0

i try to update my Fedora 37 system before i can upgrade it to Fedora 38. Unfortunatlky i#m not really in the topic of repositories and cryptic repo-errors.

Could someone tell me how to fix those few errors?

Thanks a lot.

me@system:~>sudo dnf update
Copr repo for element owned by taw                                                                 280  B/s | 341  B     00:01
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:taw:element':
- Status code: 404 for https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/taw/element/fedora-37-x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 52.222.214.128)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:taw:element': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried
Paketquellen werden ignoriert: copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:taw:element
Letzte Prüfung auf abgelaufene Metadaten: vor 1:36:31 am Mo 01 Jan 2024 11:52:12 CET.
Abhängigkeiten sind aufgelöst.

Problem 1: package qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.15.12-3.fc37.x86_64 from @System requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.9, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both qt5-qtbase-5.15.10-9.fc37.x86_64 from updates and qt5-qtbase-5.15.9-3.fc37.x86_64 from @System
- Installation des besten Update-Kandidaten nicht möglich für das Paket qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.15.12-3.fc37.x86_64
- Installation des besten Update-Kandidaten nicht möglich für das Paket qt5-qtbase-5.15.9-3.fc37.x86_64
Problem 2: unixODBC-2.3.11-1.fc37.i686 from @System  does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- cannot install both unixODBC-2.3.11-1.rh.x86_64 from packages-microsoft-com-prod and unixODBC-2.3.11-1.fc37.x86_64 from @System
- cannot install both unixODBC-2.3.11-1.rh.x86_64 from packages-microsoft-com-prod and unixODBC-2.3.11-1.fc37.x86_64 from fedora
- Installation des besten Update-Kandidaten nicht möglich für das Paket unixODBC-2.3.11-1.fc37.i686
- Installation des besten Update-Kandidaten nicht möglich für das Paket unixODBC-2.3.11-1.fc37.x86_64
Problem 3: Problem mit installiertem Paket qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.15.12-3.fc37.x86_64
- package qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.15.12-3.fc37.x86_64 from @System requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.9, but none of the providers can be installed
- package qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.15.12-3.fc37.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free-updates requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.9, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both qt5-qtbase-5.15.10-9.fc37.x86_64 from updates and qt5-qtbase-5.15.9-3.fc37.x86_64 from @System
- package keepassxc-2.7.6-2.fc37.x86_64 from updates requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.10, but none of the providers can be installed
- Installation des besten Update-Kandidaten nicht möglich für das Paket keepassxc-2.7.6-1.fc37.x86_64
===================================================================================================================================
Paket                     Architektur           Version                          Paketquelle                                Größe
===================================================================================================================================
Pakete mit Konflikten werden übersprungen:
(fügen Sie »--best --allowerasing« zur Befehlszeile hinzu, um die Aktualisierung zu erzwingen):
qt5-qtbase                x86_64                5.15.10-9.fc37                   updates                                    3.5 M
unixODBC                  x86_64                2.3.11-1.rh                      packages-microsoft-com-prod                274 k
Pakete mit nicht auflösbaren Abhängigkeiten werden übersprungen:
keepassxc                 x86_64                2.7.6-2.fc37                     updates                                    7.3 M

Transaktionszusammenfassung
===================================================================================================================================
Überspringen  3 Pakete

Nichts zu tun.
Fertig!
1
  • OK, the repo copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:taw:element was easy to solve. Even for me :-) After removing Element i could remove that repo as well and install element via flatpak.
    – Chris9834
    Commented Jan 1 at 12:47

1 Answer 1

1

Ok, seems a sudo dnf update --allowerasing --best does it. Not that i would knew what that means, but the upgrade went through and now everything seems OK.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .