Skip to main content

All Questions

0 votes
1 answer
52 views

Square of the Feynman amplitude for $a +b\to c+d$ and its reverse

In quantum field theory, if a process $a +b\to c+d$ is allowed by a certain interaction Lagrangian (hermitian), the reverse process, $c+d\to a+b$, must also be allowed (as far as I understand) by the ...
Solidification's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
73 views

Mandelstam variables sign

I am self-studying the book "Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model" by Schwartz, on page 99 (paragraph "Mandelstam variables"), the context is the $2\rightarrow 2$ scattering ...
Andrea's user avatar
  • 613
1 vote
0 answers
83 views

Doubt in $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow W^{+}W^{-}$ scattering

I am trying to understand how to compute the scattering amplitude for the process $e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow W^{+}W^{-}$, as a reference one could look at Peskin chapter 21. What I do not understand is ...
Filippo's user avatar
  • 475
13 votes
1 answer
2k views

How does one describe individual particles in QFT in practice?

A similar question was posted on this site at least ten times, but not quite in this formulation, and with no satisfactory answers, so I give it another try. Quantum field theory textbooks almost ...
Daigaku no Baku's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
72 views

Inconsistency in the $2\to 2$ kinematics

I must be confusing something horribly, because this should be very simple, but I am keep getting inconsistent results in the basic 2->2 scattering kinematics. Let the process be $$a(p_1) + b(p_2) \...
Quantization's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
49 views

Relation between matrix element of a process with its crossed processes

Consider a process in particle physics denoted by, $$(1) \quad a+b\to c+d$$ which is related to the reverse process $$(2)\quad c+d\to a+b.$$ By virtue of the hermiticity of the interaction Hamiltonian,...
Solidification's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
117 views

$γγh$ interaction in the Standard Model

The topology for the lowest order $γγh$ interaction in the Standard Model is given by where we have an intermediate top quark loop. I am confused with the charge conservation at each vertex. Since ...
IGY's user avatar
  • 1,783
2 votes
2 answers
177 views

How can QFT perturbation be used for electron-positron scattering?

I'm studying scattering and perturbation theory in QFT from Peskin and Schroeder book. After all the calculations and theory developing, they made a calculation for $$e^-e^+\to\mu^-\mu^+$$ scattering. ...
Raeed Mundow's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
189 views

$\nu_e \bar{\nu_e} \rightarrow e^- e^+$ confusion

Interacting part of the $SU(2)_L$describing the Higgs and fermionic sector with one family $$\mathcal{L}= \bar{l}_Li\not Dl_L+\bar{e}_Ri\not\partial e_R+ \bar{\nu}_Ri\not\partial\nu_R - (y_{\nu}\bar{l}...
Monopole's user avatar
  • 3,464
6 votes
2 answers
574 views

What is string theory's replacement of interaction terms from Quantum field theory?

In Quantum Field Theory, the calculation of scattering amplitudes relies on interaction terms like $\lambda \phi^4$ or $\psi ' \gamma ^{\mu} \psi$. These are products of field operators calculated at ...
Ryder Rude's user avatar
  • 6,355
1 vote
1 answer
101 views

Muon pair production

Does muon pair production ($e^+ + e^- \rightarrow \mu^+ + \mu^-$) not have a $t$-channel at the lowest order (at the tree level)? All sources like Schwartz, etc. seem to only solve for $s$-channel, ...
physicsbootcamp's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
147 views

LSZ reduction formula relation

LSZ formula gives a relation between the scattering amplitudes and correlators as $$\langle f |i \rangle = (-i)^{m+n}\int \Pi_{i=1}^m d^4x_, e^{ik_i'x_i (\Box_{x_i} -m^2)}\Pi_{j=1}^n d^4x_, e^{ik_j ...
Monopole's user avatar
  • 3,464
4 votes
1 answer
338 views

What is the physical interpretation of the two tree-level Feynman diagrams for $e^-e^- \to e^-e^-$ scattering?

In the tree level, the $e^-e^- \to e^-e^-$ scattering has two Feynman diagrams, the first one is indicative that one electron emitted a photon which was later absorbed by the other electron: However,...
Kurotama's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
368 views

Deep inelastic scattering (DIS) and handbag diagram

Here, in page 11, you can see the so-called 'handbag' diagram that explains how a virtual photon emitted in a deep inelastic scattering (DIS) process interacts with a parton. I'm going to use this ...
Vicky's user avatar
  • 1,597
0 votes
0 answers
99 views

Deep inelastic electron-proton scattering amplitude

In 'QCD and collider Physics' book by Ellis, Stirling and Webber, chapter 4.2 'The parton model from field theory' there is this equation for the amplitude of the process $e^- (k) P \rightarrow e^- (k^...
Vicky's user avatar
  • 1,597

15 30 50 per page