3
$\begingroup$

Inspired by Polyomino T hexomino and rectangle packing into rectangle

See also series Tiling rectangles with F pentomino plus rectangles and Tiling rectangles with Hexomino plus rectangle #1

Previous puzzle in this series Tiling rectangles with Heptomino plus rectangle #3

Next puzzle in this series Tiling rectangles with Heptomino plus rectangle #6

The goal is to tile rectangles as small as possible with the given heptomino, in this case number 4 of the 108 heptominoes. We allow the addition of copies of a rectangle. For each rectangle $a\times b$, find the smallest area larger rectangle that copies of $a\times b$ plus at least one of the given heptomino will tile.

Example with the $1\times 1$ you can tile a $2\times 6$ as follows:

1x1_2x6

Now we don't need to consider $1\times 1$ further as we have found the smallest rectangle tilable with copies of the heptomino plus copies of $1\times 1$.

I found 31 more but lots of them can be found by 'expansion rules' or pattern variations. I considered component rectangles of width 1 through 11 and length to 32 but my search was far from complete.

List of known sizes:

  • Width 1: Lengths 1 to 15, 18, 22
  • Width 2: Lengths 2 to 9, 11, 15, 21
  • Width 3: Lengths 4, 5, 7
  • Width 4: Length 5

Most of these could be tiled by hand using logic rather than trial and error.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

Here is a general solution for $2\times n$ rectangles, with $n$ odd and not divisible by $7$.

$2\times1$, in $2\times12$
enter image description here

$2\times3$, in $4\times40$
enter image description here

$2\times5$, in $6\times40$
enter image description here

and so on.

The size is $n+1$ by $2nk+10$, where $k\equiv n^{-1} \mod 7$.

Of course this general solution is not always optimal. Here are some better solutions:

$2\times1$

in $2\times9$
enter image description here

$2\times3$

in $8\times10$
enter image description here

Here is a general solution for $2\times n$ rectangles with $n$ even.

$2\times2$, in $4\times12$
enter image description here

$2\times4$, in $6\times26$
enter image description here

$2\times6$, in $8\times82$
enter image description here

$2\times8$, in $10\times26$
enter image description here

$2\times10$, in $12\times110$
enter image description here
and so on.

The size is $n+2$ by $2nk+10$, where $k\equiv (\frac{n}{2})^{-1} \mod 7$.

Again this general solution is not always optimal:

$2\times6$

in $8\times34$
enter image description here

Here is a general solution for $3\times n$ rectangles, where $n$ is not divisible by 3.


$3\times4$, in $8\times31$
enter image description here

$3\times5$, in $20\times38$
enter image description here

$3\times7$, in $14\times10$
enter image description here
and so on.

The size is $2nr$ by $lcm(7,n)+3$, where $r\equiv n^{-1} \mod 3$.

There is in fact a general solution for any $a\times b$ where $\gcd(a,b)=1$.

As $a$ and $b$ are co-prime, we can find positive $r$,$s$ such that $ra-sb=1$. This is equivalent to $(a-s)b-(b-r)a=1$. Doubling these equations, we can also find $t$,$u$ such that $ta-ub=2$ and $(a-u)b-(b-t)a=2$. The smallest $t$,$u$ are actually $t=(2r)\%b$ and $u=(2s)\%a$ where $\%$ is the modulo operator. This allows for the following solution:
enter image description here

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ 1x2=2x9, 2x2=4x12, 2x3=8x10, 2x4=6x26, 2x5=6x40, 2x6=8x34, 2x8=10x26 all minimal. 2x7 has a much smaller one than your generalisation, but 2x9=10x82, 2x11=12x54 and 2x15=16x40 are minimal (I think your formula gives those...). There is a nice smaller one for 2x21. Your 3x7=10x14 is minimal but 3x4 and 3x5 are not. Your axb generalisation seems to be minimal for 4x5=21x35. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 24, 2018 at 1:46
1
$\begingroup$

Let's start with a few generalizable $1 \times n$ solutions, similar to the ones here, corresponding to Type B, Type A resp. Type C:

enter image description here

Note that they can be subdivided, e.g. the first one into $1 \times 4$ and $1 \times 2$ (though the latter won't be optimal; I'll leave it for another contender); in general,

you'll need less rows as padding and the solution will have a height of $n + 1$.

Here are the solution sizes:

Type A (middle): uses $2k$ heptominoes, works when $n$ divides $7k$. Solution size is $(n + 1) \times (7k + n)$, or equivalently $(n + 1) \times (\text{lcm}(7,n) + n)$.
Type B (left): uses $2k+1$ heptominoes, works when $n$ divides $7k + 1$. Solution size is $(n + 1) \times (7k + 6)$. The minimum value of $k$ is $7^{-1} \pmod n$ (this is a so-called modular multiplicative inverse), so the solution size is $(n + 1) \times (7(7^{-1} \pmod n) + 6)$.
Type C (right): uses $2k+1$ heptominoes, works when $n$ divides $7k + 6$. Solution size is $(n + 1) \times (7k + 1 + 2n)$. The minimum value of $k$ is $7^{-1} \pmod n - 1$, so the solution size is $(n + 1) \times (7(7^{-1} \pmod n) - 6 + 2n)$.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.