Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:17 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Jul 14, 2016 at 22:44 vote accept Dan Nissenbaum
S Jul 13, 2016 at 17:19 history suggested Adam Kurkiewicz CC BY-SA 3.0
fix markup
Jul 13, 2016 at 17:00 review Suggested edits
S Jul 13, 2016 at 17:19
Nov 4, 2015 at 10:05 comment added Ciro Santilli OurBigBook.com stackoverflow.com/questions/944966/…
Apr 16, 2012 at 23:55 history edited Dan Nissenbaum CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Apr 16, 2012 at 23:23 answer added David Schwartz timeline score: 16
Apr 16, 2012 at 22:13 comment added Shinrai That's the analogy I thought you were making. It's a bad one (those are 2nd gen i7s but these are not 2nd gen Xeons), and I'd change the title IMO...I was expecting to find a question about 12 year old processors and that might keep a lot of people from clicking into here. Maybe change '2nd generation' to 'Sandy Bridge-E'.
Apr 16, 2012 at 22:10 comment added Dan Nissenbaum Intel refers to the i7-2600 line of CPU's as "2nd-generation" (ark.intel.com/products/family/59136/…). By "2nd-generation Xeon" I mean the equivalent release of the Xeon Sandy-Bridge E architecture CPU's on March 6, 2012 (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…).
Apr 16, 2012 at 22:05 answer added Stephen R timeline score: 0
Apr 16, 2012 at 22:02 comment added Shinrai Good question that I don't personally have a good answer for except to say that I was also under the impression L3 was shared. I would just ask why on earth you're calling these '2nd generation' Xeons when 'Xeon' has been an Intel product for a decade now. (If this is by analogy to Sandy Bridge i3/5/7 chips being '2nd generation' then it's a bad analogy)
Apr 16, 2012 at 21:43 history asked Dan Nissenbaum CC BY-SA 3.0