31

What I've read from UEFI so far is that it has features that BIOS didn't have: it can look in the filesystem and find the boot loader there.

Then, since the UEFI boot system can read directly

C:\Windows\System32\winload.efi

from the main partition for C:\, why is there the need for a separate 100 MB partition when it could just read winload.efi directly in the main partition?

Can't the GPT link that it should use C:\Windows\System32\winload.efi and avoid the 100 MB partition?

Screenshot

(illustrative image, not taken from my system, thus the different partition sizes)

Improve this question
0

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
52

  1. UEFI doesn't support NTFS. The spec calls for FAT family support. Vendors could add NTFS support, but:

    • It's not really necessary, because FAT32 is completely sufficient and much less complex
    • Unless all vendors agreed to add NTFS support, it wouldn't be a universally usable configuration anyway.

  2. EFI System Partition isn't tied to any particular OS. If you're multibooting, you can store multiple bootloaders on a single partition.

Improve this answer
9
  • 2
    Thank you! Then does it mean the file c:\windows\system32\winloader.efi is not used at all by the UEFI boot system? Also, for learning purposes, how can I mount the 100MB Healthy (EFI System Partition) to see its content (files / folders)? The option Change drive letter is disabled in the Windows GUI partitioning tool.
    – Basj
    Commented Jun 22, 2020 at 9:44
  • 1
    Yup, C: is always NTFS-formatted so UEFI won't be able to see its contents. You can mount ESP with diskpart.
    – gronostaj
    Commented Jun 22, 2020 at 9:45
  • 1
    Thanks a lot! PS: which diskpart command should be used to mount EFI system partition?
    – Basj
    Commented Jun 22, 2020 at 10:01
  • 1
    @Basj The same as any other: diskpart > lis vol > sel vol <#> (EFI partition) > assign letter=z > to remove: instead of assign, issue remove.
    – JW0914
    Commented Jun 22, 2020 at 10:11
  • 2
    @JW0914 Clean installs do create a separate partition if the disk is not partitioned.
    – gronostaj
    Commented Jun 22, 2020 at 10:17
22

In addition to gronostaj's answer there's another feature that require a separate partition: full disk encryption, aka BitLocker in Microsoft world.

From Microsoft documentation:

BitLocker Drive Encryption Partitioning Requirements

BitLocker must use a system partition that is separate from the Windows partition. The system partition:

  • Must be configured as the active partition.
  • Must not be encrypted or used to store user files.
  • Must have at least 100 megabytes (MB) of space.
  • Must have at least 50 MB of free space.
  • May be shared with a recovery partition.

The unencrypted partition contains the info needed to read the encrypted partition, and the UEFI can't access this encrypted partition.

Improve this answer
5
  • 3
    yeah that's why Windows Vista+ creates a small boot partition when you freshly repartition a disk, even before the UEFI era because in case the user wants to enable encryption, dynamic disks or many other things then almost nothing needs to be changed
    – phuclv
    Commented Jun 23, 2020 at 3:41
  • Could you also add that the windows volume manager also allows making the C drive a non simple volume in which case it needs a driver to load it? I dont want to make yet another answer.
    – Vality
    Commented Jun 23, 2020 at 20:23
  • @phuclv BIOS and UEFI both have boot partions separate from the OS partition for one reason: if the OS partition becomes corrupted, WinRE is still possible to boot... It has nothing to do with BitLocker.
    – JW0914
    Commented Jun 24, 2020 at 4:17
  • @JW0914 there's no WinRE recovery partition in Windows Vista. In that era each manufacturers have their own recovery partition. If you delete the only active partition then recreate it then Vista will create a small active partition for booting
    – phuclv
    Commented Jun 24, 2020 at 4:34
  • @phuclv I wasn't aware of that - my comment's intent was to address supported versions of Windows, which Vista is not, with Windows 7 only being supported for business with LTSB licenses (WinRE was implemented in Windows 7).
    – JW0914
    Commented Jun 24, 2020 at 12:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .