Both the cause of the collision and the assignment of blame were disputed. The U.S. government stated that the Chinese jet bumped the wing of the larger, slower, and less maneuverable EP-3. After returning to U.S. soil, the pilot of the EP-3, Lt. Shane Osborn, was allowed to make a brief statement in which he said that the EP-3 was on autopilot and in straight-and-level flight at the time of the collision. He stated that he was just "guarding the autopilot" in his interview with Frontline.[19] The U.S. released video footage from previous missions which revealed that American reconnaissance crews had previously been intercepted by the same aircraft.[20]
Based on the account of Wang Wei's wingman, the Chinese government stated that the American aircraft "veered at a wide angle towards the Chinese", in the process ramming the J-8. This claim cannot be verified since the Chinese government did not release data from the flight recorders of either aircraft, both of which are in its possession.[21][22][23][24][25]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hainan_Island_incident
Has the downing of a spy airplane ever been a justifying ground for waging war or causing an escalation that might lead to war? If a country sends a spy airplane and the airplane gets shot down within the territory of the nation being spied upon, can the country that lost the airplane use this as an escalation towards war or even declare war outright? If this can't be answered, then was there a precedent for doing so before? Because in this case, the U.S. said it was sorry and tried to defuse the tensions between China and the U.S.