We have $$\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial t} = \frac{i\hbar}{2m} \frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} - \frac{i}{\hbar}V\Psi$$$$\frac{\partial \Psi^*}{\partial t} = -\frac{i\hbar}{2m} \frac{\partial^2 \Psi^*}{\partial x^2} + \frac{i}{\hbar}V\Psi^*.$$
My question is essentially the same as this question, however what I'm struggling to understand is why you can't simply plug in $\psi^*$ into the first relation. Is it not a wave function? Is that what goes wrong? I get that conjugating both sides of the first equation gives the second one, but what is it that is preventing me from just using $\psi^*$ in it? In the other question this is just callously stated in a comment without further information, and for some reason I don't seem to be able to find anything anywhere else.