5
votes
Galilean invariance of the wave equation
You derived the wave equation assuming the material was stationary, and that is the only case for which that equation is valid. When you transform reference frames you no longer have a stationary ...
3
votes
Galilean invariance of the wave equation
A simple derivation of the wave equation from Newton’s second law is to consider harmonic oscillators in series:
$$
\ddot u_n = (u_{n+1}+u_{n-1}-2u_n)
$$
with $u$ the displacement and normalized mass ...
1
vote
Accepted
What is the mathematical support for the formula $f_n = n f_1$, used to calculate the frequency of a standing wave?
Let's start with a quick answer: the boundary conditions fix the frequencies of the harmonics. It's worth emphasizing that boundary conditions come from physics, not mathematics. Below, I'll consider ...
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
Related Tags
waves × 5778acoustics × 1102
electromagnetic-radiation × 814
electromagnetism × 781
optics × 600
interference × 425
homework-and-exercises × 408
frequency × 377
visible-light × 360
quantum-mechanics × 335
wavelength × 253
diffraction × 236
string × 230
superposition × 217
fluid-dynamics × 196
classical-mechanics × 194
energy × 188
fourier-transform × 185
reflection × 182
newtonian-mechanics × 169
resonance × 158
double-slit-experiment × 156
vibrations × 140
harmonic-oscillator × 139
oscillators × 137