27

I understand that people might reference the movie in a question. But shouldn't the tags for that question be related to the security technology/technique they're asking about, and not which movie it may or may not be used in?

Otherwise I'd suggest creating a Hackers tag... a Swordfish tag...

8
  • 15
    bloody hell you're not wrong. WTH? Next time just edit the q and remove the stupid tags.
    – AviD Mod
    Commented Jun 12, 2015 at 5:14
  • // , It's not just a movie.
    – Nathan Basanese
    Commented Jun 13, 2015 at 19:02
  • What else is it?
    – RoraΖ
    Commented Jun 13, 2015 at 19:06
  • // , citizenfour is an actual historical pseudonym for people in his position.
    – Nathan Basanese
    Commented Jun 13, 2015 at 19:19
  • // , Not a huge difference, but it's the sort of basis in history to which other "hacker" movies can not lay claim.
    – Nathan Basanese
    Commented Jun 13, 2015 at 19:22
  • @NathanBasanese I still wouldn't call say that someone "in his position" is on topic for this forum.
    – RoraΖ
    Commented Jun 15, 2015 at 14:43
  • 32
    /* @NathanBasanese I'm pretty sure comments don't have to have comment syntax */
    – corsiKa
    Commented Jun 15, 2015 at 16:31
  • 6
    # @corsiKa, /*Commenting*/ (at) --least REM 'makes <!---it---> C obvious -{they're-} // comments !Make %sure <#to#> use them as often as possible.
    – SEJPM
    Commented Jun 19, 2015 at 20:06

0

Reset to default

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .