111

Is it possible to initialize a static const data member outside of the constructor? Can it be initialized at the same place where data member is declared?

class A {
private:
  static const int a = 4;
  /*...*/
};
4
  • 13
    Yes, what you have works (but only for integral types).
    – UncleBens
    Commented Aug 20, 2010 at 13:07
  • 5
    Just wanted to add that static has nothing to do with constructors since static members are not specific to a given instance and exist outside of it.
    – ereOn
    Commented Aug 20, 2010 at 13:10
  • In fact, you must initialize const statics outside a class constructor. Otherwise it wouldn't be a const static. DUCY? Commented Aug 20, 2010 at 14:10
  • Possible duplicate of C++ where to initialize static const
    – CharlesB
    Commented Jan 11, 2017 at 16:28

4 Answers 4

123

YES you can but only for int types. If you want your static member to be any other type, you'll have to define it somewhere in a cpp file.

class A{
private:
 static const int a = 4; // valid
 static const std::string t ; // can't be initialized here
 ...
 ...
};


// in a cpp file where the static variable will exist 
const std::string A::t = "this way it works";

Also, note that this rule have been removed in C++11, now (with a compiler providing the feature) you can initialize what you want directly in the class member declaration.

5
  • 2
    @anarhikos - the in-class initialization only works for integral types. double is not an integral type.
    – Brian Neal
    Commented Aug 20, 2010 at 13:31
  • 2
    @anrhikos: That's why you shouldn't define inside the class. You should define outside the class as a matter of practice (see my answer)
    – user195488
    Commented Aug 20, 2010 at 13:35
  • What if I don't want to assign a value? What if I just want the default constructor to run? I get errors about re-declaring the variable outside the class if I don't assign anything.
    – Ben Farmer
    Commented Mar 9, 2016 at 13:49
  • 5
    @anarhikos, you need inline before static const (C++17), or constexpr
    – Zhang
    Commented Mar 25, 2019 at 6:09
  • 5
    It would be great if this answer would be extended to what you would need to do in c++11 or c++17. Basically adding @Zhang's comment to the answers
    – C. Binair
    Commented Mar 3, 2021 at 15:19
40

Static data members (C++ only)

The declaration of a static data member in the member list of a class is not a definition. You must define the static member outside of the class declaration, in namespace scope. For example:

class X
{
public:
      static int i;
};
int X::i = 0; // definition outside class declaration

Once you define a static data member, it exists even though no objects of the static data member's class exist. In the above example, no objects of class X exist even though the static data member X::i has been defined.

Static data members of a class in namespace scope have external linkage. The initializer for a static data member is in the scope of the class declaring the member.

A static data member can be of any type except for void or void qualified with const or volatile. You cannot declare a static data member as mutable.

You can only have one definition of a static member in a program. Unnamed classes, classes contained within unnamed classes, and local classes cannot have static data members.

Static data members and their initializers can access other static private and protected members of their class. The following example shows how you can initialize static members using other static members, even though these members are private:

class C {
      static int i;
      static int j;
      static int k;
      static int l;
      static int m;
      static int n;
      static int p;
      static int q;
      static int r;
      static int s;
      static int f() { return 0; }
      int a;
public:
      C() { a = 0; }
      };

C c;
int C::i = C::f();    // initialize with static member function
int C::j = C::i;      // initialize with another static data member
int C::k = c.f();     // initialize with member function from an object
int C::l = c.j;       // initialize with data member from an object
int C::s = c.a;       // initialize with nonstatic data member
int C::r = 1;         // initialize with a constant value

class Y : private C {} y;

int C::m = Y::f();
int C::n = Y::r;
int C::p = y.r;       // error
int C::q = y.f();     // error

The initializations of C::p and C::q cause errors because y is an object of a class that is derived privately from C, and its members are not accessible to members of C.

If a static data member is of const integral or const enumeration type, you may specify a constant initializer in the static data member's declaration. This constant initializer must be an integral constant expression. Note that the constant initializer is not a definition. You still need to define the static member in an enclosing namespace. The following example demonstrates this:

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

struct X {
  static const int a = 76;
};

const int X::a;

int main() {
  cout << X::a << endl;
}

The tokens = 76 at the end of the declaration of static data member a is a constant initializer.

0
22

Just for the sake of completeness, I am adding about the static template member variables.

template<class T> struct X{
   static T x;
};

template<class T> T X<T>::x = T();

int main(){
   X<int> x;
}
1
  • 2
    Thanks @Chubsdad for sharing! It was very hard to find the correct syntax. Commented Nov 13, 2018 at 0:32
7

You cannot initialize static members within constructors. Integral types you can initialize inline at their declaration. Other static members must be defined (in a .cpp) file:

// .h
class A{
private:
 static const int a = 4;
 static const foo bar;
 ...
 ...
};

// .cpp
const foo A::bar = ...;

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.