0
$\begingroup$

im currently studying a level particle physics and im confused about this. Particle annihilation occours when a particle meets its corresponding particle, converting their mass energy into two photons, as stated by the syllabus. However, later on we're told that an up and anti up quark (same for down quark) can combine to form a pion. How can it do both, what conditions dictate wether an up quark, antiquark pair will become a pion or annihilate into two photons? Furthermore, the textbook states that a pion will decay. Edit: upon reading the responses I just wanted to clarify, does this mean the decay of the neuteral pion is an example or method of pair production?

thanks

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Have you checked the quark content of the pions, e.g. on Wikipedia? Hint: the two quarks are not each others antiparticle. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 21 at 22:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A quark and its antiquark, depending on their (variable) total spin, may combine to a neutral pion, a photon, a neutral ρ, etc... keep reading. Further recall a neutral pion decays to two photons... $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 21 at 22:41
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean why two photons and not one? Because that is what the $\pi^0$ decays to in 85 attoseconds. $\endgroup$
    – my2cts
    Commented Jun 21 at 22:44
  • $\begingroup$ An electron and its antiparticle, the positron, eventually annihilates, but can, for a short time, combine into positronium. That shows up as specific resonances. Weird things can happen for short times. That pion that you are talking about is no different. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 22 at 6:13

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

Particle annihilation occurs when a particle meets its corresponding antiparticle, converting their mass-energy into two photons.

This is a useful oversimplification. Even electron-positron pairs, which have the cleanest electromagnetic interaction, have a three-photon annihilation mode. I think a good search term is ortho- versus para-positronium, if you want to know more.

However, an up and anti up quark (same for down quark) can combine to form a pion. How can it do both?

The formation of a pion is mediated by the strong interaction, while the formation of photon pairs is mediated by the electromagnetic interaction. Pion formation happens first because the strong interaction is … stronger … than electromagnetism. Neutral pions decay to photons because there isn't any lower-mass strong state available. Heavier mesons prefer to decay to pions.

Nucleon-antinucleon annihilations almost never end with one photon pair. The most common process is $\rm p\bar p\to 5^\text{-ish}\pi$, and all three pion charge states are generally involved. The neutral pions decay to photons, but the charged pions don't. Why not?

In the approximation that electromagnetism is negligible, the charged pions ($\pi^+=|\rm u\bar d\rangle$ and conjugate) are the same particle as the neutral pion. We say that they are related by "a rotation in isotopic spin," or "isospin," and in that model they are as closely related as the two regular-spin states of an electron. But the charged pions can't annihilate via electromagnetism, because in electromagnetism we can no longer neglect charge. Charged pions must decay by the weak interaction. Charged pions therefore live much longer than neutral pions, because the weak interaction is … weaker … than electromagnetism.

The charged pion decay is mostly $\pi^+\to\mu^+\nu_\mu\to\rm e^+\nu_e\nu_\mu$, so proton-antiproton annihilation almost always has some neutrinos in its final state.

It's possible in principle for a neutral pion to decay weakly as well, but I believe there's no direct experimental evidence for it. About 1% of neutral pion decays have at least one $\rm e^+e^-$ pair in the final state, but that's permitted by the electromagnetic interaction. Searches for $\pi^0\to\text{invisible}$ decays, including the purely weak-interaction $\pi^0\to\nu\bar\nu$ decays, suggest that these processes contribute below the part-per-billion level.

Is the decay of the neutral pion an example or method of pair production?

Generally when we say "pair production," we mean electron-positron production. Quark-antiquark pairs — at least for the up, down, charm, and strange flavors — don't act like separable particles; they act like mesons. We also don't use "pair production" to describe photon pairs, because (unlike quarks and leptons) there is no conservation law preventing the production of single photons.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

For a first-generation quark-antiquark pair (up-antiup or down-antidown) to have a high probability to form a neutral π meson ($π^0$) these conditions must be satisfied :

  1. Color charges should be such that the resulting combination has neutral color. This allow the strong force to confine the pair of quarks and form a meson.
  2. Energy of the pair should be about equal to the rest mass energy of a $π^0$ meson (≈135 MeV/$c^2$). If the energy is significantly higher, then the quarks can overcome the strong force and annihilate.

Of course even with these conditions met there is a probability of the quark pair annihilating but its low, and the most likely outcome is pion formation.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This answer suggests incorrectly that high-energy hadron interactions may "overcome the strong force" to annihilate. That's backwards. The pion is the closest thing in quantum chromodynamics to a massless boson (search term: "Goldstone boson"). At high energies, strongly-interacting processes are always preferred. This is why it's called the "strong" interaction. The answer also suggests, incorrectly, that first-generation $\rm q\bar q$ pairs can be found outside of mesons. $\endgroup$
    – rob
    Commented Jun 22 at 17:06
  • $\begingroup$ @rob Thank you for the corrections $\endgroup$
    – Robin
    Commented Jun 23 at 2:13

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.