2

During the Israel–Hamas war, numerous videos and images were taken and posted to social media by IDF soldiers, capturing their own questionable behavior. Some examples include soldiers posing with the underwear of killed or displaced women, posing beside cuffed blindfolded Palestinian men, destroying civilian infrastructure, looting, spraying racist graffiti, etc.

I would like to know if these images and videos were addressed directly at all by senior government officials (i.e., ministers, top leaders, government spokespersons) in Israel or its Western allies, and what was stated.

6
  • "and Western". TBH this going to be a little too broad. And where is the line for 'senior'? Does a spokesperson count? Etc. Also I'm not sure why senior leadership should be concerned with an IDF soldier rummaging through the pants collection of a Palestinian woman, etc. And even if they are a bit concerned, why should they be making statements about that, in particular/detail. Commented Mar 12 at 2:14
  • 1
    @Dolphin613Motorboat I am looking for statements from leaders of Western allies of Israel as I suppose it would be trivial to find statements from officials of countries opposed to Israel, who are expected to condemn the soldiers' acts. Would the question seem broad to you if I had asked for statements made on the topic in general? I don't think so, as there are questions with a similar style on this website that were well received. Example: politics.stackexchange.com/questions/2640/…
    – hb20007
    Commented Mar 12 at 6:03
  • @Dolphin613Motorboat Regarding your point about the vagueness of the term "senior officials", it's a valid one and I have edited the question to it.
    – hb20007
    Commented Mar 12 at 6:05
  • Still mixing panties with destruction is just going to get you equivocal ('frame challenge') answers that admonish you for mixing the two. (You've got one of those already.) Commented Mar 12 at 9:25
  • 2
    @Dolphin613Motorboat It's a fair point. On the other hand, I believe that someone looking through a cultural lens may interpret the severity of destruction vs panties differently. In Arab Muslim culture, the "honor" of women is a much bigger deal compared to Western society. I do not have polls to back it up, but I believe that a person belonging to such a culture would take even greater issue at the panties vs at the destruction. So, an official seeing things through such a lens might attribute greater severity to the panties.
    – hb20007
    Commented Mar 12 at 10:11

2 Answers 2

9

Easily found:

IDF’s top lawyer warns against ‘cases of unacceptable conduct’ by troops in Gaza

Halevi’s and Tomer-Yerushalmi’s comments come weeks after The New York Times published an article titled “What Israeli Soldiers’ Videos Reveal: Cheering Destruction and Mocking Gazans,” which showed photos and videos of Israeli soldiers making derogatory comments about Palestinians, vandalizing civilian property and smiling for the cameras while driving bulldozers and using explosives.

The report cited an IDF statement condemning the soldiers’ posts as “deplorable.”

The gravity of the acts in question matter too. Compared to the, alleged war crimes by one side, and the certain atrocities by the other. These are not war crimes as such.

Why non-Israeli, Western, politicians will steer clear:

Western soldiers have, on numerous occasions, behaved in such disgraceful manner. Lack of discipline, lack of clear moral leadership, combat stress, gallows humor, revenge, the very nature of these wars against irregular armies?

Those events are not what many would find most worrying. I would reserve that for allegations like Special forces blocked UK resettlement applications from elite Afghan troops. Or the Abu Ghraib scandal. Or summary executions on the battlefield.

In past wars, when Western soldiers were caught doing the kinda of crap this question refers to, other allied nations generally publicly avoided saying much about it, letting the national equivalents of those IDF lawyers take the lead in condemning it. And that was mostly the case even in the much more serious second type of actions I mention above: we expect our peer nations to mostly behave and clean their dirty laundry themselves.

There may have been more pressure behind the scenes but I can't recall it being that public (maybe with Abu Ghraib?).

So it is unclear why Western officials would get too involved, on this particular matter. They'll dodge the question as much as they can.

Last, while it is easy to condemn images of men bound and stripped to their underwear, one also needs to remember there may be valid operational security reasons for that, at least right after capture: this is a region rife with the use of suicide vests.

This kind of subject is also somewhat of a lose-lose proposition for politicians to address:

(which is why the lawyers had that job)

  • if "they" admit and criticize it => "hah! even they admit it!"

  • if "they" don't criticize it => "see! they don't think it's a problem!".

10
  • 1
    This is not what I'm asking about. She is a lawyer and not a government official ("Israel Defense Forces’ top lawyer").
    – hb20007
    Commented Mar 11 at 19:57
  • I added "e.g., ministers, leaders" to clarify my question.
    – hb20007
    Commented Mar 11 at 19:59
  • 3
    "Warns against cases of" is the positive spin version for "Indicates no disciplinary or legal action in cases of". i.e., the unacceptable conduct is quite acceptable. (Not to mention the conduct of the political and military leadership in ordering the flattening of half of Gaza with mass bombing of civilians, starvation etc.)
    – einpoklum
    Commented Mar 11 at 20:11
  • 4
    @einpoklum well, I am a cynical guy and my search was "these do not represent values idf". That's also pretty standard PR-speak. But it did match the question. Of course, a symmetric, but opposite-side, question could also be asked and it would probably yield even less substance. But OP also clearly didn't look very much. Commented Mar 11 at 20:14
  • 1
    No, the statements are very easy to find. And the "top lawyer of the IDF" is the official to be making them (esp. if the politicians want to stay at arms length) so your edits are... your edits and I am not responsible for tracking changes in the contents of your question. Commented Mar 12 at 22:10
5

First result I found, close second quotes it, referring to a picture matching one of your descriptions ("posing beside cuffed blindfolded Palestinian men in their underwear"):

US State Department spokesman Vedant Patel says footage of an IDF soldier standing over a stripped, bound and wounded Palestinian in Gaza is “deeply troubling.”

The IDF spokesman also referred to similar reports:

"IDF forces operate according to the values and spirit of the IDF," he said. "Soldiers on the battlefield are required to act professionally and ethically, and we will not compromise on this. In any event... [the videos do not] align with IDF values, command and disciplinary steps will be taken - this is the way in the IDF."

and again:

IDF spokesman Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari comments on footage published on social media showing Israeli troops vandalizing Palestinian property in the Gaza Strip.

“IDF troops operate according to the IDF’s values and spirit. Troops on the battlefield are required to act with professionalism and with morals. We will not compromise on this,” Hagari says.

He says that soldiers who participate in any incidents which violate the IDF’s values will be reprimanded or punished.

On leaked footage showing IDF troops detaining Palestinian men in northern Gaza, Hagari says the photos were not distributed by the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit.

“We tell people to undress to make sure they don’t have explosive belts on,” he says, adding that dozens of the detained men are Hamas operatives, while many others are uninvolved civilians.


You tagged your question with a tag which does show some bias on your side. Most of such images capture a moment of time out of context, and are hardly evidence of a war crime on their own. Stripping detainees is a common practice almost anywhere, and especially in the Middle East where suicide bombers are quite common. Graffiti and posing with underwear may be a bad taste, but hardly a war crime (or any crime). Claims of destroying infrastructure or looting need to be investigated, but without seeing the specific pictures and knowing the context - also not something anyone would refer to explicitly.

So the response quoted above is probably as close as you can get as an official statement.

1
  • Comments have been moved to chat; please do not continue the discussion here. Before posting a comment below this one, please review the purposes of comments. Comments that do not request clarification or suggest improvements usually belong as an answer, on Politics Meta, or in Politics Chat. Comments continuing discussion may be removed.
    – Philipp
    Commented Mar 17 at 10:58

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .