I am a Linux guy for years. My wife, on the other hand, is a Windows person. Two months ago her W10PRO seemed sluggish. In the end her ssd (480Gb) was questionable. So I did a Clonezilla backup image. Found a small ssd (160Gb) I had and replaced her questionable ssd and she was good for now. Bought new 500Gb ssd. Now is the time to backup the 160Gb with Clonezilla. Clonezilla reports clonezilla-fails-at-cloning-with-mismatched-gpt-and-mbr-partition. So, trying to find an answer to my problem during the last few days I have discovered the following:
root@faxxx7:~# gdisk -l /dev/sdb
GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 1.0.6
Partition table scan:
MBR: MBR only
BSD: not present
APM: not present
GPT: present
Found valid MBR and GPT. Which do you want to use?
1 - MBR
2 - GPT
3 - Create blank GPT
Your answer: 2
Using GPT and creating fresh protective MBR.
Disk /dev/sdb: 312581808 sectors, 149.0 GiB
Model: INTEL SSDSA2M160
Sector size (logical/physical): 512/512 bytes
Disk identifier (GUID): D42DAA42-3055-4D6E-830E-878B22D48A0F
Partition table holds up to 128 entries
Main partition table begins at sector 2 and ends at sector 33
First usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 312581774
Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boundaries
Total free space is 312581741 sectors (149.0 GiB)
Then this:
root@faxxx7:~# parted -l
Model: ATA INTEL SSDSA2M160 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 160GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
*Partition Table: msdos*
Disk Flags:
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 53.5MB 52.4MB primary ntfs boot
2 53.5MB 159GB 159GB primary ntfs
3 159GB 160GB 547MB primary ntfs msftres
So, I now know that the original W10 build (on the 480Gb) was on GPT.
The 160Gb ssd was on MBR.
You can see that when I ran 'gdisk -l' Then 'gdisk' stated "Found valid MBR and GPT. Which do you want to use?" I shutdown and restarted however gdisk continues to report and ask the same question. I froze when it came time to try deleting the MBR info. Afraid that I was making a mistake and was about to loose the needed data.
The danger of data loose makes me very cautious.
This is not an experiment. I am in need of a experienced answer with some detail?
How do I correct this issue and still keep my data?