Skip to main content

All Questions

1 vote
0 answers
40 views

Why is it justified to focus on gauge transformations constant at spatial infinity in QCD instantons?

In the context of Yang-Mills theories and QCD instantons, much of the literature and conventional treatment hinges on the consideration of gauge transformations that remain constant at spatial ...
Kris's user avatar
  • 841
3 votes
0 answers
58 views

Topological number and gauge invariance

In QCD or other non-abelian gauge theories, we come across infinitely many vacua that are gauge equivalent but have different topological numbers. We then say that the instanton solution is tunnelling ...
adithya's user avatar
  • 733
2 votes
2 answers
573 views

Understanding the prefactor $\frac{\theta g^2}{32\pi^2}$ of the $F\tilde{F}$ term in Yang-Mills theories

The most general Yang-Mills (YM) action consistent with Lorentz invariance, gauge invariance and renormalizability should contain a term $$\kappa F_{\mu\nu a}\tilde{F}^{\mu\nu a}\tag{1}$$ where $\...
SRS's user avatar
  • 26.8k
3 votes
1 answer
267 views

Isn't there a unique vacuum of the Yang-Mills quantum theory?

The theta vacua$^1$ of a Yang-Mills quantum theory are given by $$|\theta\rangle=\sum\limits_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}e^{in\theta}|n\rangle.$$ In Srednicki's Quantum Field Theory, he claims that the ...
SRS's user avatar
  • 26.8k
1 vote
1 answer
176 views

Why group elements associated with gauge transformations of finite action field configurations in QCD don't depend in $r$?

I am reading the chapter on instantons in Coleman's Aspects of Symmetry. I am puzzled by an argument i don't quite follow. In section 3.2, Coleman considers configurations of the gauge field with ...
Yossarian's user avatar
  • 6,067