In Aronow & Miller, "Foundations of Agnostic Statistics", the authors write on p105:
[A]lthough unbiased estimators are not necessarily consistent, any unbiased estimator $\widehat{\theta}$ with $\lim_{n\to \infty} V[\widehat{\theta}]=0$ is consistent.
[footnote:] The converse, however, does not necessarily hold: an unbiased and consistent estimator may nonetheless have positive (or even infinite) sampling variance (and thus, MSE) even as $n\to\infty$
I can't understand how the claim in the footnote could be true. Can anyone provide an example or an explanation?
By their definition, consistency of an estimator implies that $\forall \epsilon > 0$, as $n\to \infty$, $\Pr[ | \widehat{\theta} - \theta| > \epsilon] \to 0$. It seems to me that it must follow that $V[\widehat{\theta}] \to 0$. But clearly this is not the case.