60

So this past Saturday a group of my friends and I all watched the three The Lord of the Rings extended edition movies in one sitting.

That night, I borrowed a copy of The Hobbit, which I've never read, from my brother. When I got home, my wife informed me that she already has a copy of The Hobbit.

Comparing the two, the one from my brother was published in the late sixties or early seventies but doesn't have a publishing date or an ISBN. This book has a hardcover and has odd drawings of a hand pointing at something on the first few pages. This book is about nine inches tall by eight inches wide.

The cover just reads:

THE HOBBIT

The one my wife has is a recent paperback.

On the cover it says:

J.R.R. TOLKIEN

The enchanting prelude to Lord of the Rings

THE HOBBIT

with an illustration of the shire between J.R.R. TOLKIEN and the line about LotR.

Inside the paperback version it says:

The Hobbit, or There and Back Again

(Revised Edition)

By J.R.R. Tolkien

What has been revised in the recent paperback version of The Hobbit compared to the one my brother owns?

3
  • 2
    ringgame.net/riddles.html summarizes the exact differences in Riddle in the Dark
    – MJB
    Commented Jan 15, 2014 at 1:13
  • Do you still have your brother's copy of The Hobbit on hand? Based on your description and context I'm guessing it's a US Hobbit, probably 2nd edition, but possibly also 3rd edition prior to when they added the isbn number in 1970. If you can share a picture of the copyright page I can try giving you a more precise answer.
    – ibid
    Commented Jan 5, 2023 at 5:45
  • @ibid I don't, sorry.
    – Kalamane
    Commented Jan 6, 2023 at 16:17

3 Answers 3

63

It sounds like your wife has this one (goodreads.com), the same edition as mine.

The revision was made after Tolkien began work on The Lord of the Rings, to tie in the history and nature of the Ring and fix some minor inconsistencies between the two works. The primary difference in the revised version is the way Gollum is portrayed. Wikipedia summarizes the diverging scene:

In the first edition of The Hobbit, Gollum willingly bets his magic ring on the outcome of the riddle-game, and he and Bilbo part amicably. In the second edition edits, in order to reflect the new concept of the ring and its corrupting abilities, Tolkien made Gollum more aggressive towards Bilbo and distraught at losing the ring.

In LotR, Bilbo makes a reference to the revision himself at the Council of Elrond, when he asks any who heard another telling to forget it and forgive him. He explains that the original version was a lie he made up under the influence of the Ring, while the "revision" which he then tells in full is in fact the truth.

7
  • 12
    +1 Thanks for reference in LotR! Really interesting fact.
    – Zenon
    Commented Aug 22, 2011 at 18:25
  • 1
    That is the edition my wife has! Excellent answer.
    – Kalamane
    Commented Aug 25, 2011 at 14:11
  • 22
    Nice retcon by Bilbo :)
    – K-H-W
    Commented Apr 26, 2012 at 17:50
  • My comment to the other answer: There's a better way nowadays at least; they have reprinted the first edition. It's quite delightful. I first knew about it because of HoMe volume VI ('The Return of the Shadow') and when I found out about the reprint I was quite excited. Amazon has it and so does the Tolkien Online bookshop (don't have direct links now and it's way late here for me).
    – Pryftan
    Commented May 17, 2018 at 2:45
  • @K-H-W Yes Tolkien was able to use Bilbo's storytelling as a way to easily update the way the stories unfolded. Quite fortunate.
    – Pryftan
    Commented May 17, 2018 at 2:47
29

While Travis' answer covers the largest edit, there are substantial minor edits, especially regarding dates (to make the travel time agree with the Lord of the Rings,) and foodstuffs (to ensure that the character's diet is limited to Old World food.)

The best source I have found for this is The Annotated Hobbit, which covers the changes in exhausting detail, in a running margin, so that it does not interfere with reading the story.

2
  • 1
    There's a better way nowadays at least; they have reprinted the first edition. It's quite delightful. I first knew about it because of HoMe volume VI ('The Return of the Shadow') and when I found out about the reprint I was quite excited. Amazon has it and so does the Tolkien Online bookshop (don't have direct links now and it's way late here for me).
    – Pryftan
    Commented May 17, 2018 at 2:44
  • 1
    @Pryftan - I disagree. Looking at the complete list of changes in The Annotated Hobbit, is significantly easier than buying both editions to find them yourself.
    – ibid
    Commented Nov 23, 2021 at 15:10
3

Among other changes in The Hobbit, Tolkien changed the description of Hobbits in the first chapter.

I wrote a question recently asking if Tolkien changed the description of Hobbits in the first chapter between editions.

Did Tolkien change the description of Hobbits in The Hobbit?

And a user named Ibid answered that Tolkien did change the descrition.

Ibid quoted from the 1937 first Edition and 1951 second edition:

They are (or were) small people, smaller than dwarves (and they have no beards) but very much larger than lilliputians.

And the quote from the 1966 third edition says:

They are (or were) a little people, about half our height, and smaller than the bearded Dwarves. Hobbits have no beards.

So the first edition in 1937 compares the Hobbits to Lilliputians and uses the old version of Bilbo's encounter with Gollum.

The second edition in 1951 has the "true" version of Bilbo's encounter with Gollum but still compares the Hobbits to Liliputians.

And the third edition in 1966 has the "true" version of Bilbo's encounter with Gollum and does not compare the Hobbits to Liliputians.

So if someone has a damaged copy of The Hobbit without a mention of the edition or the printing date this is a quick way to tell which edition it is.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.