Skip to main content
5 votes

Galilean invariance of the wave equation

You derived the wave equation assuming the material was stationary, and that is the only case for which that equation is valid. When you transform reference frames you no longer have a stationary ...
George Chiporikov's user avatar
3 votes

Galilean invariance of the wave equation

A simple derivation of the wave equation from Newton’s second law is to consider harmonic oscillators in series: $$ \ddot u_n = (u_{n+1}+u_{n-1}-2u_n) $$ with $u$ the displacement and normalized mass ...
LPZ's user avatar
  • 13.1k
1 vote
Accepted

What is the mathematical support for the formula $f_n = n f_1$, used to calculate the frequency of a standing wave?

Let's start with a quick answer: the boundary conditions fix the frequencies of the harmonics. It's worth emphasizing that boundary conditions come from physics, not mathematics. Below, I'll consider ...
Andrew's user avatar
  • 51.2k

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible