6

According to whistleblowers speaking to the BBC, and a report published by Physicians for Human Rights in Israel, among many other descriptions:

Patients at the Sde Teiman hospital are kept blindfolded and permanently shackled to their beds by all four limbs, according to several medics responsible for treating patients there.

They are also made to wear nappies, rather than use a toilet.

...

The two whistle-blowers the BBC spoke to were both in positions to assess the medical treatment of detainees. Both asked to remain anonymous because of the sensitivity of the issue among their colleagues.

Their accounts are supported by a report, external, published in February by Physicians for Human Rights in Israel, which said that Israel’s civilian and military prisons had become “an apparatus of retribution and revenge” and that detainees’ human rights were being violated - in particular their right to health.

Why are Palestinian prisoners in Israeli medical centres being treated this way?

1
  • 4
    Worth noting that not all the whistle-blowers are anonymous. The BBC report names one as Dr. Yoel Donchin, who was the chief anaesthiologist at the Sde Teiman hospital. Its worth noting that Sde Teiman is a military facility, so the Doctor was already working at a military installation. Commented May 21 at 17:38

2 Answers 2

6

Patients at the Sde Teiman hospital are kept blindfolded and permanently shackled to their beds by all four limbs, according to several medics responsible for treating patients there.

Shackling dangerous criminals to hospital beds is standard practice all over the world. The US does it as well

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971251/

https://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/02/us/prisons-often-shackle-pregnant-inmates-in-labor.html

They are also made to wear nappies, rather than use a toilet.

Given the severe personnel shortage due to the war, you can't reasonably expect them to use their manpower on escorting terrorists to and from the bathroom

The two whistle-blowers the BBC spoke to were both in positions to assess the medical treatment of detainees. Both asked to remain anonymous

Their request for anonymity greatly weakens their credibility

Their accounts are supported by a report, external, published in February by Physicians for Human Rights in Israel,

Other than demanding that Israel provide better treatment to those who are hostile to it and being a reliable source for anti-Israel propaganda , what else has this organization ever done?

which said that Israel’s civilian and military prisons had become “an apparatus of retribution and revenge”

That is just an opinion and a clearly incorrect one at that . If they were really so interested in retribution and revenge why bother treating them at all? Just let them suffer and die from whatever they are in the hospital for to begin with.

5
  • 1
    Thank you @Schmerel. Please note that there's a lot more in the linked articles than just the quote you've re-quoted. Please make sure you take that into account in your answer. Commented May 21 at 18:00
  • 7
    At least one guy in the BBC interview lost his leg, but what not actually accused of anything and was released. Operations without anasthesia are hardly common practice and not addressed by the answer. Commented May 21 at 22:17
  • 4
    The question is about mostly random people kidnapped off the street as hostages, but you answered about dangerous criminals. This doesn't answer the question. Commented May 25 at 9:19
  • 4
    Israel can find the manpower for plenty of other things, from entering Eurovision to hassling Arabs in the West Bank to staffing its nightclubs and bars, so I think the manpower argument needs to be expanded a bit to be more convincing.
    – Stuart F
    Commented May 26 at 13:54
  • 6
    @StuartF are you suggesting that bartenders should be deputized to guard dangerous criminals? Or the artists who participate in Eurovision? Surely, by not having enough resources, the answer meant the military personal, who understandably cannot be spared during an active war. I am not the one who wrote the answer, btw. So let's not engage in litigating it. But as suggestions on the quality of the answer, or possible improvements, go, I am not sure your comment is constructive.
    – wrod
    Commented Jun 2 at 5:52
6

There are reports of prisoner abuse from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran, Syria, Rwanda, Morocco, Laos, Jordan, Turkey, and many other countries. While Israel's systematic abuse of Palestinians prisoners has been ongoing since the occupation began over 50 years ago, the state is not doing anything other authoritarian regimes don't. Violence is how such regimes handle dissidents.

For why and how Israel practices torture against Palestinian prisoners on an institutional level, see Democracy and the Mis-Rule of Law: The Israeli Legal System's Failure to Prevent Torture in the Occupied Territories by Barak Cohen. He refers to the 1987 Landau Commission and a 1999 Israeli High Court of Justice (HCJ) ruling about Israeli interrogation methods. The Commission was setup because the Shin Bet has tried to hide the fact that agents had beaten to death two Palestinian bus hijackers. The Commission found routine and systematic use of torture during interrogations:

The Commission squarely refuted Israel's official averments that it did not practice torture. In fact, the Commission found that since 1971, GSS [the Shin Bet] interrogators' policy was to extract confessions from Palestinians through coercive means and to perjure themselves before the military courts to hide the fact that they had coerced confessions. The Commission also found that GSS agents routinely lied to military judges regarding the use of torture to coerce confessions from Palestinian detainees and that the practice was routinized through guidelines distributed through the GSS.

While the Commission expressed a preference for non-violent interrogation methods, it stated that "when these do not attain their purpose, the exertion of a moderate measure of physical pressure cannot be avoided". I.e., "physical pressure" is a useful tool to extract confessions and information from prisoners. The phrases "moderate measure" and "physical pressure" were not defined by the Commission and left open for interpretation.

The HCJ ruling however disavowed all forms of torture and cruel and inhumane treatment. It explicitly condemned four types of "physical pressure"; "shaking", position abuse, excessive tightening of suspects' handcuffs, and sleep deprivation. Though there is ample evidence from human rights organizations and former prisoners that these techniques are still practiced. The belief that physical and psychological torture works and is justified is widespread.

To understand the psychological mechanisms causing people to commit torture, the Milgram's Experiment may be a good starting point. Former US soldier Lynndie England who tortured prisoners in Abu Ghraib justified her actions as follows:

... that she was goaded into posing for the photographs by her then lover and more senior fellow soldier, Charles Graner. 'They said in the trial that authority figures really intimidate me. I always aim to please.'

She has no regrets, by the way. The October 7 attack and the Israeli leaders' dehumanizing rethoric against "the enemies" may be triggering for the "pleasers" guarding Palestinian prisoners. Hence, there may have been an uptick in violence against Palestinian prisoners in the last six months.

Indeed, the recently published New York Times investigation into the Sde Taiman prison cites gruesome acts of torture that can't serve any purpose other than to satisfy the abuser's own sadism:

A U.N. report details scenes at a military hangar inside Sde Teiman, an army base in southern Israel that has become synonymous with the detention of Gazan Palestinians.

Mr. al-Hamlawi, the senior nurse, said a female officer had ordered two soldiers to lift him up and press his rectum against a metal stick that was fixed to the ground. Mr. al-Hamlawi said the stick penetrated his rectum for roughly five seconds, causing it to bleed and leaving him with “unbearable pain.”

A leaked draft of the UNRWA report detailed an interview that gave a similar account. It cited a 41-year-old detainee who said that interrogators “made me sit on something like a hot metal stick and it felt like fire,” and also said that another detainee “died after they put the electric stick up” his anus.

Mr. al-Hamlawi recalled being forced to sit in a chair wired with electricity. He said he was shocked so often that, after initially urinating uncontrollably, he then stopped urinating for several days. Mr. al-Hamlawi said he, too, had been forced to wear nothing but a diaper, to stop him from soiling the floor.

In addition to al-Hamlawi, the investigation cites two other detainees, Shaheen and Bakr, who were strapped to chairs wired with electricity and were shocked with electricity until they passed out. Electric chairs are not contraptions easily built by rogue soldiers, hence the practice of shocking prisoners must have institutional support.

2

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .