14
$\begingroup$

@ahiijny added a direct link to the Sol 5110-5114 MER B Downlink Report. These are the final days that signals were received from Opportunity.

The message "Tau Value is NOT a Typographical Error" calls attention to its value here of 10.8. See section(s) in bold below.

Question: Opportunity's last tau was 10.8; what does that mean, and how is tau defined mathematically and experimentally determined?

Sol 5110-5114 MER B Downlink Report

Mission Manager

* Tau Value is NOT a Typographical Error *

Overall Assessment

Opportunity is currently in the midst of a severe dust storm though all subsystems are still operating as expected in RAM mode as of the Sol 5111 UHF pass. Solar array energy is approximately 22 W-hrs, with a measured tau of 10.8. This Tau measurement is the highest ever recorded from a ground station on the planet Mars. Dust factor was previously estimated at 3.27 as of Sol 5108.

With analysis from the data from the Sol 5111 downlink, we expected the rover to enter a low power fault mode very soon after that point in time. Since then, there have been no beeps nor fault windows detected during DSN coverage periods. This behavior is fully in line with array energy expectations, as Opportunity will use deep sleep during such times. We are now waiting for the skies above Opportunity to clear enough for the solar energy to support the fault communications windows (which will send signals to Earth). The team has suspended nominal sequence operations, and we are listening every day for Opportunity to talk to us via one of the fault windows. Thermal predictions carry a positive medium to long term message, whether it takes several sols or several weeks for the storm to weaken and let the sun through. We expect no thermal damage to the batteries or computer systems, and every sol is one closer to summer warmth. Obviously, the team is concerned. But, all of the data and our knowledge indicate that Opportunity is likely to be doing more geological experiments during the upcoming Martian summer, helping unwrap the mysteries of Endeavour crater. Until then, our current mission phase is one of patience and readiness.

Opportunity did not drive during this period.

Summary

Sol 5110: Recharge

Sol 5111: Pancam wide range Tau crit 1325LST, Pancam Special Stow 315 LVL AZ

Sol 5112: Likely Deep Sleep/Low Power Fault Mode

Sol 5113: Likely Deep Sleep/Low Power Fault Mode

Sol 5114: Likely Deep Sleep/Low Power Fault Mode

Odometry: Total odometry as of the Sol 5086 drive: 45161.04 meters (28.06 miles).

Attachments: (1) Sol 5111 Pancam Tau (10.8).

Attachments: sol5111_pancam_tau

sol5111_pancam_tau:

enter image description here


From https://an.rsl.wustl.edu/merb/merxbrowser/an3.aspx

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
2

1 Answer 1

12
$\begingroup$

Vacuum would have a $\tau$ of zero. An opacity of $\tau$ means that the atmosphere is reducing the direct intensity of light from the Sun, if it were directly overhead, by a factor of $e^{-\tau}$.

It was measured by the rovers every sol by pointing the PanCam at the Sun, or where the Sun is supposed to be, measuring the intensity, correcting for the slant angle to the Sun, dividing by the intensity of the sunlight at Mars' current distance from the Sun, and taking the negative natural log of that. The reality is more complicated, but that's the general idea.

(I hate that I have to use the word "was" in that sentence.)

A typical $\tau$ on Mars at a good time of year is $0.5$. It is not unusual for it to get to $1$. At $\tau=2$, you're seeing some dust storm activity. At $\tau=3$, it's getting pretty bad. $\tau=4$ or $\tau=5$ is crazy bad.

A $\tau$ of $10.8$ is almost non-sensical.

Emily Lakdawalla made a nice animation and table of what the Sun looks like as $\tau$ went up at one point for Spirit:

animation of decreasing tau

sequence of Sun images as tau decreases

It got up to a record (at the time) of $\tau=4.7$ on Spirit sol 1265 (in 2007).

The energy on the solar panels is not reduced by that factor, since $\tau$ does not measure all the diffuse, scattered sunlight still making it to the panels.

For context, here is a plot of the $\tau$ measured by Opportunity over its entire mission from Mark Lemmon's web site:

crazy peak of 10.8 shown among more typical values of 0 to 1, some short storms of 2, and the one previously-considered huge storm up to ~5

You can see what we thought was a really bad storm in 2007 in purple, getting up to $\tau\approx 5$, and the one insane peak of $10.8$ right before Opportunity permanently went off the air.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Maybe add some comparison? If I'm right $\tau$=12.8 makes the Sun as bright as the Moon. (In terms of light reaching Earth, not in terms of visibility in the sky during daylight) $\endgroup$
    – asdfex
    Commented Feb 17, 2019 at 17:30
  • $\begingroup$ @asdfex That sounds about right to me. log(e^-12.8, 2.5119) = 13.9 means τ =12.8 is equivalent to about 13.9 magnitudes. A sun magnitude of 26.7, minus 13.9 => magnitude 12.8. And a full moon is indeed about mag 12.7 though I see a variety of values for that. But I'd also like to know how bright the actual sun would have been at that last observation, which requires reversing some of the tau corrections, and adding in the maximum brightness of the sun at that point in time from Mars, as I understand it. $\endgroup$
    – nealmcb
    Commented Feb 18, 2019 at 16:41
  • $\begingroup$ This is a fairly unimportant detail, but was (yeah, that "was" hurts) 𝜏 calculated on the rovers themselves, or on the ground using the transmitted PanCam image? In other words, did the rovers do the image processing and computation to send back a number, or did they just send back the image? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 18, 2019 at 22:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ZachLipton On the ground. $\endgroup$
    – Mark Adler
    Commented Feb 19, 2019 at 1:56
  • $\begingroup$ e^-t? Exponential units make my brain hurt... $\endgroup$
    – Hobbes
    Commented Feb 23, 2019 at 8:45

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.