Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Also, I don't understand what is going on with cd_dec here. It looks like a definition to tell that law of excluded middle holds for Cd (actually, that it's either provable or disprovable I guess), but then it's instantiated and supposed to be the decidable version of Cd? How does that work?
Thanks, I understand now the issue with decidability, I think (although I am not certain why the proof system needs to care about decidability). All my stuff is trivially decidable though, I know the values at every t.
So, if I have excluded middle (this is what propositions being decidable means, right?), the easiest for reasoning is your first example? I just want a nicer replacement for the hypotheses I currently use to define delay, but if the replacement is more awkward I can also stick with those.