Skip to main content
8 votes

Can perfectly stable orbits exist in GR?

As you say, GR implies that all orbits lose energy (very slowly) over time, due to gravitational waves. Also the vacuum of space is not true vacuum and there is some drag from the intergalactic medium ...
KDP's user avatar
  • 6,102
8 votes

Can perfectly stable orbits exist in GR?

In the literature, the orbits you are looking for a called “floating orbits”. Floating orbits are not possible in plain GR (See e.g. 1302.1016).
TimRias's user avatar
  • 12.5k
7 votes
Accepted

Is the size of a black hole singularity smaller than a fundamental particle?

The very short answer to this is: We have no idea. General relativity predicts that the singularity of a Schwarzschild black hole (which I assume is what you mean by "actual black hole") is ...
paulina's user avatar
  • 1,897
6 votes

Can perfectly stable orbits exist in GR?

In the 1979 paper "Time without end", Freeman Dyson calculates a time in the order of 1020 years until the earth would fall into the sun due to gravitational decay alone, based on the ...
HugoRune's user avatar
  • 355
6 votes

Is the size of a black hole singularity smaller than a fundamental particle?

While @paulina's answer: we don't know is correct, because quantum gravity is not understood, I'll answer for a classical Schwarzschild blackhole as described by Kip Thorne. The size is zero, however ...
JEB's user avatar
  • 35.4k
5 votes

Is the size of a black hole singularity smaller than a fundamental particle?

We know that black hole is infinitely densed. More exactly: The theory of general relativity predicts that the center of a black hole is infinitely dense. This theory predicts very well everything ...
Thomas Fritsch's user avatar
2 votes

Necessity of Singularity in General Relativity

Well the famous singularity theorems show (very very roughly speaking) that in the theory of classical GR, collapse beyond horizon implies a singularity. Classical GR is not the true theory of physics,...
Joe Schindler's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Two contradictory derivations of Killing equation

As an overall comment, I stress that conservation of $Q$ is valid for the Killing vector $\xi$ if the considered curve is a geodesic. Let us come to the issue. First of all, generally speaking, the ...
Valter Moretti's user avatar
2 votes

Two contradictory derivations of Killing equation

Both approaches are fine. In the first approach, the analysis is done at the coordinate/component level of the equations. Simply asking the question how does $Q$ very with $\tau$ if we write ...
TimRias's user avatar
  • 12.5k
1 vote

Distance and luminosity distance

Using the inverse square law we can deduce that the flux F(watts/m^2) received from a source with an intrinsic luminosity L(watts) diminishes as a function of distance squared so $F \propto L/D_e^2$ ...
KDP's user avatar
  • 6,102
1 vote

Necessity of Singularity in General Relativity

What is it that preludes the predicted field, even at $r<r_{Schwarzschild}$, from simply terminating at the surface of a collapsar of dense matter, and taking some other form inside it? This is ...
safesphere's user avatar
  • 12.7k
1 vote

Boundary conditions on transition maps on general relativity

There's nothing fancy going on with transition maps. What a mathematician means by a "transition map", in the setting of general relativity, is nothing more or less than a coordinate change ...
Lee Mosher's user avatar
1 vote

Hawking Temperature of the BTZ Black Hole

Another option for finding the Hawking temperature of the BTZ black hole is by the formalism of the surface gravity $\kappa$ which connected to the Hawking temperature via: $$T_H=\frac{\kappa}{2\pi}$$ ...
Daniel Vainshtein's user avatar
1 vote
Accepted

Cause of Coordinate Acceleration in Free Fall

The acceleration on a particle following a geodesic is defined by the Christoffel symbols which are in turn defined in terms of the metric. More properly, all inertially-moving objects not affected by ...
controlgroup's user avatar
1 vote

Trying to understand a visualization of contravariant and covariant bases

Given the metric tensor for the basis vectors $$A = \begin{bmatrix}\mathbf e_1 \cdot \mathbf e_1 & \mathbf e_1 \cdot \mathbf e_2 \\ \mathbf e_2 \cdot \mathbf e_1 & \mathbf e_2 \cdot \mathbf ...
Antoni Parellada's user avatar

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible