Timeline for The Source of Gravity Based Destruction
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2017 at 11:01 | comment | added | Slarty | @JamesMcLellan yes correct and if memory serves from another question a 600 ton black hole would last about 20 sec. So as I said it can't be too tiny mass wise. Although obviously all of these black holes would be submicroscopic | |
| Dec 22, 2017 at 0:15 | comment | added | James McLellan | 2,28E+05 kg is about 228 metric tons, right? | |
| Dec 21, 2017 at 22:53 | comment | added | Mołot | "nothing rules out super dense, but not very massive, material from existing in the universe." — sorry, but that's just not true. @Slarty explains why black hole has its limits, but our understanding of quantum & particle physics also puts some limits on non-blackhole matter. | |
| Dec 21, 2017 at 20:57 | comment | added | Slarty | It can be tiny but it can't be too tiny "So, for instance, a 1-second-life black hole has a mass of 2.28×105 kg, equivalent to an energy of 2.05×1022 J that could be released by 5×106 megatons of TNT." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation | |
| Dec 21, 2017 at 20:56 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Dec 21, 2017 at 21:06 | |||||
| Dec 21, 2017 at 20:37 | history | answered | James McLellan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |