Which of the 8 tiles below is missing?
I've been trying to figure out the answer to this question for quite some time. Can anyone spot the pattern?
Source: https://www.bergmandata.com
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
11
-
27$\begingroup$ When I took my Mensa test, we weren't allowed to copy any of the questions. Where did you get this from? ;-) $\endgroup$– DevSolarCommented Aug 10, 2015 at 14:49
-
4$\begingroup$ @DevSolar- Photgraphic memory? $\endgroup$– chasly - supports MonicaCommented Aug 10, 2015 at 17:16
-
4$\begingroup$ It wasn't clear to me until reading @BaileyM's answer that the numbered tiles were the multiple-choice answers. I think it would be good to clarify that, so that people like me don't think, incorrectly, that the numbered tiles are also part of the puzzle statement. $\endgroup$– JashaszunCommented Aug 10, 2015 at 20:34
-
27$\begingroup$ The real challenge would be to create an answer that shows that you could think of 8 different patterns each yielding a different tile as the solution... $\endgroup$– JeroenCommented Aug 11, 2015 at 9:08
-
3$\begingroup$ None of them are missing; they're all right there. $\endgroup$– Dax FohlCommented Aug 16, 2015 at 4:46
|
Show 6 more comments
7 Answers
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
14
I think the answer is
Tile 5
Because it looks to me like
Reading from left to right, the lines continue where the previous square left off, to make two long connecting 'strings' of sorts. The eighth square leaves off in the top righthand corner and about 80% of the way down the bottom side, which is where tile 5 would connect to.
Here is an image of the final solution:
-
2
-
4
-
22$\begingroup$ LOL I was like Tile 5 cause of basically the reason you gave, I greatly enjoy how you enhanced the answer into the full picture, the extra effort just makes the question and answer so much more complete and beautiful. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 10, 2015 at 14:21
-
4$\begingroup$ I missed the connector from 1,3 to 2,1 and 2,3 to 3,1 - though the solution can be found if you take them as 3 separate series, as I did $\endgroup$– JasonCommented Aug 10, 2015 at 17:33
-
3
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
11
I think the answer is
The one given by @Bailey M, but I would like to offer another answer...
Because I figured that
It would be fun to have an alternative solution :-). With this solution, the supposed rules for tiles are that:
1. the third column tiles' lines always "indicate" adjoined sides;
2. the third column tiles' lines always touch exactly one corner;
Meaning that
Tiles 1, 2, 7, and 8 are out because of rule 1;
Tiles 4, 5, 6, (and 7) are out because of rule 2;
And thus that
it must be Tile 3!
Here's an image to visualize that
-
47$\begingroup$ Which is why I hate this sort of problem--there are usually valid arguments for multiple answers and it's pretty hard to define "best". $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 10, 2015 at 22:47
-
8$\begingroup$ Loren Pechtel: I often run into theses problems where I can explain a simple logic for the answer I select in IQ tests, but it seem 5% of the time I still get it wrong. Duh. Thinking out of the box is not smart. $\endgroup$– FMaz008Commented Aug 11, 2015 at 0:39
-
9$\begingroup$ @FMaz008 - It's very smart; it's just not what Mensa want. $\endgroup$– h34Commented Aug 11, 2015 at 6:50
-
21$\begingroup$ @h34 Exactly. I can't see a puzzle like this without thinking of the story in one of Douglas Hofstadter's books about when he gave a lecture about training computers to solve "what number comes next in this sequence?" problems, and Richard Feynman was sitting in the front row. Every time he put up an example sequence on the board and asked the audience, "What number comes next?" Feynman shouted "Nine!" $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 11, 2015 at 7:11
-
9$\begingroup$ @Voo I would guess the point is that you can always come up with a "pattern" (of arbitrary complexity) that will give any answer you like as the next in the sequence. An extreme example of this is overtraining with artificial neural networks - the ANN mistakes the training data itself as being the pattern, instead of identifying the more generalised pattern. For example, if I ask you what number is next in the sequence "1 2 3", you might say "4", but Richard Feynman might say that for every 4th item you add 6 instead of 1, justifying his "9". $\endgroup$– JBentleyCommented Aug 11, 2015 at 22:22
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
2
You're all thinking to hard. This is just a game of Tic Tac Toe. Since it is the turn of X, tiles 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7 would all be correct. I personally would go with 7 because it's a well drawn X.
-
$\begingroup$ If this was Tic Tac Toe, the game would have been a draw by at least the previous turn. $\endgroup$– MastCommented Aug 12, 2015 at 22:26
-
10$\begingroup$ @Mast Obviously, but what kind of person doesn't finish filling it out anyways? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 12, 2015 at 22:41
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
6
I think Bailey M has got the intended answer.
But another answer that works is
Tile 2
Reasoning:
Notation
In each square, label the corners A-D, running clockwise from the top left. By "line" we mean a line inside a square. Call a line "par" if it is parallel to a side of the square. Call a corner "visited" if it is touched by a line.
First fact
Consider the distribution of par lines by row. In rows 1-2 the totals are the same: each row contains exactly 1. To continue the pattern of sameness, row 3 must also contain exactly 1. Of all the possible missing tiles, the only one that contains exactly 1 par line is tile 2.
Second and corroborating fact.
Now consider the distribution of par lines by column. In columns 1-2 the numbers are different: there are 0 in column 1 and 2 in column 2. Neither of the known tiles in column 3 contains a par line, so the total in column 3 can only be 0 or 1. To continue the pattern of difference, the number must be 1, so again the answer must be tile 2.
Third and supporting fact
Each fully known column contains exactly 2 squares in which the same corner is visited: in column 1, that is corner B; in column 2, corner C. So we need a tile that continues that pattern in column 3. The visited corners in the known tiles in column 3 are A and C. This restricts the possibilities for the missing tile to tiles 2 and 5. So when we choose tile 2, this pattern also continues.
Diagram of this solution:
Of course this answer doesn't use all of the given information. For example, the horizontal line in the top middle tile could be translated upwards and everything would still apply. But the same is true of what appears to be the intended solution. In that solution, it doesn't matter whether two lines in a square cross or don't cross, so long as they start and end so as to connect with the lines in adjacent squares. One could also say that going downwards for row 2 but left-to-right for rows 1 and 3 is a bit arbitrary. Our basis for deciding what we think is the best solution is subjective, or at least would take a lot of definition to be made objective.
-
1$\begingroup$ Nice reasoning. But when looking at this and Bailey's solution, his is using more information from the tiles. And although my test has been over ten years since, I think I remember that this group of question always used all available information from the tiles; there was no "noise". $\endgroup$– DevSolarCommented Aug 11, 2015 at 15:43
-
2$\begingroup$ I accept that Bailey M's solution uses more of the given information (for a handwaving definition of "more"), is neat, and is almost certainly what Mensa wanted. But the puzzle doesn't ask for the solution that uses the most information - it just says find "the" tile that fits, suggesting that we stop when we've found one. Kolmogorov and Solomonoff aside, I don't think there's a rigorous definition of "amount of information" that's relevant here. @ANil GAdiyar's solution below doesn't use where every line ends, but uses whether they cross; the opposite is true of Bailey M's solution. $\endgroup$– h34Commented Aug 12, 2015 at 7:58
-
1$\begingroup$ No solution so far has used all the information, even in an unpedantic and down-to-earth sense. One thing I find very interesting here is the role of people's knowledge of what Mensa want, which says a lot about IQ tests. (Correction to my previous comment: Bailey M's solution uses where all lines end except on the left of tile (1,1) and the bottom of the solution tile.) $\endgroup$– h34Commented Aug 12, 2015 at 8:03
-
2$\begingroup$ The way a Mensa test works (at least, how it worked when and where I took it) is this: You get a booklet with the questions, subdivided in sections. One section about puzzles like these, one about memorizing, one about words... you get the idea. Each section starts with examples, which are explained by the person giving the test, so you know what kind of solutions are expected. Only when everybody in the room is ready, the page is turned to the real questions, and the clock starts ticking. When the time is up, the next section is being explained. (ctd...) $\endgroup$– DevSolarCommented Aug 12, 2015 at 8:30
-
3$\begingroup$ (...ctd) So you get a pretty good idea of what kind of answer the questions are looking for. Besides, you cannot realistically solve all the questions correctly in the time frame, so skipping a dubious one doesn't really hurt. If this one question is the only one you got wrong, you scored off-scale high and should take the next harder test anyway. Tests are only precise for ~ 15 IQ points around a given mark, and rapidly lose significance outside that range. (Which makes people bragging about the 200+ IQ value they got from some website test targeting the 85-115 IQ range so funny. ;-) ) $\endgroup$– DevSolarCommented Aug 12, 2015 at 8:33
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
4
answer is
2
because
row 1 has 3 kinds of design:
a) one with straight line;
b) one with two lines intersecting;
c) and one with a line starting from centre of a tile.
-
2$\begingroup$ +1. A very nice solution! The amount of "information" in favour of tile 2 is increasing :-) But you should change "straight line" to "line parallel to a side of the square" and "from centre" to "from near the middle of a side". $\endgroup$– h34Commented Aug 12, 2015 at 7:48
-
$\begingroup$ The placement within columns is irrelevant to this answer; this indicates that you have ignored information. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 12, 2015 at 14:43
-
6$\begingroup$ @IanMacDonald - All answers so far have ignored some information. For example, the top answer ignores whether the lines in a square cross or don't cross. $\endgroup$– h34Commented Aug 12, 2015 at 22:27
-
$\begingroup$ Here's my reason for choosing 2 (which I admit doesn't take into account all the information). In each row there is exactly one square consisting of a)1 rectangle, b)1 triangle, and c)1 trapezoid. Squares 7 and 8 don't satisfy this condition. Therefore, unknown square 9 must contain 1 rectangle, 1 triangle, 1 trapezoid. Choice 2 is the only possible answer consisting of 1 rectangle, 1 triangle and 1 trapezoid. Therefore it the only possible valid answer for 9 which obeys this rule. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 23, 2016 at 18:27
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
The answer is...
Tile 5
Because...
Tile 5 is the only one represented on the bottom that doesn't have a similar tile on the top. I'm not sure why there's so much reading into this... All the other tiles have a similar one on the top even if you have to flip it, etc.
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
I think the answer should be
(3) because for every figure you see in a row one end of two lines lies on one side and other end on another side and also 2 out of 3 of such figures have such sides opposite to each other and one has it adjacent (note having line start at edge should be interpreted as in a favor of this hypothesis i.e. benefit of doubt goes to me). Same pattern is seen in row 2 and hence extrapolating it, I eliminate the eight-options to arrive at (3) which satisfies this rule.
