Timeline for Is this legendary homebrew cloak (Abyssal Regalia of the Dark Prince) balanced?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 20, 2023 at 17:04 | answer | added | SeriousBri | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 20, 2023 at 6:36 | answer | added | Dan B | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 19, 2023 at 17:36 | comment | added | Darth Pseudonym | If it's just a supernatural aura of convincingness then the reference to being well-dressed seems confusing. | |
Dec 19, 2023 at 17:18 | comment | added | Ella | @DarthPseudonym Sorry, my mistake. It acts more like an aura and doesn't mess with the way people see you or your appearance. Humanoids feel drawn to you, since Graz'zt himself is all about charme and seductiveness. I might add the clause that creatures immune to being charmed are unaffected, but it is not supposed to be a Charm effect as in Charm Person, so I left it out of the draft. | |
Dec 19, 2023 at 16:49 | comment | added | Darth Pseudonym | @Ella No... Infernal Wardrobe is the one that sounds like the Cloak of Many Fashions. Fiendish Elegance is very different. | |
Dec 19, 2023 at 16:10 | comment | added | Ella | @matswecja Yes, you are right. I had created the item with my warlock player in mind who is a Fiend Warlock of Graz'zt. So the attunement will have to be updated accordingly | |
Dec 19, 2023 at 16:09 | comment | added | Ella | @DarthPseudonym The Fiendish Elegance functions like the common magic item "Cloak of many fashions". It must always remain a cloak but can change material, colour and so on. | |
Dec 19, 2023 at 9:13 | comment | added | matszwecja | Abyssal Resilience assumes the character is a Fiend, but attunement requirement is generic. I would at least aknowledge the option of not having Fiendish Resilience feature when using this item. | |
Dec 19, 2023 at 4:11 | history | edited | V2Blast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarified title; minor copyediting; fixed formatting; edited tags
|
Dec 18, 2023 at 23:00 | history | became hot network question | |||
Dec 18, 2023 at 18:06 | comment | added | Darth Pseudonym | Just as a little editing matter, it's a bit unclear what Fiendish Elegance is doing. If it's creating a magical illusion of nice clothes over your rags or whatever, it should say that (and truesight or similar should nullify the effect). If it messes with peoples' minds so that they perceive you as finely dressed even if you're wearing yoga pants and crocs, then it should say that, and probably have no effect on creatures that can't be charmed, or some such thing. | |
Dec 18, 2023 at 16:27 | answer | added | Nobody the Hobgoblin | timeline score: 8 | |
Dec 18, 2023 at 15:05 | history | edited | Ella | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 289 characters in body
|
Dec 18, 2023 at 15:00 | history | asked | Ella | CC BY-SA 4.0 |