Similar, but not quite the same as this recent thread: Hidden on topic page. And of interest to me first hand, since my first two interactions with WPSE in years was actually two Qs asking for plugin recommendations.
Now, I've likely missed a large stash of discussions in meta. Still, in light of the FAQ and a few other threads I've been scanning, I'm somewhat bemused that these two answers got down-voted:
https://wordpress.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1281/1208
https://wordpress.meta.stackexchange.com/a/2641/1208
Is this "WP for Pros by Pros"? "WP for Users by Users"? "WP for Users by Pros"?
If it's for users (whether by pros or users), then plugin recommendations and all sorts of support requests that currently seem labeled as off topic actually ought to be very valid WPSE questions. Including, yes, the stuff that reeks of sewers asked by hapless peons, plebes and newbies.
If it's for pros by pros, then Chip's -1 voting Kaiser's new name suggestion is unwarranted.
Anyway, I'm at a loss. Can anyone enlighten me somewhat? The current FAQ page on what exactly is on topic reads like Chinese and seems to exclude almost everything.
I don't mean to sound thick, but I'm still puzzled. If I take the newest questions at the time of editing this question:
https://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/120452/gravity-form-list-field-with-image-uploader-and-repeater
"Please help me code this / Give me a link"Retain select value in select box
"Please help me code this"Inquiry form like on URL
"Please help me code/fix this / Give me a link"https://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/120443/java-script-code-help
"Please help me code/fix this / JS-related"Using Custom Meta Capabilities on Custom Post Type
"Please help me code/fix this / Give me a link"Pointing Existing featured images to s3 bucket
"Please help me code/fix this / Give me a link"struggling to set up WP tests "Please help me read the WP docs"
update_option not working in stand-alone PHP script "Please help me read the WP code"
https://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/120437/possible-reasons-for-an-image-upload-error
"Please help me code/fix this / Read the WP docs"SQL database export-import
"Please help me code/fix this / Read the MySQL docs"https://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/120435/problem-with-index-php-after-moving-site
"Please help me code/fix this / Too localized"https://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/120434/several-questions-regarding-user-roles-restrictions-mixed-with-custom-post-type
"Please help me code/fix this / Give me a link / Too broad"global $current_user not current user
"Please help me code/fix this / Read the WP code"https://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/120431/croppping-tool-for-wordpress-avatar-upload
"Please help me code/fix this / Give me a link"
I'll stop here, but I could continue ad nausea. Not a single question seems to fit our on-topic criteria.
As such, might it be time to revisit the latter? I mean, if nothing fits the WPSE, and the questions that do fit are better asked in the wp-hackers list, WPSE's usefulness is extremely dubious.
Edit 2: As to answers, I dutifully note this comment:
The difference is that the explanations and solutions are on our site. Answers can include links, but they should not rely on them.
Sure… but in the case of WP, if the above sample is anything to go by, nearly all questions can readily be answered with a simple pointer to the relevant doc/howto/plugin/file. There isn't much to expand on them short of paraphrasing at length.
This issue is not specific to the WPSE, mind you. SO has the same mindset, and I admittedly disagree with the way it's handled over there. Many times, a link is the only answer OPs are hoping for.