0
$\begingroup$

(I think my question will be somewhat related to this one: Deriving gravitational potential energy using vectors .)

I know the change in the potential energy associated with a conservative force, $\vec{F}$, moving along any path between A and B is given by: $$\Delta U = - \int_{\vec{r_A}} ^{\vec{r_B}} \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{r}$$

So when we're thinking about the force of gravity, $$\vec{F_G} = - \frac{GMm}{r^2}\hat{r}$$ where I've chosen $\vec{F_G}$ to be the graviational force exerted on the mass, $m$ by $M$ and $\vec{r}$ to be the position of the COM of $m$ relative to $M$'s COM.

So I get: $$\Delta U_G = - \int_{\vec{r_A}} ^{\vec{r_B}} \left(- \frac{GMm}{r^2}\hat{r}\right) \cdot d\vec{r} = \int_{\vec{r_A}} ^{\vec{r_B}} \left(\frac{GMm}{r^2}\hat{r}\right) \cdot d\vec{r}$$

Now, how would I go about evaluating this line integral to get: $$\Delta U_G = \left(-\frac{GMm}{r_B}\right) - \left(-\frac{GMm}{r_A}\right)$$

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Just want to point out that your expression for gravitational force only works if $M$ is a point mass or a spherical distribution. $\endgroup$ Commented May 16 at 13:50

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

We have the dot product: $$\hat r\cdot d\vec r=|\hat r|\cdot|d\vec r|=dr$$ Because the unit vector $\hat r$ and differential displacement vector $d\vec r$ are in the same direction. Note that the angle between $\hat r$ and $d\vec r$ is not necessarily zero, especially if the path is curved.

Change in the gravitational potential energy: $$\begin{align*}\Delta U_G=\int_{\vec{r_A}} ^{\vec{r_B}} \left(\frac{GMm}{r^2}\hat{r}\right) \cdot d\vec{r} & = \int_{\vec{r_A}} ^{\vec{r_B}} \frac{GMm}{r^2}\hat{r} \cdot d\vec{r}\\&=\int_{\vec{r_A}} ^{\vec{r_B}} \frac{GMm}{r^2}\ dr=-\dfrac{GMm}{r}\bigg|_{\vec{r_A}} ^{\vec{r_B}}\\&=-\dfrac{GMm}{|\vec r|}\bigg|_{\vec{r_A}} ^{\vec{r_B}}\\&=\left(-\frac{GMm}{|\vec {r_B}|}\right) - \left(-\frac{GMm}{|\vec {r_A}|}\right)\\\Delta U_G&=\left(-\frac{GMm}{r_B}\right) - \left(-\frac{GMm}{r_A}\right)=\left(\frac{GMm}{r_A}-\frac{GMm}{r_B}\right) \end{align*}$$ We can also use the concept of potential function and gradient theorem as follows: $$\vec{F_G} = - \frac{GMm}{r^2}\hat{r}=-\nabla\Phi(\vec r)=-\dfrac{\partial\Phi(\vec r)}{\partial r}\hat r\implies\Phi(\vec r)=-\dfrac{GMm}{r}$$ $$\Delta U_G = \int_{\vec{r_A}} ^{\vec{r_B}} \nabla\Phi(\vec r)\cdot d\vec{r} = \Phi(\vec{r_B})-\Phi(\vec{r_A})=\left(\frac{GMm}{r_A}-\frac{GMm}{r_B}\right)$$

I hope it helps!

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks. A little confused by how $\hat{r}$ and $d\vec{r}$ are in the same direction, but the angle between them isn't necessarily zero? $\endgroup$ Commented May 16 at 13:10
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, in general. The angle is not necessarily zero for a curved path. However, the infinitesimal change in the position vector is in the same direction when deriving gravitational potential energy. $\endgroup$ Commented May 16 at 13:39

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.