Jul
16 |
|
comment |
How to disentangle effects of components in system? Thanks g g , I'm afraid that I can't just disregard the effect of the valve and I need more measurements to assess the effect of the valves as well ... |
Jul
16 |
|
comment |
How to disentangle effects of components in system? Thanks Gillaume, I'm afraid that you're right and I need more measurements to assess the effect of the valves as well ... |
Jul
15 |
|
comment |
How to disentangle effects of components in system? Thanks Guillaume for the answer. Simply using a t-Test sound for me like disregarding the influence of the valve, which I'm afraid I can't do |
Jul
15 |
|
awarded | Promoter |
Jul
12 |
|
asked | How to disentangle effects of components in system? |
Jul
10 |
|
awarded | Popular Question |
Jun
2 |
|
comment |
What is the maximum load for lateral loading of a screw? Well the drawing is not to scale, so the space between the nut and the wooden parts wouldn't be so big as to fit a finger inside. The nut is just a spacer between the two wooden parts, so at most a fraction of a mm should be between nut and wooden part |
Jun
1 |
|
comment |
What is the maximum load for lateral loading of a screw? "designed to remove fingers"? What part doesn't seems safe? |
Jun
1 |
|
asked | What is the maximum load for lateral loading of a screw? |
Apr
24 |
|
comment |
What is electric flux density? The OP is not using "non-standard terminology". In electrical engineering text (for instance "Introduction to Electromagnetic Fields" from Paul and Nasar, page 91 and "Engineering Electromanetics" from Hayt, 9th edition, page 48) the field D is called electric flux density. Furthermore, in German the corresponding name elektrische Flussdichte is widespread |
Feb
28 |
|
awarded | Notable Question |
Feb
19 |
|
awarded | Supporter |
Feb
6 |
|
comment |
Global sensitivity indices with sign (positive/negative) Thanks @g-g for the comment, I added some extra details. Maybe the gradient is a good idea |
Feb
6 |
|
revised |
Global sensitivity indices with sign (positive/negative) Added further details |
Feb
5 |
|
asked | Global sensitivity indices with sign (positive/negative) |
Jan
19 |
|
awarded | Autobiographer |
Jan
19 |
|
revised |
High-voltage PCB design and IPC 2221 Changed first paragraph to avoid confusion in aim of question |
Jan
19 |
|
comment |
High-voltage PCB design and IPC 2221 Thanks for your comments, but I'm not looking into advice for designing this PCB, I am interested in knowing why does the IPC 2221 standard requires much bigger spacing than the one required by dielectric strength consideration |
Jan
18 |
|
comment |
High-voltage PCB design and IPC 2221 @vir Safety factor of 2 sounds reasonable, but IPC 2221 requires waaay more. |
Jan
18 |
|
comment |
High-voltage PCB design and IPC 2221 @winny Voltage will be continuously applied. Solder mask should provide protection against pollution |