This tag has (only) 4 questions and is only recently created (early March).
specialabilities seems useless and should be removed.
Can we burninate this tag?
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
4
-
2\$\begingroup\$ Can we just burninate this tag entirely? (I was in the middle of writing the burninate request when this popped up actually) \$\endgroup\$– RubiksmooseCommented Apr 19, 2018 at 15:39
-
\$\begingroup\$ It seems appropriate. I can't think of a use of this tag that can't be covered by other tags, like feats, classfeats, etc. \$\endgroup\$– VylixCommented Apr 19, 2018 at 15:40
-
3\$\begingroup\$ It seems to be used for 3/4 of the questions for monster abilities. Which I think still falls neatly under monsters. That being said, did you want to make this a burninate request officially then? \$\endgroup\$– RubiksmooseCommented Apr 19, 2018 at 15:47
-
2\$\begingroup\$ @Rubiksmoose done and done \$\endgroup\$– VylixCommented Apr 19, 2018 at 15:58
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
I agree. The tag should be removed. Of the 4 questions it is attached to (one of which is closed), 3 would be better categorized by monsters and the fourth apparently tries to apply it to spell effects which falls under spells. Additionally it seems like an unnecessary and confusing tag to even have (without really coming up with a narrow definition), after all what isn't a special ability in D&D 5e for example?
The tag name is formatted incorrectly as well.
For, all the reasons above, I say let it burn.
Update: Tag has been removed by @ObliviousSage and is no longer special.
