18

We currently have two tags for spam:

While I understand the difference between the person who sends the spam and the spam itself, that is not a meaningful distiction for a pair of tags. And taking a glance at the question, it is not reflected in their topics.

So could we perhaps merge the two or just burninate or something similar? When it comes to spam, I think that one is enough.

3
  • 3
    Agreed, that was a complete subset - every post with [spammer] also already had [spam], so completely useless. Thanks!
    – AviD Mod
    Commented Apr 26, 2018 at 11:22
  • 6
    @AviD Sounds like somebody was spamming tags.
    – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil'
    Commented Apr 26, 2018 at 11:43
  • Spam, spam, spam, sausage, and spam sandwich!
    – NH.
    Commented Apr 30, 2018 at 14:39

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
15

AviD has turned into a synonym of . Problem solved.

3
  • 2
    Posting this so there can be an accepted answer.
    – Anders
    Commented Apr 26, 2018 at 13:39
  • 7
    Now, we just need to make sure [ham] and [eggs] are synonyms, too. :-)
    – Arminius
    Commented Apr 26, 2018 at 14:45
  • 2
    @Arminius do you mean [ham] and [hammer]?
    – Tom K.
    Commented Apr 27, 2018 at 12:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .