In August 2012, @Polynomial asked if we could get the MathML plugin enabled on this site. It allows the use of latex style markdown in questions, answers, and comments.
Admittedly we have very few mathematical formulas, but some things would be prettier. Examples: if you go to the New Question textbox over on crypto.se, the following markdown:
# Code block vs Latex
`hash(password || salt)` vs $hash(password || salt)$
`AES(key, data)` vs $AES_{key}(data)$
`O(sqrt(n))` vs $O(\sqrt n)$
will render as:
Back on 2012, the answer, from a StackExchange employee, was that the performance hit of sending the MathJax js lib with every page load is not worth it if only a small number of questions would benefit from it.
Since it's been 5 years, I'm curious on community opinion if either the performance impact relative to average hardware, or the usage of our site has changed enough to justify asking for it?
I suspect the answer is no, it's fine the way it is, for example, the revision history of this answer to "Expert quote on entropy for uncrackable password" shows that you can often pretty it up by finding suitable UTF-8 symbols for the latex stuff if you do some leg-work, but Latex would be so much easier!
hash
inside$
signs (like$hash(password || salt)$
above), TeX (and therefore MathJax) understands it as the product of mathematical variablesh
,a
,s
,h
, etc. The kerning is off, and so on. The $O(\sqrt{n})$ example is a good use-case of real math that would benefit from MathJaX or whatever.