2

A local board of education is considering making a declaration condemning Israel for the war between Israel and Hamas, similar to the one that certain Harvard student groups made in October 2023. Apparently, the board has been lobbied to do that by a number of parents who are Palestinian. Thus the question: can a public school board, an elected body in a public education system, make such declarations?

8
  • 14
    Why shouldn't they be able to? Commented Jan 19 at 6:17
  • 7
    @ItalianPhilosophers4Monica I expect this information to be in the question not in an answer. All "Can one do something?" questions should motivate why it would be expected to be a problem. This gives valuable context to answer the question more specifically. Commented Jan 19 at 16:41
  • 3
    They obviously can. The question is whether they should.
    – Valorum
    Commented Jan 19 at 18:45
  • 2
    @NoDataDumpNoContribution, because inflammatory statements like that would put Israeli and Jewish kids in the position of likely harassment, just as that happened at CUNY, Harvard, Penn...
    – Michael
    Commented Jan 19 at 19:56
  • 2
    @Michael, are you arguing that any criticism of Israel's actions (no matter how horrendous they be) should be banned in case they lead to repercussions for Jews?
    – Ben Cohen
    Commented Jan 20 at 15:29

3 Answers 3

19

Yes, specifically because anyone at any level of the US government, be it the local, state, or federal level, not to mention people outside of the government, can make almost any statement, subject to a few narrow limitations, and statements criticizing foreign governments fall into that much broader category. This freedom is guaranteed under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, with few specific exceptions for government employees. The most famous of these is the Hatch Act, but that only applies to federal employees and would not cover the statements in question.

Note that conceptually, this statement is not so different from many other, less contentious ones that schools often make: for instance, in support of action against climate change or gun violence. The same latitude that allows schools to make these sorts of statements also allows them to opine on foreign politics, or for that matter to weigh in on domestic politics.

While the previous paragraphs should make it clear that no school board member is "disallowed" from making statements in the sense of facing criminal liability, it is worth mentioning that the school itself could be investigated by the Office of Civil Rights if the statement was suspected to represent discrimination against students. However, not only is this unlikely to lead anywhere, since the statement explicitly took a stand against discrimination, including anti-Semitism, but such investigations are limited in what they can do. Pulling federal funding is the most extreme remedy, but is very rarely employed, for the simple reason that it primarily punishes students, including those whose alleged experiences with discrimination are the targets of such investigations. When such investigations do bear fruit—again, not particularly likely here—the typical result is a strong and legally irrelevant suggestion for the school to change its practices.

Since the school board members are elected officials, they can, of course, also be voted out in the next election if voters disagree with their positions. This is the same accountability any elected official faces. Depending on the district, they might also be subject to a recall election—again, as many public officials at the local level may be—or even impeached.

8
  • 7
    One should also note that there are no real consequences of such statements. They describe the opinion of the school board on certain topics which may be of interest for students attending the school or people otherwise related to the school board but it has no impact whatsoever on the politicial topic they opined about.
    – quarague
    Commented Jan 19 at 8:45
  • Another example of limited speech that impacts school employees, including school boards, in many, but probably not all, states is advocating for funding during working hours or with school resources (ex: using a school email, even after hours). My district has a millage vote coming up and though we are allowed to provide information regarding the millage, we're not allowed to advocate for it (or fight against it) in our roles as school employees. Commented Jan 19 at 11:35
  • 2
    @quarague same goes for the opinion of all but ~10 UN Member states. Doesn't really matter in the slightest what Chile or South Africa think about the conflict, they don't have the clout to change anything. Commented Jan 19 at 15:28
  • 1
    @JasonPatterson - If an employee did that, they might be fired. But the board is elected, so I think electoral accountability would be the only consequence for them.
    – Obie 2.0
    Commented Jan 19 at 18:51
  • 1
    Does the school district have an obligation to protect the Israeli and Jewish kids from the likely harassment that would follow such statements? Scratch "protect"; does the school district have an obligation not to cause discrimination and harassment by making inflammatory statements?
    – Michael
    Commented Jan 19 at 19:59
7

Can they? Yes, they clearly can and have already done so (this is just one such declaration):

The school board in this city endorsed a resolution calling for a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war early Thursday morning, more than five hours after convening for a meeting was expected to be contentious.

The vote made Ann Arbor Public Schools one of the only school districts in the United States to adopt such a stance, three months after Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel ignited a war in Gaza and fierce debates in public bodies across the United States.

Will there be any consequences to their actions? Currently unclear, would depend on the outcome of an investigation by Federal authorities into the matter, due to potential discrimination against Jewish students at pro-Palestine schools:

Complaints about anti-Israel protests at Temple University and Brown University filed by a Jewish right-wing activist who attends neither university are among the latest round of antisemitism investigations opened by the US Department of Education.

The department’s civil rights office is also looking into a series of University of Minnesota faculty statements condemning Israel, following a complaint by a prominent Republican on the law school faculty.

In addition, as of this week, the civil rights office has opened investigations at the two largest Bay Area public school districts, where some families have cited antisemitism concerns in applying to transfer out. And it is scrutinizing a private college where a Jewish anti-Zionist professor has publicly supported Hamas.

I'm not sufficiently knowledgeable to answer the question of whether this investigation will result in any fines to the school district.

8
  • 5
    Which law/ regulation or the school boards accused to have broken? Note that your source is from Israel, maybe there is a source from the US that better explains what the actual legal complaint is.
    – quarague
    Commented Jan 19 at 8:49
  • @quarague the accusation is “discrimination” against Jewish students. Whether or not it’s legitimate I do not know. Commented Jan 19 at 14:38
  • Wouldn't that run against 1st amendment? Not that the school's is a very useful gesture to start with, but aren't 1st amendment challenges pretty hard to overcome? Or is it one set of rules in some cases, another set when it suits better? Do these big legal guns come out in cases where the Chinese govt gets condemned and which have Chinese students? Commented Jan 19 at 15:17
  • @ItalianPhilosophers4Monica the idea is that the school is not just making these statements but also discriminating against students. Whether or not this is true I have no idea. Commented Jan 19 at 15:27
  • 2
    So the investigation is not because of the statement of the schools but because there are accused of discriminating against students by religion.
    – quarague
    Commented Jan 19 at 18:50
-1

Question:

Can a public school district make a declaration condemning a foreign state?

It's a rather bold move. The school board that would make this declaration would have nothing to gain. It stands for re-election regularly, so if the declaration was not supported by the community they could and would lose their positions pretty quickly. I thus don't think they will do it.

Otherwise freedom of speech while not an absolute right in the United States, this would fall under the right. The ultimate accountability for the action is with the voters they represent.

3
  • Several boards in the U.S. have already done this, see my answer. Commented Jan 19 at 21:09
  • I mean they could gain popularity if the statement was popular with their constituents. Commented Jan 20 at 20:25
  • @AzorAhai-him-, agreed.
    – JMS
    Commented Jan 20 at 20:30

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .