4

As there is no ban on actual travel by a US citizen to Cuba but rather on the financial transactions, on which side of the legal fence would the following scenario fall?:

I am a US citizen. My spouse is neither a citizen nor resident and has never resided in the US. My spouse has her own source of income deposited into a non-US bank account to which I have no access. (aka. Not my money legally.)

If my spouse were to pay for all travel related expenses (both inside Cuba as well as in preparation for the trip) with her money and I were to bring no cash or other financial instruments with me either on my person or in my luggage, would this constitute a violation of the embargo?

1
  • 1
    Are you sure your spouse's money isn't considered part yours by the US Government by virtue of your being married? That might seem to sink your plan...
    – Gagravarr
    Commented Apr 14, 2013 at 11:35

1 Answer 1

4

It's still not legal since you are not even supposed to travel to Cuba by yourself on independent travel. You are only allowed to travel with a Cuba travel organization that has an official license from the U.S. State Department. And traveling with those binds you to their schedule, too, which I guess you do not want to take.

So who pays for the hotel does not make a difference, because you are not even supposed to be there. If you get caught or not is a different matter, but it's still a violation of the embargo.

Specifics WHY you are not allowed to travel in general

There is a government document from the treasury outlining who is allowed to travel to cuba. The document also outlines the issue of spending money in detail. I summarize the general points about who can travel to keep it short:

  1. Persons visiting “close relatives”, be it Cuban or US persons working in Cuba legally
  2. Officials on official business, Professionals doing their job or going to meetings
  3. Faculty, staff and students on specific research
  4. Religious and telecom organization members & staff
  5. Agriculture & Medicine related workers
  6. People with a specific license from the government

Assuming that you are neither of this, you are NOT allowed to travel. The loophole is point 6, being someone who has a license. While you do not have a license, there is a sub-point 2) that gives licenses of the people-to-people program organizers which in return allows their customers to travel along with the program. This means that your only chance to travel legally to Cuba is through this program.

More sources that specially pick up the issue with Jay-Z and beyonce:

  1. huffington post
  2. Petergreenberg.com
  3. mental floss
2
  • 1
    "Not even supposed to travel" is incorrect. The prohibition is on spending money there.
    – user5017
    Commented Apr 14, 2013 at 3:17
  • @BenCrowell You need to read the second sentence of the answer too. Please see my update.
    – uncovery
    Commented Apr 14, 2013 at 4:11

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .