0
$\begingroup$

Consider a two level system with a Landau-Zener Hamiltonian of the form $$\hat{H}=\begin{pmatrix}v t&\beta\\\beta&-v t\end{pmatrix}.$$

The Landau-Zener formula provides a closed form for the probability amplitude of jumping to the excited state, given by $P={\rm e}^{-2\pi\beta^2/v}$, which is valid in the limit $t_0\rightarrow\infty$, $t_f\rightarrow+\infty$.

However, consider a different problem with the same Hamiltonian, but now the initial and final time are chosen as to satisfy $v t_0=\alpha_0$ and $v t_f=\alpha_f$, where $\alpha_0$ and $\alpha_f$ are fixed. This takes us to $t_0=\frac{\alpha_0}{v}$ and $t_f=\frac{\alpha_f}{v}$. In this case, $v$ can be interpreted as the velocity of the system to undergo the transition of the diagonal terms from $\alpha_0$ to $\alpha_f$. It takes to the system $\Delta t=\frac{\alpha_f-\alpha_0}{v}$ to undergo from $\alpha_0$ to $\alpha_f$.

Now, my interpretation is that increasing values of $v$ lead to a larger violation of the adiabatic theorem, yielding higher probability of excitation. On the other hand, small values of $v$ imply that the evolution is performed more slowly, and this should lead to a decreasing probability of excitation.

However, when I plot the probability of excitation $P$ as a function of $v$ I find that there are some oscillations with a certain frequency, but I don't see where these come from, as to my understanding and according to the previous analysis, $P(v)$ should be a monotonically increasing function, as a higher velocity of the system should lead to higher probability of excitation.

My questions are therefore:

  • (a) Where do these oscillations in $P(v)$ come from?
  • (b) This oscillations imply that there are situations where $v_1>v_2$ and $P(v_1)<P(v_2)$, i.e. a higher velocity lead to a lower probability of excitation. To me, this doesn't make any sense. Is there any physical/intuitive explanation of this?
$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Could you show us exactly what you are plotting, how the plot is produced and what it looks like? The formula for $P$ that you have provided does not include time, so I assume you are plotting some modified version of it, or plotting some numerical result from your Hamiltonian? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 25 at 13:42

1 Answer 1

0
+50
$\begingroup$

The oscillating pattern of $P(v)$ may come from some interference effect, which are ubiquitous in quantum mechanics. There is nothing illogical in the oscillations that you obtained. I would only check the two things:

  1. The amplitude of the oscillations decrease with increasing $\Delta t$ and constant $v$
  2. The limit at $\Delta t \to \infty$ coincides with the Landau-Zener formula.

Moreover, TDSE for Landau-Zener problem can be analytically solved using the parabolic cylinder functions, so it is even possible to compare numerical simulation with analytics for finite $\Delta t$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I see. However, is there any quantitative way to understand this? I guess some interference effect must be beneath this, and indeed I checked the consistency of the limits of my result by comparing with the actual LZ formula. However, I would like to understand in a more numerical, concrete way the origin of this effect, and why is it related to finite time. For example, I would like to understand questions like what is the minimum time for which these oscillations are suppressed and the LZ result becomes dominant. $\endgroup$
    – TopoLynch
    Commented Jun 19 at 9:13
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe the oscillations you see are related to Rabi oscillations. I can think of a physical picture as follows. The non-diagonal term $\beta$ causes Rabi oscillations between levels $|0\rangle$ and $|1\rangle$, and its effect is significant only in a finite time interval when $vt \sim \beta$. The two-level system undergoes several Rabi flops, and the number of flops depends on $v$ (can be estimated as $\beta^2/v$). This would explain the oscillating pattern. $\endgroup$
    – E. Anikin
    Commented Jun 19 at 9:45
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, this logic would predict oscillations in $v$ even for infinite time. Maybe the absence of oscillations in the Landau-Zener formula is somehow related to the special form of the Hamiltonian. I think that for a more general problem (for example, take some nonlinear dependence of diagonal terms on $t$) there will be oscillations even for $\Delta t \to \infty$. $\endgroup$
    – E. Anikin
    Commented Jun 19 at 9:52

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.