Coretta never acknowledged King's affairs, the evidence is strong and damning. To Eig's credit, though, he doesn't use this information to sensationalize or downgrade King; it's a part of his life that's explored and placed in context, without undue stress.
Indeed, King's actions weren't always admirable. Bayard Rustin, often criticized King for his aversion to conflict, a paradoxical trait for such a forceful protest leader. Rustin, who contributed mightily to the SCLC's founding and the March on Washington, spoke from experience as King distanced himself from Rustin, both an ex-communist and a homosexual, under political pressure. Although women were "the backbone of the Civil Rights Movement" in organizing grassroots support for marches and protests, King often insisted upon pushing them into the background; at the March on Washington, he did not allow a single woman speaker. Nonetheless, Coretta found her voice, influenced King to become a more outspoken and inclusive leader, and soon became a speaker and activist in her own right - never wavering in her loyalty to Martin despite their sometimes-rocky private life.
Throughout Eig's book, there's a judicious attempt to measure King's accomplishments and failings. He's shown as someone who learned the hard way that successful demonstrations organized around a specific issue rather than generalities; hence the failure of his 1962 campaign in Albany, Georgia. And that his media savvy allowed him to monopolize press coverage of the Movement, to the detriment and resentment of many allies, who sometimes mocked him as "De Lawd." His commitment to nonviolence led Malcolm X and others to repudiate him, framing nonviolence as cowardice rather than strength; his cooperation with political leaders made him suspect on the Far Left, many of whom considered him an Establishment sellout. This might tally with the sanitized King modern readers are familiar with, less so with the man whose Letter from Birmingham Jail excoriated "white moderates" as a major obstacle to progress, who advocated for slavery reparations and universal healthcare, who remarked that "most Americans are unconscious racists" and that white hopes that Black protests would fade before resolving the root causes of poverty and racism were "an illusion of the damned."
Yet while King shared much in common with Malcolm, Carmichael and the Black Panthers, his fundamental optimism never wavered. He maintained the importance of forging alliances with whites to overcome prejudice, and was idealistic enough to envision an America where people "will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character," a claim which led Malcolm to contrast his "Dream" with the "Nightmare" faced by African-Americans in everyday life. Certainly, King's hopefulness struck many radicals, Black and white, as ineffectual in the face of Vietnam and ongoing repression; he did not envision the wholesale revolution many advocated. Yet King's idealism should not be confused with naivety; he recognized full well that the only way to achieve his Dream was through constant pressure, be it speeches, boycotts, protests or other forms of direct action. And that only such force, nonviolent though King hoped it would be, could reform American society and government enough to make it live up to its stated ideals of equality under the law.
King's activism achieved apotheosis with the Selma protests of March 1965, which humiliated Alabama Governor George Wallace and steeled Lyndon Johnson's resolve to pass the Voting Rights Act, leading to the President pronouncing "We shall overcome" to an awestruck Congress. Yet even as King achieved this triumph, events pushed beyond his control. Race riots in Watts, and later Newark and Detroit, demonstrated that liberal reform could only offer so much solution to the poverty and discrimination faced by Black Americans - especially in northern cities, where de facto segregation proved particularly hard to uproot. After being pelted by rocks during a campaign in Chicago, King remarked that "the people of Mississippi ought to come to Chicago to learn how to hate." And the Vietnam War, which steadily escalated under Johnson, struck at the core of King's pacifist beliefs. While he made some cautious criticisms of the war in 1965, he was reluctant to break with the President who'd done so much to support his cause. But by 1967, the conflict had escalated enough that King felt it was no longer possible to ignore. By speaking out against "one of the most unjust wars that has ever been fought," King effectively broke ties with the White House - and embraced many of the radicals who'd mocked him as too moderate.
King was assassinated in April 1968, while supporting sanitation strikers in Memphis and preparing for a Poor People's Campaign more extensive than his previous March on Washington. Eig doesn't address the lingering conspiracy theories around King's death, merely noting that J. Edgar Hoover was angry only that King's death made him a martyr, that James Earl Ray was affiliated with a terrorist group which had targeted the SCLC in the past, and that the riots following his death only steeled conservatives in their resolve that King was a violence-inciting hypocrite. If Jonathan Eig's book isn't as detailed as Taylor Branch or David Garrow's books, it's still valuable for reminding us about how Martin Luther King was once one of America's most divisive figures - and also one of its most dynamic, important and impactful ones. When Eig calls King "one of America's Founding Fathers," in demanding that the United States live up to its ideals, there's more than a grain of truth - and his excellent, highly-readable book is worthy of his subject.
Jonathan Eig's King: A Life is the latest biography of civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. Eig, previously a biographer of Muhammad Ali and Jackie Robinson, notes that "King's life and lessons are often smoothed and polished beyond recognition," creating a saintly image that people of all political persuasions - radical organizers, milquetoast liberals, even mendacious conservatives - have tried claiming as their own. None of this actually grapples with King's beliefs, which balanced progressive theology, traditional Black Baptist oratory, social democratic reformist ideas and unwavering Christian faith. Nor does it account for King's deep unpopularity in his lifetime, with conservatives smearing him as a communist, liberals fretting that his tactics incited violence and Black radicals who felt he had "one foot in the cotton field and another in the White House." Eig seeks to reintroduce us to King the Man, a flawed individual riven by inner conflict and self-doubt, but also an extraordinary leader, organizer and spokesman for his cause.
Eig's book spends a lot of time sketching King's personal relationships, starting with his father Martin Luther King Sr. A popular Atlanta priest with strong memories of growing up in the post-Reconstruction South, Daddy King's domineering personality cast a long shadow and provided a forbidding example to his son. Though King considered becoming a teacher, studying at Morehouse College, he eventually chose the priesthood, attending graduate school in Boston and marrying Coretta Scott over his father's objections. In 1954, King was assigned to the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery Alabama, where he soon gained a reputation as an uncommonly powerful orator. Those who knew King by reputation were disarmed first by his relatively short stature, then by his informal, jocular style which won him many admirers. Not long after arriving in Montgomery, though, King found himself in the limelight, when the NAACP's Rosa Parks initiated a bus boycott that helped kick off the modern Civil Rights Movement.
King's leadership of the Boycott gained him a national reputation, though as Eig stresses he was only one of many organizers, from Parks to NAACP leader E.D. Nixon, who carried it to its conclusions. King wrestled with the burdens and pleasures of his newfound notoriety. On the one hand, he was feted in the press and lionized by Black leaders for his courage and oratory; but he and his family were targeted with arrest, harassment, death threats and several assassination attempts (one in Harlem, where he was stabbed in the chest by a deranged woman). King developed close friendships with fellow minister Ralph Albernathy, who helped him cofound the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and Stanley Levison, a white progressive whose ties to the Communist Party earned King no end of grief. But he also clashed, not only with radicals like Malcolm X but allies like Birmingham organizer Fred Shuttleworth, who feuded with King over tactics and resented his outsized media coverage. And his relationship with Coretta often grew strained; Coretta, who had aspired to be a singer, wasn't fond of her husband's insistence that she serve as a stay-at-home wife, and eventually began finding ways to involve herself in the Movement's actions.
Eig provides lively sketches of the highpoints of the Civil Rights Movement, from the confrontations in Montgomery and Birmingham to the March on Washington, amusingly depicted in novelistic style through the perspective of onlookers (including King's police guard, who fidgets with the microphone during King's speech). He shows that King's worldview wasn't easily classified; an admirer of progressive theologians like Reinhold Niebuhr and Harry Emerson Fosdick, he also incorporated Gandhi's tactics of nonviolence and Black community organizing to his work, creating an admixture of ideas that defied easy classification. While he described himself as "more socialistic than capitalistic" to Coretta, he balked at the materialism of Marxist thought and saw it more useful as a critique than a basis for action. Perhaps this accounts for his ability to win allies across the political spectrum, from mainstream politicians like Nelson Rockefeller and Lyndon Johnson to radicals like Stokely Carmichael/Kwame Ture, who butted heads with King over his "Black Power" slogan but viewed him with admiration as an "amazing, incredible, inspiring" leader who provided a generation of activists "their first real act of self-affirmation."
While Taylor Branch's three-volume biography depicts King's relationships with politicians and the media in fine grain detail, Eig makes heavy use of recently available documents, from oral histories to FBI files and White House tapes, to reconstruct King's life. We're reminded again of Hoover's campaign against the man he dubbed America's "top alley cat," his connivance with Kennedy and Johnson in harassing and wiretapping King and the infamous "suicide letter" which, Eig shows, contributed to King's periodic bouts of depression. Eig deals fairly with discussions of King's near-compulsive infidelity, particularly his long-term relationship with SCLC's Education Director Dorothy Cotton; though Coretta never acknowledged King's affairs, the evidence is strong and damning. To Eig's credit, though, he doesn't use this information to sensationalize or downgrade King; it's a part of his life that's explored and placed in context, without undue stress.
Indeed, King's actions weren't always admirable. Bayard Rustin, often criticized King for his aversion to conflict, a paradoxical trait for such a forceful protest leader. Rustin, who contributed mightily to the SCLC's founding and the March on Washington, spoke from experience as King distanced himself from Rustin, both an ex-communist and a homosexual, under political pressure. Although women were "the backbone of the Civil Rights Movement" in organizing grassroots support for marches and protests, King often insisted upon pushing them into the background; at the March on Washington, he did not allow a single woman speaker. Nonetheless, Coretta found her voice, influenced King to become a more outspoken and inclusive leader, and soon became a speaker and activist in her own right - never wavering in her loyalty to Martin despite their sometimes-rocky private life.
Throughout Eig's book, there's a judicious attempt to measure King's accomplishments and failings. He's shown as someone who learned the hard way that successful demonstrations organized around a specific issue rather than generalities; hence the failure of his 1962 campaign in Albany, Georgia. And that his media savvy allowed him to monopolize press coverage of the Movement, to the detriment and resentment of many allies, who sometimes mocked him as "De Lawd." His commitment to nonviolence led Malcolm X and others to repudiate him, framing nonviolence as cowardice rather than strength; his cooperation with political leaders made him suspect on the Far Left, many of whom considered him an Establishment sellout. This might tally with the sanitized King modern readers are familiar with, less so with the man whose Letter from Birmingham Jail excoriated "white moderates" as a major obstacle to progress, who advocated for slavery reparations and universal healthcare, who remarked that "most Americans are unconscious racists" and that white hopes that Black protests would fade before resolving the root causes of poverty and racism were "an illusion of the damned."
Yet while King shared much in common with Malcolm, Carmichael and the Black Panthers, his fundamental optimism never wavered. He maintained the importance of forging alliances with whites to overcome prejudice, and was idealistic enough to envision an America where people "will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character," a claim which led Malcolm to contrast his "Dream" with the "Nightmare" faced by African-Americans in everyday life. Certainly, King's hopefulness struck many radicals, Black and white, as ineffectual in the face of Vietnam and ongoing repression; he did not envision the wholesale revolution many advocated. Yet King's idealism should not be confused with naivety; he recognized full well that the only way to achieve his Dream was through constant pressure, be it speeches, boycotts, protests or other forms of direct action. And that only such force, nonviolent though King hoped it would be, could reform American society and government enough to make it live up to its stated ideals of equality under the law.
King's activism achieved apotheosis with the Selma protests of March 1965, which humiliated Alabama Governor George Wallace and steeled Lyndon Johnson's resolve to pass the Voting Rights Act, leading to the President pronouncing "We shall overcome" to an awestruck Congress. Yet even as King achieved this triumph, events pushed beyond his control. Race riots in Watts, and later Newark and Detroit, demonstrated that liberal reform could only offer so much solution to the poverty and discrimination faced by Black Americans - especially in northern cities, where de facto segregation proved particularly hard to uproot. After being pelted by rocks during a campaign in Chicago, King remarked that "the people of Mississippi ought to come to Chicago to learn how to hate." And the Vietnam War, which steadily escalated under Johnson, struck at the core of King's pacifist beliefs. While he made some cautious criticisms of the war in 1965, he was reluctant to break with the President who'd done so much to support his cause. But by 1967, the conflict had escalated enough that King felt it was no longer possible to ignore. By speaking out against "one of the most unjust wars that has ever been fought," King effectively broke ties with the White House - and embraced many of the radicals who'd mocked him as too moderate.
King was assassinated in April 1968, while supporting sanitation strikers in Memphis and preparing for a Poor People's Campaign more extensive than his previous March on Washington. Eig doesn't address the lingering conspiracy theories around King's death, merely noting that J. Edgar Hoover was angry only that King's death made him a martyr, that James Earl Ray was affiliated with a terrorist group which had targeted the SCLC in the past, and that the riots following his death only steeled conservatives in their resolve that King was a violence-inciting hypocrite. If Jonathan Eig's book isn't as detailed as Taylor Branch or David Garrow's books, it's still valuable for reminding us about how Martin Luther King was once one of America's most divisive figures - and also one of its most dynamic, important and impactful ones. When Eig calls King "one of America's Founding Fathers," in demanding that the United States live up to its ideals, there's more than a grain of truth - and his excellent, highly-readable book is worthy of his subject.
February 20, 2024
Excellent book, well researched. You will learn something new about King even if you have read other books previously about his life.
January 16, 2024
King is a thorough and detailed profile of Martin Luther King Jr. Jonathan Eig’s level of research is truly impressive and I learned a lot about MLK from this biography that I didn’t know before.
I listened to most of King on audio — Once again, Dion Graham did an excellent job, highlighting why he is one of my favorite narrators.
From the epilogue of King, Eig shares the following in closing and I’ve been thinking about this since I finished the book earlier this week. It’s especially worth thought and consideration today, a day dedicated to honoring MLK:
“Our simplified celebration of King comes at a cost. It saps the strength of his philosophical and intellectual contributions. It undercuts his power to inspire change. Even after Americans elected a Black man as president and after that president, Barack Obama, placed a bust of King in the Oval Office, the nation remains racked with racism, ethno-nationalism, cultural division, residential and educational segregation, economic inequality, violence, and a fading sense of hope that government, or anyone, will ever fix those problems.
Where do we go from here? In spite of the way America treated him, King still had faith when he asked that question. Today, his words might help us make our way through these troubled times, but only if we actually read them; only if we embrace the complicated King, the flawed King, the human King, the radical King; only if we see and hear him clearly again, as America saw and heard him once before.
“Our very survival," he wrote, "depends on our ability to stay awake, to adjust to new ideas, to remain vigilant and to face the challenge of change."
I listened to most of King on audio — Once again, Dion Graham did an excellent job, highlighting why he is one of my favorite narrators.
From the epilogue of King, Eig shares the following in closing and I’ve been thinking about this since I finished the book earlier this week. It’s especially worth thought and consideration today, a day dedicated to honoring MLK:
“Our simplified celebration of King comes at a cost. It saps the strength of his philosophical and intellectual contributions. It undercuts his power to inspire change. Even after Americans elected a Black man as president and after that president, Barack Obama, placed a bust of King in the Oval Office, the nation remains racked with racism, ethno-nationalism, cultural division, residential and educational segregation, economic inequality, violence, and a fading sense of hope that government, or anyone, will ever fix those problems.
Where do we go from here? In spite of the way America treated him, King still had faith when he asked that question. Today, his words might help us make our way through these troubled times, but only if we actually read them; only if we embrace the complicated King, the flawed King, the human King, the radical King; only if we see and hear him clearly again, as America saw and heard him once before.
“Our very survival," he wrote, "depends on our ability to stay awake, to adjust to new ideas, to remain vigilant and to face the challenge of change."
February 20, 2023
Endowed with the twin gifts of the ability to craft his subject's life into readable prose and caring deeply about the subject and his story, Jonathan Eig is a quintessential biographer. His treatment of Muhammad Ali was comprehensive and memorable. With King and Ali, Eig has recently gravitated toward larger-than-life subjects, so the fruits of his labor have tended to resemble the doorstop, but the readability and flow of this prose will have the reader finishing these works sooner than he is ready to let go of the subject.
In King's case, Eig's book is so long because of the staggering amount of research the author performed. About a quarter of the book's length consists of notes and acknowledgments. The latter essay was impressively extensive and movingly written. More than 200 people were interviewed, each of whom is listed, and the author reviewed "tens of thousands of pages of newly released and newly discovered archival documents," including new documents recently released by the FBI.
Those FBI documents are pictures of a simpler time. J. Edgar Hoover wanted nothing more than to prove that King was a communist or, barring that, under the influence of communists. It seems that that effort was not successful. But it is quaint, isn't it, to think of an FBI director taking for granted that exposing a civil-rights leader's communist sympathies would matter. (So, too, is it quaint to reflect on the idea of television and newspaper reporters knowing of King's infidelity and refusing to report on it because such subjects were just not discussed in media then.) Today, the focus of such comprehensive surveillance would probably shrug and flip off the camera: "So what if I am a communist?" In King's time, which overlapped a little with Joseph McCarthy's, publicly aligning oneself with communists (especially Communists) was career suicide. (Ellen Schrecker's Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America is an excellent backgrounder.) King seemed to tread lightly in this area, but only to the extent that complacency would have undermined his work. In any event, no true communist would have chosen King for his standard bearer. King, after all, demanded only equality of opportunity. The Communist Party would never have accepted a leader who advocated anything short of equality of outcome.
In our time, communism and marital affairs may not be celebrated, but nor do they exactly raise eyebrows. However, a real shadow hangs over King. According to an FBI report, a woman was anally raped in King's Washington, D.C. hotel room by a pastor while "King looked on, laughed, and offered advice." The quoted language was handwritten over an otherwise typewritten report. The report, which was released last year, summarizes a recording that will be released in 2027.
Eig does not hide his skepticism and suggests that the recording will not substantiate the report. Considering King's life and body of work, it is hard not to share Eig's opinion. But if anything has the power to undo the reputation of the first Black person to be memorialized in the nation's capital, it is this. Eig expertly treated the tension that arose between King and the Black Power movement in the 1960s. With colorblindness having been cast aside as either passé or even racist by the Black Power movement's successors, a case can be made that King's philosophy of optimism and universal brotherhood is losing its battle with an obsessively racialized culture of victimhood. The modern-day opponents of King's dream would leap at the opportunity to write out of history the celebration of the content of our character as the boring ramblings of an abettor to rape. Let us hope that they will not have that chance.
In King's case, Eig's book is so long because of the staggering amount of research the author performed. About a quarter of the book's length consists of notes and acknowledgments. The latter essay was impressively extensive and movingly written. More than 200 people were interviewed, each of whom is listed, and the author reviewed "tens of thousands of pages of newly released and newly discovered archival documents," including new documents recently released by the FBI.
Those FBI documents are pictures of a simpler time. J. Edgar Hoover wanted nothing more than to prove that King was a communist or, barring that, under the influence of communists. It seems that that effort was not successful. But it is quaint, isn't it, to think of an FBI director taking for granted that exposing a civil-rights leader's communist sympathies would matter. (So, too, is it quaint to reflect on the idea of television and newspaper reporters knowing of King's infidelity and refusing to report on it because such subjects were just not discussed in media then.) Today, the focus of such comprehensive surveillance would probably shrug and flip off the camera: "So what if I am a communist?" In King's time, which overlapped a little with Joseph McCarthy's, publicly aligning oneself with communists (especially Communists) was career suicide. (Ellen Schrecker's Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America is an excellent backgrounder.) King seemed to tread lightly in this area, but only to the extent that complacency would have undermined his work. In any event, no true communist would have chosen King for his standard bearer. King, after all, demanded only equality of opportunity. The Communist Party would never have accepted a leader who advocated anything short of equality of outcome.
In our time, communism and marital affairs may not be celebrated, but nor do they exactly raise eyebrows. However, a real shadow hangs over King. According to an FBI report, a woman was anally raped in King's Washington, D.C. hotel room by a pastor while "King looked on, laughed, and offered advice." The quoted language was handwritten over an otherwise typewritten report. The report, which was released last year, summarizes a recording that will be released in 2027.
Eig does not hide his skepticism and suggests that the recording will not substantiate the report. Considering King's life and body of work, it is hard not to share Eig's opinion. But if anything has the power to undo the reputation of the first Black person to be memorialized in the nation's capital, it is this. Eig expertly treated the tension that arose between King and the Black Power movement in the 1960s. With colorblindness having been cast aside as either passé or even racist by the Black Power movement's successors, a case can be made that King's philosophy of optimism and universal brotherhood is losing its battle with an obsessively racialized culture of victimhood. The modern-day opponents of King's dream would leap at the opportunity to write out of history the celebration of the content of our character as the boring ramblings of an abettor to rape. Let us hope that they will not have that chance.
March 17, 2023
It took me a long time to read King: A Life…about three weeks, which is much longer than it probably should have taken. It wasn’t that the book was boring. Far from it. In fact, Jonathan Eig’s new biography is much more interesting and exciting than most in the genre. It took me so long because I had to put it down after every chapter or two to absorb what I had read and think about things. I had a rudimentary knowledge of who Martin Luther King was from learning about it in school. I knew that King was about peaceful protest, equality and freedom…and I knew that he was assassinated. Beyond that, I didn’t really know much and to be honest, I probably only knew that much because I grew up in Memphis. Schools don’t spend a lot of time on civil rights in general (mainly during February for obvious reasons), but what little is taught revolves around King. The reason for this is that many people feel that the Civil Rights Movement doesn’t matter much anymore because racism is no longer a problem. This is far from the truth, especially in the southern United States.
Jonathan Eig has authored a biography of a great man who was flawed, uncertain and afraid. King was the leader of a movement that brought about change in a country that fought (and still fights) change with every fiber of it’s being. He worked with other great men and women to secure rights for black Americans that many never thought possible. He didn’t always do the right thing and made missteps along the way. Eig doesn’t gloss over King’s mistakes and the book is all the better for it because it humanizes a man who ultimately became a mythic figure who is perceived by many to be “perfect”, which is far from the truth. Eig presents King as a human who is as flawed as the rest of us but was able to do great things in spite of that, which is what King would have wanted in my opinion. Many people will look to things like King’s adultery and try to diminish his accomplishments (just like the FBI did). This is a flawed argument because King never claimed to be perfect and his personal failures have little or nothing to do with his accomplishments for society as a whole. He was not a messiah and never claimed to be. He simply worked to inspire people and in that he succeeded completely and without question.
This is not the first biography of MLK and it certainly won’t be the last, but it will likely be known as the best. King: A Life is exhaustively researched and includes interviews with people who were there, recently declassified FBI files and previously available information. To get the most from the book, I would recommend taking the time to digest what you read. While it is extremely well-written and flows in such a way that you want to continue reading, I would encourage you to put it down every so often to reflect on just what happened during the 50’s and 60’s in the United States. Think about the injustices that occurred and are still occurring today. Feel for the people who have suffered and feel pride in the people who stood up for what was right in the face of impossible odds. A much as this may be simply an interesting biography, it is more than that. This is a testament to the man who gave his entire life over to making the world a better place as well as the people who helped him. This is a book that should make you uncomfortable, sad, angry and afraid. This is a book that should remind you of the difference between right and wrong. This is also a book that should give you hope and inspiration. Thank you to Netgalley and Farrar, Straus and Giroux for providing me with an ARC of King: A Life.
Jonathan Eig has authored a biography of a great man who was flawed, uncertain and afraid. King was the leader of a movement that brought about change in a country that fought (and still fights) change with every fiber of it’s being. He worked with other great men and women to secure rights for black Americans that many never thought possible. He didn’t always do the right thing and made missteps along the way. Eig doesn’t gloss over King’s mistakes and the book is all the better for it because it humanizes a man who ultimately became a mythic figure who is perceived by many to be “perfect”, which is far from the truth. Eig presents King as a human who is as flawed as the rest of us but was able to do great things in spite of that, which is what King would have wanted in my opinion. Many people will look to things like King’s adultery and try to diminish his accomplishments (just like the FBI did). This is a flawed argument because King never claimed to be perfect and his personal failures have little or nothing to do with his accomplishments for society as a whole. He was not a messiah and never claimed to be. He simply worked to inspire people and in that he succeeded completely and without question.
This is not the first biography of MLK and it certainly won’t be the last, but it will likely be known as the best. King: A Life is exhaustively researched and includes interviews with people who were there, recently declassified FBI files and previously available information. To get the most from the book, I would recommend taking the time to digest what you read. While it is extremely well-written and flows in such a way that you want to continue reading, I would encourage you to put it down every so often to reflect on just what happened during the 50’s and 60’s in the United States. Think about the injustices that occurred and are still occurring today. Feel for the people who have suffered and feel pride in the people who stood up for what was right in the face of impossible odds. A much as this may be simply an interesting biography, it is more than that. This is a testament to the man who gave his entire life over to making the world a better place as well as the people who helped him. This is a book that should make you uncomfortable, sad, angry and afraid. This is a book that should remind you of the difference between right and wrong. This is also a book that should give you hope and inspiration. Thank you to Netgalley and Farrar, Straus and Giroux for providing me with an ARC of King: A Life.
June 22, 2023
Very thoroughly researched and carefully compiled biography. I learned so much about the civil rights movement, and I appreciated the education. I also really appreciated that the author interviewed so many living people to compile the narrative. All that being said, for some reason, Martin Luther King didn't completely come to life for me until the very final chapters.
Excellent from a historical and educational perspective. Good from a reading engagement perspective.
My hat is off to the author. He deserves a lot of credit for his extensive research and caring approach to the subject matter.
Excellent from a historical and educational perspective. Good from a reading engagement perspective.
My hat is off to the author. He deserves a lot of credit for his extensive research and caring approach to the subject matter.
May 7, 2024
wow.
pick this up. NOW.
pick this up. NOW.
February 14, 2024
Of all the books I've read about MLK, this was the one from which I took away the most. . . accessible, background given when I needed and expected it, not pushing in interrupting narrative storylines. Well-organized, well-researched and even-handed in its reporting. Nothing held back, warts admitted and located when known.
Jonathan Eig has provided an excellent study of a man we all need to study and to who we need to pay attention. . .Martin Luther King, Jr's message is just as urgent as ever, and the author does not shut the door claiming he's said it all. Each generation and all individuals need to to revisit what has happened, pin it up and compare it to what is now happening, and do our best to anticipate what will yet happen. Take the lessons, messages, words of wisdom that issued from that mighty voice: predictions, warnings and calls to action. This book is an ideal tool to assist in that undertaking.
Listen up, and carry on, working toward the good. We need to be better.
Jonathan Eig has provided an excellent study of a man we all need to study and to who we need to pay attention. . .Martin Luther King, Jr's message is just as urgent as ever, and the author does not shut the door claiming he's said it all. Each generation and all individuals need to to revisit what has happened, pin it up and compare it to what is now happening, and do our best to anticipate what will yet happen. Take the lessons, messages, words of wisdom that issued from that mighty voice: predictions, warnings and calls to action. This book is an ideal tool to assist in that undertaking.
Listen up, and carry on, working toward the good. We need to be better.
November 5, 2023
This was a solid read. Eig did a much better job than other King biographers with good pacing and no deviations from a clear linear timeline.
King's origin story was also well done and a full quarter of the biography was spent on his childhood.
There were not as many contemporary quotes or touching moments though as I would expect from an otherwise top notch biography.
4 stars. Solid read
King's origin story was also well done and a full quarter of the biography was spent on his childhood.
There were not as many contemporary quotes or touching moments though as I would expect from an otherwise top notch biography.
4 stars. Solid read
January 5, 2024
Warning, this review gets a little preachy, which is kind of fitting. But if that's not your thing I get it. I didn't intend this review to go that way but fuck it here we are. TLDR: It's a great book, you should read it.
The life of Dr. King was integrally tied to the civil rights movement, therefore it would be impossible to describe one without the other. Eig did an amazing job portraying just how difficult it must have been for the black community, not only in the push for equality and desegregation, but just simply to live in a country that seemingly resents their mere existence. They were at best, looked over and disregarded, and at worst consciously and murderously despised simply for having dark skin relative to the rest of the population. Using King as a vehicle, Eig did a marvelous job of demonstrating the vitriolic hatred that faced black people and the monumental task that the civil rights movement faced to overcome such hate each and every day. Which makes their accomplishments seem even more incredible than they already are. Which, admittedly, my surprise reveals my ignorance on the subject. I am not ashamed to admit that because our education system fucking sucks when it comes to things like this.
Without consciously choosing to, most of us middle class white people will never know about the true extent of the inhumane treatment of the black community. Stefan Zweig has taught me to beware of pity, but nonetheless my heart goes out to all of those people in this country today that are still experiencing even a fraction of such hate and disenfranchisement. Which, I know, is ultimately fucking meaningless. Virtue signaling is pathetic pandering and accomplishes nothing other than to stroke one's moral ego and let them say “Oh aren’t I so high and mighty, look how fuckin righteous I am”. The feelings of being lost in desperation, oppressed and ignored, targeted and profiled are things I will never understand fully and it shames me to know that so many people still experience such pain daily. Bringing such thoughts and feelings into the forefront of the reader's mind, however, is an important, maybe the most important, feature of this book. Pity is usually counterproductive and patronizing, but knowledge, empathy, and awareness is irreplaceable if we really want lasting change and a better future.
King, as well as the other major civil rights leaders of the day, truly had their work cut out for them. Several times while reading, I stopped and said out loud, "goddamn dude, that's fucked". As I said before, Eig's writing does a great job of demonstrating the struggle in a way that truly conveys "struggle". They fought against the exact same rhetoric we see today, none of it very good rhetoric either to be honest. It was lazy then and it's lazy now. Co Opting/Reversing slogans, playing the victim, deliberate straw manning, ad hominem, statistical manipulation. It's unsettling just how little the arguments and themes against radical justice have changed over 60 years. The sad part though is that it still seems to work. Hell, it used to work on me. A prime example as to why reading uncomfortable history, like this, is so important to a good education.
It is also impossible to talk about King without also talking about nonviolence, and his, literally religious, commitment to it. I am aware of, and have read books about, the tragic events that took place in Wilmington, Tulsa, Rosewood, numerous lynchings and hate mobs, etc. Which, again, I had to find out on my own. I have to say, the more I learn about historic, and unfortunately sometimes not so historic, racial tensions, the more I feel surprised that type of shit didn't happen more often and on a grander scale. I believe that King's strict dedication to nonviolence and religious appeal is likely the reason such tensions didn't explode into an all out war. "Hate begets hate; violence begets violence; toughness begets a greater toughness. We must meet the forces of hate with the power of love.” Whatever else may be said about King, he certainly wasn't a Saint as he may sometimes be depicted, his commitment to nonviolent protest and reform likely saved the country from itself in ways we can hardly appreciate.
A true "revolution of values" is required to achieve tangible results and justice at a deeper level. This biography and the life of Dr. King puts much into perspective, not just pertaining to race, but all forms of hate and injustice. We as individuals must undergo our own revolution of values. What makes up a society but the people within it? What creates the values of a society and a culture but the values of said individuals that comprise it? Values such as: Wisdom: Which allows us to know right from wrong, Justice: The demand for equal treatment and genuine respect for all people, and Love: "Love is the only force that can capture hate." Can we, as individuals, be reconciled with “Wisdom, Justice, and Love”? Only when the answer is yes will we be able to change society as a whole.
The life of Dr. King was integrally tied to the civil rights movement, therefore it would be impossible to describe one without the other. Eig did an amazing job portraying just how difficult it must have been for the black community, not only in the push for equality and desegregation, but just simply to live in a country that seemingly resents their mere existence. They were at best, looked over and disregarded, and at worst consciously and murderously despised simply for having dark skin relative to the rest of the population. Using King as a vehicle, Eig did a marvelous job of demonstrating the vitriolic hatred that faced black people and the monumental task that the civil rights movement faced to overcome such hate each and every day. Which makes their accomplishments seem even more incredible than they already are. Which, admittedly, my surprise reveals my ignorance on the subject. I am not ashamed to admit that because our education system fucking sucks when it comes to things like this.
“In those schools named for King, and in almost every school in America, King’s life and lessons are often smoothed and polished beyond recognition. Young people hear his dream of brotherhood and his wish for children to be judged by the content of their character, but not his call for fundamental change in the nation’s character, not his cry for an end to the triple evils of materialism, militarism, and racism.”
Without consciously choosing to, most of us middle class white people will never know about the true extent of the inhumane treatment of the black community. Stefan Zweig has taught me to beware of pity, but nonetheless my heart goes out to all of those people in this country today that are still experiencing even a fraction of such hate and disenfranchisement. Which, I know, is ultimately fucking meaningless. Virtue signaling is pathetic pandering and accomplishes nothing other than to stroke one's moral ego and let them say “Oh aren’t I so high and mighty, look how fuckin righteous I am”. The feelings of being lost in desperation, oppressed and ignored, targeted and profiled are things I will never understand fully and it shames me to know that so many people still experience such pain daily. Bringing such thoughts and feelings into the forefront of the reader's mind, however, is an important, maybe the most important, feature of this book. Pity is usually counterproductive and patronizing, but knowledge, empathy, and awareness is irreplaceable if we really want lasting change and a better future.
King, as well as the other major civil rights leaders of the day, truly had their work cut out for them. Several times while reading, I stopped and said out loud, "goddamn dude, that's fucked". As I said before, Eig's writing does a great job of demonstrating the struggle in a way that truly conveys "struggle". They fought against the exact same rhetoric we see today, none of it very good rhetoric either to be honest. It was lazy then and it's lazy now. Co Opting/Reversing slogans, playing the victim, deliberate straw manning, ad hominem, statistical manipulation. It's unsettling just how little the arguments and themes against radical justice have changed over 60 years. The sad part though is that it still seems to work. Hell, it used to work on me. A prime example as to why reading uncomfortable history, like this, is so important to a good education.
It is also impossible to talk about King without also talking about nonviolence, and his, literally religious, commitment to it. I am aware of, and have read books about, the tragic events that took place in Wilmington, Tulsa, Rosewood, numerous lynchings and hate mobs, etc. Which, again, I had to find out on my own. I have to say, the more I learn about historic, and unfortunately sometimes not so historic, racial tensions, the more I feel surprised that type of shit didn't happen more often and on a grander scale. I believe that King's strict dedication to nonviolence and religious appeal is likely the reason such tensions didn't explode into an all out war. "Hate begets hate; violence begets violence; toughness begets a greater toughness. We must meet the forces of hate with the power of love.” Whatever else may be said about King, he certainly wasn't a Saint as he may sometimes be depicted, his commitment to nonviolent protest and reform likely saved the country from itself in ways we can hardly appreciate.
A true "revolution of values" is required to achieve tangible results and justice at a deeper level. This biography and the life of Dr. King puts much into perspective, not just pertaining to race, but all forms of hate and injustice. We as individuals must undergo our own revolution of values. What makes up a society but the people within it? What creates the values of a society and a culture but the values of said individuals that comprise it? Values such as: Wisdom: Which allows us to know right from wrong, Justice: The demand for equal treatment and genuine respect for all people, and Love: "Love is the only force that can capture hate." Can we, as individuals, be reconciled with “Wisdom, Justice, and Love”? Only when the answer is yes will we be able to change society as a whole.
November 21, 2023
I've read several biographies on King, but I think this one is my favorite.
I say that in part because I come from a school of thought wherein any history that is less than 50 years after the event cannot be accurately told. Those who write the history of modern events were either old enough to affected directly or know people who were affected directly by the events.
It takes 50 years or so for the emotions and biases surrounding an event to melt away to obtain an accurate presentation of the event. MLK's story is further complicated by the involvement of the US Government which buried key evidence for 50+ years. MLK Scholars are still waiting for key documents to be released in 2027.
This means that modern scholars have a treasure trove of documents unavailable to previous scholars when researching King. Eig also benefited from the fact that he had the ability to interview many of Kings family members or associates who were still alive.
So what in particular about this book did I enjoy?
Eig had access to journals and documents of Kings childhood and youth that included details that I was not familiar with. This continued into his academic career wherein Eig went into more details about how various theologians or ideas influenced his life. King embraced one of his professors mantras for sermonizing "Prove, paint, and pursuade." During a speach, King sought to prove his point. To paint an image as to what that meant or what it could be. Then to pursuade the audience to act upon his message.
He also talked about how different people influenced his theology and philosophy. For example, how Nietsche almost convinced him that a Christian God of Love could not exist, but that Ghandi showed him that it could. About how King took Ghandi's non-violence ideology and merged it with Niebuhr's Christian realism to create “a Niebuhrian stratagem of power”. How he was a major critic of Paul Tillich, but that in critiquing Tillich, his theology ended up being an adaptation of Tillich rather than a repudiation of him.
I personally enjoyed the last section of the book when he talked about his relationship with LBJ and his growing criticism of the Vietnam War. Eig chronicles how King lost influence after his speech in Chicago condemning the war. A speech written largely by Vincent Harding.
(On an aside, I knew Dr Harding for several years as I attended a school where he taught.)
I say that in part because I come from a school of thought wherein any history that is less than 50 years after the event cannot be accurately told. Those who write the history of modern events were either old enough to affected directly or know people who were affected directly by the events.
It takes 50 years or so for the emotions and biases surrounding an event to melt away to obtain an accurate presentation of the event. MLK's story is further complicated by the involvement of the US Government which buried key evidence for 50+ years. MLK Scholars are still waiting for key documents to be released in 2027.
This means that modern scholars have a treasure trove of documents unavailable to previous scholars when researching King. Eig also benefited from the fact that he had the ability to interview many of Kings family members or associates who were still alive.
So what in particular about this book did I enjoy?
Eig had access to journals and documents of Kings childhood and youth that included details that I was not familiar with. This continued into his academic career wherein Eig went into more details about how various theologians or ideas influenced his life. King embraced one of his professors mantras for sermonizing "Prove, paint, and pursuade." During a speach, King sought to prove his point. To paint an image as to what that meant or what it could be. Then to pursuade the audience to act upon his message.
He also talked about how different people influenced his theology and philosophy. For example, how Nietsche almost convinced him that a Christian God of Love could not exist, but that Ghandi showed him that it could. About how King took Ghandi's non-violence ideology and merged it with Niebuhr's Christian realism to create “a Niebuhrian stratagem of power”. How he was a major critic of Paul Tillich, but that in critiquing Tillich, his theology ended up being an adaptation of Tillich rather than a repudiation of him.
I personally enjoyed the last section of the book when he talked about his relationship with LBJ and his growing criticism of the Vietnam War. Eig chronicles how King lost influence after his speech in Chicago condemning the war. A speech written largely by Vincent Harding.
(On an aside, I knew Dr Harding for several years as I attended a school where he taught.)
April 13, 2024
I’ve fallen too far behind in my write-ups so it’s time for an abridged review.
A remarkable, illuminating (on several levels), eminently readable examination of Martin Luther King's life and times.
Author Jonathan Eig (author of the highly regarded book "Ali") makes his purpose clear from the start. His book, he says, seeks to recover the real man from the gray mist of hagiography. In the process of canonizing King, we’ve defanged him, replacing his complicated politics and philosophy with catchphrases that suit one ideology or another. We’ve heard the recording of his “I Have a Dream” speech so many times we don’t really hear it anymore.
He succeeds brilliantly in this. The Martin Luther King, Jr, shown here is not a saint but a deeply flawed and conflicted man. The book moves briskly through the stages of his life, from his education and early experiences (including, remarkably, this: "ten-year-old Martin Luther King Jr. dressed in slave rags and sung with his church choir at the premier of the film Gone with the Wind) the factors that shaped his formative years to his entry into the ministry, his close brush with death when he was stabbed, his exhausting efforts to secure civil rights, and the work he began to address poverty in the United States. Throughout the book we see the many demons King wrestled with, the profound self-doubt, fear, exhaustion, frustration, uncertainty about what to do (Bayard Rustin said King’s biggest “ironic” flaw as a protest leader was that he hated conflict), anger, and even a growing sense that he would be killed as JFK had been (”When he learned Kennedy was dead, King sat in silence for a long time. ‘This is what is going to happen to me also, he finally said.” Reading this, I was reminded of the dark presentiments Lincoln had before he was killed.) We also see how extraordinary he was, how broad his vision and deep his determination.
I’m not going too rehash what others have written about “King.” It was universally and deservedly regarded as one of the best books of the year. Instead, I’ll quickly note what struck me as I read — the things I knew and forgot, vaguely remembered, remembered wrong, or didn’t know at all. I won’t differentiate one from another here.
Predictably, given what most people now know of King’s life, much of the book has to do with Dr. King’s relationship to women: his mother, girlfriends, wife, and colleagues. Dr. King loved his wife dearly but he had many, many affairs, some of them lasting for years. It wasn’t much of a secret to those around him: His colleagues certainly knew, and the journalists of the time protected King’s privacy out of what Eig calls “standards of fairness and decency, at a time when even mild swear words never appeared in print or on the air.”
Then there was J. Edgar Hoover who became utterly obsessed with Dr. King. The extent of his animus is startling. King was followed, photographed, his phone lines tapped and recorded. Hoover regularly saw that the sordid details were leaked to the press, sometimes in the form of tape recordings that were edited to make the tapes as salacious as possible. To his deep frustration, the press didn’t bite. It was a very different world then -- in many ways.
The book covers the difficult dynamics between various parties in the civil rights movement: NAACP, SCLC, Malcolm X, etc. It was all surprisingly personal. At each step there was tension. Was King the right person for the job? (He certainly wasn't at all sure himself.) Should he focus his energy solely on the South or should he also become active in the North? By expanding his speeches to problems of poverty in America was he diluting the racial nature of the movement? Was his speaking out so forcibly against the Vietnam War alienating allies and important politicians (LBJ among them) and making the struggle harder?
Some lines from the book suggest what was going on in these arenas:
This, from Eig’s description of Dr. King addressing Congress: “ ‘Rarely, in any time, does an issue lay bare the heart of America itself. Rarely are we met with a challenge, not to our growth or abundance, our welfare or security, but rather to the values and the purposes and meaning of our beloved Nation.’ The audience of legislators applauded. He paused and delivered each of his next four words deliberately: ‘And … we … shall … overcome!’ Members of the audience jumped to their feet, applauding.” Utterly unimaginable today.
“Rank and file Negro sentiment is against Martin,” [Bayard] Rustin said, “because they are saying, ‘China is not our problem. We ain’t got no freedom here. What the fuck is wrong with King. “While our Black brothers are ` in Vietnam, we’re getting gassed for trying to vote in Canton, Mississippi.”
“The same liberals who helped fight Jim Crow in the South declined to address issues of job discrimination, housing segregation, and police assaults on Black communities in the North… because so many Americans thought it did not need to change…” Shocked by the level of racial violence in Illinois, King said, “I think the people of Mississippi ought to come to Chicago to learn how to hate.”
The book powerfully reminds (and I’m convinced we do need to be reminded) us of how terrible the Jim Crow South was. Eig reports on numerous shootings, bombings, and beatings. One horrifying example among many: A Black female student at Florida A&M University in Tallahassee was abducted and raped. Four young white men admitted to the crime. Yet only when students at the Black university announced a campaign of “passive resistance,” including a boycott of classes and mass prayer meetings, were charges filed in the case.”
“King also said his view of white Americans had changed. After his experience in Chicago, after seeing how white people in the North resisted appeals to integrate their schools and neighborhoods, he had concluded that only a small part of white America supported racial justice. ‘Most Americans,’ he said, ‘are unconscious racists.’ “
And finally, this: “ 'Toward the end of that afternoon,’ [King] said, ‘I tried to talk to the nation about a dream that I had had, and I must confess to you today that not long after talking about that dream I started seeing it turn into a nightmare.’ ”
Eig's book is a powerful corrective to the impulse White America in particular has long had to view Martin Luther King, Jr., as a saint. As he succinctly puts it elsewhere in the book, "In hallowing King we have hollowed him." For me, by portraying King with all his flaws, gifts, mistakes, and accomplishments, Eig does more than simply set the record straight. By sanctifying King we unconsciously tell ourselves that most of the work has been done, that he did most of what he set out to do even though his life was tragically cut short. King's life, fully viewed, shouldn't be understood as the end point of America's journey to racial and economic justice but a foundation on which to build.
A remarkable, illuminating (on several levels), eminently readable examination of Martin Luther King's life and times.
Author Jonathan Eig (author of the highly regarded book "Ali") makes his purpose clear from the start. His book, he says, seeks to recover the real man from the gray mist of hagiography. In the process of canonizing King, we’ve defanged him, replacing his complicated politics and philosophy with catchphrases that suit one ideology or another. We’ve heard the recording of his “I Have a Dream” speech so many times we don’t really hear it anymore.
He succeeds brilliantly in this. The Martin Luther King, Jr, shown here is not a saint but a deeply flawed and conflicted man. The book moves briskly through the stages of his life, from his education and early experiences (including, remarkably, this: "ten-year-old Martin Luther King Jr. dressed in slave rags and sung with his church choir at the premier of the film Gone with the Wind) the factors that shaped his formative years to his entry into the ministry, his close brush with death when he was stabbed, his exhausting efforts to secure civil rights, and the work he began to address poverty in the United States. Throughout the book we see the many demons King wrestled with, the profound self-doubt, fear, exhaustion, frustration, uncertainty about what to do (Bayard Rustin said King’s biggest “ironic” flaw as a protest leader was that he hated conflict), anger, and even a growing sense that he would be killed as JFK had been (”When he learned Kennedy was dead, King sat in silence for a long time. ‘This is what is going to happen to me also, he finally said.” Reading this, I was reminded of the dark presentiments Lincoln had before he was killed.) We also see how extraordinary he was, how broad his vision and deep his determination.
I’m not going too rehash what others have written about “King.” It was universally and deservedly regarded as one of the best books of the year. Instead, I’ll quickly note what struck me as I read — the things I knew and forgot, vaguely remembered, remembered wrong, or didn’t know at all. I won’t differentiate one from another here.
Predictably, given what most people now know of King’s life, much of the book has to do with Dr. King’s relationship to women: his mother, girlfriends, wife, and colleagues. Dr. King loved his wife dearly but he had many, many affairs, some of them lasting for years. It wasn’t much of a secret to those around him: His colleagues certainly knew, and the journalists of the time protected King’s privacy out of what Eig calls “standards of fairness and decency, at a time when even mild swear words never appeared in print or on the air.”
Then there was J. Edgar Hoover who became utterly obsessed with Dr. King. The extent of his animus is startling. King was followed, photographed, his phone lines tapped and recorded. Hoover regularly saw that the sordid details were leaked to the press, sometimes in the form of tape recordings that were edited to make the tapes as salacious as possible. To his deep frustration, the press didn’t bite. It was a very different world then -- in many ways.
The book covers the difficult dynamics between various parties in the civil rights movement: NAACP, SCLC, Malcolm X, etc. It was all surprisingly personal. At each step there was tension. Was King the right person for the job? (He certainly wasn't at all sure himself.) Should he focus his energy solely on the South or should he also become active in the North? By expanding his speeches to problems of poverty in America was he diluting the racial nature of the movement? Was his speaking out so forcibly against the Vietnam War alienating allies and important politicians (LBJ among them) and making the struggle harder?
Some lines from the book suggest what was going on in these arenas:
This, from Eig’s description of Dr. King addressing Congress: “ ‘Rarely, in any time, does an issue lay bare the heart of America itself. Rarely are we met with a challenge, not to our growth or abundance, our welfare or security, but rather to the values and the purposes and meaning of our beloved Nation.’ The audience of legislators applauded. He paused and delivered each of his next four words deliberately: ‘And … we … shall … overcome!’ Members of the audience jumped to their feet, applauding.” Utterly unimaginable today.
“Rank and file Negro sentiment is against Martin,” [Bayard] Rustin said, “because they are saying, ‘China is not our problem. We ain’t got no freedom here. What the fuck is wrong with King. “While our Black brothers are ` in Vietnam, we’re getting gassed for trying to vote in Canton, Mississippi.”
“The same liberals who helped fight Jim Crow in the South declined to address issues of job discrimination, housing segregation, and police assaults on Black communities in the North… because so many Americans thought it did not need to change…” Shocked by the level of racial violence in Illinois, King said, “I think the people of Mississippi ought to come to Chicago to learn how to hate.”
The book powerfully reminds (and I’m convinced we do need to be reminded) us of how terrible the Jim Crow South was. Eig reports on numerous shootings, bombings, and beatings. One horrifying example among many: A Black female student at Florida A&M University in Tallahassee was abducted and raped. Four young white men admitted to the crime. Yet only when students at the Black university announced a campaign of “passive resistance,” including a boycott of classes and mass prayer meetings, were charges filed in the case.”
“King also said his view of white Americans had changed. After his experience in Chicago, after seeing how white people in the North resisted appeals to integrate their schools and neighborhoods, he had concluded that only a small part of white America supported racial justice. ‘Most Americans,’ he said, ‘are unconscious racists.’ “
And finally, this: “ 'Toward the end of that afternoon,’ [King] said, ‘I tried to talk to the nation about a dream that I had had, and I must confess to you today that not long after talking about that dream I started seeing it turn into a nightmare.’ ”
Eig's book is a powerful corrective to the impulse White America in particular has long had to view Martin Luther King, Jr., as a saint. As he succinctly puts it elsewhere in the book, "In hallowing King we have hollowed him." For me, by portraying King with all his flaws, gifts, mistakes, and accomplishments, Eig does more than simply set the record straight. By sanctifying King we unconsciously tell ourselves that most of the work has been done, that he did most of what he set out to do even though his life was tragically cut short. King's life, fully viewed, shouldn't be understood as the end point of America's journey to racial and economic justice but a foundation on which to build.
December 23, 2023
We need new studies on transcendent leaders so that we will never forget how their lives shaped history and how their legacies continue to impact our world with optimism for an improved tomorrow. Jonathan Eig’s unputdownable new biography of Martin Luther King Jr is the first full-length work to appear in decades about one of America’s most revered figures, and it is a commendable addition to the vast literature on MLK.
As I consumed Eig’s rapidly paced narrative, I appreciated how he avoided the easy temptation to glorify King as Christlike. Instead, he focuses on King’s lifelong commitment to the Christian ethics of love and compassion and of finding purpose and redemption through acts of undeserved suffering for the cause of helping others, which for King constituted the divine test for humans of fulfilling God’s expectations of us.
King’s mission to secure justice and equality for all Americans is inspiring, of course, but what can be disturbing is remembering how King’s efforts met perilous resistance from hatemakers, such as the Klan, but also from disgraceful elected officials at every level of government. Although he had a cooperative relationship with President Johnson that influenced the passage of both the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, King’s enemies included governors, mayors, police chiefs, and members of Congress who wanted him gone.
When studying MLK’s life and work, trying to put in perspective the degree of cruelty and ruthlessness he faced can feel overwhelming and even numbing. I found it both shameful and sickening to recollect how segregationists were proud to defend themselves as justified in utilizing violence and murder without any fear of intervention from the law so that they could entrench racism and white supremacy in their states, counties, cities, and courts to perpetuate terror and oppression against Black people.
As King expanded his mission for attaining civil rights to include confronting the evils of poverty and war, he became more revolutionary in his final years with messaging that echoed Malcolm X who was assassinated three years before King suffered the same fate. In particular, King’s condemnation of the Vietnam War fractured his relationship with LBJ and drew the ire of close friends and, of course, from his sworn enemies. But what enrages me most is a reminder of how hatemakers had no inhibition about using violence against King even as he never wavered in discipline from nonviolent activism.
It is also troubling to learn from Eig’s research of newly available FBI reports how J. Edgar Hoover did everything in his power to coordinate schemes to ruin King. Hoover wanted to expose King’s extramarital affairs, and when those attempts didn’t gain traction, he spread falsehoods that branded King as a communist sympathizer intent on destroying American democracy.
I found myself at times in disbelief with contemplating how remarkable it was that King somehow survived for 13 years as leader of the Civil Rights Movement amid the relentless homicidal danger he faced on a daily basis. Every time he led an act of civil disobedience to confront the terror and injustice of racism and white supremacy, he encountered mobs of violent hatemakers wanting to harm him.
I felt a combination of admiration and sadness for King’s fearlessness and courage to face death threats and still continue to do what was right in exposing the evils of racism, poverty, and militarism. My sorrow had me fighting back tears as Eig documents King’s premonitions of how he knew he was going to die, and yet he remained steadfast to the cause of Christian love and nonviolence towards his enemies as the path to achieving a future humanity where everyone was judged by the content of their character and not the color of their skin.
Throughout this engaging biography, my most lasting impression became Eig’s ability to compel me to reflect upon what has really changed since King’s sacrifices. Only defeatists would argue we’ve made no progress. However, the erosion of American conscience is frightening and alarming when we are forced to witness the resurgence of hate groups demanding their agenda be validated while lunatic politicians celebrate the passage of cruel, ruthless legislation that devastates peoples’ lives, particularly people of color and anyone among the poverty-stricken who King gave his life fighting for.
No different than the maniacal segregationists in MLK’s era, those in recent years who have made the proliferation of hate fashionable declare grievance and victimhood for themselves when any effort is made to extend opportunity to others who are different, vulnerable, underprivileged, disadvantaged, or exploited. As King experienced during his life, I still see too much emboldened hatred and shameless misinformation from indecent and uncivil individuals raging against how improvement of America for everyone somehow makes the rich now poor, or how a better America for everyone somehow makes those with power and privilege less equal.
Eig’s biography captures both the joy and sorrow of what remembering King requires of us, and in his epilogue he leaves us to consider this challenge: “Our simplified celebration of King comes at a cost. It saps the strength of his philosophical and intellectual contributions. It undercuts his power to inspire change. Even after Americans elected a Black man as president and after that president, Barack Obama, placed a bust of King in the Oval Office, the nation remains racked with racism, ethno-nationalism, cultural division, residential and educational segregation, economic inequality, violence, and a fading sense of hope that government, or anyone, will ever fix those problems.”
What might be most vital to take away from Eig’s new study of MLK’s life is the unsettling reminder that whenever we honor King’s achievements, we also must recognize the need to finish his unfinished work, which cost him his life. King was willing to make the ultimate sacrifice, and Eig enables us to see that were King alive today he’d be on the front lines fighting to dismantle forces of hate, corruption, hypocrisy, misinformation, and injustice that are still turning us backwards, especially the rampant conniving of those in elected office doing everything in their power to undermine, reverse, and destroy MLK’s work.
As I consumed Eig’s rapidly paced narrative, I appreciated how he avoided the easy temptation to glorify King as Christlike. Instead, he focuses on King’s lifelong commitment to the Christian ethics of love and compassion and of finding purpose and redemption through acts of undeserved suffering for the cause of helping others, which for King constituted the divine test for humans of fulfilling God’s expectations of us.
King’s mission to secure justice and equality for all Americans is inspiring, of course, but what can be disturbing is remembering how King’s efforts met perilous resistance from hatemakers, such as the Klan, but also from disgraceful elected officials at every level of government. Although he had a cooperative relationship with President Johnson that influenced the passage of both the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, King’s enemies included governors, mayors, police chiefs, and members of Congress who wanted him gone.
When studying MLK’s life and work, trying to put in perspective the degree of cruelty and ruthlessness he faced can feel overwhelming and even numbing. I found it both shameful and sickening to recollect how segregationists were proud to defend themselves as justified in utilizing violence and murder without any fear of intervention from the law so that they could entrench racism and white supremacy in their states, counties, cities, and courts to perpetuate terror and oppression against Black people.
As King expanded his mission for attaining civil rights to include confronting the evils of poverty and war, he became more revolutionary in his final years with messaging that echoed Malcolm X who was assassinated three years before King suffered the same fate. In particular, King’s condemnation of the Vietnam War fractured his relationship with LBJ and drew the ire of close friends and, of course, from his sworn enemies. But what enrages me most is a reminder of how hatemakers had no inhibition about using violence against King even as he never wavered in discipline from nonviolent activism.
It is also troubling to learn from Eig’s research of newly available FBI reports how J. Edgar Hoover did everything in his power to coordinate schemes to ruin King. Hoover wanted to expose King’s extramarital affairs, and when those attempts didn’t gain traction, he spread falsehoods that branded King as a communist sympathizer intent on destroying American democracy.
I found myself at times in disbelief with contemplating how remarkable it was that King somehow survived for 13 years as leader of the Civil Rights Movement amid the relentless homicidal danger he faced on a daily basis. Every time he led an act of civil disobedience to confront the terror and injustice of racism and white supremacy, he encountered mobs of violent hatemakers wanting to harm him.
I felt a combination of admiration and sadness for King’s fearlessness and courage to face death threats and still continue to do what was right in exposing the evils of racism, poverty, and militarism. My sorrow had me fighting back tears as Eig documents King’s premonitions of how he knew he was going to die, and yet he remained steadfast to the cause of Christian love and nonviolence towards his enemies as the path to achieving a future humanity where everyone was judged by the content of their character and not the color of their skin.
Throughout this engaging biography, my most lasting impression became Eig’s ability to compel me to reflect upon what has really changed since King’s sacrifices. Only defeatists would argue we’ve made no progress. However, the erosion of American conscience is frightening and alarming when we are forced to witness the resurgence of hate groups demanding their agenda be validated while lunatic politicians celebrate the passage of cruel, ruthless legislation that devastates peoples’ lives, particularly people of color and anyone among the poverty-stricken who King gave his life fighting for.
No different than the maniacal segregationists in MLK’s era, those in recent years who have made the proliferation of hate fashionable declare grievance and victimhood for themselves when any effort is made to extend opportunity to others who are different, vulnerable, underprivileged, disadvantaged, or exploited. As King experienced during his life, I still see too much emboldened hatred and shameless misinformation from indecent and uncivil individuals raging against how improvement of America for everyone somehow makes the rich now poor, or how a better America for everyone somehow makes those with power and privilege less equal.
Eig’s biography captures both the joy and sorrow of what remembering King requires of us, and in his epilogue he leaves us to consider this challenge: “Our simplified celebration of King comes at a cost. It saps the strength of his philosophical and intellectual contributions. It undercuts his power to inspire change. Even after Americans elected a Black man as president and after that president, Barack Obama, placed a bust of King in the Oval Office, the nation remains racked with racism, ethno-nationalism, cultural division, residential and educational segregation, economic inequality, violence, and a fading sense of hope that government, or anyone, will ever fix those problems.”
What might be most vital to take away from Eig’s new study of MLK’s life is the unsettling reminder that whenever we honor King’s achievements, we also must recognize the need to finish his unfinished work, which cost him his life. King was willing to make the ultimate sacrifice, and Eig enables us to see that were King alive today he’d be on the front lines fighting to dismantle forces of hate, corruption, hypocrisy, misinformation, and injustice that are still turning us backwards, especially the rampant conniving of those in elected office doing everything in their power to undermine, reverse, and destroy MLK’s work.
January 3, 2024
Remarkable. Just read it. The story of my generation.
One trivial and pedantic note: "reverend"is not a title. It's an adjective. It's not "Reverend King." It's "the reverend Dr. King." My undergraduate class in biblical history has stayed with me.
One trivial and pedantic note: "reverend"is not a title. It's an adjective. It's not "Reverend King." It's "the reverend Dr. King." My undergraduate class in biblical history has stayed with me.
January 31, 2024
Great look at Dr. MLK, Jr the man, not the icon.
June 17, 2023
Disappointing, but not a total bust. Eig synthesizes the well-known story of King's life with new material, most importantly from unpublished memoirs by King's wife and father, and information from FBI files. If you've been following the story, there's not much new--the FBI material including the specifics about King's sexual life--are presented in Beverly Gage's biography of J. Edgar Hoover, for example. The most problematic aspect of the book, though, is the thin sense of the nuances of African American history and a failure to make use of some of the best recent scholarship in the field. His treatment of Rosa Parks, for example, borders on the old "tired Black woman" stereotype of the committed activist established by Danielle McGuire's At the Dark End of the Street as well as various Parks biographies.
Just can't recommend it on balance. Taylor Branch's three volume history of America in the King Years remains the standard, while David Garrow's slightly outdated book remains the best one-volume.
Just can't recommend it on balance. Taylor Branch's three volume history of America in the King Years remains the standard, while David Garrow's slightly outdated book remains the best one-volume.
February 15, 2023
This book was fantastic. The author used an abundance of research (interviews, memoirs, FBI files, etc) to tell a very complete story of the life of Martin Luther King Jr.
I only knew the basics of his life that they (barely) teach you in school. Learned so much about his life, his goals, his struggles and even his flaws. It's a big book but it wasn't a chore to read at all. The book is well written and I was completely focused and engaged when reading.
When this book comes out, do yourself a favor and read about this historic man.
Thanks to @netgalley and @fsgbooks for the advanced copy..
.
#mlkjr #book #bookstagram #readingisfundamental #stilllearning #kingalife
I only knew the basics of his life that they (barely) teach you in school. Learned so much about his life, his goals, his struggles and even his flaws. It's a big book but it wasn't a chore to read at all. The book is well written and I was completely focused and engaged when reading.
When this book comes out, do yourself a favor and read about this historic man.
Thanks to @netgalley and @fsgbooks for the advanced copy..
.
#mlkjr #book #bookstagram #readingisfundamental #stilllearning #kingalife
August 9, 2023
MLK’s entire career lasted only 13 years. “Jim Crow laws prohibited Black and white people from playing checkers, dominos, and card games together in their own homes.” “Black people could shop in department stores, but they couldn’t try on clothes.” When Blacks wanted to be free of Jim Crow, the FBI seriously attributed it only to influence of the Communist Party. MLK learned of both civil disobedience and the theory of non-violent resistance through Thoreau’s writings. It taught him that when you accept evil without challenging it, you are condoning evil.
History: In 1948, Coretta King supported my grandpa Henry Wallace for President because of his anti-Jim Crow stance and went to see him at the Progressive Party’s national convention while she was a student delegate. Gandhi told Howard Thurman that it might be the Blacks who first successfully deliver the message of non-violence to the world. “When the finance minister of Ghana visited the United States and tried to order orange juice at a Howard Johnson’s restaurant in Delaware, he was told that Black customers were not welcome.” MLK loved the opera Lucia di Lammermoor. Radio in the 50’s allowed Black and white youths to listen to each other’s music which led to a new fusion music called rock and roll. Buses back then were “rolling theaters of degradation” due to Jim Crow. Blacks paid up front and then had to enter through the rear door; sometimes the drivers took off before Blacks could reach the rear door – sometimes buses didn’t stop for blacks standing alone in the rain. You could count on any Black in Montgomery to have a horror story of racial treatment.
Montgomery Bus Boycott: Before Rosa Parks in 1955, was Viola White who in 1944 also refused to give up her seat on a bus. She was beaten, arrested and convicted and then (to send a stronger message), her daughter was seized and raped by a police officer. MLK becomes Dr. King in 1955 when he gets his PhD. His parishioners loved calling him Dr. King because Jim Crow did not tolerate calling Blacks “Mr.” and “Mrs.”. A walking Black woman during the Montgomery Bus Boycott told a minister, “My body may be a bit tired, but for many years now my soul has been tired. Now my soul is resting. So, I don’t mind if my body is tired, because my soul is free.” Police tailed Black drivers in response and dispersed those waiting for rides, and also handed out dubious traffic violations. Once during church, police ticketed seventy-eight parishioners’ cars for parking violations. The bus boycott ends successfully after 381 days and MLK’s achievement becomes a national story. Blacks were to be considered stupid and here was an articulate photogenic Black with a PhD leading a non-violent movement. MLK pragmatically knew well that the privileged don’t give up privileges “without strong resistance”.
King: King was known for spending 15 hours writing and rehearsing a sermon. For him it was about trying to successfully combine the militant and the moderate in one speech. MLK made demands, not wishes. This was a time when most Blacks didn’t own telephones so handed-out flyers were critical for speech attendance. King thought the pursuit of greatness was fine as long as you sought greatness in serving others. Otherwise, he thought that hunger for attention, pressured people to lie. MLK saw the Gospel as social as well as personal, and that meant personal commitment to end social evils. MLK’s inner voice told him to “Preach the Gospel, stand up for the truth, stand up for righteousness.” The FBI had many agents reporting on King to Hoover. King is jailed a total of 29 times. The influence of Bayard Rustin is the reason that MLK stops having a gun and allowing his bodyguards to be armed. King travels to Africa and Europe where he is treated like a statesman. Author William Faulkner urged Blacks to slow down their revolution or else risk a violent response. A different cracker racist at the time said, “The niggers have a powerful weapon in economic sanctions, and if it works with buses, we don’t know when it will spread to other businesses.” King believed Jesus felt compelled to follow the path of truth no matter where it led. He felt suffering brings people together and people willing to suffer rather than inflict suffering on others was in line with Matthew 11:28-30. You can react to injustice with bitterness or turn your suffering into a creative source.
The SCLC was created because the NAACP balked at direct-action. Between 1957 through the end of 1962, 17 bombs went off just in Birmingham Alabama at Black churches and homes of civil rights leaders - with no arrests. Then fifteen sticks of dynamite killed four children in 1963; the governor responded saying the blast was probably caused by communists or “publicity-seeking” civil rights activists. King usually slept only four and a half hours sleep at night. When in the Birmingham jail, he felt the American people “have been persuaded to accept token victories as indicative of genuine and satisfactory progress.” Everyone was telling him to wait, the Kennedy’s, Billy Graham, but for King “waiting represented complicity”.
King’s eloquent twenty page “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” was written without access to his library or collaborators. King comes to the conclusion his biggest problem is not the Ku Klux Klanner, but instead is “the white moderate, who is devoted more to order than to justice.” King “made it impossible for white people to ignore than plight of Black people in the South.” He would force the oppressor’s actions into the media sunlight after centuries of it hidden unrecorded in the shadows. For King saw, “The rest of the world was looking on”. Meanwhile, Southerners were saying with a straight face that that the civil rights movement was “a scheme to undermine democracy.” At the same time, the FBI was desperately trying to find any evidence that proven Hoover’s thesis that Reds were using the civil rights movement to “destabilize American society.” Not So Patriotic Moment: note that neither the Kennedy administration nor the FBI thought to protect the civil rights movement rather than to investigate and undermine it. Imagine the Kennedys and the FBI both happily ignoring the glaring fact that (as MLK himself said), “as long as you have segregation and discrimination alive in this nation, the communists will have a convenient propaganda weapon.”
When King learned JFK was shot in 1963, he said to Coretta, “This is what is going to happen to me also.” In 1964, “In New York City, a majority of white people surveyed by the New York Times said the civil rights movement had gone too far”– all for the crime of wanting equal treatment. Malcolm X was four years older than King. Fact about Mississippi: “Since 1882, no state in the nation had recorded more lynchings.” LBJ winning the election was seen as a victory for the civil rights movement. At this time, MLK was getting death threats “almost daily”. Ralph Abernathy said he saw the FBI as the movement’s enemy just as surely as the Ku Klux Klan. Hoover turned up the heat against King after he won the Nobel Prize. King still didn’t know his home and office phones were tapped. Harry Truman said when learning of the March to Selma, “Silly. They can’t accomplish a darned thing.” King felt he now had to speak on behalf of all people, not just Blacks. Peace on earth requires goodwill towards all men. Just as the short-sighted liberal crowds turned on Dylan for going electric, just so the short-sighted liberal crowds admonished King for not sticking to ONLY civil rights.
King NOT against capitalism: King was not a socialist, nor did he request ending capitalism. His crime was calling for a fairer distribution of wealth. Fairness? How dare you? He felt Marx was wrong on individual rights. Economically, King was a social democrat. King talked with Abby Mann about a movie of King’s life. When Mann asked how the movie would end, King said, “It ends with me getting killed” and then he smiled. In 1964 King was the 4th most admired man in the US, while in 1966, he was not only off the list completely, but that 63% of respondents said they viewed him negatively. Imagine mainstream media today EVER mentioning that last fact on air. 63% of the US thinking negatively of King, even though he never asked for the 63% to sacrifice anything, he never asked for reparations for slavery or Jim Crow - yet he had somehow gone “too far” for the majority of Americans. Selfishness R US.
Black power appears first as the title of a Richard Wright book in 1954. For Stokely Carmichael, Black Power meant “political and economic autonomy.” It meant not violence, but strength & self-determination. King preferred the terms “black consciousness” or “black equality” but Stokely thought those terms did not inspire courage or action. King said, “a riot is the language of the unheard” and its origin was white power not being willing to make the needed changes. King was floored by virulent Chicago racism and said, “I think the people of Mississippi ought to come to Chicago to learn how to hate.”
Vietnam: Blacks were at the time 10% of the US population, yet 20% of the casualties in Vietnam. In 1966 the number of US deaths in Vietnam tripled. Events in Chicago and Los Angeles made King sermonize anti-capitalist themes. King felt convinced that the next step was the civil rights movement uniting with the peace movement to take on racism, poverty and war. King also saw that he couldn’t speak against the violence in the ghettos (the riots of the day) without also addressing that the US was “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today.” King noticed that the US was born of a Revolution for freedom but here was the US in Vietnam and elsewhere intentionally squashing/crushing both revolution and freedom. King’s transformation happened while the vast majority of Americans were still cheering on the war and incessant bombing from the sidelines. Such a Christian nation. When MLK turned against the war in Vietnam, the New York Times said King concentrating on it was “both wasteful and defeating”. King became so disillusioned that he said only a small amount of white America wanted racial justice and that the rest were “unconscious racists.” He felt the US wasn’t changing because most didn’t think it needed to change. King watched his dream turn “into a nightmare”. “I still have a dream, because, you know, you can’t give up in life.”
The US was then spending $2 billion a month on the failing war. US officers began envisioning fighting that war for decades. The FBI was out to discredit King and “Prevent the rise of a (Black) messiah” or successful martyr. King said, “Every day I live under the threat of death, but I couldn’t allow this possibility to immobilize me. And I think that ultimately freedom does mean fearlessness.” To make it easy-peasy for anyone to kill King, Memphis television and newspapers not only mentioned the hotel his was staying in (where he got killed) but they also broadcast his room number. What could go wrong? When Hoover learns that King had just been shot (April 4th, 1968) he said, “I hope that son of a bitch doesn’t die. If he does, they’ll make a martyr out of him.”
Know that MLK said, only one day before he was murdered: “I’ve been to the mountaintop. And I don’t mind. Like anybody, I would like to live a long life… But I’m not concerned with that now. …I’ve seen the Promised Land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the Promised Land!” It was in MLK’s last 24 hours alive that he famously also said, “Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord.” After MLK’s death, James Farmer said, “Evil societies always destroy their conscience.” Amen.
Mr. Eig ends his book with the insight that corporate America annually advertises MLK’s words about a brotherhood that ignores color while intentionally ignoring any of his talk about changing the character of the US – that of its supporting pillars of materialism, militarism, and racism. A great book. As you can see, I learned a lot spending so many hours reading all problems MLK faced daily, and the joys of Cancel Culture taking out King while alive before King was martyred and then resurrected with surgically removed balls. Just as South Africa ended apartheid but intentionally kept economic apartheid going, so King’s death ended any uncomfortable public chatter about looking at poverty or militarism critically (as King felt was our moral responsibility if we were to call ourselves Christian). Bravo, Mr. Eig.
History: In 1948, Coretta King supported my grandpa Henry Wallace for President because of his anti-Jim Crow stance and went to see him at the Progressive Party’s national convention while she was a student delegate. Gandhi told Howard Thurman that it might be the Blacks who first successfully deliver the message of non-violence to the world. “When the finance minister of Ghana visited the United States and tried to order orange juice at a Howard Johnson’s restaurant in Delaware, he was told that Black customers were not welcome.” MLK loved the opera Lucia di Lammermoor. Radio in the 50’s allowed Black and white youths to listen to each other’s music which led to a new fusion music called rock and roll. Buses back then were “rolling theaters of degradation” due to Jim Crow. Blacks paid up front and then had to enter through the rear door; sometimes the drivers took off before Blacks could reach the rear door – sometimes buses didn’t stop for blacks standing alone in the rain. You could count on any Black in Montgomery to have a horror story of racial treatment.
Montgomery Bus Boycott: Before Rosa Parks in 1955, was Viola White who in 1944 also refused to give up her seat on a bus. She was beaten, arrested and convicted and then (to send a stronger message), her daughter was seized and raped by a police officer. MLK becomes Dr. King in 1955 when he gets his PhD. His parishioners loved calling him Dr. King because Jim Crow did not tolerate calling Blacks “Mr.” and “Mrs.”. A walking Black woman during the Montgomery Bus Boycott told a minister, “My body may be a bit tired, but for many years now my soul has been tired. Now my soul is resting. So, I don’t mind if my body is tired, because my soul is free.” Police tailed Black drivers in response and dispersed those waiting for rides, and also handed out dubious traffic violations. Once during church, police ticketed seventy-eight parishioners’ cars for parking violations. The bus boycott ends successfully after 381 days and MLK’s achievement becomes a national story. Blacks were to be considered stupid and here was an articulate photogenic Black with a PhD leading a non-violent movement. MLK pragmatically knew well that the privileged don’t give up privileges “without strong resistance”.
King: King was known for spending 15 hours writing and rehearsing a sermon. For him it was about trying to successfully combine the militant and the moderate in one speech. MLK made demands, not wishes. This was a time when most Blacks didn’t own telephones so handed-out flyers were critical for speech attendance. King thought the pursuit of greatness was fine as long as you sought greatness in serving others. Otherwise, he thought that hunger for attention, pressured people to lie. MLK saw the Gospel as social as well as personal, and that meant personal commitment to end social evils. MLK’s inner voice told him to “Preach the Gospel, stand up for the truth, stand up for righteousness.” The FBI had many agents reporting on King to Hoover. King is jailed a total of 29 times. The influence of Bayard Rustin is the reason that MLK stops having a gun and allowing his bodyguards to be armed. King travels to Africa and Europe where he is treated like a statesman. Author William Faulkner urged Blacks to slow down their revolution or else risk a violent response. A different cracker racist at the time said, “The niggers have a powerful weapon in economic sanctions, and if it works with buses, we don’t know when it will spread to other businesses.” King believed Jesus felt compelled to follow the path of truth no matter where it led. He felt suffering brings people together and people willing to suffer rather than inflict suffering on others was in line with Matthew 11:28-30. You can react to injustice with bitterness or turn your suffering into a creative source.
The SCLC was created because the NAACP balked at direct-action. Between 1957 through the end of 1962, 17 bombs went off just in Birmingham Alabama at Black churches and homes of civil rights leaders - with no arrests. Then fifteen sticks of dynamite killed four children in 1963; the governor responded saying the blast was probably caused by communists or “publicity-seeking” civil rights activists. King usually slept only four and a half hours sleep at night. When in the Birmingham jail, he felt the American people “have been persuaded to accept token victories as indicative of genuine and satisfactory progress.” Everyone was telling him to wait, the Kennedy’s, Billy Graham, but for King “waiting represented complicity”.
King’s eloquent twenty page “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” was written without access to his library or collaborators. King comes to the conclusion his biggest problem is not the Ku Klux Klanner, but instead is “the white moderate, who is devoted more to order than to justice.” King “made it impossible for white people to ignore than plight of Black people in the South.” He would force the oppressor’s actions into the media sunlight after centuries of it hidden unrecorded in the shadows. For King saw, “The rest of the world was looking on”. Meanwhile, Southerners were saying with a straight face that that the civil rights movement was “a scheme to undermine democracy.” At the same time, the FBI was desperately trying to find any evidence that proven Hoover’s thesis that Reds were using the civil rights movement to “destabilize American society.” Not So Patriotic Moment: note that neither the Kennedy administration nor the FBI thought to protect the civil rights movement rather than to investigate and undermine it. Imagine the Kennedys and the FBI both happily ignoring the glaring fact that (as MLK himself said), “as long as you have segregation and discrimination alive in this nation, the communists will have a convenient propaganda weapon.”
When King learned JFK was shot in 1963, he said to Coretta, “This is what is going to happen to me also.” In 1964, “In New York City, a majority of white people surveyed by the New York Times said the civil rights movement had gone too far”– all for the crime of wanting equal treatment. Malcolm X was four years older than King. Fact about Mississippi: “Since 1882, no state in the nation had recorded more lynchings.” LBJ winning the election was seen as a victory for the civil rights movement. At this time, MLK was getting death threats “almost daily”. Ralph Abernathy said he saw the FBI as the movement’s enemy just as surely as the Ku Klux Klan. Hoover turned up the heat against King after he won the Nobel Prize. King still didn’t know his home and office phones were tapped. Harry Truman said when learning of the March to Selma, “Silly. They can’t accomplish a darned thing.” King felt he now had to speak on behalf of all people, not just Blacks. Peace on earth requires goodwill towards all men. Just as the short-sighted liberal crowds turned on Dylan for going electric, just so the short-sighted liberal crowds admonished King for not sticking to ONLY civil rights.
King NOT against capitalism: King was not a socialist, nor did he request ending capitalism. His crime was calling for a fairer distribution of wealth. Fairness? How dare you? He felt Marx was wrong on individual rights. Economically, King was a social democrat. King talked with Abby Mann about a movie of King’s life. When Mann asked how the movie would end, King said, “It ends with me getting killed” and then he smiled. In 1964 King was the 4th most admired man in the US, while in 1966, he was not only off the list completely, but that 63% of respondents said they viewed him negatively. Imagine mainstream media today EVER mentioning that last fact on air. 63% of the US thinking negatively of King, even though he never asked for the 63% to sacrifice anything, he never asked for reparations for slavery or Jim Crow - yet he had somehow gone “too far” for the majority of Americans. Selfishness R US.
Black power appears first as the title of a Richard Wright book in 1954. For Stokely Carmichael, Black Power meant “political and economic autonomy.” It meant not violence, but strength & self-determination. King preferred the terms “black consciousness” or “black equality” but Stokely thought those terms did not inspire courage or action. King said, “a riot is the language of the unheard” and its origin was white power not being willing to make the needed changes. King was floored by virulent Chicago racism and said, “I think the people of Mississippi ought to come to Chicago to learn how to hate.”
Vietnam: Blacks were at the time 10% of the US population, yet 20% of the casualties in Vietnam. In 1966 the number of US deaths in Vietnam tripled. Events in Chicago and Los Angeles made King sermonize anti-capitalist themes. King felt convinced that the next step was the civil rights movement uniting with the peace movement to take on racism, poverty and war. King also saw that he couldn’t speak against the violence in the ghettos (the riots of the day) without also addressing that the US was “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today.” King noticed that the US was born of a Revolution for freedom but here was the US in Vietnam and elsewhere intentionally squashing/crushing both revolution and freedom. King’s transformation happened while the vast majority of Americans were still cheering on the war and incessant bombing from the sidelines. Such a Christian nation. When MLK turned against the war in Vietnam, the New York Times said King concentrating on it was “both wasteful and defeating”. King became so disillusioned that he said only a small amount of white America wanted racial justice and that the rest were “unconscious racists.” He felt the US wasn’t changing because most didn’t think it needed to change. King watched his dream turn “into a nightmare”. “I still have a dream, because, you know, you can’t give up in life.”
The US was then spending $2 billion a month on the failing war. US officers began envisioning fighting that war for decades. The FBI was out to discredit King and “Prevent the rise of a (Black) messiah” or successful martyr. King said, “Every day I live under the threat of death, but I couldn’t allow this possibility to immobilize me. And I think that ultimately freedom does mean fearlessness.” To make it easy-peasy for anyone to kill King, Memphis television and newspapers not only mentioned the hotel his was staying in (where he got killed) but they also broadcast his room number. What could go wrong? When Hoover learns that King had just been shot (April 4th, 1968) he said, “I hope that son of a bitch doesn’t die. If he does, they’ll make a martyr out of him.”
Know that MLK said, only one day before he was murdered: “I’ve been to the mountaintop. And I don’t mind. Like anybody, I would like to live a long life… But I’m not concerned with that now. …I’ve seen the Promised Land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the Promised Land!” It was in MLK’s last 24 hours alive that he famously also said, “Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord.” After MLK’s death, James Farmer said, “Evil societies always destroy their conscience.” Amen.
Mr. Eig ends his book with the insight that corporate America annually advertises MLK’s words about a brotherhood that ignores color while intentionally ignoring any of his talk about changing the character of the US – that of its supporting pillars of materialism, militarism, and racism. A great book. As you can see, I learned a lot spending so many hours reading all problems MLK faced daily, and the joys of Cancel Culture taking out King while alive before King was martyred and then resurrected with surgically removed balls. Just as South Africa ended apartheid but intentionally kept economic apartheid going, so King’s death ended any uncomfortable public chatter about looking at poverty or militarism critically (as King felt was our moral responsibility if we were to call ourselves Christian). Bravo, Mr. Eig.
March 18, 2024
Apparently this is the first significant biography of MLK written in the last 35 years. That just seems crazy to me. Eig’s update incorporates new information from many interviews with people who knew King (although as time goes on there are fewer remaining to speak with), newly-available transcripts from FBI surveillance, and an unpublished autobiography from King’s father.
Most of us may believe that we already know the story of MLK, and therefore reading a new biography may not be worthwhile, but Eig’s book makes a number of important contributions.
As the author points out, the common perception of King is that he was a martyr and some kind of saint. This view makes him seem unreal to us, and also by extension fosters the belief that we cannot do the things that he did—that real change will not happen until the next superhuman saint comes along. But this very personal biography shows that King was just a man like the rest of us. And like the rest of us he had flaws. Eig shows how Hoover’s FBI tapped his phones, found evidence of marital infidelity and then weaponized these flaws to impede the civil rights movement. Following the famous “I Have a Dream” speech in DC the FBI marked him as a threat to the country despite finding no evidence of communist ties, and eventually convinced LBJ to withdraw support as well.
Eig also demonstrates that the source and motivation for King’s fight for racial justice was his Christian faith. He believed in the radical love that Jesus espoused—and commands of his followers. For King, the fight for justice was an extension of this love. He said that “justice is love in action.” Thus King urged demonstrators to commit to nonviolence and show love to their opponents. It was his Christian faith that propelled him to continue on this path that he knew would eventually result in his martyrdom for the cause.
Another important feature of Eig’s account is to highlight that King’s goal was not the tame color-blindness that some have imagined. Despite the commonly repeated phrases in his “Dream” speech, he was more radical than he has often been portrayed. He believed and preached against the war in Vietnam (how could one preach nonviolence at home and support that war abroad?) and advocated sweeping government programs to help the poor of all races.
Another remarkable finding in this biography is the ideas of King and Malcom X were more similar than is popularly believed. Arthur Haley interviewed King and published an article in Playboy in which King seems to be critical and dismissive of Malcom X. But Eig uncovered the original recordings which actually reveal that King’s view of Malcolm X was much more respectful and nuanced.
Overall, an excellent, well-written, and informative read.
Of course Bob wrote a great review:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Most of us may believe that we already know the story of MLK, and therefore reading a new biography may not be worthwhile, but Eig’s book makes a number of important contributions.
As the author points out, the common perception of King is that he was a martyr and some kind of saint. This view makes him seem unreal to us, and also by extension fosters the belief that we cannot do the things that he did—that real change will not happen until the next superhuman saint comes along. But this very personal biography shows that King was just a man like the rest of us. And like the rest of us he had flaws. Eig shows how Hoover’s FBI tapped his phones, found evidence of marital infidelity and then weaponized these flaws to impede the civil rights movement. Following the famous “I Have a Dream” speech in DC the FBI marked him as a threat to the country despite finding no evidence of communist ties, and eventually convinced LBJ to withdraw support as well.
Eig also demonstrates that the source and motivation for King’s fight for racial justice was his Christian faith. He believed in the radical love that Jesus espoused—and commands of his followers. For King, the fight for justice was an extension of this love. He said that “justice is love in action.” Thus King urged demonstrators to commit to nonviolence and show love to their opponents. It was his Christian faith that propelled him to continue on this path that he knew would eventually result in his martyrdom for the cause.
Another important feature of Eig’s account is to highlight that King’s goal was not the tame color-blindness that some have imagined. Despite the commonly repeated phrases in his “Dream” speech, he was more radical than he has often been portrayed. He believed and preached against the war in Vietnam (how could one preach nonviolence at home and support that war abroad?) and advocated sweeping government programs to help the poor of all races.
Another remarkable finding in this biography is the ideas of King and Malcom X were more similar than is popularly believed. Arthur Haley interviewed King and published an article in Playboy in which King seems to be critical and dismissive of Malcom X. But Eig uncovered the original recordings which actually reveal that King’s view of Malcolm X was much more respectful and nuanced.
Overall, an excellent, well-written, and informative read.
Of course Bob wrote a great review:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
February 6, 2024
This book helped me realize how radical Martin Luther King Jr. was, and the radicalism he would inspire..
January 16, 2024
I've been listening to this for months (it's big!), and was determined to wrap it up by MLKs 95th birthday. And so I did. ❤️
𝗞𝗶𝗻𝗴: 𝗔 𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲
𝗕𝘆 𝗝𝗼𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗘𝗶𝗴
𝗡𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗗𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗵𝗮𝗺
I've read several books on King, and King: A Life is the most comprehensive and nuanced of them all, including new research, tapes, letters, and declassified FBI files. I especially appreciate that Eig doesn't shy away from allowing readers to see King as the wonderfully imperfect human he was, instead of the irreproachable Civil Rights mascot he's often portrayed as. The talented Dion Graham narrates this book just beautifully. 👌🏼
𝗞𝗶𝗻𝗴: 𝗔 𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲
𝗕𝘆 𝗝𝗼𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗘𝗶𝗴
𝗡𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗗𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗵𝗮𝗺
I've read several books on King, and King: A Life is the most comprehensive and nuanced of them all, including new research, tapes, letters, and declassified FBI files. I especially appreciate that Eig doesn't shy away from allowing readers to see King as the wonderfully imperfect human he was, instead of the irreproachable Civil Rights mascot he's often portrayed as. The talented Dion Graham narrates this book just beautifully. 👌🏼
January 17, 2024
Well researched and very informative. Jonathan gives great insight separating the Man King and the Visionary Dr. King.
April 1, 2024
A really interesting and well written book. I don’t think the holiday or the history we are taught does a guy like Martin Luther King justice. While he was a man who served and laid his life for a cause he also struggled. It was interesting to hear the full insight on his life.
I will say I was disappointed at the way his movement sort of fell apart halfway through. Seemed like he got a little too vague and tried to focus on one too many things and it kind of caused a major sputter in the movement.
Nonetheless the book really makes you think about your theology and how we view these heroes. I will say while he did have flaws I am inspired by the way he lived for something so much more than himself. He just didn’t have too many selfish moments honestly.
I am now going to write my 10 page brief on this for Titans so if anyone does want to read that please let me know🙏🏼
I will say I was disappointed at the way his movement sort of fell apart halfway through. Seemed like he got a little too vague and tried to focus on one too many things and it kind of caused a major sputter in the movement.
Nonetheless the book really makes you think about your theology and how we view these heroes. I will say while he did have flaws I am inspired by the way he lived for something so much more than himself. He just didn’t have too many selfish moments honestly.
I am now going to write my 10 page brief on this for Titans so if anyone does want to read that please let me know🙏🏼
July 18, 2023
Excellent read about the life of MLK. The book tracks the rise of the The Civil Rights movement, which I found to be very informative. We also learn about the other key players in this movement, such as Malcom X and Stokely Carmichael.
It's amazing to me how many of the same issues around race then still exist today, particularly with the rise of white nationalism in America.
I highly recommend this book.
It's amazing to me how many of the same issues around race then still exist today, particularly with the rise of white nationalism in America.
I highly recommend this book.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,185 reviews