22

this is the header file: employee.h

#ifndef EMPLOYEE_H
#define EMPLOYEE_H

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;

class Employee {
public:
    Employee(const string &first, const string &last) 

Overloaded Constructor

    : firstName(first), 

firstName overloaded constructor

      lastName(last) 

lastName overloaded constructor

    { //The constructor start
    ++counter; 

it adds one plus per each object created;

    cout << "Employee constructor for " << firstName
         << ' ' << lastName << " called." << endl;
    }

    ~Employee() { 

Destructor cout << "~Employee() called for " << firstName << ' ' << lastName << endl;

Returns the first and last name of each object

        --counter; 

Counter minus one

    }

    string getFirstName() const {
        return firstName; 
    }

    string getLastName() const {
        return lastName;
    }

    static int getCount() {
        return counter;
    }
private:
    string firstName;
    string lastName;

   static int counter = 0; 

Here is where i got the error. But, why?

};

principal program: employee2.cpp

#include <iostream>
#include "employee2.h"
using namespace std;

int main()
{
    cout << "Number of employees before instantiation of any objects is "
         << Employee::getCount() << endl; 

Here ir call te counter's value from the class

    { 

Start a new scope block

        Employee e1("Susan", "Bkaer"); 

Initialize the e1 object from Employee class

        Employee e2("Robert", "Jones"); 

Initialize the e2 object from Employee class

        cout << "Number of employees after objects are instantiated is"
             << Employee::getCount(); 

        cout << "\n\nEmployee 1: " << e1.getFirstName() << " " << e1.getLastName()
             << "\nEmployee 2: " << e2.getFirstName() << " " << e2.getLastName()
             << "\n\n";
    } 

end the scope block

    cout << "\nNUmber of employees after objects are deleted is "
         << Employee::getCount() << endl; //shows the counter's value
} //End of Main

What is the problem? I have no idea what's wrong. I have been thinking a lot, but a i do not what is wrong.

5
  • I don't think that's what he wants, since counter is being modified later.
    – PMF
    Commented Dec 1, 2013 at 8:02
  • @PMF: Yeah, you're right! Commented Dec 1, 2013 at 8:03
  • I want initialize counter and later increment it with the constructor. Then decrement it with the destructor. Commented Dec 1, 2013 at 8:15
  • 1
    I don't think the error message can be any clearer.
    – SwiftMango
    Commented Dec 1, 2013 at 8:42
  • 2
    @texasbruce The error message only tells you what's wrong, not how to solve the problem.
    – mucaho
    Commented Nov 9, 2015 at 19:51

2 Answers 2

74

The initialization of the static member counter must not be in the header file.

Change the line in the header file to

static int counter;

And add the following line to your employee.cpp:

int Employee::counter = 0;

Reason is that putting such an initialization in the header file would duplicate the initialization code in every place where the header is included.

6
  • I did it, but it returns: In function ‘int main()’: error: ‘int Employee::counter’ is private error: within this context Commented Dec 1, 2013 at 8:18
  • 1
    @user3053929: Where did you put it? It needs to be outside any function but where the class Employee is known. BTW: Why is your cpp file called employee2.cpp? And including employee2.h?
    – PMF
    Commented Dec 1, 2013 at 13:18
  • Because i did another one. But it does not matter. Thank for the info Commented Dec 1, 2013 at 14:59
  • if that's sole reason why it's prevented, why const members are allowed? Don't they get initialized in every place where the header is included aswell? Commented Sep 5, 2017 at 20:14
  • @JesusChrist: Not sure. Either it wouldn't matter if the const member got a new memory location every time (in fact existing multiple times) or not at all (because it gets eliminated by the compiler)
    – PMF
    Commented Oct 16, 2017 at 8:43
6

According to a similar SO answer there is another approach, in particular suited for your current implementation (header-only library):

// file "Employee.h"
#ifndef EMPLOYEE_H
#define EMPLOYEE_H

class Employee {
public:
    Employee() {
        getCounter()++;
    }
    ~Employee() {
        getCounter()--;
    }

    static auto getCount() -> std::size_t {
        return getCounter();
    }
private:
    // replace counter static field in class context,
    //    with counter static variable in function context
    static auto getCounter() -> std::size_t& {
        static std::size_t counter = 0;
        return counter;
    }
};

#endif //EMPLOYEE_H

I took the liberty to use std::size for representing the non-negative employee count and trailing return syntax for functions.

Accompanying test (ideone link):

#include "Employee.h"

int main() {
    std::cout << "Initial employee count = " << Employee::getCount() << std::endl;
    // printed "count = 0"

    Employee emp1 {};
    std::cout << "Count after an employee created = " << Employee::getCount() << std::endl;
    // printed "count = 1"

    {
        Employee emp2 {};
        std::cout << "Count after another employee created = " << Employee::getCount() << std::endl;
        // printed "count = 2"
    }
    std::cout << "Count after an employee removed = " << Employee::getCount() << std::endl;
    // printed "count = 1"

    return 0;
}

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.