I find that I much prefer \varphi to \phi and generally would rather use the \varphi than the \phi. But it's three more characters to type \varphi instead of \phi, which is most troublesome. So I would like to swap the two commands. I tried a couple of things on my own, but one resulted in an infinite loop in compilation and the other led to \varphi taking over all of the \phi commands I made. What would be the correct way to do this?
3 Answers
Try the following:
$\phi\varphi$
\let\temp\phi
\let\phi\varphi
\let\varphi\temp
$\phi\varphi$
-
2Okay, so my issue before is that I was using \renewcommand instead of \let. Could you elaborate on the differences between the two commands? Commented Apr 1, 2012 at 18:49
-
9
\let\a\bmakes \a have the definition that\bhas so\let\a\ais a no-op\newcommand\a{\b}makes a expand to \b so\newcommand\a{\a}makes a expand to itself and loop forever Commented Apr 1, 2012 at 18:57 -
5@DavidCarlisle Okay so it's essentially hard linking versus symbolic linking. Which is what I suspected the issue was. Thanks. Commented Apr 1, 2012 at 19:04
The usual way to exchange two values is to use a temporary command name to store one of them while swapping, but if, for no particular reason, you want to avoid the extra command name then:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
$\phi\varphi$
\expandafter\mathchardef\expandafter\varphi\number\expandafter\phi\expandafter\relax
\expandafter\mathchardef\expandafter\phi\number\varphi
$\phi\varphi$
\end{document}
answered Apr 1, 2012 at 18:55
-
-
15
-
I see, you are using the input stream as temporary storage. Commented Jun 26, 2012 at 23:55
For non-complex macros, using an interim macro to swap definitions is sufficient. However, if the macros (say, funcA and funcB) takes optional arguments, you need to use a different approach via letltxmacro's macro \LetLtxMacro{<new macro>}{<old macro>}:
\usepackage{letltxmacro}% http://ctan.org/pkg/letltxmacro
%...
\LetLtxMacro{\temp}{\funcA}
\LetLtxMacro{\funcA}{\funcB}
\LetLtxMacro{\funcB}{\temp}
-
2+1 for giving an answer with less
\expandafters but more use than mine. Commented Apr 1, 2012 at 20:36
\let\phi\varphi\let\oldphi\phi \let\phi\varphi \let\varphi\oldphi\let\phi\varphi, as the two symbols very rarely are used together in the same document (a polite way to say: "never use both in the same document").\phiand\varphi.