Many countries had lockdowns during Covid.
It seemed that most scientists and health organizations supported them, and therefore, many government officials as well.
There were some contradictory figures, like the Great Barrington Declaration, or Sweden’s policy of not locking down as strictly.
Although it seems reasonable to consider restricting interpersonal contact would reduce transmission of a disease, my question is about the rational, genuinely academic, scientific, philosophical, and theoretical perspectives amongst experts, on the extent to which lockdowns are necessary, advisable or good.
Some questions a non-expert can think about:
- if some people are at risk, why wouldn’t we have special measures to keep those people protected and isolated, while offering them special support and assistance, instead of forcing everybody to isolate?
- Isn’t it your inherent right to risk contracting a disease? I believe there are some who may have preferred to go on living their life like normal even if they may get sick or even die. From a highly philosophical angle, I do believe it’s completely your right to take a risk, but it’s usually not the government’s right to restrict freedom of movement or activity so heavily (in democratic countries).
- There could be ethical considerations about harming other people by possibly exposing them to a virus. However, how consistently is such a principle upheld, in society? Is it illegal to have sex without proving you don’t have AIDS or an STD? Is it illegal to give someone unhealthy food, or second hand smoke exposure?
I am thinking about how the lockdown was seen as a utilitarian necessity by governments to minimize death, which could have had even more devastating effects on societies, than that of economic downturn, less time in school, and social isolation. That said, it still opens the question if that is actually legal. So, amongst experts, is it considered standard, or uncertain, if lockdowns are overall the better choice, considering other approaches, and negative effects that lockdowns have? And second, even if it is seen as better in outcome, to what extent can the government order businesses to close down?