Timeline for The Source of Gravity Based Destruction
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2021 at 9:53 | answer | added | Ruadhan | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 24, 2017 at 8:51 | answer | added | Nathaniel D. Hoffman | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 24, 2017 at 4:07 | vote | accept | Mackenzie Bodily | ||
| Dec 23, 2017 at 22:47 | answer | added | Omni | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 21:55 | comment | added | Cort Ammon | How fast does this need to occur. A supermassive blackhole eating up your galaxy could be fast... on galactic time scales. A few billion years is a short timeframe for a galaxy. | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 18:12 | comment | added | Muuski | @ifly6 Usually cheating means "breaking the rules". Which is impossible in physics because if something is possible for you to do, then it was always a part of the rules in the first place. | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 15:25 | comment | added | ifly6 | What does cheating mean? | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 10:51 | answer | added | NonstandardDeviation | timeline score: 8 | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 2:26 | history | edited | rek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Minor format changes; tag added.
|
| Dec 22, 2017 at 1:35 | comment | added | a4android | @JBH And on the money too. Cosmic strings are hypermassive. Galactic masses per centimetre? (or is it per metre?). Anyway that's exceptionally massive. The main problem may be the way the cosmic string is arranged in space to cause gravitational catastrophe. | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 1:21 | comment | added | JBH | I'm thinking along the line of Star Trek - Generations where the "nexus" was this giant string flowing through space that could be affected by changes in gravity (e.g., the destruction of a star). Let's reverse the idea and make the string the gravity-bearing object. A super-massive molecular chain bookin' through space and wreaking havoc everywhere it goes. (Maybe a super-dense/massive fluid with high attraction and a parsec long.... Yeah... that's the ticket!) | |
| Dec 21, 2017 at 23:52 | answer | added | Willk | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 21, 2017 at 23:04 | comment | added | Stephan | Two things: intergalactic means they live in more than once galaxy. Interstellar is the word your looking for. Secondly, gravity has no maximum range. The force falls off with the inverse-square law. | |
| Dec 21, 2017 at 21:53 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 22, 2017 at 1:35 | |||||
| Dec 21, 2017 at 21:24 | answer | added | Uriel | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Dec 21, 2017 at 21:06 | history | suggested | user44285 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed some seemingly unnecessary and confusing information that distracted this question from it's main point.
|
| Dec 21, 2017 at 20:52 | answer | added | lilHar | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 21, 2017 at 20:48 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 21, 2017 at 21:06 | |||||
| Dec 21, 2017 at 20:37 | answer | added | James McLellan | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 21, 2017 at 20:30 | comment | added | Green | And welcome to Worldbuilding! :) | |
| Dec 21, 2017 at 20:30 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 22, 2017 at 2:26 | |||||
| Dec 21, 2017 at 20:29 | comment | added | Green | Hi Mackenzie, would you mind clarifying what your question is? I see at least two candidates but I'm not sure which one. Also, if your question is purely about blackholes then the first three paragraphs, while nice background, kind of distract from the question you want to ask. | |
| Dec 21, 2017 at 20:23 | history | asked | Mackenzie Bodily | CC BY-SA 3.0 |