the difference between disk usage reported by df
and du
makes 20% of capacity of my drive. It is ubuntu-type btrfs filesystem with @ and @home. Where could be the problem please?
df -h /dev/sda2
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 112G 68G 43G 62% /
sda2
partition is mounted to /run/timeshift/backup
sudo du -h -d 0 /run/timeshift/backup
48G /run/timeshift/backup
Where is the difference of 20GB?
On other disk:
janbenes@Tablet4 ~ (master)> sudo btrfs filesystem du -s /run/timeshift/backup/@
Total Exclusive Set shared Filename
678.45GiB 305.54MiB 678.15GiB /run/timeshift/backup/@
janbenes@Tablet4 ~ (master)> sudo btrfs filesystem du -s /run/timeshift/backup/@home
Total Exclusive Set shared Filename
175.53GiB 168.46MiB 175.36GiB /run/timeshift/backup/@home
janbenes@Tablet4 ~ (master)> sudo btrfs filesystem df /run/timeshift/backup
Data, single: total=1.45TiB, used=1.02TiB
System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=240.00KiB
Metadata, single: total=11.01GiB, used=6.77GiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B
According to btrfs filesystem du
used capacity should be about 850GB and not 1,020GB.
btrfs balance
recently?). Take them into account and stilldf
anddu
are different in general; plus there arebtrfs filesystem du
andbtrfs filesystem df
.btrfs filesystem
on another disk and still huge difference. I have seen it before. Looks like BTRFS comes at cost of 20% capacity of a disk...