I would state that no such party is a “left” one, no matter how they choose to call themselves nor how other their views are left-leaning. To be mocked as “alt-left” at best. As this stands against:
- egalitarianism, everyone is inherently equal,
- post-colonialism, as colonialism created the inequality and people are looking for better lives on the other hemisphere,
- ecology, as the climate disaster, hits the Global South (GS) much harder than the Imperial Core (IC), and it will make more GS land unlivable and some countries, like Kiribati [1,2]
- anticapitalism.
As capitalism feeds from all of the above problems:
- migration is used as a cheap labour and a subjugation measure against the working class (despite the migrants being working class themselves); this causes the capitalists' interest in portrayal of migrants as „lazy jobstealers”, to keep the local working class antagonized and scared, so they won't ask questions about their conditions,
- causes the climate disaster (essentially №3),
- causes colonialism and exploitation of the Global South, which creates the migration (essentially №2),
And to cap it off, it's inhumane. Because the above reasons are so great in the GS, that people risk their lives to travel to the IC.
Read about any disaster of boat traveling the Mediterranean Sea and their treatment by the coastal guards, about the Polish-Belarus border (bonus: contrast that with the Polish society reaction on the Ukrainian, war-related migration), about the UK openly being against the international law, EU paying off the post-Kadafi chaos, Frontex. (EU-related examples, as they're the closest to me.)
People risk their lives because at home they don't have lives.
There are of course valid reasons for not accepting everyone and criticising the past and current migration politics and their effects. Just the key is to not stop at the first thought „migration bad” but drive down deep from „why people migrate?”, to „what happens if we take a bunch of people and treat them as more or less disposable tools in political conflicts?”
As Max Frish said: “We asked for workers. We got people instead.”
So, if you're against migration, then you're not a leftist. Good bye
To comment on few “thoughts” from the quoted article:
The price for increased competition for affordable housing, low-wage jobs and failed integration is not primarily paid by those who are well off.
What system causes inequality and makes human rights, as housing, too much of a cost? The one you should be against?
The SPD and Greens have now also made a U-turn on migration policy and want to limit irregular immigration to Germany. At the same time, they are planning cuts in economic and social policy. "Reality is being forced upon these parties," says Patzelt.
Reality of telling that the system is not working?
Reality of telling that the system is not working, right?
(Also „Querfront”, are you on the left if you support the right? Also, also dude uses the term „woke” to justify that the left has shifted solely to identitarian politics, leaving the working class. Which most often that not is just right-spread falsehood.)
Germany's left-wing parties, he believes, should focus on "the little people whose familiar living environments are endangered by globalization and the migration that accompanies globalization, among other things."
The people from the Global South, right?