18
$\begingroup$

Beginner puzzle

This puzzle is intended to be suitable for people who are new to puzzle solving.

Clarification: Both experienced solvers and new solvers are welcome to post solutions to this puzzle.


Using the numbers 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 10 each exactly once, place a number into each circle so that the products of the three numbers along each edge are the same, and as large as possible.

6 empty circles arranged into a triangle with 3 circles on each edge of the triangle


This puzzle is from a UK Junior Mathematical Olympiad.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I have been able to entertain several non puzzle minded friends with this puzzle and potential more general incarnations and questions such as: where do these numbers come from in the first place and what about another regular polygon with more sides than 3. In short: this is indeed a suitable introduction to PE. Thanks. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 8 at 1:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @FirstNameLastName I am happy that this was a suitable puzzle for you. Some of my puzzles are easy and some are tough. Nowadays when I post an easy puzzle, I label it “Beginner puzzle”. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 8 at 2:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ minor nuance : this puzzle is suitable, but, perhaps a bit too easy for me personally, if I may say so, and rather, as you, I modestly believe, intended, certainly suitable for beginners, I use it to convince people they can solve puzzles :-) $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9 at 1:55

4 Answers 4

19
$\begingroup$

First observe that

there are two multiples of 3, namely 3 and 6. The two numbers must be placed so that the three sides are multiples of 3 (and none of them multiple of 9 since we have too few factors of 3 for that), and the only way to do that is to place one at a corner and the other at the opposing side. The same applies to 5 and 10.

So we get this far:

        2/4
    5/10    3/6
3/6     2/4     5/10

In order to maximize the product,

see that each pair is in the form of $(n, 2n)$. The extra factors of 2 can go either to all sides or all corners. Out of the two, putting them at the corners gives greater product.

So the answer is

    4
  5   3
6   2   10

with the side product of 120.

$\endgroup$
0
6
$\begingroup$

This is intended only as a partial answer:

Bubbler’s answer gave an arrangement of the six numbers where the product of the numbers (for each edge) is:

120

The following is a proof that the common product can’t be larger than what Bubbler achieved:

First of all there must an edge that doesn’t contain the number 10.

The maximum product for this non-10 edge is the product of the three largest numbers other than 10 which is $4 \times 5 \times 6=120$.

Q. E. D.

The above proof idea came from an answer to this question which was later deleted. I don’t know the reason for the deletion.

$\endgroup$
0
2
$\begingroup$

One derived rule limits the amount of choices for the 6 numbers and their positions

If we call corner values A B C and opposite middle values a b c then one easily proves A/a=B/b=C/c must be equal to some r. But that common ratio r must be bigger than 1 for maximum common product AbC=BcA=CbA. So 10 is a corner value leaving only 5 as opposite middle value and common ratio 2. This further determines 6 as next corner value and all the following values, and, the common product 120=ABC/r. It is not that hard to find similar 6 numbers with such common pairwise rational ratio r. For example 1 2 3 4 6 8 or also n^0...n^5 for some n>0. A similar slightly more difficult reasoning leads to find 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 15 and their positions on the corners and sides of a pentagon, and, the common product 120. For a square I find in a similar way 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 12 and their positions on the corners, and, the common product 60.

$\endgroup$
-2
$\begingroup$

Considering that

10 will give the largest product, it can only be in the middle of a row.

And that

we don’t want the multiple of 10 to be too large,

it means that

10 can only be flanked by 2 and 3, giving 2x3x10 = 60

Then the other numbers place themselves easily:

it’s either 2-4-5, 2-4-6, 2-5-4, 2-6-4, 2-5-6, or 2-6-5 on one row

but

none of the first four give 60 as product,

so we are left with

2-5-6 or 2-6-5

But since this means rejecting

4

in that row, it means the other row must have it, so we have

4 x 3 x 5 = 60

as only possibility, meaning the other row is thus

2 x 5 x 6 = 60

Thus the final answer is

2
10-6
3-4-5

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your final answer is not valid, having products of 60, 24 and 180. The solution you describe is valid, though the product is not as large as possible. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 30 at 11:31
  • $\begingroup$ I’m not sure I understand your reasoning leading to “10 can only be flanked by 2 and 3”. How large is “too large”, and why? $\endgroup$
    – Sneftel
    Commented Mar 30 at 18:57
  • $\begingroup$ Indeed, I screwed up when I wrote the last element. And I completely missed the “product as large as possible” part. (facepalm) $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 30 at 20:35

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.